gas in the ring geometry
play

Gas in the Ring Geometry Eugene Zaremba Queens University, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Persistent Currents in a Two-component Bose Gas in the Ring Geometry Eugene Zaremba Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Financial support from NSERC Work done in collaboration with Konstantin Anoshkin and Zhigang Wu; also


  1. Persistent Currents in a Two-component Bose Gas in the Ring Geometry � Eugene Zaremba Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Financial support from NSERC Work done in collaboration with Konstantin Anoshkin and Zhigang Wu; also Smyrnakis, Magiropoulos, Efremidis and Kavoulakis

  2. Experiments on Persistent Currents � A. Ramanathan et al ., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 , 130401 (2011) S. Moulder et al ., Phys. Rev. A 86 , 013629 (2012)

  3. Bloch’s Criterion for Persistent Currents* � • for a single-species system in the one-dimensional ring geometry, Bloch showed that the ground state energy takes the form L 2 Yrast Spectrum E 0 ( L ) = 2 M T R 2 + e 0 ( L ) L = ν ~ where e 0 ( L ) is even and periodic: e 0 ( − L ) = e 0 ( L ) , e 0 ( L + N ~ ) = e 0 ( L ) • Bloch argued that, if E 0 ( L ) exhibits local minima at , L n = nN ~ persistent currents are stable *F. Bloch, Phys. Rev. A 7 , 2187 (1973)

  4. Yrast spectrum of the Lieb-Liniger model and connection to the soliton solutions of the GP equation � • the Hamiltonian for 1D bosons interacting via a delta function potential is given by ~ 2 ∂ 2 ∂θ 2 + 1 ˆ X H = − δ ( θ i − θ j ) 2 U 2 MR 2 ij • the many-body wavefunctions can be obtained using the Bethe ansatz ( Lieb and Liniger, 1963 ) • particle momentum shows no BEC in the thermodynamic limit • the yrast spectrum corresponds to Lieb’s type II excitations ( Lieb , 1963 ); it can be determined explicitly using the Lieb-Liniger solution ( Kaminishi et al., 2011 ) • the excitations corresponding to the yrast spectrum can be identified as solitons ( Ishikawa and Takayama, 1980 )

  5. Mean-field Analysis for the Single-component Case � • the Gross-Pitaevskii energy functional for bosons on a ring is Z 2 π Z 2 π 2 � � d ψ ¯ � � d θ | ψ ( θ ) | 4 E [ ψ ] = + πγ d θ � � d θ � � 0 0 • the yrast spectrum is obtained by minimizing the GP energy with respect to ψ subject to the constraint that the average angular momentum has the value Z 2 π d θ ψ ∗ d ψ L = 1 ¯ d θ = l i 0 • this can be achieved by minimizing the functional Z 2 π F [ ψ ] = ¯ ¯ E [ ψ ] − Ω ¯ d θ | ψ ( θ ) | 2 L − µ 0 where and are Lagrange multipliers Ω µ • this leads to the GP equation − ψ 00 ( θ ) + i Ω ψ 0 ( θ ) + 2 πγρ ( θ ) ψ ( θ ) = µ ψ ( θ )

  6. Mean-field Solutions and Yrast Spectrum � • the mean-field solutions for a general value of l are solitons • this stationary state solution represents a travelling soliton as viewed in a rotating frame; in the lab frame, the soliton is the time- dependent state ψ ( θ , t ) = ψ ( θ − Ω t ) e − iµt • the energy of the mean-field soliton agrees with the exact many- body energy if the interactions are not too strong ( Kanamoto et al. , 2010 ) E 0 ( l ) − γ / 2 ¯ � 3 � 2 � 1 0 1 2 3 l

  7. Extension of Bloch’s Argument to the Two-species System � • we consider an ideal 1D ring geometry with N A particles of mass M A and N B particles of mass M B ; N = N A +N B , M T = N A M A +N B M B • the many-body wave function can be written as Ψ L α ( θ 1 , ..., θ N ) = exp( iNl Θ cm ) χ L α ( θ 1 , ..., θ N ) where N 1 X Θ cm = M i θ i , L = lN ~ M T i = i • χ L α ( θ 1 ,…, θ N ) is a function of coordinate differences θ i – θ j and is therefore a zero angular momentum wave function

  8. Extension of Bloch’s Argument, cont’d � • χ L α ( θ 1 ,…, θ N ) satisfies the Schr Ö dinger equation L 2 H χ L α = e α ( L ) χ L α e α ( L ) = E α ( L ) − 2 M T R 2 with the boundary conditions ✓ ◆ − i 2 π ν M i χ L α ( · · · , θ i + 2 π , · · · ) = exp χ L α ( · · · , θ i , · · · ) M T • if M A / M B = p / q , a rational number, e α ( L ) is a periodic function with period where ˜ N ~ ˜ N = pN A + qN B • for M A = M B = M , p = q = 1 and the periodicity is N as for the single-species case

  9. Connection with Landau’s Criterion � • M A = M B = M ; Bloch’s argument allows for persistent currents at ; for L = L n + ∆ L L n = nN ~ E 0 ( L n + ∆ L ) = 1 2 M T R 2 Ω 2 n + Ω n ∆ L + E 0 ( ∆ L ) where we have defined the angular velocity L n Ω n = M T R 2 • assuming E 0 ( Δ L ) to correspond to a single quasiparticle excitation with energy ε ( m ) and angular momentum , we have ∆ L = m ~ E 0 ( L n + ∆ L ) = E 0 ( L n ) + ε ( m ) + m ~ Ω n • Bloch’s criterion for persistent currents, E 0 ( L n + Δ L ) > E 0 ( L n ), then implies ✓ ε ( m ) ◆ Ω n < ~ | m | min • this is the Landau criterion for a ring

  10. Bogoliubov Excitations in a Ring � • the two-species system has Bogoliubov excitations with energies ± = 1 ± 1 q B ) 2 + 4 (4 ✏ A ✏ B g 2 E 2 � E 2 A + E 2 � ( E 2 A + E 2 AB − E 2 A E 2 B ) B 2 2 where ✏ s = ~ 2 m 2 p ✏ 2 E s = s + 2 ✏ s g ss , 2 M s R 2 g ss = U ss 0 √ N s N s 0 2 π • the Landau criterion is satisfied for most choices of the parameters, implying the stability of superfluid flow at L n • however, if M A = M B and U AA U BB = U 2 AB , the E_ mode is particle- like and supercurrents are not stable at L n

  11. Mean-field Analysis � • the stability of persistent currents can be analyzed using mean-field theory; this was first done by Smyrnakis et al .* • for the special case M A = M B and U AA = U BB = U AB = U , the so- called symmetric model, the Gross-Pitaevskii energy functional is Z 2 π Z 2 π 2 ! 2 � � � � d ψ A d ψ B x A | ψ A | 2 + x B | ψ B | 2 � 2 ¯ � � � � � E [ ψ A , ψ B ] = d θ + x B + πγ d θ x A � � � � d θ d θ � � � � 0 0 with γ = NMR 2 U/ π ~ 2 x A = N A /N, x B = N B /N, • the objective is to minimize the GP energy with respect to ψ A and ψ B subject to the constraint that the average total angular momentum has the value L = lN ~ • this can be achieved by minimizing the functional Z 2 π F [ ψ A , ψ B ] = ¯ ¯ E [ ψ A , ψ B ] − Ω ¯ X d θ | ψ s ( θ ) | 2 L − x s µ s 0 s where and are Lagrange multipliers Ω µ s *J. Smyrnakis et al ., Phys. Rev. Lett 103 , 100404 (2009)

  12. Minimizing the GP Energy � • the condensate wave functions are expanded as X X ψ A ( θ ) = c m φ m ( θ ) , ψ B ( θ ) = d m φ m ( θ ) m m where φ m ( θ ) = e im θ √ 2 π • the expansion coefficients must satisfy the normalization constraints | c m | 2 = 1 , | d m | 2 = 1 X X m m and the angular momentum constraint m | c m | 2 + x B X X m | d m | 2 l = x A m m

  13. Two-component Analysis � • the simplest variational ansatz is ψ A = c 0 φ 0 + c 1 φ 1 , ψ B = d 0 φ 0 + d 1 φ 1 • minimizing the energy with respect to c 0 , c 1 , d 0 and d 1 , one finds ¯ E 0 ( l ) = l + γ / 2 E 0 ( l ) • this result is exact if 0 ≤ l ≤ x B or x A ≤ l ≤ 1 0 x B x A 1 2 l • as predicted by the Landau criterion, superfluid flow is unstable at L n • however, there is a possibility that persistent currents might be stable for l in the range x B < l < x A • to examine this possibility, an improved variational ansatz is required

  14. Persistent Currents at l = x A + n � E 0 ( l ) E 0 ( l ) = l 2 + ¯ ¯ e 0 ( l ) 0 x B x A 1 2 l • the stability of persistent currents at l = x A + n is determined by the slope d ¯ � E 0 ( l ) � l =( x A + n − 1) − = 2 n − 1 − λ � dl � • for n = 1 , the critical value of the interaction parameter is 3 γ cr = 2(4 x A − 3) • this gives the correct value of γ cr = 3/2 for x A = 1 ; however, the above expression predicts that persistent currents are not possible for n > 1 (Smyrnakis et al ., 2009)

  15. Analytic Soliton Solutions * � • the coupled GP equation for equal interactions strengths − ψ 00 s ( θ ) + i Ω ψ 0 s ( θ ) + 2 πγρ ( θ ) ψ s ( θ ) = µ s ψ s ( θ ) • here, the angular velocity, Ω , is a Lagrange multiplier introduced to ensure the angular momentum takes a specific value l • modulus-phase representation Z 2 π p ρ s ( θ ) e i φ s ( θ ) , ψ s ( θ ) = d θ ρ s ( θ ) = 1 0 • boundary conditions ρ s ( θ + 2 π ) − ρ s ( θ ) = 0 φ s ( θ + 2 π ) − φ s ( θ ) = 2 π J s , J s = 0 , ± 1 , ± 2 , · · · • J s is the soliton winding number *Z. Wu and E. Zaremba, Phys. Rev. A 88 , 063640 (2013)

  16. Density Ansatz � • the ansatz ( Porubov and Parker, 1994; Smyrnakis et al., 2012 ) ρ B = 1 − r + r ρ A 2 π reduces the coupled system to two uncoupled equations for the densities s − W 2 1 s − 1 s ) 2 − 2 πγ s ρ 3 µ s ρ 2 2 ρ s ρ 00 4( ρ 0 s + ˜ s = 0 4 with different interaction strengths γ A = ( x A + rx B ) γ γ B = ( r − 1 x A + x B ) γ • the density equation for the single-component system was solved by others; it has analytic solutions in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions u = jK ( m ) 1 + η s dn 2 ( u | m ) ⇥ ⇤ ρ s ( θ ) = N ( η s ) ( θ − θ 0 ) π where j is the soliton train index and η s is a number which depends on γ s (hence x A , γ and r ); m is the elliptic parameter defining the complete elliptic integral K ( m )

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend