galaxy evolution in clusters
play

Galaxy Evolution in Clusters: Exploring the Role of Ram Pressure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Galaxy Evolution in Clusters: Exploring the Role of Ram Pressure Stripping Using Simulations VIRGO VIRGO Stephanie Tonnesen STRASBOURG STRASBOURG Columbia University COYPU!! COYPU!! Greg Bryan June 22, 2010 Strasbourg Virgo Meeting


  1. Galaxy Evolution in Clusters: Exploring the Role of Ram Pressure Stripping Using Simulations VIRGO VIRGO Stephanie Tonnesen STRASBOURG STRASBOURG Columbia University COYPU!! COYPU!! Greg Bryan June 22, 2010 Strasbourg Virgo Meeting

  2. Which Mechanisms Act to Drive the Evolution of galaxies, and Where do they act in a Cluster? Treu et al. 2003 r vir = 1.7 Mpc can only occur within 1 Mpc Fig. 10

  3. N-body: Stars 7 Mpc FOV Particle: 10 8 M sun Galaxy: 10 3 particles

  4. Adaptive Mesh Refinement : Gas 7 Mpc FOV Cell: 10 8 M sun T max = 15,000 K R vir ~ 1.8 Mpc

  5. Chapter Initial Approach A vital part of a galaxy’s evolution from a late type to an earlier type is the loss of cool gas Gravitational Galaxy-ICM Interactions Interactions • Affect both gas • Affect only gas and stars

  6. Chapter Our Sample • 132 Galaxies • Spheres with radius = 26.7 kpc • 15 timesteps of .244 Gyr • Examine changes in gas and stellar mass

  7. Tidal accretion / merge No mass change or SF Galaxy-ICM Tidal stripping Distance from cD Within 1 Mpc 1 - 2.4 Mpc 2.4 - 5 Mpc Distance ranges are chosen to correspond to Treu et al. 2003

  8. Histogram comparing the gain of cool gas mass (T<15 000 K for the galaxies that have no change in their stellar mass. Distance from cD Galaxies are able Within 1 Mpc to accrete cool ga 1 - 2.4 Mpc from their 2.4 - 5 Mpc surroundings in the outer regions of the cluster Closer to the cluster center, ca see the onset of starvation (Larso et al. 1980)

  9. Chapter Tidal accretion / merge No mass change or SF Galaxy-ICM Tidal stripping Distance from cD Within 1 Mpc 1 - 2.4 Mpc 2.4 - 5 Mpc Distance ranges are chosen to correspond to Treu et al. 2003

  10. Chapter Change in Gas Mass vs Distance from cD

  11. D(Mgas) vs P_ram Distance from cD Within 1 Mpc 1 - 2.4 Mpc 2.4 - 5 Mpc

  12. Chapter But… Just because there are a number of instances of ram pressure stripping, can ram pressure really strip a galaxy of enough gas to change it into an earlier type?

  13. Chapter The Stripped Sample • 16 galaxies lose all their gas • 75% of them lose their gas through a galaxy-ICM interaction (no tidal stripping) • 58% of galaxies that undergo a galaxy-ICM interaction start before entering 1 Mpc.

  14. Chapter

  15. Chapter Cluster Simulation Summary • Galaxy-ICM interactions are the most common interaction that can strip a galaxy of its gas • Ram pressure stripping occurs out to the virial radius of the cluster

  16. Chapter ICM Density Ram Pressure = ρ v 2 Velocity squared At the virial radius: • ram pressure spans 2 orders of magnitude, • ICM density varies by more than an order of magnitude • velocity squared varies by more than an order of magnitude

  17. Gas Falls in Along Filaments

  18. Part II Zooming in to Highly Resolved Simulations of Ram Pressure Stripping 93 kpc Resolution 38 pc Cooling to 8,000 K or Cooling to 300 K No Star Formation

  19. Chapter

  20. Chapter 10 -26 < ρ < 10 -22 10 -22 < ρ < 10 -20 10 -20 < ρ M gas (10 10 M sun ) Time (Gyr)

  21. Chapter PHRCW PHRCNW M gas (10 10 M sun ) PMRCW PMRCNW PLRCW PLRCNW Time (Gyr)

  22. Chapter T (10 6 6 K) K) T (10 Pmax Pmean

  23. Chapter Focus on the Disk

  24. Pmean Pvary Radius (kpc) 10 -22 10 -22 Gas Density (g cm -3 ) Gas Density (g cm -3 ) 100 Myr after the wind has hit the disk

  25. Gas Mass (M sun ) Time (Gyr)

  26. Chapter Where Does Fallback Happen?

  27. Chapter Are the negative velocities from disordered motion, or can we find net fallback? Gas Mass Flux (M sun yr -1 ) Time (Gyr) Compares the total net flux to the largest radius with negative net flux at any time.

  28. What might cause stripped gas to fallback? In other words, what might cause gas to move laterally into the shadow of the disk? • Drag from ICM slowing down cloud rotational velocity, and gravity drawing gas towards the center • A Pressure gradient with a low pressure pocket behind the disk along which gas flows • Turbulence, which will randomly move some gas into the shadow at which point it can fallback

  29. Chapter Why Does Gas Fallback? v R (km s -1 ) Between 10-35 kpc above the disk, 315 Myr after the wind has Within 10 kpc above the disk, the radial velocity of gas has a hit the disk: large distribution, indicating turbulence. The skew is inwards, and grows with The skew is outwards, so NEITHER gravity dragging gas inwards, time. NOR a low pressure pocket directly behind the disk Therefore, gas is flowing towards are acting to move gas into the shadow of the disk. the center along an increasingly 100 Myr after the wind steep pressure gradient. has hit Pmean 10 kpc < z < 35 kpc Gas Density (g cm -3 )

  30. Chapter Turnover to Fallback occurs where pressure decreases 152 kpc 82 kpc

  31. Chapter The Pressure Gradient Grows with Time 260 Myr 100 Myr 200 Myr 315 Myr

  32. Long tails have been observed in HI, X-rays, and H α ~110 kpc kpc ~110 tail tail Oosterloo & van Gorkom 2005

  33. Chapter Including cooling changes the morphology of the tails 250 Myr 500 Myr T min = 8000 K No Cooling

  34. Chapter Cold dense clouds are hard to accelerate The wind velocity is 1413 km s -1 , but most of the tail gas remains less than 1000 km s -1 , especially in the cooled cases. No Cooling 300 K 8000 K v ICM 1000 0 Velocity (km s -1 ) -1000 v ICM 1000 0 Fallback -1000 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200 50 100 150 200 Distance above Disk (kpc)

  35. Chapter HI Column Density 40 pc resolution Lowest contour: 10 19 cm -2 500 Myr 250 Myr T min = 8000 K T min = 300 K T min = 8000 K T min = 300 K

  36. HI at the resolution of current Chapter observations 18” x 92” 15” 500” 1.4 kpc x 1.2 kpc 40 kpc 7.4 kpc T min = 8000 K T min = 8000 K T min = 8000 K Chung et al (2007) Oosterloo & van Gorkom Vollmer & Huchtmeier (2005) (2007)

  37. Chapter H α intensity 40 pc resolution Lowest contour: 2 x 10 -18 erg cm -2 s -1 arcsec -2 500 Myr 500 Myr 250 Myr 250 Myr T min = 8000 K T min = 8000 K T min = 300 K T min = 300 K T min = 8000 K T min = 8000 K T min = 300 K T min = 300 K

  38. Chapter ESO 137-001 in A3627 (Norma cluster) Sun et al. 2009 XMM-Newton 0.5-2.0 keV image Blue: Chandra 0.6-2.0 keV image Red: H α image

  39. Chapter The X-ray Surface Brightness and H α Intensity projections from a comparison simulation T3vh

  40. Chapter Why are some tails X-ray bright?

  41. Chapter Does this tail have any HI? H α emission is produced at the edges of dense cold clouds.

  42. What about H α ?

  43. In total • Ram pressure stripping can happen throughout a cluster • Ram pressure can strip a galaxy of (nearly) all its gas • Ram pressure results in small gas disks, as observed in Virgo • Ram pressure simulations including radiative cooling agree well with tails observed in HI, H α , and X-ray emission. • X-ray bright tails are produced by galaxies stripped in high pressure ICMs • HI and H α emission are linked • Fallback of stripped gas onto galaxy disks may occur after peak ram pressure, or during constant ram pressure. There is no net fallback during constant ram pressure.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend