GALAH view of the Galactic disk
Gayandhi De Silva Australian Astronomical Observatory Ken Freeman (ANU), Joss Bland-Hawthorn (U. Sydney) and the GALAH Survey team
Dynamics of Disk Galaxies
- Seoul. 24 October 2013
GALAH view of the Galactic disk Gayandhi De Silva Australian - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GALAH view of the Galactic disk Gayandhi De Silva Australian Astronomical Observatory Ken Freeman (ANU), Joss Bland-Hawthorn (U. Sydney) and the GALAH Survey team Dynamics of Disk Galaxies Seoul. 24 October 2013 Whats a Galah? Target: a
Dynamics of Disk Galaxies
2/13
‘good’ chemical element lines
392 stars over 2degree field
Chann nnel el Wavel veleng ngth ( (Å) Blue 4708 - 4893 Green 5649 - 5873 Red 6481 - 6739 IR 7590 - 7890
3/13
(a) When and where were the major episodes of star formation in the disk and what drove them? (b) To what extent is the Galactic disk composed of stars from merger events? (c) How have the stars that formed in situ in the disk evolved dynamically since their birth? (d) Where are the solar siblings that formed together with our Sun? The major goal of GALAH is to identify chemically similar groups
disrupted clusters, to decipher the star formation, migration and minor-merger history of the Milky Way.
4/13
Expected contribution from Galactic components:
−Thin disk ~ 75% −Thick disk ~ 24% −Bulge ~ 1% −Halo ~ 0.1% With HERMES ~ 350 stars per hour gives > 2000 stars per night At 100 nights per year for ~5 years gives > 1 million stars
5/13
Data reduction pipeline “2dfrdr” developed at the AAO handles all their fibre based instruments and runs real time between exposures Automated abundance analysis pipeline “Theremin” developed within the GALAH collaboration (based on MOOG) provides:
Ca, Ti, Sc, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Nd, Ce, Eu
6/13
Use the chemical information within stars to “t “tag” ” them to common formation sites (Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn 2002) Assumes stars form in clusters and such clusters are chemically homogenous – holds for present day open clusters. Method verified by identification of moving groups and stellar
substructure, for example:
HR 1614 1614, Ar , Argus As Association & & Wolf 360 g 360 group = homogenous clusters
De Silva et al. 2007, De Silva et al. 2013, Bubar & King 2010
ercules = dynamical stream
Bensby et al. 2007
ades = both!
Pompeia et al 2011 De Silva et al 2011 Tabernero et al 2011
7/13
HR 1614 group Hercules stream Hyades stream
8/13
Use group finding algorithm to tag 703 disk stars purely using chemical info
Mitschang et al. 2013a, MNRAS # stars per group δc (dex)
9/13
[Fe/H] [α/Fe]
Mitschang et al. 2013b, submitted
10/13
Chemo mo-dynamical ev l evolution: What are the dominant nucleosynthetic processes (principle chemical components) as a function of position, velocity and stellar orbital motions. Direct evidence for a physical sequence of disk evolution. Mi Mixing ng a and mi migration: n: what will be the distribution of stars in chemically recovered clusters - narrow range in RGC or spread over kpcs in radius? Will depend on migration and mixing efficiencies. Merger h er history ry: what will be the frequency of chemically tagged dwarf galaxy signatures vs. homogenous clusters. Will depend on the satellite galaxy infall rate. So Solar si sibli lings: s: chemically tag the solar family – chemical signature
11/13
HERMES commissioning: started, continue till Nov 2013 GALAH pilot survey: Nov 2013 – Jan 2014 GALAH main survey: 2014 – 2019 (?)
12/13
The GALAH team on a horizontal branch
13/13