Future of Community Safety Work Group Update Presentation to City - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

future of community safety work group update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Future of Community Safety Work Group Update Presentation to City - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Future of Community Safety Work Group Update Presentation to City Council Policy & Government Oversight Committee Thursday, August 6, 2020 City of Minneapolis Fut utur ure o e of Engage in a year long process of community


slide-1
SLIDE 1

City of Minneapolis

Future of Community Safety Work Group Update

Presentation to City Council – Policy & Government Oversight Committee Thursday, August 6, 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fut utur ure o e of Co Communi unity Safet ety Wor

  • rkgroup

Engage in a year long process of community engagement, research, and structural change to create a transformative new model for cultivating safety in our city.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Minneapolis 2040

Public Safety goal:

Prioritize collaborative, multisector, community-inclusive approaches to ensuring safety for all members

  • f our community.
  • Follow a public health approach to ending violence by

reducing the factors that put people at risk for being involved with violence.

  • Expand the use of non-enforcement, community-driven

public safety strategies and responses such as restorative practices that can address and repair the harm caused by a crime.

  • Proactively build trust between first responders and the

community.

  • Ensure that first responders reflect the diversity of the city’s

residents.

  • Maintain and enhance a public safety infrastructure

that improves response times to police and fire calls, implements new technologies, provides operation and training opportunities, and improves communication among public safety agencies.

  • Maintain the City’s Emergency Operations Plan.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Future of Community Safety Workgroup Goals

Process Goal

Using a Human Centered Design approach that centers Black, Indigenous, and People of color communities, engage residents who are disproportionately impacted by police and community violence and victim survivors of community, domestic, and sexual violence to co-design new systems of public safety.

End Goal

Solutions and strategies to build a multidisciplinary, comprehensive system of public safety rooted in public health, community, and justice that keeps all Minneapolis residents and communities safe.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Workgroup Structure

Future of Community Safety Core re Te Team Future of Community Safety Workgr group

Subcommittee: Policy & Research Subcommittee: Reimagining Policing & Alternatives to Policing Subcommittee: Violence Prevention Subcommittee: Community Engagement

CM Cunningham

  • CM Cunningham
  • Brian Smith
  • Sasha Cotton
  • Joy Marsh Stephens
  • City Councilmembers
  • City Staff
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Workg kgroup p Deliver erables es

  • Community Engagement Plan
  • Community “Vision of Success”

adopted

  • Co-created policy, practices, and

budget recommendations

  • Establish community oversight

committee

  • Implementation Plan & Timeline
slide-7
SLIDE 7

911 / MPD workgroup Police Conduct Oversight Commission/Office of Police Conduct Review OVP strategic planning Minnesota Department

  • f Human Rights

Law Diversion program Pathways to Freedom (Human Trafficking & Exploitation Prevention Initiative) Blueprint YCB's Children and Youth Master Plan Minneapolis 2040 Public Safety Goal Strategic & Racial Equity Action Plan Public Safety Priority

Work already underway

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Public H Health F Framework

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Project LIFE (Group Violence Intervention)

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

City of Minneapolis

Community Engagement

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Engagement Goals

  • Appreciative Inquiry: Engagement activities facilitate co-creation of new systems of public safety built on

community strengths and vision of success.

  • Connection: People feel connected to one another. It’s not just about the City hearing from community, but

about us being in relationship with community.

  • Meaningful and Relevant Dialogue: The community feels that the dialogue has been meaningful and relevant to

their interests and daily lives. The City has clarified appropriate expectations with residents on where they can influence and where they can’t influence Council action.

  • Additive Inquiry: Engagement activities build upon previous engagements and reflect what the public has

already told us on these topics

  • Access to Information and Opportunities: The public has the information they need to participate in ways that

are appropriate to their experiences and lifestyles. Engagement strategies are varied and designed to accessible and meet people where they are.

  • Contributions Have Impact: The public feels their input has been thoughtfully considered and sees their

contributions reflected in the plan. Residents feel a sense of pride in a system of public safety that reflects their vision and values.

  • Empowering Experience: Community leadership and capacity has been built through the process. Participants in

the process develop a shared language around a public health approach to community safety

  • Delight and Surprise: The process centers on curiosity and co-creation resulting in outcomes we couldn’t predict

from the beginning

  • Inclusive Representation: The perspectives and participation of a broad range of community members is

equitably represented, particularly those from marginalized communities.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Centering racial healing in the process

Healing Engagement Research & Planning

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Phases of the work

Phase 1:

Pre-Engagement & Planning

Phase 2:

Research

Phase 3: Long-Term Engagement Phase 4:

Solution Development

Phase 5:

Recommendations

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Short Term: Phase 1 & 2

z

PHASE ACTVITIES OUTCOME PHASE 1

Pre-engagement

  • Launch virtual opportunities to co-create long-term

engagement plan.

  • Digital survey launched.

Community engagement plan is co-created and developed with residents.

PHASE 2

Research

  • Establish research teams.
  • Gather existing data and information.
  • Conduct literature review.

Shared understanding of what we know and what community has already told us about their experience.

Synthesis

  • Sort existing data into themes categorized by specific

problems or pain points experienced by residents.

  • Engage community stakeholders and staff to create

and validate themes. Thematic challenge areas are identified and verified with community.

Planning

  • Identify key audiences to engage for each challenge

area.

  • Develop engagement objectives, tactics, and

questions.

  • Build partnerships to lead and guide engagement.

Deeper dive engagements are designed for each thematic challenge area.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Long-Term: Phases 3-5

z

PHASE ACTVITIES OUTCOME PHASE 3

Long-Term Engagement

  • Capture resident experiences.
  • Collaborate with residents on developing ideas and

exploring solutions within each thematic challenge area. Solutions to community safety that center resident experiences are captured and prioritized.

PHASE 4

Solution Development

  • Vetting and feasibility of ideas
  • Testing and prototyping solutions

Determine the ideas and solutions to be considered for implementation

PHASE 5

Recommendations

  • Core Team presents recommendations to community,

Council, and Mayor Guiding policy document created

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Audiences

Key Stakeholder Groups

  • Black, Indigenous and People
  • f Color
  • LGBTQIA+ Communities
  • Sex Workers and Those in the

Informal Economy

  • Cultural Organizations
  • Immigrants and Refugees
  • Public Safety Policy Advocates
  • Relevant Appointed Boards

and Commissions

  • Neighborhood Organizations
  • Limited-English Populations
  • Homeless Populations
  • Accessibility Population
  • Business Associations
  • Property Owners
  • Youth and Families
  • Seniors and Aging Populations
  • Small Business Owners
  • Renters
  • Crime Victims
  • Residents with Criminal

Records

  • Residents/Families with

mental health issues

  • Religious Community
  • Alternative Public Safety

Response Networks

  • Domestic Abuse/Sexual

Violence Survivors Additional Stakeholder Groups

  • City of Minneapolis Residents
  • Public Agencies
  • Media Outlets
  • College Students
  • Institutions
  • Tourists and Visitors
  • The General Public
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Meeting in a Box
  • Town Halls
  • Ward Meetings
  • Focus groups
  • Website
  • Artist-designed engagements
  • Civic Engagement Phase Summaries
  • Handouts
  • Topical Presentations
  • Study Sessions
  • Survey

Potential Engagement Strategies

slide-26
SLIDE 26

City of Minneapolis

Next Steps

slide-27
SLIDE 27

After Engagement

Prototyping recommendations Policy changes Implementation Plan

slide-28
SLIDE 28

City y Counci cil Key Deci cision Points A s Ahe head

Community Engagement Plan Community-defined “vision of success” Recommendations to prototype & test Implementation Plan Budget investments

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Next Steps for Community

VIRTUAL AND IN-PERSON (PHYSICALLY DISTANT) OPPORTUNITIES TO CO-CREATE LONG-TERM ENGAGEMENT PLAN ONLINE SURVEY FOR PRELIMINARY DATA ON VISION OF SUCCESS PROVIDE INPUT ON SPECIFIC CHALLENGE AREAS AND SIGN UP FOR COMMUNITY COMMITTEES WORK

slide-30
SLIDE 30

City of Minneapolis

Questions?