FUTURE OF B.C. HOUSING REPORT
A study of buyer and renter sentiment in British Columbia
FUTURE OF B.C. HOUSING REPORT A study of buyer and renter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
FUTURE OF B.C. HOUSING REPORT A study of buyer and renter sentiment in British Columbia R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M Resonance Consultancy is a global advisor on real estate, tourism and economic development for leading developers,
A study of buyer and renter sentiment in British Columbia
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
was interested in conducting market research with BC residents.
and preferences as well as their perceptions of the BC housing market.
4
Region Sample Size Greater/Metro Vancouver 603 Vancouver Island 352 Interior/Okanagan 356 Kootenays 202 Northern BC 201
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
7
Base: All respondents (Total n=1,714)
CURRENT LOCATION TYPE DESIRED LOCATION TYPE
Suburban community Suburban community Downtown/near downtown Downtown/near downtown Small town Small town Rural area Rural area Resort area Resort area 3% 13% 17% 32% 34% 1% 8% 13% 34% 44%
CURRENT AND PREFERRED LOCATION TYPE
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
9
Base: All respondents
TOTAL AGE
(n=1,714) Millennials (n=249) Gen X (n=594) Boomers+ (n=871)
Suburban community 34% 40% 34% 29% Downtown/near downtown 32% 41% 32% 26% Small town 17% 9% 16% 24% Rural area 13% 9% 13% 16% Resort area 3% 1% 4% 4%
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
DESIRED LOCATION TYPE
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
AGE
Millennials (n=202) Middle Aged (n=371) Seniors (n=348)
Vancouver 72% 60% 41% Burnaby 37% 25% 17% North Vancouver 28% 27% 14% West Vancouver 19% 22% 18% White Rock 14% 17% 30% New Westminster 12% 9% 9% Richmond 16% 6% 9% Langley 11% 9% 11% Coquitlam 10% 7% 8% Surrey 9% 5% 8% Tsawwassen 3% 5% 12% Bowen Island 4% 8% 5% Port Moody 5% 7% 4% Delta 3% 4% 7% Maple Ridge 4% 5% 4% Abbotsford 4% 3% 6% Port Coquitlam 3% 5% 4% R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
11
*Small base size, interpret with caution. Base: Would most like to/consider living in Metro Vancouver (n=921)
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
MOST DESIRABLE METRO VANCOUVER COMMUNITIES
4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 6% 6% 7% 8% 10% 10% 10% 20% 20% 24% 27% 58%
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
Greater/Metro Vancouver Kelowna and Thompson-Okanagan Victoria, Vancouver Island South, & Gulf Islands Nanaimo and Vancouver Island North Cranbrook, Kootenays and Rockies Sunshine Coast Prince Rupert, Prince George, and Northern BC Squamish-Whistler-Pemberton Somewhere outside BC 15
Base: Likely to move to different region in next 5 years (n=182)
27% 1% 2% 4% 6% 10% 11% 13% 25%
FUTURE REGION MOST LIKELY TO MOVE TO
1 IN 3 HOMEOWNERS IN METRO VANCOUVER ARE CONSIDERING SELLING THEIR HOME TO MOVE TO MORE AFFORDABLE MARKETS
Total Metro Vancouver Residents Millennials (age 18 to 34) Gen-X (age 35 to 54) Boomers (age 55+)
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
16 16
28% 40% 35% 34%
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
17
VANCOUVER’S INCOME GAP
$10K $30K $50K $20K $40K $60K $70K
$62,202 $60,091 $54,391 $53,905 $52,229 $50,456 $48,142 $47,267 $41,981 $64,352 Toronto Hamilton Calgary Edmonton Montreal Ottawa Quebec City Waterloo Winnipeg Vancouver
Source: Statistics Canada 2011 National Household Survey
2011 Media total incomes for 25-55 year olds with bachelor degrees
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
20
Base: All respondents (Total n=1,714)
purchasing, are considering renting, would like to own one day, or would like to rent one day?
RENT OWN
Single family home Single family home Apartment/condominium Apartment/condominium Vacation home Vacation home Duplex/townhome/rowhouse Duplex/townhome/rowhouse Retirement housing Retirement housing Mobile home Mobile home 8% 18% 31% 34% 38% 74% 3% 15% 12% 26% 10% 23% 2% 2% 10% 4% 11% 8% 3% 1% 9% 4% 17% 43% 3% 10% 9% 7% 22% 12% 1% 1% 4% 1% 15% 8%
Own now Considering purchasing Would like to own Rent now Considering renting Would like to rent
PROPERTY TYPE
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
22
Base: All respondents (n=1,714)
Cost of housing Private outdoor space Number of bedrooms Overall square footage/size Storage space Walking distance to shopping/dining/entertainment Garage/indoor parking Pet friendly Reputation of developer/building management Access to public transit Proximity to work Sustainability/energy efficiency ratings Design/interior design 42% 44% 46% 46% 47% 48% 49% 49% 51% 52% 55% 65% 80% 21% 21% 18% 16% 19% 13% 18% 20% 24% 23% 24% 18% 16% 12% 14% 14% 13% 13% 10% 14% 14% 14% 15% 15% 19% 20% 9% 10% 14% 17% 15% 25% 17% 15% 13% 15% 16% 27% 44%
10 – Extremely important 9 8
MOST IMPORTANT HOME FEATURES
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
Age of home/building Guestrooms for friends/family Air-conditioning Gourmet kitchen Proximity to good schools Access to fitness facilities Formal dining room In-law/rental suite Access to swimming pool Proximity to good child care Community room/clubhouse Electric car charging station 23
Base: All respondents (n=1,714)
9% 10% 11% 13% 14% 14% 22% 22% 28% 29% 36% 41% 5% 5% 5% 7% 7% 8% 10% 10% 14% 13% 15% 21% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 6% 6% 9% 8% 11% 10% 2% 3% 2% 3% 4% 2% 5% 6% 5% 9% 10% 10%
10 – Extremely important 9 8
LESS IMPORTANT HOME FEATURES
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
27
Base: All respondents
features in your decision to purchase or rent a new home?
TOTAL AGE
% Important (10 – Extremely Important, 9, 8)
(n=1,714) Millennials (n=249) Gen X (n=594) Boomers+ (n=871)
Cost of housing 80% 83% 82% 75% Private outdoor space 65% 50% 71% 69% Number of bedrooms 55% 54% 59% 53% Overall square footage/size 52% 54% 54% 50% Storage space 51% 43% 53% 54% Walking distance to shopping/dining/entertainment 49% 49% 44% 53% Garage/indoor parking 49% 39% 48% 56% Pet friendly 48% 52% 50% 43% Reputation of developer/building management 47% 35% 48% 54% Access to public transit 46% 55% 43% 43% Proximity to work 46% 63% 58% 21% Sustainability/energy efficiency ratings 44% 40% 43% 48% Design/interior design 42% 37% 41% 47%
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
MOST IMPORTANT HOME FEATURES
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
29
*Small base size, interpret with caution. Base: All respondents
features in your decision to purchase or rent a new home?
TOTAL ETHNICITY
% Important (10 – Extremely Important, 9, 8) (n=1,714) Caucasian (n=614) Asian (n=138)
Cost of housing 80% 80% 82% Private outdoor space 65% 68% 44% Number of bedrooms 55% 54% 63% Overall square footage/size 52% 49% 60% Storage space 51% 52% 47% Walking distance to shopping/dining/entertainment 49% 47% 59% Garage/indoor parking 49% 47% 60% Pet friendly 48% 51% 35% Reputation of developer/building management 47% 46% 52% Access to public transit 46% 42% 69% Proximity to work 46% 43% 63% Sustainability/energy efficiency ratings 44% 43% 48% Design/interior design 42% 41% 47%
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
MOST IMPORTANT HOME FEATURES
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
AGE REGION
Millennials (n=175) Gen X (n=308) Boomers+ (n=299) Metro Van. (n=317)
Studio/Loft 4% 2% 2% 4% One 18% 7% 9% 13% Two 34% 34% 51% 38% Three 30% 38% 32% 31% Four 12% 15% 3% 11% Five or more 3% 4% 1% 3% 31
*Small base size, interpret with caution. Base: Likely to move in next 5 years (n=782)
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
3% 11% 33% 38% 12% 3%
NUMBER OF BEDROOMS IN FUTURE HOME
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
AGE REGION
Millennials (n=175) Gen X (n=308) Boomers+ (n=299) Metro Van. (n=317)
500 square feet or less 10% 3% 3% 4% 501-1,000 square feet 37% 26% 36% 35% 1,001-1,500 square feet 30% 37% 38% 34% 1,501-2,000 square feet 17% 22% 17% 18% More than 2,000 square feet 6% 12% 6% 9% 32
*Small base size, interpret with caution. Base: Likely to move in next 5 years (n=782)
8% 19% 35% 33% 6%
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FUTURE HOME
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
35
Base: All respondents (n=1,714)
Consider living in a smaller home in order to be closer to transit, shops and restaurants Consider living in a smaller home in order to be closer to your place of work Accept a community park as a substitute to a personal yard in
Consider living in a high-rise (8+ storey) building for a reduction in property taxes Consider living in a laneway home/ground-level/ basement apartment to reduce housing costs Give up a parking space for reduced purchase price/rent Consider renting out all or part of your home on a short-term basis through a service like Airbnb to help offset your living costs Accept two children sharing a bedroom to live in an urban or walkable community None of the above 26% 17% 21% 23% 26% 34% 35% 42% 46%
HOUSING COMPROMISES
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
36
Base: All respondents (n=1,714)
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
TOTAL AGE REGION
(n=1,714) Millennials (n=249) Gen X (n=591) Boomers+ (n=869) Metro Van. (n=603)
Consider living in a smaller home in order to be closer to transit, shops and restaurants 46% 54% 43% 44% 50% Consider living in a smaller home in order to be closer to your place of work 42% 60% 50% 19% 47% Accept a community park as a substitute to a personal yard in
35% 44% 35% 28% 39% Consider living in a high-rise (8+ storey) building for a reduction in property taxes 34% 49% 31% 26% 40% Consider living in a laneway home/ground-level/ basement apartment to reduce housing costs 26% 30% 23% 25% 28% Give up a parking space for reduced purchase price/rent 23% 35% 24% 12% 25% Consider renting out all or part of your home on a short-term basis through a service like Airbnb to help offset your living costs 21% 25% 24% 14% 22% Accept two children sharing a bedroom to live in an urban or walkable community 17% 29% 19% 6% 19% None of the above 26% 15% 23% 37% 22%
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
R E S O N A N C E C O . C O M
38
Base: All respondents
address the current housing affordability issue in BC?
TOTAL AGE REGION
(n=1,714) Millennials (n=249) Gen X (n=594) Boomers+ (n=871) Metro Van. (n=603)
Tax foreign investment in the housing market 70% 70% 69% 70% 71% Limit foreign investment in the housing market 67% 71% 67% 65% 70% Invest in more amenities and infrastructure in suburban areas to create new economic centres outside downtown 47% 45% 45% 51% 51% Increase the housing supply by fast tracking approvals of new rental buildings 45% 41% 42% 53% 48% Revise zoning in suburban areas to permit development of more multi-family housing 44% 44% 40% 48% 46% Increase property taxes on single family homes to encourage higher density development 10% 15% 11% 4% 13%
Statistically significantly higher than comparison group(s).
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS FOR ADDRESSING HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN BC
Chris Fair cfair@ResonanceCo.com +1-646-413-8887