From reference genes to global mean normalization Jo Vandesompele - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

from reference genes to global mean normalization
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

From reference genes to global mean normalization Jo Vandesompele - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

From reference genes to global mean normalization Jo Vandesompele professor, Ghent University co-founder and CEO, Biogazelle qPCR Symposium USA November 9, 2009 Millbrae, CA outline what is normalization gold standard for mRNA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

From reference genes to global mean normalization

Jo Vandesompele professor, Ghent University co-founder and CEO, Biogazelle qPCR Symposium USA November 9, 2009 – Millbrae, CA

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • utline

 what is normalization  gold standard for mRNA normalization  global mean normalization and selection of stable small RNAs for

microRNA normalization

slide-3
SLIDE 3

introduction to normalization

 2 sources of variation in gene expression results

 biological variation (true fold changes)  experimentally induced variation (noise and bias)

 purpose of normalization is reduction of the experimental variation

 input quantity: RNA quantity, cDNA synthesis efficiency, …  input quality: RNA integrity, RNA purity, …

 gold standard is the use of multiple stably expressed reference genes

 which genes?  how many?  how to do the calculations?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

normalization: geNorm solution

 framework for qPCR gene expression normalisation using the reference

gene concept:

 quantified errors related to the use of a single reference gene

(> 3 fold in 25% of the cases; > 6 fold in 10% of the cases)

 developed a robust algorithm for assessment of expression stability of

candidate reference genes

 proposed the geometric mean of at least 3 reference genes for

accurate and reliable normalisation

 Vandesompele et al., Genome Biology, 2002

slide-5
SLIDE 5

geNorm software

 automated analysis

 ranking of candidate reference genes according to their stability  determination of how many genes are required for reliable normalization  http://medgen.ugent.be/genorm

slide-6
SLIDE 6

0.003 0.006 0.021 0.023 0.056 NF4 NF1

 cancer patients survival curve

statistically more significant results

geNorm validation (I)

log rank statistics Hoebeeck et al., Int J Cancer, 2006

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 mRNA haploinsufficiency measurements

accurate assessment of small expression differences

geNorm validation (II)

Hellemans et al., Nature Genetics, 2004

patient / control

3 independent experiments

95% confidence intervals

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 geNorm is the de facto standard for reference gene validation and

normalization

 > 2,000 citations of our geNorm technology  > 10,000 geNorm software downloads in 100 countries

normalization using multiple stable reference genes

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

global mean normalization

 when a large set of genes are measured, the average expression level

reflects the input amount and could be used for normalization

 e.g. microarray based normalization

  • lowess, mean ratio, …

 SAGE / NGS sequencing counts

 the set of genes must be unbiased and sufficiently large  we make use of this principle to normalize microRNA data from

experiments in which we quantify a substantial number of miRNAs (450 or 650) in a given sample

slide-11
SLIDE 11

global mean normalization

 small-RNA controls

 classic normalization strategy  small nuclear RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs  18 available from Applied Biosystems

 global mean normalization

 method applied for microarray data  universal: applicable for every miRNA dataset  many datapoints needed (megaplex vs. multiplex)

 miRNAs/controls that resemble the mean

 minimal standard deviation when comparing miRNA expression with

mean ( geNorm V value, standard deviation of log transformed ratios)

 compatible with multiplex assays  need to determine mean

slide-12
SLIDE 12

small RNA controls

 How ‘stable’ is the global mean compared to controls?

 geNorm analysis using controls and mean as input variables  exclusion of potentially co-regulated controls

HY3 7q36 RNU19 5q31.2 RNU24 9q34 RNU38B 1p34.1-p32 RNU43 22q13 RNU44 1q25.1 RNU48 6p21.32 RNU49 17p11.2 RNU58A 18q21 RNU58B 18q21 RNU66 1p22.1 RNU6B 10p13 U18 15q22 U47 1q25.1 U54 8q12 U75 1q25.1 Z30 17q12 RPL21 13q12.2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

miRNA expression datasets

 neuroblastoma tumour samples  T-ALL samples  EVI1 deregulated leukemias  retinoblastoma tumour samples  normal tissues  normal bone marrow

slide-14
SLIDE 14

0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 expression stability

T-ALL geNorm ranking

slide-15
SLIDE 15

geNorm ranking bone marrow pool normal tissues neuroblastoma leukemia EVI1 overexpression

slide-16
SLIDE 16

20 40 60 80 100 120 50 100 150 200 250 300 not normalised stable controls mean miRNAs

neuroblastoma – removal of variation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

removal of variation bone marrow pool normal tissues T-ALL leukemia EVI1 overexpression

slide-18
SLIDE 18

biological validation

 MYCN binds to the mir-17-92 promoter

CpG island mir-17-92 cluster +5 kb

  • 5 kb

CATGTG CATGTG CATGTG CACGTG CACGTG CATGTG CATGTG

A B C

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B C

Fold enrichment Amplicon

IMR5 WAC2

slide-19
SLIDE 19

biological validation

 choice of normalization strategy influences differential miRNA expression

 Mir-17-92 expression in neuroblastoma tumours

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

stable controls mean miRNAs

slide-20
SLIDE 20

biological validation

 choice of normalization strategy influences differential miRNA expression

 Mir-17-92 expression in neuroblastoma tumours

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

stable controls mean miRNAs

slide-21
SLIDE 21

biological validation

 choice of normalization strategy influences differential miRNA expression

 Mir-17-92 expression in neuroblastoma tumours

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

stable controls mean miRNAs

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 fold change (MYCN amplified vs. MYCN single copy) controls mean

average FCcontrols = -0.404 average Fcmean = 0.050 average FCmiRNAs = 0.124

balanced differential expression

slide-23
SLIDE 23

correlation MYCN downregulated genes – 2 normalization strategies stable miRNA control normalisation mean normalisation

slide-24
SLIDE 24

strategy also works for microarray data

 each sample is measured by

RT-qPCR and microarray

 global mean normalization  standardization per method  hierarchical clustering  samples cluster by sample

(and NOT by method)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

conclusions global mean normalization

 novel and powerful miRNA normalization strategy

 maximal reduction of technical noise  improved identification of differentially expressed genes  balancing of differential expression  universally applicable

  • global mean
  • multiple stable endogenous controls

 Mestdagh et al., Genome Biology, 2009

slide-26
SLIDE 26

 most powerful, flexible and user-friendly real-time PCR data-analysis

software

 based on Ghent University’s geNorm and qBase technology  state of the art normalization procedures

  • one or more classic reference genes
  • global mean normalization
  • expressed repeat normalization

 detection and correction of inter-run variation  dedicated error propagation  fully automated analysis; no manual interaction required  booth 19

qbasePLUS normalization

http://www.qbaseplus.com

slide-27
SLIDE 27

conclusions

 proper normalization has a major impact on your results

 provides statistically more significant results  enables accurate assessment of small expression differences

 gold standard for mRNA gene expression analysis

 geNorm evaluation of candidate reference genes  geometric mean of multiple stably expressed reference genes

 global mean normalization and subsequent geNorm based selection of

reference genes that resemble the mean is a valid option when measuring a large and unbiased set of genes (e.g. all miRNAs)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

acknowledgments

 miRNA

 Pieter Mestdagh (UGent)  Frank Speleman (UGent)  Applied Biosystems

 qbasePLUS

 Jan Hellemans (Biogazelle – UGent)  Stefaan Derveaux (Biogazelle – UGent)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 January 28-29, 2010

Ghent, Belgium

 www.advances-in-genomics.org