Friends of Golden Bay (Inc) Submission 0922 Expert evidence by Dr - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

friends of golden bay inc submission 0922
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Friends of Golden Bay (Inc) Submission 0922 Expert evidence by Dr - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Friends of Golden Bay (Inc) Submission 0922 Expert evidence by Dr Donald J Mead Golden Bay B.Sc. (NZ); B.Sc. (Edin); PhD (Fla.); FNZIF; IAH The sacred Te Waikoropup Main Spring with exceptional clarity and very high ecological values


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Friends of Golden Bay (Inc) Submission 0922

Expert evidence by Dr Donald J Mead Golden Bay

B.Sc. (NZ); B.Sc. (Edin); PhD (Fla.); FNZIF; IAH

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The sacred Te Waikoropupū Main Spring with exceptional clarity and very high ecological values

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Inside the Arthur Marble Auifer

Inside the Arthur Marble Aquifer

Photo Neil Silverwood

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Updated Friends of Golden Bay results

  • Lowess (LOcally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing) explains 72 and 71% of the

variation for the Main and Fish Springs, respectively.

Nitrate-N (mg/l) Date

Nitrate-N in the Main and Fish Springs (FoGB data)

1/12/15 1/3/16 1/6/16 1/9/16 1/12/16 1/3/17 1/6/17 1/9/17 1/12/17 1/3/18 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

Legend Main NO3-N Fish NO3-N Lowess (Main NO3) Lowess (Fish NO3)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Updated statistical results

  • Seasonal changes

– Main Spring - not significant – Fish Spring - highly significant; lowest in summer & highest in winter

  • Sudden increase by 0.04 mg/l in March

2017 (10% increase)

– Statistically a highly significant change

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • March 2017 increase:

– Very highly significant (P <0.0000) but means and standard deviations have hardly changed from the earlier submission.

Median (mg/l N) Mean (mg/l N) SD (mg/l) Main Spring

Before 19/3/17 0.395 0.395 0.0169 After 19/3/17 0.440 0.442 0.0133

Fish Spring

Before 19/3/17 0.360 0.362 0.0246 After 19/3/17 0.400 0.408 0.0228

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Updated – also uses Stewart’s new analysis

  • This analysis assumes the simple shallow/deep aquifer

model is realistic.

  • Gives a feel of where the nitrate is coming from.

Pre mid-March 2017 Post mid-March 2017 Shallow aquifer Deep aquifer Shallow aquifer Deep aquifer Nitrate-N (mg/l) 0.350 0.401 0.396 0.457 Nitrate-N (t/year) Fish Springs Main Springs Total % from shallow aquifer 30.7 26.2 56.9 9.0 97.0 106.0 34.7 29.6 64.3 10.0 108.3 118.3

35% 35%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Discussion and conclusions

  • Nitrate in Springs is increasing and has reached

the limit suggested by NIWA

  • 35% of nitrate discharged from Springs comes

from ‘shallow aquifer’

  • This is based on the assumption that the simple

Stewart and Thomas model is OK

  • If setting limits the sampling strategy must also

be defined

  • In the paper I have suggested how the FoGB

data may be used to decide on an efficient sampling strategy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nitrate-N in the Eastern Valley Creeks

Median Nitrate-N (mg/l) Range Nitrate-N (mg/l) Ironstone Creek 0.03 0.03 – 0.04 Gorge Creek 0.09 0.06 – 0.11 Rameka Creek 0.44 0.41 – 0.45 Small Spring 0.23 0.10 – 0.36 Takaka River at Harwood* 0.005 <0.001 – 0.028

* Based on data from 2005 to 2015.

There is already a 50 fold increase in nitrate from land-use

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Spring’s Phosphate (DRP) results

  • The median DRP is 0.005 mg/l for both Springs
  • Range 0.003 to 0.008 mg/l
  • Takaka river at Harwoods 2005-2015
  • Median 0.0015 mg/l (range <0.001 – 0.003)
  • The AMA is being contaminated by P
  • DRP (mg/l)

Date

Dissolved Reactive Phosphate in the Main and Fish Springs since February 2016

1/12/15 1/3/16 1/6/16 1/9/16 1/12/16 1/3/17 1/6/17 1/9/17 1/12/17 1/3/18 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010

Legend Main P Fish P Lowess (Main P) Lowess (Fish P)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fish Creek results

  • Samples collected at the reserve boundary
  • NO3 –N and DRP wash off dairy farms – a wider

problem than just Fish Creek.

Creek NO3-N (mg/l) Creek DRP (mg/l) Date

Nitrate-N and DRP in Fish Creek since February 2016

1/12/15 1/3/16 1/6/16 1/9/16 1/12/16 1/3/17 1/6/17 1/9/17 1/12/17 1/3/18 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

Legend NO3-N DRP

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • E. coli in Fish Creek
  • Sampled on 23 occasions since Nov 2016 and

at several points in the catchment.

  • Initial study confirmed DOCs earlier results that
  • E. coli is not in the Main Spring itself.
  • E. coli can be very high (e.g. >24000 /100 mm)
  • n occasions.

– depending on dairy cattle grazing patterns

  • This study is indicative of a widespread problem.
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • E. coli changes during a rain event
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Discussion and Conclusions

The National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management states that water quality must be maintained or improved

  • Nitrate-N has increased in both Springs over the

27 months

  • It is now at 0.44 mg/l

– This therefore should be the upper limit for NO3-N

  • The median PRP is 0.005 mg/l.

– This is substantially higher than measured at Harwood’s on the Takaka river. – The upper limit for DRP should be 0.005 mg/l

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Nitrate, phosphate and E. coli wash off pastures

into streams and rivers

– These also need to be addressed by the Tribunal

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Thank You