Friday, 4 th January 2013 WIND AND EARTHQUAKE LOAD ON THE VERTICAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

friday 4 th january 2013 wind and earthquake load on the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Friday, 4 th January 2013 WIND AND EARTHQUAKE LOAD ON THE VERTICAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Friday, 4 th January 2013 WIND AND EARTHQUAKE LOAD ON THE VERTICAL PRESSURE VESSEL FOR OIL SEPARATOR USING GRAPHICAL- BASED SOFTWARE Name : Aji Abdillah Kharisma Student Number : 20409191 Department : Mechanical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

WIND AND EARTHQUAKE LOAD ON THE VERTICAL PRESSURE VESSEL FOR OIL SEPARATOR USING GRAPHICAL- BASED SOFTWARE

Name : Aji Abdillah Kharisma Student Number : 20409191 Department : Mechanical Engineering Advisor : Dr. C. Prapti Mahandari, ST, M.Eng

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

INTRODUCTION RESEARCH METHOD RESULT AND DISSCUSSION CONCLUSION

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

Vertical Separator and its function Mechanical design of a Oil Separator Pressure Vessel

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

Designing a pressure vessel involves numerous calculations. Many software as a tool for designing a pressure vessel are available A pressure vessel has been design using a Graphical-Based Software is PV Elite 2010

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Objective of The Research

  • To determine the safety factor of the pressure vessel design on the

earthquake and wind load inputs.

  • To determine the result of the calculation of greatest bending and design

stability which occur on the wind load input.

  • To determine the result of the calculation of greatest bending and the

stress allowance on the design due to the earthquake load input.

Introduction

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A pressure vessel has been design using Standar Code ASME VIII Divison 1. Analysis was conducted on the Wind and Earthquake Load Design of The Oil Separator Pressure Vessel. Wind and Earthquake Load on The Oil Separator Design using Standar ASCE 7-98 Criteria of the stability and design of a acceptable on The Wind and Earthquake Load Design. Output are presented as they were generated.

Research Methods

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Flow chart input Wind Load

Friday, 4th January 2013

Research Methods

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Flowchart Input Eartquake Load

Friday, 4th January 2013

Research Methods

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Result and Discussion

Wind Bending : 20971.9 N.m

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Result and Discussion

From To Wind Bending (N-m) 10 to 20 20971.9 20 t0 30 17735.5 30 to 40 13736.8 40 to 50 9151.17 50 to 60 9145.94 60 to 70 5291.80 70 to 80 2467.08 80 to 90 705.858

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Result and Discussion

  • Effective Height [z]

= Centroid Hgt. + Vessel Base Elevation = 0.657 + 0.000 = 0.657 m = 2.156 ft. Imperial Units

  • Compute [Kz]

Because z (2.156 ft.) < 15 ft. = 2.01 * ( 15 / Zg ) 2 / Alpha = 2.01 * ( 15 / 900.000 )2 / 9.500 = 0.849

  • As there is No Hill Present: [Kzt]

K1 = 0, K2 = 0, K3 = 0

  • Topographical Factor [Kzt]

= ( 1 + K1 * K2 * K3 )² = ( 1 + 0.000 * 0.000 * 0.000 )² = 1.0000

  • `Basic Wind Pressure, Imperial Units [qz]:

= 0.00256 * Kz * Kzt * Kd * I * Vr(mph)² = 0.00256 * 0.849 * 1.000 * 0.950 * 1.000 * (25.054 )² = 1.296 psf [0.062 ] kPa

  • `Force on the first element [F]:

= qz * Gh * Cf * WindArea = 0.062 * 0.889 * 0.617 * 5.007 = 170.221 N Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Result and Discussion

Earthquake Bending :

  • 797398. N-m

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Result and Discussion

From To Earthquake Bending (N-m) 10 to 20 797398. 20 to 30 687538 30 to 40 545604. 40 to 50 379911. 50 to 60 379721. 60 to 70 233727. 70 to 80 116016. 80 to 90 34922.1

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Result and Discussion

Earthquake Load Input :

  • Fa 1.000
  • Fv 1.400
  • Ss 1.00
  • S1 0.400
  • Moment Reduction Factor Tau : 1.000
  • Force Modification Factor R : 3.000
  • Importance Factor : 1.000
  • Site Class : C
  • Sms = Fa * Ss = 1.000 * 1.000 = 1.000
  • Sm1 = Fv * S1 = 1.400 * 0.400 = 0.560
  • Sds = 2/3 * Sms = 2/3 * 1.000 = 0.667
  • Sd1 = 2/3 * Sm1 = 2/3 * 0.560 = 0.373
  • Check the Period (1/Frequency) from 9.5.3.3-1

= Ct * hn3/4 where Ct = 0.020 and hn = total Vessel Height [Ta]: = 0.020 * 16.42213/4 = 0.398 seconds The Coefficient Cu from Table 9.5.3.3 is 1.300 Check the Min. Value of T which is the Smaller of Cu*Ta and T, [T]: = Min. Value of (1.300 * 0.398 , 1/6.699 ) = 0.1493 per 9.5.3.3 Compute the Seismic Response Coefficient Cs per 9.5.3.2.1, [Cs]: = Sds / ( R / I ) = 0.667 / ( 3.00 / 1.00 ) = 0.2222 Check the Maximum value of Cs per eqn. 9.5.3.2.1-2 : = Sd1 / ( ( R / I ) * T ) = 0.373 / ( ( 3.00 / 1.00 ) * 0.149 ) = 0.8336 Check the Minimum value of Cs per eqn. 9.5.3.2.1-3: = 0.044 * 1.00 * 0.667 = 0.0293 Compute the Total Base Shear V = Cs * Total Weight, [V]: = 0.2222 * 474627.4 = 105472.76 N Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusion

The wind bending which occurs in the oil separator design is 20971.9 N-m. The earthquake bending in the oil separator on the earthquake load design is 797398 N-m

  • W/LDr2 > 25 criterion, the value is 0.10005+05 > 25. This condition fulfills the

requirement of occurring vibration.

  • Vc > 22.3515 m/s criterion, The value is 38.4 m/s > 22.3512 m/s. This condition in the

pressure vessel design is stable. It is not necessary to reanalyze.

  • Dynamic deflection criterion of the design due to either wind or earthquake loads.

If < 6 or 100 ft, in the unit SI < 30.48 m (the design is approved). If 0.00116 m < 0.1524 m (the design is approved in the dynamic deflection condition).

  • Pm < SE = 11.19 N/ mm2 < 120.65 N/mm2
  • Pb > Pm = 180.98 N/mm2 > 11.19 N/mm2
  • PL = Pm+Qm< 1.5 SE = 22.34 N/mm2 < 180.98 N/mm2

Friday, 4th January 2013

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Thank You

Friday, 4th January 2013