Frank Kehlenbach Director of European International Contractors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Frank Kehlenbach Director of European International Contractors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Frank Kehlenbach Director of European International Contractors (EIC) FIDIC standard forms as risk mitigation tool FIDIC standard forms of contract have historically allocated the construction risk fairly , i.e. on the basis of which party
FIDIC standard forms as risk mitigation tool
- FIDIC standard forms of contract have historically allocated the construction risk
fairly, i.e. on the basis of which party is best placed to assume individual risks
- Provide the lowest outturn cost, as bidders do not have to price for potential risks
- Avoid any possibility of arbitrary interpretations and actions by one of the parties
IMPACT OF FAIR CONDITIONS IMPACT OF UNFAIR CONDITIONS Co-operation / Teamwork Claims, Disputes, Penalties Quality works Poor quality works Profitability Insolvencies / Bankruptcies Professionalism & Integrity Corruption / Cartels
FIDIC standard forms have become more risky for contractors over time
- In the “good old times”, the first three
FIDIC “Red Book” editions were agreed and published jointly by FIDIC and the world’s regional contractors’ federations
- Contractor was obliged to design (to the extent
provided for by the Contract), execute and complete the Works with due care and diligence (not fitness for purpose)
- Existence of a trusted and independent
Engineer able to operate as experienced contract administrator was welcomed as a value added by both contractor and employer
FIDIC standard forms have become more risky for contractors over time
- In 1987, consensus between FIDIC and
international contractors – which had existed for three decades – ended and FIDIC became the sole publisher of the 4th edition of its “Red Book”
- Reason was irreconcilable standpoints
with respect to the role of the impartial and independent Engineer
- In 1996 supplement, DABs were introduced
- Collaboration between FIDIC and contractors
was remodeled (“friendly reviewer”)
FIDIC standard forms have become more risky for contractors over time
In 1999, FIDIC published an unbalanced standard form with enormous risk for contractors. EIC comment:
- “Whilst it is not difficult to draft conditions that appeal to
employers, FIDIC has always endeavoured to explain to prospective Employers the reason behind the allocation of certain risks.
- By leaving the traditional FIDIC philosophy behind and
instead in the Silver Book taking on-board the “all risks
- n the contractor - philosophy”, FIDIC will contribute to
poor contract practices.
- In the end, it does not serve employers generally that
unreasonable conditions are imposed on contractors. Employers will have to pay the costs for construction and it must be most fair that the cost to execute a particular project is borne by the owner of the project.”
FIDIC standard forms have become more risky for contractors over time
F A I R C O N T R A C T C O N D I T I O N S
Contractor’s contractual rights are unreasonably limited
- r duties expanded
Employer’s contractual rights are unreasonably expanded or duties reduced Engineer’s or DAB’s powers are restricted
- r deleted
Event Time Cost Cost plus Profit
Delayed Drawings or Instructions
X X X
Right of Access to the Site
X X X
Fossils
X X
Setting Out, Ground conditions
X X X
Exceptionally adverse climatic conditions
X X
Consequences of Suspension by Employer
X X
Adjustment for Changes in Legislation
X X
Consequences of Employer’s Risks
X X
X
Typical re-allocation of risk in Particular Conditions of fair “FIDIC” forms
FIDIC standard forms have become more risky for contractors over time
FIDIC standard forms have become more risky for contractors over time
- In 2010, MDBs adopted the FIDIC “Pink Book”
as the standard form of contract used by MDBs for construction projects for which they provide finance
- Participating banks and FIDIC have amended
the General Conditions of the FIDIC 1999 Red Book and have also diminished the role of the Engineer
- WB Procurement Reform: FIDIC forms of
contract will probably no longer be imposed by MDBs as exclusive set of general conditions but will be one of several options available to borrowers
Consequences of too risky contract conditions
If the risks to the Contractor become excessively high, the following problems may occur:
Higher bid price Bid failure & disruption of project implementation Contract award to bidder who fails or not capable of estimating risks properly Poor construction quality and delay of the work Undermining the relationship of mutual trust and respect between parties Groundless claims from the contractor Frequent disputes between the employer and the contractor In extreme cases eventual termination of the contract
JICA Checklist for One-Sided Contracts (March 2011)