Fractional quantum Hall spectroscopy investigated by a resonant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fractional quantum hall spectroscopy investigated by a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fractional quantum Hall spectroscopy investigated by a resonant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fractional quantum Hall spectroscopy investigated by a resonant detector Alessandro Braggio CNR-SPIN, Genoa https://sites.google.com/site/alessandrobraggio/ M. Sassetti M.Carrega D.Ferraro Genoa Genoa Geneve-Marseille New. J. Phys. 16


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2012

Fractional quantum Hall spectroscopy investigated by a resonant detector

Alessandro Braggio CNR-SPIN, Genoa

  • M. Sassetti

Genoa M.Carrega Genoa D.Ferraro Geneve-Marseille

  • New. J. Phys. 16 043018 (2014)

https://sites.google.com/site/alessandrobraggio/

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Topological protected edge states
  • Fractional statistics & charges

Laughlin PRL’83

  • Chiral edge states with gapless modes

Wen PRB90,Halperin PRB 82, Buttiker PRB 88, Beenakker PRL 90

  • Laughlin sequence
  • Jain sequence

Jain, PRL’89Jain, PRL’89

FQHE: edge states & qps

σxy = ν e2 h σxx = 0 ν = 1 2np + 1 = 1, 1 3, 1 5, .. ν = p 2np + 1 = 2 5, 2 3, ...

Jain PRL’89, Wen & Zee PRB’92, Kane & Fisher PRB’95

Kane & Fisher PRB’95

Hierarchical models ν = N NΦ

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Multiple qp excitations

  • Hierarchical theories
  • Fractional statistics

m = 1 m > 1

Single-qp m-agglomerate e∗ = 1 2np + 1 me∗

Laughlin PRL 83, Arovas, Schrieffer & Wilczek PRL 84

Ψ(m)(x)Ψ(m)(y) = Ψ(m)(y)Ψ(m)(x)e−iθmsgn(x−y) G(m)(τ) = hΨ(m)(τ)Ψ(m)†(0)i G(m)(τ) / |τ|−∆m Abelian + = ∆m Scaling dimension Ψl(x) ∝ elT ·K·φ

slide-4
SLIDE 4

QPC:Current & Noise

  • Weak backscattering current
  • Power-law signatures in the

scaling dimension I = ν e2 h V IB IB ⌧ I

  • Current noise signatures: charge measurement

S(ω = 0) = Z +∞

−∞

h{δIB(t), δIB(0)}+i δIB = IB hIBi m-qps G(m)

B

∝ T 2∆m−2 I(m)

B

∝ V 2∆m−1 ∆m S(m) = I(m)

B

coth ✓me∗V 2kBT ◆ S(m) ≈ me∗I(m)

B

S(m) ≈ 2kBTGB

k

B

T

  • m

e

V kBT ⌧ me∗V

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Multiple-qp evidences

  • Fractional charges: single-qps evidences

Theory:Kane & Fisher PRL 94, Fendley, Ludwig & Saleur PRL 95 Exp:De-Picciotto… Nature 97,Saminadayar.… PRL’97,Reznikov… Nature’99

  • Multiple-qp. evidences

Robert B. Laughlin, Horst L. Störmer and Daniel C. Tsui "for their discovery of a new form of quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations"

B u n c h i n g B u n c h i n g S i n g l e q p S i n g l e q p

eeff/e T(mK)

  • M. Heiblum (2/5,3/7,2/3,5/2,..),Willet(5/2),Yacoby (2/3),…

Chung…PRL03, Bid PRL03,Dolev….

ν = 5/2

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Single-qp and multiple-qp crossover
  • Renormalization of scaling exponent

Theoretical explanations 1

ν = 2 5

2e∗ e∗

  • Charge and neutral modes

ωn ⌧ ωc ∆m =gc∆c

m + gn∆n m

  • Mode velocity vn ⌧ vc
  • D. Ferraro, A. B. , N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti PRL 08,PRB10,NJP10,PRL11

Coupling other degrees: Rosenow & Halperin PRL 02, Papa & MacDonald PRL 05 1/f noise + dissipation: A. B., D. Ferraro, M. Carrega, N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti NJP12

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Qp. charge measurements
  • Contropropagating neutral modes evidences
  • Heat transport & neutral modes proliferation
  • Edge reconstruction & T dependent edge coupling
  • Imaging of the edge structure
  • Edge model identification

Bid et al., Nature 10, Gross et al. PRL12, Gurman et al. Nature 12, Shtanko et al PRB14, Takei et al. PRB11, Dolev et al. PRL11 Kou et al. PRL12,D. T. McClure et al. PRL12, Safi & Sukhorukov EPL10 Altimiras et al PRL12, Aita et al PRB13, Inoue et al. Nature14

  • N. Paradiso et al. PRB11,PRL12, Pasher et al. PRX14, Kozikov et al NJP13
  • J. Wang et al PRL13, Karzig et al NJP12, Zhang et al 1406.7296

Meier et al. 1406.4517

New questions

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Why not at finite frequency ?

  • Josephson resonances

Blanter&Buettiker Phys.Rep.00, Rogovin&Scalapino Ann. Phys 74

  • Rich theoretical tools & interesting non-equilibrium phys.

Chamon..PRB95; Chamon..PRB96; Dolcini..PRB05; Bena..PRB06; Bena..PRB07; Sukhorukov..PRB01; Sukhorukov..EPL10; Schoelkopf…03; Deblock…Science ’03; Engel…’04;Hekking….06;……

  • Interesting questions: how to measure it?

Lesovik..JETP97;Gavish U..PRB00;Gavish U.. arXiv:0211646; Bednorz& Belzig PRL13; Aguado..PRL00;

  • Symmetrized noise (Landau docet)
  • Non-symmetrized (Emission/absorption from QPC)

Aguado PRL00, Blanter 05, Martin&Crepieux 04-05-06,…..

ωm = me∗V/~ [I(t), I(t0)] 6= 0

Symmetrized or non-symmetrized ?

S(m)

+/−(ω) =

Z +∞

−∞

e±iωthδI(m)

B

(t)δI(m)

B

(0)i S(m)(ω) = Z +∞

−∞

eiωth{δIB(t), δIB(0)}+i = X

i=±

S(m)

i

(ω)

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Finite frequency detection
  • Impedance matched resonant detection scheme

Altimiras et al. APL13, PRL14

  • Output power proportional to variation of LC energy

ω = p 1/LC

T

Tc

Cold detector Hot detector Resonant Tc ⌧ T Tc T S(m)

meas(ω) = K

n S(m)

+

(ω) + nB(ω) h S(m)

+

(ω) − S(m)

(ω) io δhx2i K = ⇣ α 2L ⌘2 1 2η ⌧ 1

S(m)

(ω) S(m)

+

(ω)Emission

Absorption

Lesovik G B and Loosen R JETP 65 295 (1997); Gavish U,….arXiv:0211646

nB(ω) = 1 eω/TC − 1

ω <e h G(m)

ac (ω)

i

25kΩ 50Ω ω ≈ 5GHz T ≈ 15mK

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Noise properties in QPC-LC

  • Detector quantum limit (Cold detector)
  • Absorbitive QPC limit (Hot detector)
  • Is it measurable?
  • Lowest order in the tunnelling (purely additive)
  • Keldysh formalism blow up in Fermi’s rule: rate

kBTc ⌧ ω

S(m)

meas(ω) ≈ KS(m) +

(ω) + O(e−~ω/kBTc)

S(m)

meas(ω) ⇡ K

n S(m)

+

(ω) kBTc<e h G(m)

ac (ω)

io kBTc ω

ω0 = e∗V/~

|tm|2

Ssym(ω) = X

m

S(m)

sym(ω)

Smeas(ω) = X

m

S(m)

meas(ω)

Γ(m)(E) Smeas ≡ Sex T = Tc

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Non-interacting result

Ssym(ω, ω0)

a)

c)

Smeas(ω, ω0)/K

Electron

Smeas(ω, ω0) ⇡ KS+(ω, ω0) = K 2 ✓ Ssym(ω, ω0) 2 ˜ S0 ω ωc ◆ kBTc ⌧ ω

Ssym(ω, ω0) = 2 ˜ S0 ωc [θ(ω0 − ω)ω0 + θ(ω − ω0)ω] ˜ S0 = e2 2 |t1|2 2πα2 1 ωc

Tc = 15mK ω = 7.9GHz(60mK) ωc = 660GHz(5K) T = 0.1, 5, 15, 30[mK]

Γ(1)(E) ∝ θ(E)E

Lesovik G B and Loosen R JETP 65 295 (1997)

ν = 1 ∝ V ∝ V

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Interacting case: Laughlin

b)

Ssym(ω, ω0)

d)

Smeas(ω, ω0)/K

Single-qp Tc = 15mK ω = 7.9GHz(60mK) ωc = 660GHz(5K) T = 0.1, 5, 15, 30[mK]

Ssym(ω, ω0) ≈ |ω − ω0|4∆(1)

1/3−1

Chamon, Freed & Wen PRB95,PRB96

  • Detector quatum limit
  • QPC Shot noise

kBTc ⌧ ω kBT ⌧ ω0

ν = 1/3 e∗ = e 3

S(m)

meas(ω, ω0) ≈ S(m) +

(ω) ≈ K (me∗)2 2 Γ(m) (−ω + mω0) ω ∼ ω0

returns directly the rates…….

S(m)

meas(ω, ω0)

  • m = 1

∝ V ∝ V

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rate detection

a)

Smeas(ω, ω0)/K

b)

Sex(ω, ω0)/K

ν = 1/3, 1/5, 1/7 Tc = T T = 10mK Tc = 10, 30, 60, 90 mK Dashed lines theoretical rates It is possible to extract the scaling dimensions without requiring an extended window in frequency and bias simplifying the experimental requirements

  • ∆(1)

ν

= ν 2 Note that Smeas ≡ Sex T = Tc

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hotter is better?

b)

Smeas(ω, ω0)/K

d)

∂Smeas(ω, ω0) K∂ω0

ν = 1/3 Tc = 5, 15, 30, 60 mK The QPC cannot excite detector modes only absorptive The QPC excites detector The combined effect is an enhancement of jump/peak Tc = 15mK ω = 7.9GHz(60mK) ωc = 660GHz(5K)

  • ∝ V

∝ V

Safi & Sukhorukov EPL10

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Multiple-qp spectroscopy:Smeas

c) d)

Smeas(ω, ω0)/K Smeas(ω, ω0)/K

ν = 2 5 ν = 2 3 T = 0.1, 5, 15, 30[mK] Note that Smeas ≡ Sex T = Tc Smeas(ω, ω0) ≈ α1Γ(1)(ω0 − ω) + α2Γ(2)(2ω0 − ω)

  • Rates are directly fitted: scaling dimensions at finite T
  • Multiple-qps are observed in different window

e∗ = e 5 e∗ = e 3

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Conclusion

  • QPC+LC resonator is a powerful tool
  • f.f. noise resolve the presence of multiple qps
  • Multiple-qp spectroscopy can be done at realistic T
  • Information on qps by analysing bias behaviour
  • Changing detector temperature increases the

sensibility

  • Validate composite edge model theories
  • This techniques can be used in other systems
  • New. J. Phys. 16 043018 (2014)
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Topological order in IQHE

  • Topological invariant 2+1D under magnetic field

(Kubo)

  • Magnetic Brillouin zone (torus)

σxy = −ie2~ X

Eα<EF <Eβ

(vy)βα(vx)αβ − (vx)αβ(vx)βα (Eα − Eβ)2

Thouless, Kohmoto, Nightingale,den Nijs PRL’82; Kohmoto Ann. Phys. 160, 343 (1985)

σ(α)

xy = e2

2πi Z d2k Z d2r ✓∂uα∗

k1,k2

∂k2 ∂uα

k1,k2

∂k1 − ∂uα∗

k1,k2

∂k1 ∂uα

k1,k2

∂k2 ◆ σ(α)

xy = ne2

h Topological invariant

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Edge states & Multiple-qp

  • Chiral Luttinger liquids
  • Multiple-qps excitations
  • Filling factor
  • Fractional charges
  • Fractional statistics
  • Monodromy: qp aquires phase in a loop

around

L = 1 4⇡ (Kij@xi@tj + Vij@xi@xj + 2✏µνtj@µjAν) Ψl(x) ∝ elT ·K·φ ν = tT · K−1 · t ql = 1 2π lT · K−1 · t = me∗ θl = 2π lT · K−1 · l qp 2-qps 3-qps 2π e− e−

Wen & Zee PRB 92, J. Fröhlich et al JSTAT 97 Wen, Kane & Fisher ,….

φi

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TFT for FQHE: CS (Laughlin)

  • Fractional qp.
  • Multiple qps
  • Abelian fractional statistics

j0

qp = elδ(r − r0)

L = LCS + aµjµ

qp

J0 e = ν B φ0 + lνδ(r − r0) e∗

l = eνl

Single-qp 2-agglomerate l = 1 l = 2 ν = 1 3 electron ≡ l = 3 +

Laughlin PRL 83, Arovas, Schrieffer & Wilczek PRL 84

Ψ(m)(x)Ψ(m)(y) = Ψ(m)(y)Ψ(m)(x)e−iθmsgn(x−y)

  • Non-Abelian extension

Wen Adv. Phys. 95, Read&Rezayi PRB99

6= Fusion Rules eiθm → ei ˆ

Θmn

e− ν = 1 2np + 1 = 1, 1 3, 1 5, ...

slide-20
SLIDE 20

TFT for FQHE: CS

  • Electron in a flatland 2+1D under B (break TR)
  • Gapped bulk state
  • Chiral edge states (no backscattering)
  • Low energy effective theory TFT: Chern-Simons

Jµ = xy✏µνρ@νAρ J0 e = ν e 2π B = ν B φ0 ν = N NΦ σxy = ν e2 2π Ji = xy✏ijEj Jµ = e 2⇡ ✏µνρ@νaρ ∂µJµ = 0

Froehlich & Zee, NPB 91; Wen, Adv.Phys. 95,....

ν = 1 k Current cons. LCS = − k 4⇡ ✏µνρaµ@νaρ + e 2⇡ ✏µνρAµ@νaρ

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TFT for FQHE: CS

  • Abelian Hierarchical models aI = (a1, ..., an)

LCS = −KIJ 4⇡ ✏µνρaI

µ@νaJ ρ + e

2⇡ tI✏µνρAµ@νaI

ρ

  • Filling factor
  • Fractional charges
  • Fractional statistics
  • Monodromy: qp aquires phase in a

loop around ν = tT · K−1 · t lqp

I = (l1, .., ln)

ql = 1 2π lT · K−1 · t = me∗ θl = 2π lT · K−1 · l 2π e−

Wen & Zee PRB 92, J. Fröhlich et al JSTAT 97

e− ν = p 2np + 1 = 2 5, 2 3, ...

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CS with boundary

  • Breaking of gauge invariance
  • Requiring full gauge invariance bulk+boundary
  • Local observable locate at the boundary: 1+1D

chiral currents Kač-Moody algebra WZW model


  • 1+1D chiral boson -Luttinger liquid

[a(z), a(z0)] = 2π k δ(z − z0) z = (x + t)/ √ 2 Stot = Sbulk + Sbd δStot = 0 aµ = ∂µφ Sedge = k 2π Z dtdx∂xφ(∂t − ∂x)φ [φ(x), φ(x0)] = iπνsgn(x − x0) χ

Wen Adv Phys. 95, Zee 95 Wen ; Fisher&Kane

Ψl(x) ∝ elT ·K·φ Bosonization

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Theoretical explanations 2

Qeff e ν = 2 5

  • M. Heiblum data from Chung et al PRL 03
  • D. Ferraro, A. B., N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti, PRB10
  • D. Ferraro, A. B., N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti, NJP10

b

20 40 60 1 2 3 4

80

ν =2/5

82mK q=e/5 9mK q=2e/5 Shot Noise, S (10

  • 30A

2/Hz)

Back Scattered Current, IB (pA)

Qeff(T) = " 3T G(tot)

B

✓d2Sexc dV 2 2 3T d3IB dV 3 ◆# 1

2

V →0

⇡  hIBi3 (e2IB) 1

2

V →0

Chung et al PRL 03

Sexc = Qeff(T) coth Qeff(T)V 2T

  • IB(V, T) − 2TGB(T)
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Theoretical explanations 2

  • GB (10−6S)

Sexc (10−30A2/Hz) V (µV)

eeff/e T(mK)

ν = 5/2

  • M. Carrega, D. Ferraro, A. B., N. Magnoli,
  • M. Sassetti, PRL 107, 146404 (2011)

Non-Abelian theory + 6=

Data from M. Dolev and M.Heiblum

Valid also for Abelian Non-Abelian Ψ(2)

I

Ψ(1)

σ

Ψ(1)

σ

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Resolving m-qp scalings?

Ssym(ω, ω0) Ssym(ω, ω0)

a) b)

ν = 2 5 ν = 2 3

Ssym

S(m)

sym(ω, ω0) ≈ |ω − ω0|4∆(m)

ν

−1

Chamon, Freed & Wen PRB95,PRB96

  • Josephson resonances
  • Peaks ( ) or dips ( )
  • Thermal effect spoil the signatures

ω ≈ mω0

∆(m)

ν

> 1/4 ∆(m)

ν

< 1/4

T = 0.1, 5, 15, 30[mK] e∗ = e 5 e∗ = e 3

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Is enough?

  • Single-qp and multiple-qp crossover
  • D. Ferraro, A. B, M. Merlo, N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti PRL 08
  • D. Ferraro, A. B., N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti, NJP10
  • D. Ferraro, A. B., N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti, PRB10
  • M. Carrega, D. Ferraro, A. B., N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti PRL11
  • M. Carrega, D. Ferraro, A. B., N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti, NJP12
  • A. B., D. Ferraro, M. Carrega, N. Magnoli, M. Sassetti NJP12
  • GB (10−6S)

Sexc (10−30A2/Hz) V (µV)

2e∗ e∗

∆m ˜ ∆m Good agreement with many observations, simple & coherent explanations Theorist Exp ?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Some properties of QPC-LC

  • Detail balance
  • QPC absorption
  • Diff, conductance
  • Detector quantum limit
  • Absorbitive QPC limit (Emissive detector)
  • Is it measurable?
  • Lowest order in the tunnelling (purely additive)

S(m)

+

(ω) = e−~ω/kBT S(m)

+

(−ω)

S(m)

+

(ω) S(m)

(ω) = ω <e h G(m)

ac (ω)

i

G(m)

ac (ω) =

Z dteiωt 1 ω h[δI(m)

B

(t), δI(m)

B

(0)]i

kBTc ⌧ ω S(m)

meas(ω) ≈ KS(m) +

(ω) + O(e−~ω/kBTc)

S(m)

meas(ω) ⇡ K

n S(m)

+

(ω) kBTc<e h G(m)

ac (ω)

io

kBTc ω Sex(ω, ω0) = Smeas(ω, ω0) − Smeas(ω, ω0 = 0) ω0 = e∗V/~

|tm|2

Ssym(ω) = X

m

S(m)

sym(ω)

Smeas(ω) = X

m

S(m)

meas(ω)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

A Fermi-golden rule result

  • Standard Keldysh formalism blow up in Fermi’s rule
  • Tunnelling rate
  • Green functions
  • Non-sym Noise
  • Symmetrized noise
  • Differential conductance (diss.)

Γ(m)(E) = |tm|2 Z +∞

−∞

dτ eiEtG<

m,−(−t)G> m,+(t)

G>

m,±(t) = hΨ(m) ν,±(t)Ψ(m)† ν,± (0)i

S(m)

+

(ω, ω0) = (me∗)2 2 h Γ(m) (−ω + mω0) + Γ(m) (−ω − mω0) i

S(m)

sym(ω, ω0) = (me∗)2

2 X

j,k=±

Γ(m) (jω + kmω0)

<e h G(m)

ac (ω)

i = (me∗)2 2ω X

j,k=±

jΓ(m) (jω + kmω0)