Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Investor Update Conference Call - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Investor Update Conference Call - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Investor Update Conference Call February 10, 2017 Safe Harbor Statement Forward-Looking Statements The information contained in this presentation includes certain estimates, projections and other
2
Forward-Looking Statements The information contained in this presentation includes certain estimates, projections and other forward-looking information that reflect Calpine’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These estimates, projections and other forward-looking information are based on assumptions that Calpine believes, as of the date hereof, are reasonable. Inevitably, there will be differences between such estimates and actual results, and those differences may be material. There can be no assurance that any estimates, projections or forward-looking information will be realized. All such estimates, projections and forward-looking information speak only as of the date hereof. Calpine undertakes no duty to update or revise the information contained herein other than as required by law. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the estimates, projections and other forward-looking information in this presentation as they are based on current expectations and general assumptions and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those set forth in Calpine’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, and in other documents that Calpine files with the SEC. Many of these risks, uncertainties and
- ther factors are beyond Calpine’s control and may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs
and estimates expressed herein. Calpine’s reports and other information filed with the SEC, including the risk factors identified in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and on Calpine’s website at www.calpine.com. Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP Financial Information The following presentation includes certain “non-GAAP financial measures” as defined in Regulation G under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Schedules are included herein that reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures included in the following presentation to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Safe Harbor Statement
Agenda
3
- Welcome and Safe Harbor
Bryan Kimzey
Vice President, Investor Relations
- CEO Review
Thad Hill
President, Chief Executive Officer
- Operations Review
Trey Griggs
EVP and President, Calpine Retail
- Financial Review
Zamir Rauf
EVP, Chief Financial Officer
- Q&A
$564 $677 $830 $842 $736 $710 - $860 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E $1,749 $1,830 $1,949 $1,976 $1,815 $1,800 - $1,950 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E
Continuing Our Solid, Stable Track Record
Consistently Delivering
Adjusted EBITDA1 Adjusted Free Cash Flow1
Recent Achievements
- Executing on strategic priorities
Wholesale Power Operations — Record safety performance: Lowest-ever TRIR of 0.55 — TX merchant plants with full-year capacity factors >65%: Bosque, Freestone, Pasadena2 Retail Acquisitions — Completed framework of retail platform: Closed on accretive acquisition of Calpine Energy Solutions3 — Acquired North American Power, representing a low-multiple bolt-on to our residential retail footprint
- Continuing to optimize portfolio
— Closed on sale of Osprey Energy Center — Closed on sale of Mankato Power Plant
- Proactively and responsibly managing balance sheet
— Accelerating delevering: $2.7B by 2019 — Reducing interest expense — Extending maturities — Increasing revolver capacity
Reaffirming 2017 guidance Reaffirming 2017 guidance
4
1 A non-GAAP financial measure. Reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow to Net Income (Loss), the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, are included in the appendix. 2 Pasadena unit 2 (non-cogen). 3 Formerly Noble Americas Energy Solutions; now also referred to as “Solutions.”
($ millions)
CEO Outlook
5
Power Markets
Texas: “Something’s gotta give” + Load growth continues + No new fossil after 2017 — More renewables coming, but growth may slow East: “Location, location, location” + Opportunity for EMAAC to separate? — Backwardated forward energy curve California: “Physics will prevail” — Energy markets challenged by renewables + Significant recent and potential future retirements + Clear affirmation of federal jurisdiction over state + New FERC commissioners — Nuclear interference in competitive markets and some state RPS, but… + …Commitment from RTOs to preserve market philosophy
Clean, Flexible Wholesale Fleet
- Efficient natural gas-fired power plants capable
- f meeting ramping needs of evolving
power grids
- Nation’s largest operator of combined heat and
power resources and renewable geothermal resources
- Dedication to best-in-class operations and
maintenance preserves competitive advantage
Expanded Customer Channels
- Consistent wholesale origination efforts to meet
customer needs under contracts
- Retail platform now complete
‒ Residential ‒ Indirect C&I ‒ Direct C&I
- Customer focus provides opportunity for stable
(and increased) Adj. EBITDA
Gov/Reg Environment
Calpine’s position in evolving power industry creates compelling value opportunity Calpine’s position in evolving power industry creates compelling value opportunity
Integrated platform
DELIVER SOLID, STABLE CASH FLOWS DELIVER SOLID, STABLE CASH FLOWS DELIVER SOLID, STABLE CASH FLOWS
2017 Objectives
6
EXECUTE ON DELEVERING PLAN
- Commitment to delever
- Accelerate debt paydown: $2.7B committed or planned over next
three years
- Reduce leverage by ~1.5x by FYE 20192
- Philosophy: Delevering creates equity value
SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE EXPANDED RETAIL PLATFORM SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE EXPANDED RETAIL PLATFORM SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE EXPANDED RETAIL PLATFORM
Maintain excellent safety performance Achieve FOF <2.5% Complete York 2 Pay off ~$850M1 of debt Complete annual portfolio review Deliver on Adj. EBITDA guidance of $1,800 - $1,950 M
Wholesale Fleet Wholesale Origination Enterprise + Hedging Systems Solutions Management
Direct C&I
Champion Management
Broker C&I NE Residential (NAP) TX Residential TX GLO
1 Includes repayment of Solutions bridge loan, scheduled amortization, repurchase of lessor interest in Pasadena lease and call of remaining 2023 notes (funded by ~$53 million in cash on hand and a $400 million term
loan due 2019). Amount excludes call premium of ~$18 million. 2 At midpoint of 2017 Adjusted EBITDA guidance range.
~$15.7 B ~$15.7 B Current Post-Paydown, Same Multiple Debt Equity
- $2.7B of debt paydown equates to ~$7.50/share4 of equity value at current multiple
- Plan not dependent upon any proceeds from asset sales
- Once executed, leaves no further corporate maturities until 2023
$925 $550 $453 $750 ~$2,700
2017 - 2019: Scheduled Debt Paydown 2017: Repay Solutions Bridge 2017: Call Remaining 2023 Notes 2019: Call 2022 Notes Total Planned Debt Paydown (2017 - 2019)
7
Commitment to Delevering
Delevering Accretes Value to Equity
($ millions)
1 Includes scheduled amortization, repurchase of lessor interest in Pasadena lease, and assumption of CPN exercise of OMEC put and the associated retirement of OMEC debt. 2 To be partially financed with $400 million term loan due 2019, which we plan to repay in 2018. Amount shown does not include call premium of ~$18 million. 3 Based upon closing stock price as of 02/09/17. 4 Reflects impacts of $2.7B of debt paydown, assuming constant Adj. EBITDA, multiple and share count.
Accelerating Debt Paydown
~67% of current market cap3 ~67% of current market cap3
1
Enterprise Value3
2
+$7.50/ share
4
8
OPERATIONS REVIEW
2.7 0.7 2.2 1.7 2.1 1.3 0.2 2.8 2.1 2.1 West - Gas West - Geo Texas East CPN
2015 2016
29,277 5,559 49,377 30,751 20,702 5,554 47,877 35,434 West - Gas West - Geo Texas East 2015 2016 Portfolio Changes
0.75 0.55
3-Yr. Avg. 2016
Focused on Best-in-Class Operations
9
1 As compared to our SEC filings, generation shown here includes net interest in generation from our unconsolidated power plants and plants owned but not operated by us. 2 According to EEI Safety Survey (2015). 3 2016 data for West-Gas and CPN shown excluding Sutter (where operations have been suspended) and South Point (pending sale). 4 Including the impacts of the wildfire, 2016 FOF for the Geysers was 7.4 and for the CPN fleet was 2.3; 2015 FOF for the Geysers was 7.6 and for the CPN fleet was 2.3.
Generation in Key Markets (000 MWh)1 Employee Total Reportable Incident Rate Forced Outage Factor (FOF, %)
EEI Top Quartile2 *Geysers includes: Big Geysers, Calistoga, Cobb Creek, Eagle Rock, Lake View, Ridge Line, Sonoma, Sulphur Springs. **Mid Atlantic Peakers includes: Christiana, Crisfield, Delaware City, Tasley.
3 3,4 3
Granite Ridge Garrison Key YoY Drivers: Return to normal hydro Sutter/South Point
4
Agnews Gilroy Peakers Pine Bluff Baytown Hermiston Riverview Bethlehem King City Cogen RockGen Bosque King City Peaker Russell City Corpus Christi Lambie Westbrook Deer Park Los Esteros Wolfskill Delta Metcalf York Edge Moor Mid-Atlantic Peakers** Yuba City Freestone Morgan Zion Geysers* Pastoria
Plants with no recordable injuries and < 2 % FOF for 2016
Without wildfire Without wildfire
Record Low Reversal of coal/gas switching
$0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125% 0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Economic Reserve Margin (Before Retirements) Renewable % contribution to Economic Reserve Margin
10
2017 Market Overview
1 OTC: Once-through cooling. 2 Source: PIRA, 2016 weather normalized. 3 ELCC: Effective Load Carrying Capacity. 4 Economic Reserve Margin is calculated using the same capacity and load assumptions in the ERCOT CDR Reserve Margins, less new fossil resources built after 2017 and less resources that price at the cap
(reserves, emergency response, load management). Renewable contribution to Economic Reserve Margin reflects ELCC of renewable resources per CDR.
Generation DR
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 Offered Only Base / Cleared Base (2019/20 Auction)
- Est. Winter Capacity
Available for Seasonal CP Pairing Base Capacity At-Risk
East Texas
New England Auction Results PJM Transition to 100% CP puts “Base Only” Resources at Risk
EMAAC MW
New ERCOT Load Growth Assumptions More Closely Reflect the Market… …Yet Supply Assumptions Remain Disconnected
Economic Reserve Margin Renewable Contribution to Economic Reserve Margin ~8% of Cleared EMAAC Capacity in 2019/20 Auction Cleared $/kW-month (Rest of Pool) Source: ERCOT, Calpine. Source: ERCOT, Calpine. Source: PJM, PJM Market Monitor, Calpine.
4 4 4
Load Growth Relative to 2016 Peak (MW)
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Dec 2015 CDR Dec 2016 CDR
4
Source: ISO-NE.
California
- Competitive + environmental issues affecting
resource viability — Bankrupt system resources — OTC retirements1: ~9GW of gas-fired by 2020; Diablo Canyon (2.2 GW) by 2024
- Load growth still positive2, despite increased
behind-the-meter solar & energy efficiency
- Energy storage unable to provide same level of
reliability as dispatchable generation
- Pending reduction in solar ELCC3 will decrease
Resource Adequacy contribution
Increasing Value of Local Resource Adequacy Calpine Assets Critical to Bay Area Reliability
Metcalf Los Esteros Agnews Gilroy Russell City Wolfskill Creed Goose Haven Lambie Los Medanos Delta Riverview
SAN FRANCISCO
Calpine Local Reliability plant Calpine System Reliability plant
TRANSBAY CABLE
40 123 145 (23) (105) (130)
($200) ($100) $0 $100 $200
Bal-2017 2018 2019
Heat Rate +500 btu/KWh Heat Rate -500 btu/KWh
116 271 336 (142) (288) (330)
($400) ($300) ($200) ($100) $0 $100 $200 $300 $400
Bal-2017 2018 2019
Natural Gas +$1/mmbtu Natural Gas -$1/mmbtu 87% 41% 24% 13% 59% 76%
Bal-2017 2018 2019 Hedged Wholesale Volume Open Wholesale Volume
Updating Modeling Tips & Hedge Disclosures to Incorporate Expanded Retail Platform
11
Wholesale Energy Hedge Profile2
Use in conjunction with modeling tips in appendix
1 Wholesale Energy Margin + Wholesale Regulatory & Other Margin = Wholesale Margin + Retail Margin = Total Commodity Margin. 2 Spark spread in NP-15, ERCOT and NEPOOL based upon 7,000 btu/kWh production heat
rate and in PJM-W based upon 8,000 btu/kWh production heat rate. NP-15 adjusted to deduct cost of carbon cap-and-trade, without which, spark spreads would have been $9.94, $12.24 and $13.39, respectively. NEPOOL adjusted to deduct cost of RGGI, without which, sparks spreads would have been $14.05, $15.61 and $15.55, respectively. 3 Estimated as of 1/27/17. Excludes immaterial proprietary positions. Hedged margin excludes unconsolidated projects and includes the current mark-to-market adjustments of all executed transactions. Changing market heat rates will change delta volumes and gas price exposures. Sensitivities are assumed to occur across the portfolio and the sensitivities on strategic options only capture intrinsic value. 4 Volumes are on a delta hedge basis. Delta volumes are the expected volume based on the probability of economic dispatch at a future date based on current market prices for that future date. This is lower than the notional volume, which is plant capacity, less known performance and operating constraints. In addition to planned upgrades, volumes assume addition of York 2, sales of Osprey and South Point and retirement of Clear Lake (2017) and addition of our net interest in Guadalupe Peaking Energy Center (2019). 5 Represents Calpine’s forecasted average annual capacity of net ownership interest with peaking capacity, excluding equity plants. Capacity additions/deletions are reflected in anticipated month of completion.
$ Wholesale Energy Margin1,3 as % of Wholesale Margin (by year):
71% 67% 69%
Comparable hedge level, 3Q16 Call
4 4
Volume estimates (MM MWh): ~90 ~95
2017 2018 2019 Hedged Wholesale Margin ($/MWh)3 $19 $25 $33
- Avg. MW in
Operation3,5
(excl. unconsol.)
25,175 25,737 25,883
Change to Commodity Margin ($M)
Natural Gas Price Sensitivity3
(assuming no change in heat rate)
Market Heat Rate Sensitivity3
(assuming no change in gas price) Change to Commodity Margin ($M)
Sensitivities Updated Methodology: Standalone Treatment of Retail Margin1
2017 2018 2019 NP-15 $4.89 $7.07 $8.07 ERCOT $15.18 $13.85 $13.21 PJM-W $14.98 $14.74 $14.47 NEPOOL $12.48 $14.02 $13.92 Nat Gas (HH) $3.46 $3.12 $2.88
On-Peak Spark Spread2
Changes / Implications:
- Margin from Champion Energy now included in
standalone Retail Margin — Modest changes to Wholesale Energy Margin as % of Wholesale Margin and Hedged Wholesale Margin ($/MWh) for 2017, 2018 — Update to premium ranges in modeling tips to reflect (i) reclassification of unsold retail into Retail Margin and (ii) portfolio changes
- Separate addition of Retail Margin,
including Solutions and Champion/NAP
- Note: 2017 wholesale volume estimates reflect
lower forward spark spreads, including those driven by hydro in West
Wholesale Energy Margin + Wholesale Regulatory & Other Margin Wholesale Margin + Retail Margin (2017E: $375M - $425M) Total Commodity Margin
Local National Residential C&I Broker C&I Direct C&I Consultative Small Businesses
Champion Champion Solutions
Product Customization
High Low
Geographic Scope
North American Power
Strategically Complete Retail Platform
Three Customer Channels
- ~1,500 customers
- 90%+ retention rate
Direct, Large C&I Direct, Large C&I Indirect, Small C&I + State of Texas Agency Business Indirect, Small C&I + State of Texas Agency Business Residential Mass Markets Residential Mass Markets
- ~20,000 customers
- ~75% retention rate
- ~350,000 customers
- ~65% retention rate
Retail Presence Retail Office Wholesale Power Plant1
West
Retail load: ~8 MM MWh Generation: ~26 MM MWh
Central
Retail load: ~20 MM MWh Generation: ~48 MM MWh
East
Retail load: ~37 MM MWh Generation: ~36 MM MWh
Full Spectrum of Retail Service Offerings Geographic Diversity Complements Wholesale Fleet
Figures reflect 2016 MWh.
1 Map reflects pending sale of South Point.
12
13
FINANCIAL REVIEW
$1,976 $1,815 2015 2016 2017E $842 $736 $710 - $860 2015 2016 2017E
2016 in Review
14
($ millions)
Meeting 2016 Guidance while Overcoming Challenges… …And Holding Steady in 2017
Adjusted EBITDA1 Adjusted Free Cash Flow1
1 A non-GAAP financial measure. Reconciliations of Adj. EBITDA to Net Income (Loss), the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, are included in the appendix.
- Portfolio changes: Full year of operation at Garrison,
11 months of operation at Granite Ridge, sale of Mankato
- Higher contribution from retail hedging
- Strong cost performance
- Lower generation volumes
‒ Texas: Reversal of coal-to-gas switching ‒ California: Return to normal hydro
- Weak spark-spreads across markets
- Delevering plan under way
- Deliver solid, stable cash flows
- Successfully integrate expanded retail platform
$1,800 - $1,950
$390 $357 $44 $(15) $(10) $(52)
4Q15 Adj. EBITDA Geysers Wildfire Regulatory Capacity Payments Contracts Market/ Hedges/ Costs 4Q16 Adj. EBITDA
$150 $107 4Q15 4Q16 $84 $86 4Q15 4Q16 $156 $164 4Q15 4Q16
6,707 7,668
4Q15 4Q16
11,969 9,749
4Q15 4Q16
9,036 6,460
4Q15 4Q16
Regional Adjusted EBITDA1: 4Q 2016 vs. 2015
15
($ millions, 000 MWh)
West Region Texas Region East Region
Adjusted EBITDA1,3 Adjusted EBITDA1 Adjusted EBITDA1 Generation2 Generation2 Generation2
- Lower plant operating expense4 primarily due to 2015 Geysers wildfire
- Lower Commodity Margin1
— Lower contribution from wholesale hedging activity — Expiration of a PPA and resource adequacy contract at Pastoria Higher contribution from retail hedging activity (Solutions)
1 A non-GAAP financial measure. Reconciliations of Commodity Margin to Income from Operations and of Adj. EBITDA to Net Income (Loss), the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, are included in the appendix. 2 As compared to our SEC filings, generation shown here includes net interest in generation from unconsolidated projects and plants owned but not operated by us. 2016 data for West excludes Sutter (where
- perations are suspended) and South Point (pending sale).
3 South Point excluded from all 2016 results. 4 Increase in plant operating expense excludes changes in major maintenance expense, stock-based compensation expense, non-cash loss on disposition of assets and other costs.
- Lower plant operating expense4 and SG&A
- Lower Commodity Margin1
— Lower contribution from wholesale hedges — Lower realized spark spreads + Higher contribution from retail hedging activity (Solutions)
- Lower Commodity Margin1
— Lower contribution from wholesale and environmental hedges — Lower regulatory capacity revenue in PJM — Sale of Mankato (Oct 2016) Acquisition of Granite Ridge (Feb 2016) Higher contribution from retail hedging activity (Solutions)
Adjusted EBITDA1 Drivers
1 1,3
$636 $839 $2,908 $2,859 $1,140 $1,550 $625 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Senior Unsecured Notes Project Debt CCFC TL Senior Secured Notes Senior Secured Term Loans $839 $666 $2,286 $2,604 $1,683 $625 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Senior Unsecured Notes Project Debt CCFC TL Senior Secured Notes Senior Secured Term Loans
Strategic Balance Sheet Management Activities Benefiting Capital Structure
16
($ millions)
1 At midpoint of 2017 Adjusted EBITDA guidance range. 2 The proforma debt maturity schedule shown here is projected for year end 2019 and is not prepared on a
U.S. GAAP basis and does not conform to the debt maturity schedule presented in Calpine’s Form 10-K. (Refer to the Form 10-K for further information regarding U.S. GAAP-basis debt maturities). Assumptions used in debt maturity charts shown here are as follows: (i) excludes letter of credit facilities; (ii) maturity balances assume cash sweeps; and (iii) all other debt maturities are paid from operating cash flows at the project level. Assumes paydown of $550M Solutions bridge loan in 2017 and $400M 2019 Term Loan in 2018, the planned call of the $750M 2022 Senior Secured Notes in 2019, and the retirement of the OMEC project debt in 2019 with the proceeds from the put/call option at the end of the PPA. Put price in the OMEC PPA approximates the projected debt balance. Remaining project debt in 2025 is the balance of Steamboat ($133M).
Maturities2
3Q16 Debt Maturities & Recent Actions
Recent and Future Balance Sheet Activities Have Allowed Us To…
Increase revolver capacity to ~$1.8B Decrease interest expense Extend maturities Increase secured debt capacity Increase financial flexibility Reduce leverage by ~1.5x by 20191
Maturities2
Pro Forma YE2019 Debt Maturities & Planned Actions
Aggressively Paying Down $2.7B of Debt by 2019
Refinanced and extended Steamboat facility to 2025 Extended 2022 Term Loan to 2024 + Repriced 2023 Term Loan (-25 bps) $550M Solutions bridge loan Plan to paydown $400M 2019 TL in late ‘18 Plan to call $750M in late ‘19 $280M OMEC project debt to be repaid after put/call exercise Paying off 2023 Notes with $53M cash on hand and $400M 2019 Term Loan
$25 $50 $90 $150 2017 2018 2019 2020
Delevering and Strengthening the Balance Sheet
17
$200 $200 $200 $53 $46 $550 $280 $750 $400 ~$850 $600 $1,230 2017 2018 2019 Amortization 2023 Notes Pasadena Solutions Bridge OMEC 2022 Notes 2019 Term Loan Call in late 2019
Increasing Annual Interest Savings from Repayments and Strategic Refinancings Planned Paydown of $2.7B of debt by 2019
1 Includes savings from scheduled amortizations. 2017 interest savings reflects year-over-year benefit previously disclosed in 2017 guidance, as well as $15M of savings from recently announced refinancings.
All savings reflect LIBOR curve as of 01/11/2017. 2 At midpoint of 2017 Adjusted EBITDA guidance range. 3 Cumulative savings from 2017-2020.
Pay down 2019 Term Loan in late 2018
Planned paydown will reduce leverage by ~1.5x2 and cumulatively save more than $300M in interest expense3 Planned paydown will reduce leverage by ~1.5x2 and cumulatively save more than $300M in interest expense3
18
APPENDIX
4Q16 4Q15 4Q16 4Q15 Total MWh Generated (in thousands) 1,2 23,877 27,712 Average Capacity Factor, excl. Peakers 44.4% 53.4% West 6,460 9,036 West 42.1% 59.0% Texas 9,749 11,969 Texas 46.0% 57.0% East 7,668 6,707 East 44.4% 42.7% Average Availability 2 89.3% 84.6% Steam Adjusted Heat Rate (Btu/KWh) 2 7,386 7,293 West 93.2% 88.2% West 7,279 7,313 Texas 89.0% 84.9% Texas 7,263 7,071 East 87.0% 81.5% East 7,626 7,673 2016 2015 2016 2015 Total MWh Generated (in thousands) 1,2 109,567 114,964 Average Capacity Factor, excl. Peakers 51.2% 55.6% West 26,256 34,836 West 43.2% 56.8% Texas 47,877 49,377 Texas 57.8% 59.5% East 35,434 30,751 East 50.4% 48.8% Average Availability 2 90.5% 89.2% Steam Adjusted Heat Rate (Btu/KWh) 2 7,324 7,306 West 92.0% 89.2% West 7,277 7,320 Texas 90.3% 89.4% Texas 7,143 7,089 East 89.7% 89.0% East 7,617 7,663
1 Generation has been adjusted to include net interest in generation from our unconsolidated power plants and plants owned but not operated by us. 2 Generation, average availability and steam adjusted heat rate excludes power plants and units that are inactive.
Selected Operating Statistics
19
30,751 35,434 2015 2016 34,836 26,256 2015 2016 $760 $737 2015 2016 $481 $409 2015 2016 $735 $669 2015 2016 49,377 47,877 2015 2016
Regional Adjusted EBITDA1: 2016 vs. 2015
20
($ millions, 000 MWh)
West Region Texas Region East Region
Adjusted EBITDA1,3 Adjusted EBITDA1 Adjusted EBITDA1 Generation2 Generation2 Generation2
- Lower Commodity Margin1
— Lower contribution from wholesale hedges — Expiration of a PPA and resource adequacy contract at Pastoria — Expiration of Greenleaf operating lease + Gas transportation billing credit in 2Q16
1 A non-GAAP financial measure. Reconciliations of Commodity Margin to Income from Operations and of Adj. EBITDA to Net Income (Loss), the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, are included in the appendix. 2 As compared to our SEC filings, generation shown here includes net interest in generation from unconsolidated projects and plants owned but not operated by us. 2016 data for West excludes Sutter (where
- perations are suspended) and South Point (pending sale).
3 South Point excluded from all 2016 results. 4 Increase in plant operating expense excludes changes in major maintenance expense, stock-based compensation expense, non-cash loss on disposition of assets and other costs.
- Lower Commodity Margin1
— Lower contribution from hedges — Lower realized spark spreads + Higher contribution from retail hedging activity
- Higher plant operating expense4, primarily due to Granite Ridge
- Higher Commodity Margin1
+ Portfolio changes: Acquisition of Granite Ridge (Feb 2016), COD at Garrison (Jun 2015) + New PPA at Morgan (starting Feb 2016) + Higher contribution from retail hedging activity — Lower contribution from wholesale hedges — Lower regulatory capacity revenue in PJM
Adjusted EBITDA1,3 Drivers
1 1,3
$1,976 $1,815 $50 $40 $35 $(35) $(35) $(216)
2015 Adj. EBITDA Geysers Wildfire Gas Transport Credit Portfolio Changes, net Regulatory Capacity Payments Contracts Market/ Hedges/ Costs 2016 Adj. EBITDA
Although Calpine’s fleet can be difficult to model, simplifying techniques may help
- 1. Estimate annual generation (MWh) based on market outlook relative to disclosed
historical generation with adjustments for asset acquisitions, asset divestitures and plants reaching commercial operations as well as changes in gas and coal price environments.
- Note: Estimated generation in this step should exclude volumes from
unconsolidated investments (Greenfield, Whitby). Margin from these plants is captured in step 7 below.
- 2. Estimate hedged wholesale energy margin based on disclosed % hedged (blue bars)
and disclosed hedge margin ($/MWh).
- Note: 2017 hedged wholesale margin ($/MWh) is full year average including
YTD settlements. 2017 hedge profile is for balance of year only (applicable for steps 3 and 4 as well).
- 3. Estimate Geysers unhedged wholesale energy margin using MWh estimate
(historically, ~6 million MWh), assuming that the Geysers unhedged % is the same as the entire portfolio in 2017 and ~50% in 2018 - 2019. Apply NP-15 ATC prices.
- 4. Estimate gas fleet unhedged wholesale energy margin based on rough assumptions:
- Dispatched generation tends to capture a premium to the block on-peak spark
spread for open volume. This premium varies significantly with, and is inversely related to, dispatch volumes. For 2017, this relationship is captured within our guidance. For years past 2017, depending upon your volume assumption in step 1 above, use the following rules of thumb for applying the premium:
- For this exercise, hedge profile is assumed to be relatively flat across all
regions, and disclosed regional steam adjusted plant heat rates should be considered when calculating spark spreads.
Note: Tips are provided to help investors consider simplifying techniques to apply the information disclosed to date in their modeling efforts. These tips are naturally less precise than models based on detailed operational, contract, and hedge position data might be.
1 Updated to reflect (i) reclassification of unsold retail into Retail Margin (step 7) and (ii) portfolio changes. 2 Excluding major maintenance expense, non-cash loss on disposal of assets, and stock-based compensation. 3 Excluding stock-based compensation.
21
- 5. Adjust wholesale energy margin to capture items such as ancillary services and
storage positions (benefit of small tens of millions), as well as environmental allowance costs in California (AB32) and in states that participate in RGGI.
- To consider Calpine's AB32 costs, apply our combined-cycle average
emissions rate of 860 lb/MWh for the California combined-cycle plants and assume that ~25% of those costs are passed on to our customers per contractual arrangements. Note: This step is only required if the on-peak spark spread used in step 4 has not been adjusted to capture carbon cost in California.
- To consider Calpine’s RGGI costs, apply our combined-cycle average
emissions rate of 860 lb/MWh for our power plants in ME, MA, NH, NY, and DE and assume that we retain 100% of these costs. Note: This step is only required if the on-peak spark spread used in step 4 has not been adjusted to capture RGGI credit cost for affected plants. 6. The sum of steps 2 through 5 above will provide you with an estimate of our Wholesale Energy Margin. To estimate the contribution of Wholesale Reliability and Other Margin (regulatory capacity and REC revenue) and arrive at an estimate of total Wholesale Margin, simply divide the Wholesale Energy Margin by the disclosed percentages of Wholesale Energy Margin as a % of total Wholesale Margin. 7. Add estimated Retail Margin for all periods to arrive at total Commodity
- Margin. (For 2017, Retail Margin is estimated at $375 million - $425 million.)
8. Add estimated margin from unconsolidated investments (Greenfield, Whitby) by multiplying Calpine capacity (net interest) by $110/kw-yr in all periods shown.
- Since these margins from unconsolidated investments are not included in
Commodity Margin, but are included in Adjusted EBITDA, it is necessary to additionally estimate expenses related to unconsolidated investments for purposes of calculating Adjusted EBITDA. 9. When modeling operating costs for the consolidated power plants and retail entities, use 2016 reported plant operating expense2 and sales, general and administrative expense3 and other operating expense and apply an inflationary factor for 2017 and subsequent periods, with adjustments for asset/retail acquisitions, asset divestitures and plants reaching commercial operations.
- To capture the impact of net portfolio changes on total costs from 2016 to
2017, add ~$130 million to total costs2,3 in 2017 as compared to 2016, primarily to account for Solutions and NAP retail acquisitions. Volume Projection (excl. unconsolidated) (MM MWh)1 Recommended Premium to On-Peak Spark Spread <90 10% - 20% 90 – 100 0% - 10% 100 – 110… (10)% - 0%
22
Capital Structure Chart
Total Debt: $ 12,179 Add: Net Debt from Unconsolidated Projects3 105 Add: Debt Issuance Costs4 154 Net Debt $ 11,713
All balances as of 12/31/16.
1 In 4Q15, we entered into an agreement with one of the two lessors of our Pasadena Power Plant to purchase their 50% interest. The transaction is expected to close during 1Q17. 2 Equal to minority interest in debt associated with Russell City Energy Center, excluding debt issuance costs. 3 Equal to our net interest in total debt, less cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash from unconsolidated subsidiaries as disclosed in 10-K. 4 Reported as a component of Other Assets prior to 1/1/16.
($ in millions)
$8,867
Corporate Revolver First Lien Term Loans Senior Secured Notes
Total Corporate Debt Corporate Debt
$2,290 $3,165
Projects
- Steamboat
− Freeport − Morgan
- Bethpage
- Otay Mesa
- Pasadena1
- Russell City
- Los Esteros
Projects
- Hidalgo
- King City
- Stony Brook
- Other
Projects
- Brazos Valley
- Magic Valley
- Bosque
- Hermiston
- Osprey
- Westbrook
- Guadalupe
Project Debt $1,583 CCFC $1,553 Capital Lease Obligations & Other $176
— Less: 25% Russell City Debt2 (119)
Unsecured Notes $3,412
Less: Cash, Cash Equivalents & Restr. Cash (606)
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Federal State Foreign
Calpine1 Continues to Benefit from Federal NOL Positions
1 Includes CCFC.
23
- Federal NOLs at Dec. 31, 2016: $6.7 billion
— All are unrestricted
NOL Summary State NOL Overview Managing NOL Expiration
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 0 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 Over 20 Federal NOLs Years Until Expiration No Current Operations 15% West 45% East 40%
24
National Generation Portfolio of Approximately 26,000 MW
Geographic Diversity Dispatch Technology
As of 2/10/2017
Technology Load Type Location COD With Peaking Capacity CPN Interest With Peaking Capacity, Net West Region Agnews Power Plant Natural Gas Intermediate CA 1990 28 100% 28 Creed Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2003 47 100% 47 Delta Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2002 857 100% 857 Feather River Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2002 47 100% 47 Geysers (13 plants) Geothermal Baseload CA 1971 - 1989 725 100% 725 Gilroy Cogeneration Plant* Natural Gas Intermediate CA 1988 130 100% 130 Gilroy Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2002 141 100% 141 Goose Haven Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2003 47 100% 47 Hermiston Power Project Natural Gas Intermediate OR 2002 635 100% 635 King City Cogeneration Plant* Natural Gas Intermediate CA 1989 120 100% 120 King City Peaking Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2002 44 100% 44 Lambie Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2003 47 100% 47 Los Esteros Critical Energy Facility Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2013 309 100% 309 Los Medanos Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2001 572 100% 572 Metcalf Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2005 605 100% 605 Otay Mesa Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2009 608 100% 608 Pastoria Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2005 749 100% 749 Riverview Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2003 47 100% 47 Russell City Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2013 619 75% 464 South Point Energy Center (1) Natural Gas Intermediate AZ 2001 530 100% 530 Sutter Energy Center (2) Natural Gas Intermediate CA 2001 578 100% 578 Wolfskill Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2003 48 100% 48 Yuba City Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking CA 2002 47 100% 47 Total - West Region 7,425 Texas Region Baytown Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2002 842 100% 842 Bosque Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2000/2011 762 100% 762 Brazos Valley Power Plant Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2003 609 100% 609 Channel Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2001 808 100% 808 Corpus Christi Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2002 500 100% 500 Deer Park Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2003 1,204 100% 1,204 Freeport Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2007 236 100% 236 Freestone Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2002 994 75% 746 Guadalupe Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2001/2011 1,000 100% 1,000 Hidalgo Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2000 476 79% 374 Magic Valley Generation Station Natural Gas Intermediate TX 2002 712 100% 712 Pasadena Power Plant* Natural Gas Intermediate TX 1998 781 100% 781 Texas City Power Plant* Natural Gas Intermediate TX 1987 453 100% 453 Total - Texas Region 9,027
Calpine Operating Power Plants
As of February 10, 2017
25
Technology Load Type Location COD With Peaking Capacity CPN Interest With Peaking Capacity, Net East Region Auburndale Peaking Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking FL 2002 117 100% 117 Bayview Oil Peaking VA 1963 12 100% 12 Bethlehem Natural Gas / Oil Intermediate PA 2003 1,130 100% 1,130 Bethpage Energy Center 3 Natural Gas Intermediate NY 2005 80 100% 80 Bethpage Peaker Natural Gas Peaking NY 2002 48 100% 48 Bethpage Power Plant Natural Gas Intermediate NY 1989 56 100% 56 Cumberland Natural Gas / Oil Peaking NJ 1990/2009 191 100% 191 Edge Moor* Natural Gas / Oil Peaking DE 1965 725 100% 725 Fore River Energy Center Natural Gas / Oil Intermediate MA 2003 731 100% 731 Garrison Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate DE 2015 309 100% 309 Granite Ridge Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate NH 2003 695 100% 695 Greenfield Energy Centre Natural Gas Intermediate Ontario, CA 2008 1,038 50% 519 Hay Road Natural Gas / Oil Intermediate DE 1989 1,130 100% 1,130 Kennedy Int'l Airport Power Plant* Natural Gas Intermediate NY 1995 121 100% 121 Mid-Atlantic Peakers** Natural Gas / Oil Peaking NJ/DE/MD/VA 1965-1991 371 100% 371 Morgan Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate AL 2003 807 100% 807 Pine Bluff Energy Center* Natural Gas Intermediate AR 2001 215 100% 215 RockGen Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking WI 2001 503 100% 503 Stony Brook Power Plant* Natural Gas Intermediate NY 1995 47 100% 47 Vineland Solar Solar Peaking NJ 2009 4 100% 4 Westbrook Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate ME 2001 552 100% 552 Whitby Cogen* Natural Gas Intermediate Ontario, CA 1998 50 50% 25 York Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate PA 2011 565 100% 565 Zion Energy Center Natural Gas Peaking IL 2002 503 100% 503 Total - East Region 9,456 TOTAL - CALPINE 25,908 Projects Under Construction York 2 Energy Center Natural Gas Intermediate PA 2017 (est) 828 100% 828 Projects Under Advanced Development Guadalupe Peaking Energy Center(3) Natural Gas Peaking TX 2017-19 (est) 418 100% 418 * Indicates cogeneration plant ** Includes Carll's Corner, Christiana, Crisfield, Delaware City, Mickleton, Sherman Avenue, Tasley, West.
(3) In accordance with a PPA, a third party will purchase a 50% ownership interest in this power plant upon achieving commercial operation. (1) We have entered into an agreement to sell South Point Energy Center. South Point Unit 2 experienced a combustion turbine outage in the Fall of
2015 and we are currently evaluating the timing of repairs in light of the impending sale. Further, the balance of facility is not currently operating, however, it can be operated at our discretion based on market conditions.
(2) We suspended operations at our Sutter Energy Center to assess the future of the facility.
Calpine Operating Power Plants (cont’d)
As of February 10, 2017
26
27
Reg G Reconciliation: Commodity Margin
Commodity Margin includes our power and steam revenues, sales of purchased power and physical natural gas, capacity revenue, revenue from renewable energy credits, sales of surplus emission allowances, transmission revenue and expenses, fuel and purchased energy expense, fuel transportation expense, environmental compliance expense and realized settlements from our marketing, hedging, optimization and trading activities, but excludes mark-to-market activity and other revenues. We believe that Commodity Margin is a useful tool for assessing the performance of our core operations and is a key operational measure reviewed by our chief operating decision maker. Commodity Margin does not intend to represent income from operations, the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, as an indicator of operating performance and is not necessarily comparable to similarly- titled measures reported by other companies.
($ in millions)
28
Reg G Reconciliation: Commodity Margin (continued)
($ in millions)
Commodity Margin includes our power and steam revenues, sales of purchased power and physical natural gas, capacity revenue, revenue from renewable energy credits, sales of surplus emission allowances, transmission revenue and expenses, fuel and purchased energy expense, fuel transportation expense, environmental compliance expense and realized settlements from our marketing, hedging, optimization and trading activities, but excludes mark-to-market activity and other revenues. We believe that Commodity Margin is a useful tool for assessing the performance of our core operations and is a key operational measure reviewed by our chief operating decision maker. Commodity Margin does not intend to represent income from operations, the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, as an indicator of operating performance and is not necessarily comparable to similarly- titled measures reported by other companies.
Reg G Reconciliation: Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) attributable to Calpine before net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for certain non-cash and non-recurring items as detailed in the following
- reconciliation. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent cash
flows from operations or net income (loss) as defined by U.S. GAAP as an indicator of operating performance and is not necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors and other users of
- ur financial statements in evaluating our operating performance
because it provides them with an additional tool to compare business performance across companies and across periods. We believe that EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items such as interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting methods and book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were
- acquired. Additionally, we believe that investors commonly adjust
EBITDA information to eliminate the effects of restructuring and other expenses, which vary widely from company to company and impair
- comparability. We adjust for these and other items as our
management believes that these items would distort their ability to efficiently view and assess our core operating trends. In summary, our management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of
- perating performance to assist in comparing performance from
period to period on a consistent basis and to readily view operating trends, as a measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations, and in communications with our Board of Directors, shareholders, creditors, analysts and investors concerning our financial performance. Adjusted Free Cash Flow represents net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted, less operating lease payments, major maintenance expense and maintenance capital expenditures, net cash interest, cash taxes, and other adjustments, including non-recurring items. Adjusted Free Cash Flow is a performance measure and is not intended to represent net income (loss), the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, or liquidity and is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
($ in millions, except share amounts)
29
30
Reg G Reconciliation: 2017 Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow Guidance
Major Maintenance and Capital Expenditure Guidance
31
1 Primarily includes expenditures associated with York 2 Energy Center. 2 Excludes acquisitions.
2016 2017E Major maintenance expense $ 257 $ 315 A Maintenance capital expenditures 148 120 B Growth-related capital expenditures1 230 220 Capital expenditures, gross2 $ 378 $ 340
Reconciling to our Guidance Summary: Major maintenance expense and maintenance capital expenditures $405 $435 A + B