Foundations of Chemical Kinetics Lecture 12: Transition-state - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

foundations of chemical kinetics lecture 12 transition
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Foundations of Chemical Kinetics Lecture 12: Transition-state - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Foundations of Chemical Kinetics Lecture 12: Transition-state theory: Examples Marc R. Roussel Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Eyring plot example: Internal rotation of N,N-dimethylnicotinamide O C H 3 N CH 3 N This elementary


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Foundations of Chemical Kinetics Lecture 12: Transition-state theory: Examples

Marc R. Roussel Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Eyring plot example: Internal rotation of N,N-dimethylnicotinamide

O H3 CH3 C N N

This elementary process can be studied by NMR. The following data were obtained: T/◦C 10.0 15.7 21.5 27.5 33.2 38.5 45.7 k/s−1 2.08 4.57 8.24 15.8 28.4 46.1 93.5 We want to calculate the enthalpy, entropy, and free energy of activation.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Eyring plot example: Internal rotation of N,N-dimethylnicotinamide (continued)

For each point, we calculate ln(kh/kBT) and plot this vs T −1:

  • 29
  • 28.5
  • 28
  • 27.5
  • 27
  • 26.5
  • 26
  • 25.5
  • 25
  • 24.5

3.1 3.15 3.2 3.25 3.3 3.35 3.4 3.45 3.5 3.55 ln(kh/kBT) T -1/10-3K-1

Slope = −9185 K Intercept = 3.829

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Example: Eyring plot (continued)

∆‡H◦

m = −R(slope) = −(8.314 472 J K−1mol−1)(−9185 K)

= 76 kJ mol−1 ∆‡S◦

m = R(intercept) = (8.314 472 J K−1mol−1)(3.829)

= 32 J K−1mol−1 ∆‡G ◦

m = ∆‡H◦ m − T ◦∆‡S◦ m

= 76 kJ mol−1 − (298.15 K)(32 × 10−3 kJ K−1mol−1) = 67 kJ mol−1 Interpret ∆‡S◦

  • m. Do the sign and size of this quantity make sense?

What does the reaction profile look like?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Statistical factors

◮ The reaction AB + C → A + BC should, all other things being

equal, be slower than A2 + C → A + AC because in the latter case, C can attack either end of the molecule and a reaction can still occur.

◮ We deal with this in the statistical approach to transition state

theory by adding a statistical factor (L‡) to the rate constant: k = L‡ kBT c◦h Q‡ QX QY N exp

  • −∆E0

RT

  • (second-order reaction)

◮ The statistical factor is the number of distinct, equivalent

transition states that can be formed if we label equivalent atoms in the reactants.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Statistical factors: examples

  • 1. H + D2 → HD + D
  • 2. CH3 + C2H6 → CH4 + C2H5
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Calculation of the rate constant for the reaction D + H2 → HD + H

Data: H2:

◮ R = 0.741 ˚

A

◮ ˜

ν = 4400 cm−1 Transition state:

◮ Linear with RDH = RHH = 0.930 ˚

A

◮ Classical barrier height: 40.2 kJ mol−1 ◮ Vibrational frequencies: ˜

νsym stretch = 1764, ˜ νbend = 870 cm−1 with gbend = 2 To do: Calculate the rate constant at 450 K.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

D + H2 → HD + H (continued)

◮ L‡ = 2 ◮ The factor involving the partition functions can be factored

into terms for each type of motion: Q‡ QD QH2 =

  • Q‡

QD QH2

  • elec
  • Q‡

QD QH2

  • tr

Q‡ QH2

  • rot

Q‡ QH2

  • vib

◮ The first excited states of both D and H2 are very high in

energy, so their partition functions at moderate temperatures are just their respective ground-state degeneracies. The same turns out to be true for the transition state. gelec,H2 = 1, gelec,D = 2, gelec,TS = 2 (one unpaired electron) ∴

  • Q‡

QD QH2

  • elec

= 1

slide-9
SLIDE 9

D + H2 → HD + H (continued)

◮ Recall

Qtr = V h3 (2πmkBT)3/2 ∴

  • Q‡

QD QH2

  • tr

= h3 V

  • mTS

2πkBTmDmH2 3/2

◮ The masses are readily computed: mD = 3.344 × 10−27 kg,

mH2 = 3.347 × 10−27 kg, mTS = mD + mH2 = 6.692 × 10−27 kg.

◮ Putting in all the constants, we get

  • Q‡

QD QH2

  • tr

= 5.513 × 10−31 m3 V

slide-10
SLIDE 10

D + H2 → HD + H (continued)

◮ The vibrational partition function is

Qvib = [1 − exp(−hc˜ ν/kBT)]−1, so Q‡ QH2

  • vib

= 1 − exp(−hc˜ νH2/kBT) [1 − exp(−hc˜ νsym/kBT] [1 − exp(−hc˜ νbend/kBT)]2 .

◮ Putting in all the data, we get

  • Q‡/QH2
  • vib = 1.140.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

D + H2 → HD + H (continued)

◮ For a linear triatomic molecule,

3 1

m m m R2

1 2

R

I = m1m3 m (R1 + R2)2 + m2 m (m1R2

1 + m3R2 2)

with m = m1 + m2 + m3.

◮ For the transition state of this reaction, m1 = mD,

m2 = m3 = mH and R1 = R2 = R‡: ITS = mH m (R‡)2(5mD + mH) = 3.979 × 10−47 kg m2

◮ For a diatomic molecule, I = µR2, which gives

IH2 = 4.595 × 10−48 kg m2.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

D + H2 → HD + H (continued)

◮ The rotational partition function of a linear molecule is

Qrot = 8π2IkBT h2

◮ The rotational term in the transition-state equation is

therefore Q‡ QH2

  • rot

= ITS IH2 = 8.661.

◮ Putting it all together now, we have

Q‡ QD QH2 = (1) 5.513 × 10−31 m3 V

  • (8.661)(1.192)

= 5.693 × 10−30 m3 V

slide-13
SLIDE 13

D + H2 → HD + H (continued)

◮ The zero-point energy of H2 is

1 2hc˜

νH2 = 4.370 × 10−20 J ≡ 26.32 kJ mol−1.

◮ The zero-point energy of the transition state is the sum of the

zero-point energies for each of its vibrational modes added to the height of the barrier: ZPETS = L 2hc (˜ νsym stretch + 2˜ νbend) + Eb = 61.16 kJ mol−1

◮ Therefore

∆E0 = 61.16 − 26.32 kJ mol−1 = 34.84 kJ mol−1

slide-14
SLIDE 14

D + H2 → HD + H (continued)

◮ If we want the rate constant in L mol−1s−1, pick

V = 10−3 m3, N = 6.022 141 29 × 1023, and c◦ = 1 mol L−1.

◮ Plugging everything in, we get

k = 5.6 × 106 L mol−1s−1

◮ The experimental value is

k = 9 × 106 L mol−1s−1

◮ Main source of error: tunneling, which is very significant for

light particles