Form-Based Code Hands-On Workshop 2014 MAP Conference Kaizer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

form based code
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Form-Based Code Hands-On Workshop 2014 MAP Conference Kaizer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Intensive Form-Based Code Hands-On Workshop 2014 MAP Conference Kaizer Rangwala, AICP, Rangwala Associates Mark Wycko ff , FAICP, The Planning & Zoning Center @ MSU Rick Neumann, Richard Neumann Architects Lyne Wells, AICP, Principal +


slide-1
SLIDE 1 Kaizer Rangwala, AICP, Rangwala Associates Mark Wyckoff, FAICP, The Planning & Zoning Center @ MSU Rick Neumann, Richard Neumann Architects Lynée Wells, AICP, Principal + Urban Planner, Williams & Works

Form-Based Code

2014 MAP Conference Intensive Hands-On Workshop Photo by Rick Neumann
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why are Codes necessary?

Regulatory oversight is essential for us to feel free. Practically everything we do is dependent on people we don’t know.” — Philip Howard

Laws that aspires to completeness doesn’t leave room for questions of priority
  • r practicality.”
— Philip Howard “ If you make ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law.” — Winston Churchill Flexibility Predictability
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why are Conventional Codes Ineffective?

Land Use General Plan Transportation Zoning Nothing about places
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definition of FBC

Form-Based Codes foster predictable built results & a high- quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. They are regulations, not mere guidelines. They are adopted into city or county law. Form-Based Codes are an alternative to conventional zoning.” Form-Based Code Institute
slide-5
SLIDE 5 Form-Based Codes foster predictable built results and a high quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. They are regulations, not mere
  • guidelines. They are adopted
into city or county law. Form- Based Codes are an alternative to conventional zoning.” Public Realm Private Realm Pedestrian Realm Vehicular Realm Public Realm Pocket Park John Nolen’s 1913 plan for Green Garden Terrace, Erie, PA Image Courtesy of Dover Kohl Image Courtesy of Dover Kohl
slide-6
SLIDE 6 Why use-based system does not work? Mixed-uses Singular use Use Mgmt Form-Based Codes foster predictable built results and a high quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. They are regulations, not mere
  • guidelines. They are adopted
into city or county law. Form- Based Codes are an alternative to conventional zoning.” Form
slide-7
SLIDE 7 Why not design guidelines?
  • Offer too much room for
subjective interpretation;
  • Require oversight by
discretionary review bodies, leading to a politicized planning process that can cost time & money. Design guidelines CERTAINTY
  • Citizens – know what
the end result will be
  • City – easier to
administer
  • Developers/property
  • wners – easier
process, more
  • pportunities & options
Regulations R-40 R-40 Image by Peter Katz & Steve Price Form-Based Codes foster predictable built results and a high quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. They are regulations, not mere
  • guidelines. They are adopted
into city or county law. Form- Based Codes are an alternative to conventional zoning.”
slide-8
SLIDE 8 Two Different Types of Zones Cannot be Combined! FBCs default to walkable urbanism Form-Based Zones Lower parking requirements 
 (More walking, access to transit) Public realm = public space Blended density (variety of types) Mixed-use environments Conventional Zones Higher parking requirements 
 (less walking & access to transit) “Podded” densities & uses Larger public and private open space required due to isolation Uses more flexible based on
  • perational characteristics
Specific uses allowed Walkable Urban Areas Drivable Suburban Areas Form-Based Codes foster predictable built results and a high quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for the code. They are regulations, not mere
  • guidelines. They are adopted
into city or county law. Form- Based Codes are an alternative to conventional zoning.”
slide-9
SLIDE 9

FBCs Essentials

If the code does not cover an entire jurisdiction, is it structured to allow for future geographic expansion?
slide-10
SLIDE 10 Has the code been framed with the cooperation of all appropriate city departments?

FBCs Essentials

Image altered from source www.made.org.uk
slide-11
SLIDE 11 Is the Code easy to navigate?

FBCs Essentials

slide-12
SLIDE 12 Is the Code graphically clear? a b d c Alley Front Side 45’ 40’ Property Line Encroachment Line Setback Line 2 Westview An Urban Village 24W.200.030 T4.11 (Urban Neighborhood Zone)
  • A. Building Placement
  • 1. Primary and accessory buildings
A primary building shall be placed on a lot in compliance with the following requirements, within the shaded area as shown in the diagram above, unless specifj ed
  • therwise by the standards for an allowed building type
in Section 24W.205 (Building Type Standards). An accessory building shall be placed on a lot in compliance with the following requirements, within the shaded area shown in Diagram C (Parking Placement). Setback Primary Accessory a Front 5’ min.; 10’ max. N/A b Side Street 5’ min.; 10’ max. Within 50% of rear lot depth c Side Yard 5’ min. 5’ min. d Rear 10’ min. 5’ min.
  • 2. Architectural Encroachments
Patios, uncovered stoops, roof overhangs, and awnings may encroach 8’ maximum into the required setbacks, as may be further limited by the UBC.
  • B. Building Profj
le and Frontage
  • 1. Height
Each structure shall comply with the following height limits.
  • a. Maximum Height: 3 stories to parapet or ridgeline
for primary building. For fm at roof, the maximum height of the parapet cannot exceed 40’; and for sloping roof, the maximum height of the roof ridge cannot exceed 45’.
  • b. Minimum Floor to Floor: 15’ minimum for a pri-
mary non-residential building ground fm
  • or intended
for nonresidential use.
  • c. Accessory Buildings: 24’ maximum to eave.
  • 2. Allowed Frontage Types
Only the following frontage types are allowed within the T4.11 zone, except in the Shopfront Overlay. In the Shopfront Overlay; only the Shopfront Awning type is
  • allowed. Ti
e street facing facade of each primary build- ing shall be designed as one of the following frontage types, in compliance with Section 24W.204 (Frontage Type Standards).
  • a. Common yard
  • b. Porch and fence
  • c. Dooryard
  • d. Stoop
  • e. Forecourt
  • f. Lightcourt
  • g. Shopfront Awning
  • h. Gallery
  • i. Arcade
Diagram A: Building Placement Diagram B: Building Profj le i ii iv iii Alley Front Side Urban Standards 3
  • C. Parking and Services
  • 1. Parking and Services Placement
  • a. Ofg
  • street parking and services shall be placed on a
lot in compliance with the following requirements, within the shaded area shown on the diagram above, unless subterranean. i Front setback 50% of lot depth ii Side street setback 10’ minimum iii Side yard setback 5’ minimum iv Rear setback 5’ minimum
  • b. Subterranean parking shall not extend beyond build-
ing footprint, and may extend to a height of 3’ maxi- mum above fj nished grade, provided that garage perimeter wall either aligns with face or building or becomes part of a Stoop or Door Yard frontage type.
  • 2. Parking Requirements
Each site shall be provided ofg
  • street parking as fol-
lows, designed in compliance with the requirements in Zoning Ordinance Chapter 24.415.
  • a. Residential uses
  • i. Minimum of 1 covered parking space per dwelling
unit.
  • ii. Minimum 1 guest parking space for every 10
  • units. Guest parking may be waived if on-street
parking is available.
  • iii. Minimum of 1 bicycle rack space for every 20
parking spaces required.
  • iv. Minimum 1 shared automobile and 2 shared
bicycles required for every 75 units.
  • b. Non-Residential
  • i. Minimium of 1 parking space per 300 square feet
  • f gross fm
  • or area.
  • D. Building Types
Only the building types shown in the table above are allowed in the T4.11 Urban Neighborhood Zone, on lots of the minimum widths shown. Each allowed building type shall be designed in compliance with Section 24W.205 (Building Type Standards).
  • E. Allowed Land Uses
Only a land use identifj ed as permitted or conditional by Section 24W.203, Table 1 (Land Use Table) shall be estab- lished on a lot in the T4.11 Urban Neighborhood Zone, in compliance with the planning permit requirements of Section 24W.203.020 Building Type Allowed Lot Widths 25’ 35’ 50’ 75’ 100’ 125’ 150’ Duplex/Triplex/Quad Villa Bungalow Court Row house Live/work Side court housing Courtyard housing Stacked dwelling Only allowed as part of mixed-type projects. Commercial block Diagram C: Parking Placement Allowed Building Type Table Lot Private Frontage R.O.W Public Frontage Lot Private Frontage R.O.W Public Frontage 2 Westview An Urban Village Common Yard: A frontage wherein the facade is set back sub- stantially from the frontage line. Ti e front yard created remains unfenced and is visually continuous with adjacent yards, support- ing a common landscape. Ti e setback can be densely landscaped to bufg er from the higher speed thoroughfares. Dooryard: A frontage wherein the facade is set back from the frontage line with an elevated garden or terrace permitted to
  • encroach. Ti
is type can efg ectively bufg er residential quarters from the sidewalk, while removing the private yard from public
  • encroachment. Ti
e terrace is also suitable for cafes. Stoop: A frontage wherein the facade is aligned close to the frontage line with the fj rst story elevated from the sidewalk suf- fj ciently to secure privacy for the windows. Ti e entrance is usu- ally an exterior stair and landing. Ti is type is recommended for ground-fm
  • or residential use.
Forecourt: A frontage wherein a portion of the facade is close to the frontage line and the central portion is set back. Ti e fore- court with a large tree ofg ers visual and environmental variety to the urban street streetscape. Ti e forecourt may accommodate a vehicular drop-ofg . Lightcourt: A frontage wherein the facade is setback from the frontage line by a sunken lightcourt. Ti is type bufg ers residential use from urban sidewalks and removes the private yard from public encroachment. Shopfront and Awning: A frontage wherein the facade is aligned close to the frontage line with the building entrance at sidewalk grade. Ti is type is conventional for retail use. It has substantial glazing on the sidewalk level and an awning that may
  • verlap the sidewalk to the maximum extent possible.
Gallery: A frontage wherein the facade is aligned close to the frontage line with an attached cantilevered shed or a lightweight colonnade overlapping the sidewalk. Ti is type is conventional for retail use. Ti e gallery shall be no less than 10 feet wide and may
  • verlap the whole width of the sidewalk to within 2 feet of the
  • curb. Notwithstanding the graphic, encroachments will not be
permitted. Arcade: A frontage wherein the facade is a colonnade that
  • verlaps the sidewalk, while the facade at sidewalk level remains
at the frontage line. Ti is type is conventional for retail use. Ti e arcade shall be no less than 12 feet wide and may overlap the whole width of the sidewalk to within 2 feet of the curb. Not- withstanding the graphic, encroachments will not be permitted. Porch & Fence: A frontage wherein the facade is set back from the frontageline with an attached porch permitted to encroach. A fence at the frontage line maintains the demarcation of the yard while not blocking view into the front yard. Ti e porches shall be no less than 8 feet deep. Table 2: Private Frontages Vince Street Lewis Street Flint Street Warner Street Barnett Street Rosewood Street Olive Street Riverside Street
  • A. Description
Two or more detached two- or three-story dwellings with zero side yard setbacks located upon a qualifying lot in the T4.11 zone. A Rowhouse may be used for non-residential purposes where allowed in T4.11 zone. Ti e following text provides performance standards for Rowhouses.
  • B. Access
  • 1. Ti
e main entrance to each dwelling shall be accessed directly from and face the street. [E]
  • 2. Parking and services shall be accessed from an alley or
subterranean garage in a Mixed Type Development. Ti is type is not allowed on a lot without an alley or
  • utside of a Mixed Type Development. [E]
  • C. Parking and Services
  • 1. One parking space for each dwelling unit shall be
within a garage. [E]
  • 2. Corner lots shall not have garages that face the side
  • street. [E]
  • 3. Services, above ground equipment and trash container
areas shall be located on the alley. [W]
  • D. Open Space
  • 1. Front yards are defj
ned by the street build-to line and frontage type requirements of the applicable zone. [DR]
  • 2. One usable, outdoor space shall be provided behind the
rowhouse at no less than 15% of the lot area and of a regular geometry (e.g.: rectangular) with a minimum dimension of 20’. [E] 24W.205.080 Rowhouse Allowed lots (if qualifj ed by size) Building Type Diagram SW Parking Travel Travel Parking Parkway Setback Setback SW 10’ 4’ 8’ 12’ 12’ 59’ 64’ Existing r.o.w. 8’ 9’ 10’ 6’ V i n c e S t r e e t F l i n t S t r e e t O l i v e S t r e e t R i v e r s i d e S t r e e t Street Type Standards 3 Movement Slow Speed 20 mph Pedestrian Crossing Time 10 seconds R.O.W. Width 59’ (pavement width 40’) Traffjc Lanes 2; 1 each way Bulbouts End of block,and at paseo crossing Parking Parallel both sides (limited perpendicular) Sidewalk width 4’ and 6’ Planter 9’ one side, continuous Planting Trees 40’ on center Tree Species See Section 208 Street lighting 14’ tall poles at 35’ to 75’ on center 24W.207.030A Vince, Flint, and Riverside Streets Tie streets will be narrowed, perpendicular parking will be limited to the open space and civic areas, and bulb-outs at paseo crossings will slow down the traffjc. Only one-side of the street will be pulled in -- the exist- ing curb and sidewalk on the other side will not change. Existing condition: Vince Street looking east Mature trees and visual termination of the east west streets by the hills on either side are defjning features of Westview Village streets. Existing condition: Riverside Street looking south Existing condition: Flint Street looking east See Westview Village FBC at www.rangwalaassoc.com

FBCs Essentials

slide-13
SLIDE 13 Does the Code regulate the form of the right-of- ways? with Moule & Polyzoides

FBCs Essentials

slide-14
SLIDE 14 Source: Suzaane Schultz, Planning Director, City of Grand Rapids
slide-15
SLIDE 15 Does the Code have all essential FBC ingredients? Subdivision

FBCs Essentials

Downtown Specific Plan, Ventura, CA. Moule & Polyzoides Art of place- making Source: Leon Krier
slide-16
SLIDE 16 with Ferrell Madden Regulatory Plan
slide-17
SLIDE 17 with Ferrell Madden Public Realm (open space)
slide-18
SLIDE 18 Height Siting Elements Use with Ferrell Madden Building Form Standards
slide-19
SLIDE 19 Height Frontage Types Setbacks Parking Santa Ana Transit Code, Moule & Polyzoides Urban Standards
slide-20
SLIDE 20 Santa Ana Transit Code, Moule & Polyzoides Building Types
slide-21
SLIDE 21 Lot Private Frontage R.O.W Public Frontage Lot Private Frontage R.O.W Public Frontage Common Yard: A frontage wherein the facade is set back sub- stantially from the frontage line. Ti e front yard created remains unfenced and is visually continuous with adjacent yards, support- ing a common landscape. Ti e setback can be densely landscaped to bufg er from the higher speed thoroughfares. Dooryard: A frontage wherein the facade is set back from the frontage line with an elevated garden or terrace permitted to
  • encroach. Ti
is type can efg ectively bufg er residential quarters from the sidewalk, while removing the private yard from public
  • encroachment. Ti
e terrace is also suitable for cafes. Stoop: A frontage wherein the facade is aligned close to the frontage line with the fj rst story elevated from the sidewalk suf- fj ciently to secure privacy for the windows. Ti e entrance is usu- ally an exterior stair and landing. Ti is type is recommended for ground-fm
  • or residential use.
Forecourt: A frontage wherein a portion of the facade is close to the frontage line and the central portion is set back. Ti e fore- court with a large tree ofg ers visual and environmental variety to the urban street streetscape. Ti e forecourt may accommodate a vehicular drop-ofg . Lightcourt: A frontage wherein the facade is setback from the frontage line by a sunken lightcourt. Ti is type bufg ers residential use from urban sidewalks and removes the private yard from public encroachment. Shopfront and Awning: A frontage wherein the facade is aligned close to the frontage line with the building entrance at sidewalk grade. Ti is type is conventional for retail use. It has substantial glazing on the sidewalk level and an awning that may
  • verlap the sidewalk to the maximum extent possible.
Gallery: A frontage wherein the facade is aligned close to the frontage line with an attached cantilevered shed or a lightweight colonnade overlapping the sidewalk. Ti is type is conventional for retail use. Ti e gallery shall be no less than 10 feet wide and may
  • verlap the whole width of the sidewalk to within 2 feet of the
  • curb. Notwithstanding the graphic, encroachments will not be
permitted. Arcade: A frontage wherein the facade is a colonnade that
  • verlaps the sidewalk, while the facade at sidewalk level remains
at the frontage line. Ti is type is conventional for retail use. Ti e arcade shall be no less than 12 feet wide and may overlap the whole width of the sidewalk to within 2 feet of the curb. Not- withstanding the graphic, encroachments will not be permitted. Porch & Fence: A frontage wherein the facade is set back from the frontageline with an attached porch permitted to encroach. A fence at the frontage line maintains the demarcation of the yard while not blocking view into the front yard. Ti e porches shall be no less than 8 feet deep. Table 2: Private Frontages Lot Private Frontage R.O.W Public Frontage Lot Private Frontage R.O.W Public Frontage
  • A. Description
Dooryards are elevated gardens or terraces that are set back from the frontage line. Ti is type can efg ectively bufg er residential quar- ters from the sidewalk, while removing the private yard from public
  • encroachment. Ti
e terrace is also suitable for restaurants and cafes as the eye of the sitter is level with that of the standing passerby.
  • B. Design Standards
  • 1. A retaining wall may be built around the dooryard or terrace.
  • 2. Ti
e retaining wall may not be higher than structurally necessary.
  • 3. Ti
e retaining wall may be constructed of stucco, brick, or stone, alone or in combination. 24W.204.040 Dooryard (Terrace) Illustrative photo of commercial Dooryard Illustrative photo of residential Dooryard Diagram of residential Dooryard Diagram of commercial Dooryard Section and plan of Dooryard Westview Village, Ventura, CA Frontages
slide-22
SLIDE 22 Ferrell Madden Streets
slide-23
SLIDE 23 Table 2: Land Use (continued) DP Director Permit Required Land Use Types (1) P Permitted Uses UP Use Permit Required — Not Allowed Pemit Required by Zone Additonal Regulations SD:H1 P&OS Services – Business, Financial, Professional Bank, fjnancial services p — Business support service p — Medical/Dental p — Offjce p — Services – General Catering service P (3) — Day care P — Drive-through service — — Lodging P — Mortuary, funeral home — — Personal service P — Safety service P — Transportation, Communications, Infrastructure Helicopter landing Service UP — Parking facility (public or commercial) P — Wireless telecommunications facility P — ZO 24.497 (4) Transit station or terminal P — Utility or equipment substation P — Parks and Open Space Outdoor dining P P Outdoor sports/recreation facilities — DP Outdoor entertainment — DP Farmer’s market DP DP SD:H1 Hospital District Zone P&OS Parks & Open Space Zone Notes 1 Defnition of land uses are listed in Section 24SD:H1.300. 2 Excluding sanitariums, nursing homes, convalescent homes, maternity homes, or rest homes. 3 Use not allowed on ground fmoor where Frontage Overlays occur (see regulating plan, Section 24SD: H1.102). 4 Use permit as may be required by Zoning Ordinance (ZO 24.497: Standards for Wireless Telecommunication Facilities). Table 2: Land Use DP Director Permit Required Land Use Types (1) P Permitted Uses UP Use Permit Required — Not Allowed Pemit Required by Zone Additonal Regulations SD:H1 P&OS Hospital General hospital P(2) — Helicopter landing services UP — Ambulance services (medical equipment, supplies) DP — Industry, Manufacturing, Processing, & Wholesaling Laboratory (medical, analytical) P(3) — Printing and publishing P(3) — Research and development P — Recreation, Education, & Public Safety Adult business — — Community meeting facility P P ZO 24.480 Health/fjtness facility/indoor sports & recreation P — Library, museum P — Public parks and playgrounds P P School (public or private) UP — Studio (art, dance, martial arts, music) P — Residential Dwelling (multi-unit) P — Dwelling (single-dwelling, accessory, carriage house) — — Home occupation P — Live/work P — Special residence P — Retail Bar, tavern, night club UP — ZO.24 460 Gas station — — General Retail, except with any of the following features: P — Alcoholic beverage sales UP — ZO.24.460 Auto- or motor-vehicle related sales or services — — Drive-through facilities — — Floor area over 20,000 square feet — — Restaurant P — Community Memorial Hospital District, Ventura Land Use
slide-24
SLIDE 24 Ferrell Madden Architecture
slide-25
SLIDE 25 C H A P T E R 5 : T H E D E V E L O P M E N T C O D E 5.6 - Sign Standards
  • A. Purpose. This section provides sign regulations that are in addition to those
in Zoning Code Chapter 21.19 (Signs) in order to help generate the vibrant, mixed-use, pedestrian environment envisioned in Chapter 2 (Form and Character) of this Specific Plan.
  • B. Applicability
  • 1. Signs regulated. These sign regulations, as described and illustrated in
Tables 5.6.1 (Allowed Sign Types) and 5.6.2 (Allowed Sign Locations by Frontage Type), apply to all building-mounted signs in the T-3F, T4-NC, T4-F, TC-1, and TC-2 zones. All other signs, including banner signs, inflatable signs, monument signs, real estate directional signs, and win- ery directional signs, and billboards shall instead comply with Zoning Code Requirements (Chapter 21.19).
  • 2. Applicability to sign content. The provisions of this Section do not regu-
late the message content of a sign (sign copy), regardless of whether the message content is commercial or noncommercial.
  • C. Specified standards for signs.
  • 1. Calculating maximum allowable sign area. The maximum allowable
sign area for building-mounted signs shall be regulated by Table 5.6.1 (Allowed Sign Types).
  • 2. Design. Building-mounted signs shall be designed with a pedestrian
scale in mind and shall also be subject to the following restrictions:
  • a. The maximum number of letter styles permitted is three, although
two is preferred.
  • b. Flat surface signs shall be painted in such a manner as to create the
appearance of depth.
  • c. Borders around signs are encouraged.
  • d. Sign panel materials shall be compatible with façade materials. The
use of wood or metal is encouraged.
  • 3. Illuminated signs. Illuminated signs designed to be seen from a distance
are inappropriate and are discouraged. The use of most backlit plastic box signs or internally illuminated signs or awnings is discouraged. Backlit cabinet signs with light translucent lettering on dark or opaque background or use of individual plastic letters that are compatible in size and style with the building will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
  • 4. Prohibited Materials. The use of fluorescent materials and/or paints is
prohibited on signs in the TC-1 zone.
  • 5. Street Furniture. In some instances, street furniture, including portable
signs, may be allowed on city sidewalks. All street furniture shall be regu- lated by Chapter 11.30 of the Zoning Code. (Ord. 889 N.S. § 1 (part), 2004) Yard Sign on posts Projecting Sign Marquee Sign Wall Mounted Sign Awning Sign Hanging Sign Hanging sign 1 b d a Wall-mounted sign 4 a b c c Roof-mounted sign 8 Awning Sign - Mounted 5 a h b d j Awning Sign - Valence 6 a b d j i Projecting sign (One sign allowed per tenant space) 3 a b d l a b d k Yard sign 2 e b f j d a Marquee sign 7 a d l i n m TABLE 5.6.1: ALLOWED SIGN TYPES Key Sign Type Hanging Sign Yard (post) Projecting Wall-Mounted Awning - Mounted Awning -Valence Marquee Roof Width 36" max 36" max 48" max Width of storefront 25’ max 25’ max 6’ max (1) 50’ max Height 24" max 24" max 30" max 30" max 12" max 10" max
  • 8' max
Sign Area (wall)
  • 24” max, up to 1 sq
ft per linear ft on store frontage
  • Clear
8’ - 6" min 12’ min 8’ - 6" min
  • 8’ - 6" min
8’ - 6" min 12’ min
  • Height
  • 5' max
  • Space
  • 12" max
  • Feature
  • 6 sq ft max
  • Sign Area
  • max 75% of ‘a’
max 75% of ‘a’
  • Projection
  • 12” min
  • within 2’ of curb
within 2’ of curb
  • within 2’ of curb
  • Thick
  • 24" max
  • 24" max
  • Extend
  • 10' max
  • Alignment
  • may align with corner
  • r be placed anywhere
  • n wall
  • Signs Per Building
1 max. hanging sign per building; 1 max 1 per tenant space 1 per storefront 1 per awning 1 per awning 1 max; not allowed with a roof sign 1 max per building, not allowed with a marquee sign. Only allowed in TC-1 Zone and only 2 such signs allowed Notes: (1) to within 2’ of curb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 a b g a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Sign Types
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Organizing Principles

Applications for:
  • 1. Zones
  • 2. Frontage-based
  • 3. Street-based
  • 4. Building types based
Growth & Conservation Greenfield Infill & renewal Preservation Lee County, FL. Dover Kohl
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Zones: Transect-based (rural-urban)

Ventura, CA protocode. HDR
slide-28
SLIDE 28 Benefit of Transect-based codes The framework applies to most elements of place-making: Building form Parking placement Use Public spaces Signage Lighting Streets Green building Transit Storm-water mgmt. Many more ... Source: ITE’s Walkable Thoroughfare Source: SmartCode
slide-29
SLIDE 29 Modifications allow intuitive & easy to understand zone names further breakdown of 6 transect zones to respond to local characteristics

Zones: Modified Transect-based

Downtown Specific Plan, Ventura, CA. Moule & Polyzoides
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Frontage-based

Regulations proportional to its necessity & appropriateness to a vital “street-space” Besides streets, also includes form & function of the private building Station Area Code, Farmers Branch, TX. Ferrell Madden
slide-31
SLIDE 31 4.!Town!Center!Street! Parallel parking and wide sidewalks on both sides of the Town Center Street create a safe inviting place for both pedestrians and motorists. 12-ft-wide sidewalks with tree wells are preferred, but 6-ft-wide sidewalks with 6-ft-wide green strips are also acceptable. Notes:!!
  • 1. Appurtenances may extend beyond the
height limit.
  • 2. Building fronts are required to provide
shelter to the sidewalk by means of at least
  • ne of the following: arcade, colonnade,
marquee, awning, or second-floor balcony.
  • 3. The alignment of floor-to-floor heights of
abutting buildings is encouraged to allow for shared use of elevators. A.!Building!Placement: Build-to-line location: 0 ft. from property line Space Between Buildings: 0 ft. if attached 6–10 ft. if detached B.!Building!Volume:!!
  • Bldg. Width:
16 ft. minimum 160 ft. maximum
  • Bldg. Depth:
125 ft. maximum
  • Bldg. Height:
2 stories minimum 4 stories maximum The first floor shall be a minimum of twelve (12) feet in height ! The Regulating Code is divided into 8 distinct street types. Focus on streets, flexibility in building types Requires skilled administration Central Hercules Code, CA Dover Kohl

Street-based

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Building type based

Primarily ties regulation to building types Tie regulation to zone first Only use building types in FBC if you are completely confident in your ability to refine content Typically used for small planning areas where detailed planning will be done Source: Towns & Town Making Principles
slide-33
SLIDE 33 Is the Code
  • rganized on a
regulating plan that assigns development intensity on a lot- to-lot basis? High-level of context sensitivity & high-degree of detail

FBCs Essentials

slide-34
SLIDE 34 Are the boundaries of the Code properly chosen at the scale of Neighborhoods, Districts, Corridors?

FBCs Essentials

slide-35
SLIDE 35 Was the Code developed under an open participatory public process? Image Source IAP2 Best Practice for Public Participation Image Courtesy of Mary Madden

FBCs Essentials

slide-36
SLIDE 36 Is the Code based on a community generated vision?

FBCs Essentials

slide-37
SLIDE 37 Administration

FBCs Concerns

Training & Outreach
slide-38
SLIDE 38 Triggers depends on political will & existing conditions Non-conformities allowing additions that bring the structure closer to compliance strong position of no additions allowing allowing interim uses Image Source: Jana Ecker, Planning Director, Birmingham
slide-39
SLIDE 39 We are getting better at technical stuff
  • - ITE Manual a huge step
Skewed funding priorities -- some progress Jurisdictional boundaries -- diplomacy, politics, getting to yes Institutional & cultural barriers -- be a generalist (urbanist)
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Jana Ecker says Work with Road Authorities ▪ Many Michigan roads are not under authority
  • f the municipality
▪ Need to work with MDOT or County Road Commission ▪ Involve road authorities in the creation of the FBC from the early planning stages ▪ Include on Steering Committee ▪ Request feedback during draft reviews ▪ Result: Context sensitive solutions Image Source: crainsdetroit.com
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Act Now!

http://betterblock.org/ Image source: NACTO Urban Design Guide Overview

Power of demonstration project

slide-42
SLIDE 42 Distinction between urban form & style FBCs will limit creative expression — Architectural Style Important aspects of the urban form are controlled with clear & precise standards. Once the context is established, the community’s architectural character (style) preferences are codified as guidelines. Moule & Polyzoides
slide-43
SLIDE 43 Clear vision (alignment of investments and policies) Culture of removing barriers & creating incentives (Form-Based Codes) Renewal partnership (public- private sharing of resources, risks, and rewards) Don’t oversell as a cure all — for best results Kick Start the FBC ▪ Purchase key properties ▪ Provide incentives to build (bistro, economic development licenses) ▪ Establish CIA or DDA ▪ Make public investments (art, green spaces, branding, streetscape etc.) Source: Jana Ecker, Planning Director, Birmingham
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Deploying FBCs

1.Mandatory 2.Parallel/Option 3.Floating

Methods Birmingham, MI
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Birmingham

Source: Jana Ecker, Planning Director, Birmingham Triangle District Urban Design Plan
slide-46
SLIDE 46 Source: Jana Ecker
slide-47
SLIDE 47 Source: Jana Ecker Source: JPRA Architects
slide-48
SLIDE 48 Ventura Downtown Form-based Code

WorkingArtistsVentura

  • $57 Million
  • 54 Affordable Units for Artists
  • 15 Supportive Housing Units
  • 13 Market Rate
  • Gallery/Theater Space
  • 6100 sq. ft. Retail
slide-49
SLIDE 49

Resources

Jana Ecker, AICP, Planning Director, City of Birmingham (248) 530-1841 Suzanne Schulz, AICP, Planning Director, City of Grand Rapids (616) 456-4100 Lynee Wells, AICP, Urban Planner Williams & Works (616) 648-3534 www.formbasedcodes.org ▪ Birmingham ▪ Grand Rapids ▪ Fremont ▪ Genoa Township (new Town Center) ▪ Farmington ▪ Macomb Township (Town Center) ▪ Marquette ▪ Wyoming Michigan cities using FBCs
slide-50
SLIDE 50