for Open-set Land Cover Classification of Satellite Imagery Razieh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

for open set land cover classification
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

for Open-set Land Cover Classification of Satellite Imagery Razieh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Representative-Discriminative Learning for Open-set Land Cover Classification of Satellite Imagery Razieh Kaviani Baghbaderani 1 , Ying Qu 1 , Hairong Qi 1 , Craig Stutts 2 1 University of Tennessee 2 Applied Research Associates Land Cover


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Representative-Discriminative Learning for Open-set Land Cover Classification

  • f Satellite Imagery

Razieh Kaviani Baghbaderani1, Ying Qu1, Hairong Qi1, Craig Stutts2

1 University of Tennessee 2 Applied Research Associates

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Land Cover Classification

http://lesun.weebly.com/hyperspectral-data-set.html [Christophe et al. 2018]

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Challenge

  • Vast area of versatile cover materials
  • The training data is non-representative

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_cover

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Challenge

  • Vast area of versatile cover materials
  • The training data is non-representative

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_cover

slide-5
SLIDE 5

❑Existing methods

“Closed-set assumption”

❑This paper

“Open-set assumption”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Image Space (𝑌) Embedding Space (𝑎𝐺) Abundance Space (𝑇)

Representative-Discriminative Learning

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Image Space (𝑌) Embedding Space (𝑎𝐺)

Representative-Discriminative Learning

Closed-set Embedding Learning Representative-discriminative Feature Learning

Abundance Space (𝑇) Image Space (𝑌) Embedding Space (𝑎𝐺) Abundance Space (𝑇)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Closed-set Embedding Learning

Classification loss: Sparsity loss: Image space Embedding space

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Representative-Discriminative Feature Learning

  • Instead of an Auto-encoder structure

→ A multi-task representative-discriminative feature learning structure

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Representative-Discriminative Feature Learning

❑Inspired by Spectral Unmixing concept,

  • Physical constraints:
  • Non-negativity
  • Sum-to-one

Bases Abundance

𝑎𝐺

▪ Known: ▪ Unknown:

𝑎𝐺 = 𝑡𝐶 𝑎𝐺 = 𝑡𝐶 𝑡 ∉ 𝑡

= 𝑡𝐶

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Representative-Discriminative Feature Learning

𝑎𝐺 = 𝑡𝐶 ❑B → Decoder D

  • s ∈ Dirichlet distribution

Using stick-breaking structure:

𝑨𝐺 ෞ 𝑨𝐺

❑s → Encoder E

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Representative-Discriminative Feature Learning

❑To increase the discriminative capacity,

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Hyperspectral data

Pavia University (PU) Pavia Center (PC) Indian Pines (IN)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Experiments on Hyperspectral data

Pavia University (PU) Pavia Center (PC)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Experiments on Hyperspectral data

Pavia University (PU) Pavia Center (PC)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Experiments on Hyperspectral data

[26] Bendale & Boult, 2016. [30] Oza & Patel, 2019.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Experiments on RGB Images

… 𝑌

Classifier (F) Encoder (E)

Reconstruction loss

Dirichlet-Net

𝑇

ෞ 𝑨𝐺

𝑍

Decoder (D) Classifier (C)

𝛾 𝑣 𝑊 𝑨𝐺 𝑍

Substituted with a CNN-based structure

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Experiments on RGB Images

[26] Bendale & Boult, 2016. [33] Neal et al., 2018. [34] Oza & Patel, 2019. [31] Perera et al., 2020.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Ablation Study

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Contributions

For more details:

https://github.com/raziehkaviani/rdosr

✓Exploited both representative and discriminative power of feature learning. ✓Being the first to address Open-set land cover classification in satellite imagery. ✓Showed the generalization capacity to RGB images.