food for thought jos oseph poore
play

Food for Thought JOS OSEPH POORE OXFORD UNIVERSITEIT VOEDS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kennissymposium 13 maart 2020 Voedselvisie: # food oodforth thou ought #voeds dselv lvis isie Food for Thought JOS OSEPH POORE OXFORD UNIVERSITEIT VOEDS DSELVOETAFDR DRUK: IMPACT V VAN AN VOED EDSEL O OP DE P E PLAN ANEET


  1. Kennissymposium 13 maart 2020 Voedselvisie: # food oodforth thou ought #voeds dselv lvis isie Food for Thought

  2. JOS OSEPH POORE OXFORD UNIVERSITEIT VOEDS DSELVOETAFDR DRUK: IMPACT V VAN AN VOED EDSEL O OP DE P E PLAN ANEET (INCL. Q Q&A &A) # food odfor orthou ought #vo voed edsel selvi visi sie

  3. Food’s Environmental Impacts and an Integrated Solution Presentation to Party for the Animals Conference, 13 th March 2020 Joseph Poore

  4. urce: Ellis et al. (2010) Urban Sour 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

  5. urce: Ellis et al. (2010) Urban Mixed Crops Sour 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

  6. urce: Ellis et al. (2010) Urban Mixed Crops Pasture Rangelands Sour 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

  7. Commod odit ity C Crop op D Driven Defor orestation on (million hectares) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Sour urce: Curtis et al (2018); Global Forest Watch

  8. >13,000 Sour urce: IUCN (2018)

  9. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 5% 26% Food Sour urce: NOAA (2018) Sour urce: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  10. Acid Rain 32% Food Sour urce: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  11. Eutrophication 78% 25,000km 2 Food “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico Sour urce: NOAA (2018) Sour urce: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  12. Scarcity-Weighted Water Use 90% Food Sour urce: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  13. Food C Consumption (trillion calories per day) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 Sour urce: Adapted from Smith (2015), using data from FAOSTAT and the UN

  14. Food C Consumption (trillion calories per day) 40 35 30 Forecast Annua nual C Consum umption i n in 2050: 050: 25 • 1.2 trillion litres of dairy 20 • 500 billion kilograms of meat 15 10 5 0 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 Sour urce: Adapted from Smith (2015), using data from FAOSTAT and the UN; adapted from FAO forecasts

  15. 570 m 0 million f n farms >2 m 2 million c crop p varieties i s in n seed eed 430 b 0 brands nds va vaults 14 c 14 compa panies o s own n 54 o 54 of the he Food p produc uced i ed in ev every c climate larges est b brands nds and s soil, l, w with o optim imal p l practic ices for ea each

  16. Summa mary 1. 1. Agriculture s sit its a at t the h heart of of alm almost all all envir ironmental p l proble lems 2. 2. Achieving s sustainability w will become h e harder er g given en g growi wing d g demand 3. 3. Solutions m must b t be effecti tive e over er millions o of d diver erse e producer ers

  17. Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  18. Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  19. Greenhouse Gas Emissions kg CO 2 eq 0 1 2 3 1000 kcal Cassava Rice (flooded) Oatmeal Potatoes Wheat & Rye (Bread) Maize (Meal) Low impact producers High impact producers 10 th percentile 90 th percentile Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  20. • Large variabil ilit ity a across a all i indi ndicators, , inc nclud uding i in n simila lar g geographic regio ions ns • Implie ies a a targeted mitigatio ion a n appr pproach w h will ha have hi highe hest i impa pact Greenhouse Gas Emissions Acidification Eutrophication Land Use kg CO 2 eq g SO 2 eq g PO 4 3- eq m 2 ·year 0 1 2 3 0 18 0 36 0 2 4 6 1000 kcal Cassava Rice (flooded) Oatmeal Potatoes Wheat & Rye (Bread) Maize (Meal) 0 2 4 6 0 72 0 36 0 0,4 0,8 1,2 1 kg Tomatoes Brassicas Onions & Leeks Root Vegetables 0 1 2 3 0 45 0 18 0 2,5 5 7,5 1 kg Berries Bananas Apples Citrus Low impact producers High impact producers 10 th percentile 90 th percentile Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  21. • There a e are e differ erent c causes of environmen ental impact f for d differ eren ent f farmer ers • We ne need t d to be be flexibl xible a and l nd let the hem de deliver mitig igatio ion ho however works be best f for the hem Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  22. • Large variabil ilit ity a across a all i indi ndicators, , inc nclud uding i in n simila lar g geographic regio ions ns • Implie ies a a targeted mitigatio ion a n appr pproach w h will ha have hi highe hest i impa pact Greenhouse Gas Emissions Acidification Eutrophication Land Use kg CO 2 eq g SO 2 eq g PO 4 3- eq m 2 ·year 0 10 20 30 0 180 0 180 0 40 80 120 100g of protein Beef (beef herd) Lamb & Mutton Crustaceans (farmed) Beef (dairy herd) Cheese Pig Meat Fish (farmed) Poultry Meat Eggs Tofu Groundnuts Other Pulses Peas Nuts 0 2 4 6 0 36 0 24 0 4 8 12 1 litre Cow’s milk Soymilk Low impact producers High impact producers 10 th percentile 90 th percentile Source: Poore & Nemecek (2018)

  23. Netherland nds: G GHG e emissio ions ns r rela lated t to f food unde under di different di diets GHG emissions per capita (kg CO2eq, IPCC 2013) 2,985 1,638 582 261 127 -152 Source: Poore, Clark & Springmann (2020)

  24. Netherland nds: E Eut utrophying e emissio ions related t to f food unde under di different di diets Eutrophying emissions per capita (g PO43-eq, CML2 baseline) 10,247 7,434 5,508 5,813 4,132 3,469 Source: Poore, Clark & Springmann (2020)

  25. • Bene nefit it o of e eating less o of a a hi high i h impa pact pr produ duct inc ncrease by cho hoosing t the he m most s sus ustaina nably pr produc uced • Consumers can n make s suc uch h cho hoice i if value ue c cha hain c n cha hann nnels ena nabl ble i ide dentity pr preservatio ion n Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Gt CO 2 eq) Change in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Consume 20% less, targeting the highest impact producers 50% reduction in animal Animal-Product Oils Sugars AlcoholsStimulants products, targeting Free Diet highest impact producers 0 0% -4 -25% -10,4 -14,7 -8 -50% Weighted Average = -45% -12 -75% 70% -16 -100% A 30% reduction in global GHG emissions across all sectors Source: Poore & Nemecek (2019)

  26. Source: Poore (2018) The Guardian; mondra.green

  27. Source: https://mondra.green

  28. Source: https://mondra.green

  29. Household appliance market share by energy efficiency group 60% 1992 (labels introduced) 40% 20% 0% 60% 2018 40% 20% 0% G F E D C B A A + A ++ A +++ Source: CECED

  30. Summa mary 1. 1. Very y signif ific ican ant potential ial t to r o reduce f food ood’s i imp mpac acts 2. 2. Mitigation requires es a a sophisti ticated ed a approach, e engaging f g full s supply-cha chain 3. 3. Mandatory l labels a are t the e most p t promising w way t to shift t ft the e en entire s system

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend