1
FOCUSED - EFFICIENT - SUST AINABLE
TSX: PRQ March 8, 2018
FOCUSED - EFFICIENT - SUST AINABLE March 8, 2018 1 PETRUS: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
TSX: PRQ FOCUSED - EFFICIENT - SUST AINABLE March 8, 2018 1 PETRUS: LEADERSHIP Diverse, Experienced & Effective NEI EIL L KORCHINSKI DON T T. GR GRAY BRI BRIAN MINNEHAN Pre President t & & CEO, EO, Di Director Cha
1
FOCUSED - EFFICIENT - SUST AINABLE
TSX: PRQ March 8, 2018
2
Diverse, Experienced & Effective DON T
GRAY
Cha hairman, , Boar
Directo tors
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. Gear Energy Ltd.
DONALD CO CORMACK
Di Director
Former PWC Audit Partner Walton Group YYC Calgary Airport
PATR TRICK ARN RNELL LL
Di Director
Rangeland Industrial Services Ltd. ORIX Investments Inc.
BRI BRIAN MINNEHAN
Di Director
Natural Gas Partners
STE TEPHEN WHI HITE
Di Director Veresen Inc.
Fort Chicago Energy Management Ltd.
JEF EFFREY ZLO ZLOTKY
Di Director
Natural Gas Partners Thompson & Knight LLP
NEI EIL L KORCHINSKI
Pre President t & & CEO, EO, Di Director
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. Renaissance Energy Crescent Point Energy Husky Energy
CH CHEREE STEPHENSON
VP P Finance & & CFO
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. Gear Energy Ltd. Ernst & Young LLP
MARCUS SCHLEGEL
VP P Engi Engineering
CanEra Energy Corp. Canadian Natural Resources Limited Anadarko Canada
RO ROSS KEI KEILL LLY
VP P Explo Exploration
Bonavista Energy Husky Energy Anadarko Canada
BR BRETT BO BOOTH
VP P Land
Bonavista Energy
3
Corporate Profile
Production & Funds Flow Q4 2017 Average Production 10,711 boe/d Current Production1 10,518 boe/d Base Decline Rate ~29% Commodity Weighting 73% Gas, 27% Oil & Liquids Q4 2017 Funds Flow (Annualized)2 $52.3 mm ($1.04/share3) Market Summary & Capital Structure Shares Outstanding& Market Capitalization4 49.5 mm (39% Insiders), $54.5 mm Net Debt5 $148 mm Revolving Credit Facility6 $130 mm ($97.6 mm drawn) Second Lien Term Loan6 $35 mm (matures October 2019) Capital Budget & Drilling Locations 2018 Capital Budget $25-$30 mm, 9 wells (4.4 net) 7 Estimated Free Cash Flow8 $10-$15 mm 2018 Forecasted Production Growth9 2% Drilling Locations 399, 25+ year inventory10
1) Current production represents field estimates for month of February 2018. 2) Funds Flow represents annualized Q4 2017 funds flow. 3) Per share figure uses annualized Funds Flow for Q4 2017 and common shares (basic) outstanding as at December 31, 2017. 4) 49.5 million basic shares outstanding, 39% insiders; insider ownership includes shares held by Natural Gas Partners (24.4% basic). Calculation of Market Capitalization uses March 7, 2018 closing price. 5) Net debt includes working capital (deficiency) and is estimated as at December 31, 2017. 6) Revolving credit facility requires first and second lien lender approval for borrowing exceeding $120 mm. Amounts outstanding on revolving credit facility and second lien term loan are as at December 31, 2017. 7) Gross and net wells are estimated based on estimated 2018 capital budget and expected 2018 drilling program. 8) Estimated Free Cash Flow is based on current forecast for commodity futures pricing, anticipated service costs and current activity levels. 9) Forecasted 2018 production growth reflects the estimated change in production between 2017 and 2018 based on Petrus’ current capital budget range, drilling program and production estimates. 10) Gross booked and unbooked locations. See “Drilling Locations” in Reader Advisory section. Assumes 16 wells/year pace of drilling.
4
5.1x 4.5x 3.3x 2.8x
$0 $0 $60 $60 $120 $120 $180 $180 $240 $240 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 Q4/17 $m $milli lions Funds Flow Net Debt Net Debt/Funds Flow
3
Proven Commitment to Debt Reduction
1) Net debt decreased 35% from Q4 2015 to Q4 2017. 2) Reduction of 45% represents the difference in the Net Debt to Funds Flow ratio from year end 2015 to Q4 2017. 3) Funds Flow data for 2015, 2016 and 2017 represents annual funds flow. Q4 2017 funds flow data represents Q4 2017 annualized funds flow.
1
Net Debt
2
Net Debt/Funds Flow
5
$8. $8.90 $6. $6.48 $4. $4.81
2015 2016 Q4 2 2017 Op E Ex ($ ($/boe) e)
Low Cost Operator
Operating Costs
1) Operating costs decreased 46% from year end 2015 to Q4 2017.
6
8,435 7,100 8,595 9,331 10,240 10,567 10,711 $0.67 $0.52 $0.87 $0.99 $1.01 $0.63 $1.04
Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017
Production (boe/d) Funds Flow ($/Share)
Consolidation and Ferrier Development
1) Production increased 51% from Q3 2016 to Q4 2017. 2) Funds flow per share increased 100% from Q3 2016 to Q4 2017. 3) Funds Flow data is based on annualized quarterly Funds Flow.
PE PEACE RI RIVER R
Disp Disposed of
/d
1
Production
2
Funds Flow Per Share
3
7
Ferrier Focused
CEN ENTRAL ALBE BERTA
Low decline, Glauc Oil
1, 1,653 653 boe
/d1
81+ Locations
FOO OOTHIL ILLS
Cardium Oil, Low decline Gas
1, 1,487 487 boe
/d1
49+ Locations l EDMONTON l RED RED DE DEER
FER FERRIE IER
Predictable, Liquids Rich Cardium
7, 7,37 378 boe boe/d /d1
198+ Cardium Locations 71+ Other3 Locations
LMR: 4.552 399+ Drilling locations 73% Gas, 27% Liquids
1) Current production represents field estimates for month of February 2018. 2) Alberta Energy Regulator Liability Management Ratio as at March 3, 2018. 3) “Other” locations refer to Glauconitic and other Mannville formations including the Notikewin, Falher and Ellerslie.
8
TCPL Sales Line Petrus 2-25 Plant
Low Risk Growth
Repeatable, predictable, low risk,
manufacturing style resource play
Liquids rich Cardium Infrastructure control Potential for Glauconitic,
Notikewin, Falher, Ellerslie
1) Current production represents field estimates for month of February 2018.
7,378 7,378
Current boe/d1
60 60 bbls ls
Liquids per mmcf 50% Oil
269+ 269+ Locations
9
Land Position and Drilling Locations1
Initial Acquisition (Q (Q3 20 2014 14) YE E 20 2014 14 YE E 20 2015 15 YE E 20 2016 16 YE E 20 2017 17 Ne Net t Unde ndevel velope
d Ac Acre res 7,435 7,435 22,735 22,735 24,494 24,494 27,177 27,177 35,648 35,648 Tier 1 Cardium Locations 30 30 36 38 100 Tier 2 Cardium Locations 36 91 118 127 98 GLAUC/NTKN/FLHR & Other Locations 3 3 11 17 71 Tot Total al Loc Locat ation ions 69 69 124 124 165 165 182 182 269 269
7,435 22,735 24,494 27,177 35,648 69 124 165 182 269 Initial Acquisition (Q3 2014) YE 2014 YE 2015 YE 2016 YTD 2017
Ferrier Acreage & Locations
Net Undeveloped Acres Total Locations
GRO GROWTH
Q3 2014-Current
5X 5X 3X 3X 3X 24X 4X 4X
1) Locations include a combination of booked locations as identified by Sproule Associates Limited (“Sproule”) and unbooked locations which are internal estimates based on Petrus‘ internal evaluations. 2) 17 year drilling inventory estimate based on total current locations and a continued drilling pace consistent with the 2017 drilling pace of 16 gross wells.
DRILLING INVENTORY2
10
Material Operating Cost Reductions
100% Petrus operated 60 mmcf/d capacity Firm transportation contracts ensure production flows unrestricted
11 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017
Ferrier Opex ($/boe)1
Ferrier Operating Expense Timeline
1) Operating expense data based on Petrus actual financial data. 2) Ferrier operating expense decreased by 74% from Q2 2015 to Q4 2017.
KEYERA TAKE OR PAY EXPIRED PETRUS 2-25 GAS PLANT ON STREAM (Capacity-30 mmcf/d)
2
Operating Expense
12
Reducing the Cost of Adding Production
1) Total Capital cost represents cost associated with drilling, completion, equipping and tie-in. 2) Based on IP60, capital $/BOED of added production decreased 52% from 2015 using ball drop technology to 2017 using cemented sleeve technology.
$12,039/boed $5,837/boed
2015 2017 $/IP60 Tot Total l Capi pita tal1$ $ Inve nvested per er BOE OE of
Producti tion
dded
OPTIM OPTIMIZ IZATIO TION & & ADV DVANCIN ING TEC TECHNOLOGY
Increased Frac Density Pad Drilling Faster Drilling Times Monobore Wellbore Design Efficient Water Management
13
Economic Overview
1) Includes $350,000 of full cycle capital additions. 2) Assumptions: February 27, 2018 CIBC strip, Fx 1.25, WTI Diff 7$ USD/bbl, Nov 2018 on stream, Crown w/ 5% avg. GOR. Economics provided for Tier 1 Oil, Tier 1 Gas and Tier 2 locations represent average locations for each category and have average Petrus working interests of 34%, 61% and 66% respectively.
Petr Petrus Avg
WI (%) Gros ross Capital1 (mm$) Gros ross Sa Sales IP P 30 30
(BOE/d)
Gros ross Sa Sales EUR EUR
(MBOE) E)
IRR2 (%) Pa Payo yout2 (ye years) NPV102 (mm$) F&D2 ($/ $/boe)
Hal Half Cyc Cycle Eco Economics
Tier 1 Oil 34 3.60 495 301 102.7 1.0 1.07 12.13 Tier 1 Gas 61 2.90 530 465 44.4 1.9 1.02 6.89 Tier 2 66 2.90 380 345 15.9 3.6 0.18 10.01
Fu Full Cyc Cycle Eco Economics
Tier 1 Oil 34 3.95 495 301 78.6 1.2 0.96 13.31 Tier 1 Gas 61 3.25 530 465 32.9 2.4 0.82 7.72 Tier 2 66 3.25 380 345 9.1 5.0 0.00 11.22
14
1 2 3 4 5
Median Payout: 2.7 Years Petrus Tier 1 (Oil): 0.8 Year Payout Petrus Tier 1 (Gas): 1.3 Year Payout
Half Cycle Payout Estimates1
1) Non-Petrus payout estimates provided by Peters & Co. Limited. All payout estimates based on flat US$60/bbl WTI and US$3.00/Mcf NYMEX (C$2.25/Mcf AECO) prices. FX Rate USD/CAD .80 Economics provided for Tier 1 Oil, Tier 1 Gas and Tier 2 locations represent average locations for each category and have average Petrus working interests of 34%, 61% and 66% respectively. Petrus economics include 5% average GOR. 2) In some cases actual payout data exceeds bounds of chart area.
+2
Petrus Tier 2: 2.8 Year Payout
15
Stable Funds Flow 1,653 1,653
Current boe/d1
37% 37%
Oil & Liquids
81+ 81+
Locations
1) Current production represents field estimates for month of February 2018.
Stable, low decline Glauc oil production Waterflood upside potential Concentrated, operated, high working
interest
Critical infrastructure ownership and control
16
Significant Upside Potential
Current declines are ~10% Waterflood projects could reduce decline to <10%
6%
Recovery Factor To Date
Glauc “P” Pool
Waterflood Up
Upside
Potential
Glauc “R” Pool
9% 9%
Recovery Factor To Date
Waterflood Up
Upside
Potential
Glauc “A” Pool
Currently Under Waterflood
On Trend for 25
25%
Recovery
18%
Recovery Factor To Date
17
2 3 1 1Oil & Gas Financial Hedges
1) Percentages hedged based on actual production for Jan 2016 to Sep 2017; Oct 2017 forward based on Q4 2017 average production. Data uses hedging contracts in place as at March 7, 2017. 2) Oil price represents WTI CAD$/bbl. 3) Gas price represents AECO 7A CAD$/GJ. 4) Average price represents the average price of all 2018 hedging contracts in place as at December 31, 2017.
2018 % Gas Hedged1
2018 % Oil Hedged1
2018
2018
18
24% 24%
1 –Q3 2017
Competitive on Performance Metrics2
1) Peer group, as defined by Petrus, comprised of the following companies listed in alphabetical order: Bonterra Energy Corp., Cardinal Energy Ltd., Cequence Energy Ltd., Crew Energy Inc., Delphi Energy Corp., Journey Energy Inc., Painted Pony Energy Ltd., Perpetual Energy Inc., RMP Energy Inc., Storm Resources Ltd., Surge Energy Inc., Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. and Yangarra Resources Ltd. 2) All metrics calculated internally by Petrus using publically available data from quarterly financial reports. Any calculation requiring share price uses September 29, 2017 closing price. 3) DAPS Growth calculation represents the change in debt and dividend adjusted production per share from Q3 2016 to Q3 2017. 4) Cash Flow per Share calculation based on annualized Q3 2017 cash flow. 5) PDP reserves values per share based on NPV 10 before tax as reported for 2016 and Q3 2017 weighted average shares outstanding. 6) DACF/Share based on Q3 2017 debt adjusted cash flow and Q3 2017 weighted average (dil.) shares outstanding.
0%
Cash Flow/Share4
$0
Total Cash Costs($/boe)6
$0
DA Prod/Share Growth3
$3.65
$0
$9.79
PDP Reserves Value ($/share)5
$0.63
19
Positioned for Sustainable Value Creation
Quality Ass Assets Quality Ass Assets Fi Financial Str Strength Lo Low Cos Cost Ope perations Str Strong Hed Hedge Boo Book Ca Capital Eff Efficiency
Diversified, low risk, strong economics, consistent reserves growth Proven commitment to debt reduction, Increasing liquidity Ongoing cost reductions, owning key infrastructure significantly reduces op costs Commodity price risk mitigated through financial hedges Disciplined capital deployment, highest IRR projects, effective execution
20
Certain information regarding Petrus Resources Ltd. ("Petrus", "our" or "we" or the "Company") set forth in this document may constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws, including, but not limited to, the following: Petrus' business model, including planned activities by core area, anticipated consolidation opportunities, potential drilling locations and plans, potential waterflood plans and the expected benefits therefrom, the anticipated economics of certain plays based on various assumptions, the potential upside in certain assets, potential hedging gains, 2016 year end reserves, future operating expenses and well costs and other statements herein with respect to intended operational, business and other expected activities. In addition, information relating to reserves is deemed to be forward-looking information, as it involves the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves described can be economically produced in the future. The forward-looking statements and information (collectively, “forward-looking information”) is based on certain key expectations and assumptions made by Petrus, including expectations and assumptions concerning: prevailing commodity prices and exchange rates (including those prevailing in Alberta); applicable royalty rates and tax laws; future well production rates and resource and reserve volumes; the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals; the performance of existing wells; the success obtained in drilling new wells (including exploration wells); the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; assumptions of costs associated with drilling and development plans; consistency of laws and regulation relating to the oil and gas industry; expectation that current pricing and incentive programs will continue to be in force as expected; the costs and availability of labour and services; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which Petrus operates; and the ability of Petrus to obtain financing on acceptable terms when and if needed. In addition, this document may contain forward-looking information attributed to third party industry sources. Since forward-looking information addresses future events and conditions, by its very nature it involves inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These risks include, without limitation: risks associated with oil and gas exploration, development, exploitation, production, marketing and transportation, risks that future drilling will result in unsuccessful wells despite initial expectations being positive, risks that although exploration drilling may result in successful wells, any production from such wells is uneconomic, loss of markets, volatility of commodity prices, environmental risks, inability to obtain drilling rigs or other services, capital expenditure costs, including drilling, completion and facility costs, unexpected decline rates in wells, wells not performing as expected, changes in Petrus' credit facilities, including its borrowing base, risk of defaults and other re-determinations, delays resulting from Petrus' inability to obtain required regulatory approvals and ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources, the impact of general economic conditions in Canada, the United States and overseas, industry conditions, changes in laws and regulations (including the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations and royalty rates) and changes in how they are interpreted and enforced, increased competition, the lack of availability of qualified personnel
document are made as at the date of this document and Petrus does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable securities laws. Although Petrus believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward-looking information is based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking information because Petrus can give no assurances that they will prove to be
given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits that Petrus will derive therefrom. The information contained in this presentation does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all information that a reader may require. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own analysis and reviews of the Company and of the information contained in this presentation. Without limitation, readers should consider the advice of their financial, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors and such other factors they consider appropriate in investigating and analyzing the Company. Barrels of Oil Equivalent - Barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 thousand cubic feet (“mcf"): 1 barrel ("bbl") is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. In addition, given that the value ratio based on the current price of crude oil as compared to the current price of natural gas is significantly different from the energy equivalency of 6:1, utilizing a conversion on a 6:1 basis may be misleading as an indication
Analogous Information - Certain information contained herein is considered "analogous information" as defined in National Instrument 51-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities ("NI 51-101"). Such analogous information has not been prepared in accordance with NI 51-101 and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook and Petrus is unable to confirm whether such estimates have been prepared by a qualified reserves evaluator. In particular, this presentation describes increased recovery factors in a pool analogous to Petrus' Glauconite "A" Pool with respect to waterflood activities. Such information is not intended to be an estimate of Petrus' resources or projections of future results. In addition, such positive analogous information may not be applicable to Petrus or its properties. Such information has been presented to show the potential for enhanced recovery in certain of Petrus' areas of interest or areas analogous to Petrus' areas of
information has been presented to help demonstrate the basis for Petrus' business plans and strategies. There is no certainty that such results will be achieved by Petrus and such information should not be construed as an estimate of future recovery rates or reserves or resources or future production levels. Well Economics - Certain information contained herein sets forth the well economics utilized by management of Petrus in analyzing various opportunities of Petrus. The presentation of such well economics does not represent an estimate of reserves or the net present value of such reserves. Such economics were prepared on the assumptions set forth herein and also make certain other assumptions with respect to initial production levels, the type of commodity that may be produced, commodity prices, well depths, capital expenditures that may be incurred in drilling, completing and in the tie-in of wells, operating costs related to the wells and royalties. The well economics are partially based on certain historic results received by Petrus and other producers in the area to date and certain production profiles based on area production and other assumptions as set forth, which may prove to be inaccurate.
Petrus Resources Ltd. Corporate Update March 8, 2018
21
Capital costs to drill, complete and tie-in wells and operating costs in each area are also based on management's experience and not on historical data. In addition, such costs are based on management's estimates when the estimates were prepared and have not been escalated notwithstanding that certain wells are planned to be drilled in the future or that operating costs may increase in the future, including during the period that wells are projected to be drilled. Target volumes are volumes of oil and natural gas that management is targeting and in respect to which management is basing its decision to pursue the opportunity in a particular prospect. Actual reserves recovered from any prospect may be different than management's expectations utilized for planning purposes as provided herein and such difference may be material and would impact on the economics of each particular play. Initial Production Rates - Any references herein to production rates, test rates or initial production rates (including IP 30) are useful in confirming the presence of hydrocarbons, however, such rates are not determinative of the rates at which such wells will continue production and decline thereafter. Readers are cautioned not to place reliance on such rates in calculating the aggregate production for Petrus. Initial production or test rates may be estimated based on other third party estimates or limited data available at this time. Well-flow test result data should be considered to be preliminary until a pressure transient analysis and/or well-test interpretation has been carried out. In all cases herein, initial production or test results are not necessarily indicative of long-term performance of the relevant well or fields
Drilling Locations - This document discloses drilling locations in three categories: (i) proved locations; (ii) probable locations; and (iii) unbooked locations. Proved locations and probable locations are derived from the report prepared by Sproule Associates Limited dated March 8, 2018 and effective December 31, 2017 evaluating the crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas and future net production revenues attributable to the properties of Petrus and account for drilling locations that have associated proved and/or probable reserves, as applicable. Unbooked locations are internal estimates based on Petrus' prospective acreage and an assumption as to the number of wells that can be drilled per section based on industry practice and internal review. Unbooked locations do not have attributed reserves. Of the 399 gross (251.7 net) drilling locations identified herein 159 gross (86.4 net) are proved locations, 66 gross (36.0 net) are probable locations and 188 gross (129.3 net) are unbooked locations. Unbooked locations have been identified by management as an estimation of our multi-year drilling activities based on evaluation of applicable geologic, seismic, engineering, production and reserves
drilling locations on which we actually drill wells will ultimately depend upon the availability of capital, regulatory approvals, seasonal restrictions, oil and natural gas prices, costs, actual drilling results, additional reservoir information that is obtained and other factors. While certain of the unbooked drilling locations have been derisked by drilling existing wells in relative close proximity to such unbooked drilling locations, some of other unbooked drilling locations are farther away from existing wells where management has less information about the characteristics of the reservoir and therefore there is more uncertainty whether wells will be drilled in such locations and if drilled there is more uncertainty that such wells will result in additional oil and gas reserves or production. Non-GAAP Measures - This document contains terms commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry, such as funds flow, debt-adjusted share, operating netback and net debt. These terms do not have a standardized meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. “funds flow" should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, funds from operating activities as determined in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as an indicator of Petrus' performance. "funds flow" represents funds from operating activities prior to changes in non-cash working capital, transaction costs and decommissioning provision expenditures incurred. "Net debt" is long term debt, capital lease
the oil and gas industry to measure the contribution of crude oil and natural gas sales after deducting royalties and operating costs. Definitions: boe = barrel of oil equivalent (6:1) boe/d = boe per day mmcf/d = mmcubic feet per day WI = working interest mm = million
Continued
22
FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: : Suit ite 240 2400, 240 240 – 4th 4th Ave venue SW | | Cal Calgary, Albe lberta T T2P 4H4 4H4 www.petr trusresources.com Neil Korchinski, President & CEO 403.930.0889 | nkorchinski@petrusresources.com Cheree Stephenson, VP Finance & CFO 403.930.0891 | cstephenson@petrusresources.com
23
Supplemental Information
24
Recent Well Production Data1
Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Cumulative Production
Lateral ateral Len ength (miles les) On Prod rod Dat Date Gas as (mcf/d /d) Liquids (bbl bbl/d /d) Tot
al (boe
/d) Gas as (mcf/d /d) Liquids (bbl bbl/d /d) Tot
al (boe
/d) Gas as (mcf/d /d) Liquids (bbl bbl/d /d) Tot
al (boe
/d) Gas as (mcf/d /d) Liquids (bbl bbl/d /d) Tot
al (boe
/d) Gas as (mcf/d /d) Liquids (bbl bbl/d /d) Tot
al (boe
/d) Gas as (mcf/d /d) Liquids (bbl bbl/d /d) Tot
al (boe
/d) Tot
al Days Days
rod Gas as (mmcf) Liquids (bbl bbl) Tot
al (boe
100/15-11-039-09W5/00 2 1/12/17 2,945 310 801 3,839 312 952 3,852 252 894 3,730 217 839 1,346 76 301 3,747 214 838 370 1,128 61,709 249,706 100/02-08-038-08W5/00 1 4/23/17 405 206 274 1,163 218 412 1,255 203 412 1,278 179 392 1,340 172 396 1,255 150 359 269 343 44,449 101,624 100/04-08-038-08W5/00 1 4/23/17 451 162 237 1,326 219 440 1,432 195 434 1,455 177 420 1,433 171 410 1,286 144 358 269 360 43,292 103,370 100/15-08-039-08W5/00 1 5/5/17 3,162 273 800 1,785 185 483 1,738 149 439 2,339 171 561 2,444 151 559 2,526 144 565 257 635 37,730 143,621 100/16-08-039-08W5/00 1 5/5/17 2,730 359 814 1,861 238 548 1,870 204 516 1,940 189 512 2,379 193 590 2,439 185 592 257 615 48,348 150,854 102/16-30-038-08W5/00 2 11/27/17 1,782 288 585 2,737 303 759 2,757 263 722 2,680 239 686 100 268 26,111 70,799 100/01-19-039-08W5/00 1.5 12/12/17 714 380 499 1,372 359 587 1,434 296 535 85 97 26,051 42,245 100/04-19-038-08W5/00 2 12/20/17 1,754 185 478 2,578 246 675 2,712 230 682 77 193 17,645 49,643
Av Averag age
1,743 270
270
561 2,082 260
260
607 2,131 224
224
579 2,237
195 195
568 1,789 153
153
451 2,251 167
167 543
1) Production data represents field estimates; gas production and totals are based on raw production.
25
100 200 300 400 500 600 5 10 15 20
Production (boe/d)2 Months on Production2 Actual Tier 1 Avg. (41 wells) Tier 1 Type Curve Sproule Tier 1 Analog Actual Tier 2 Avg. (59 wells) Tier 2 Type Curve Sproule Tier 2 Analog
Type Curves versus Actual Performance
1) Type curve data as per Sproule reserves report as at December 31, 2016. “Sproule Tier 1 Analog” uses 3-19-039-08W5 TP well as representative location, “Sproule Tier 2 Analog” uses 3-20-038-08W5 TP well as representative location. 2) Actual production data sourced from GeoScout and Petrus field data capture.
1 1