FIRE SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION: GETTING IT RIGHT Prof Ali Nadjai: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fire safety in construction getting it right
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FIRE SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION: GETTING IT RIGHT Prof Ali Nadjai: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FIRE SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION: GETTING IT RIGHT Prof Ali Nadjai: Director of FireSERT BEng(H), MSc, PhD, Ceng, MIStructE, MIFireE, PGCUT ulster.ac.uk Slide 1 INTRODUCTION Canada Sweden Russia FireSERT USA Europe China JAPAN Middle East


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ulster.ac.uk

Slide 1

FIRE SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION: GETTING IT RIGHT

Prof Ali Nadjai: Director of FireSERT BEng(H), MSc, PhD, Ceng, MIStructE, MIFireE, PGCUT

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FireSERT Sweden Abu Dhabi Hong Kong USA Singapore Qatar South Africa Europe Australia Canada North Africa South America China Middle East Russia JAPAN

Firesert: Centre of Excellence

Oman

INTRODUCTION

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Slide 6

  • Provide an internationally competitive

research base for fire safety science

  • Extend/develop the knowledge base for

fire safety engineering

  • Disseminate knowledge to the widest

possible audience

  • To develop and deliver higher technical

fire safety education and training programmes

  • Support industry and Innovation

Firesert: Centre of Excellence

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fires are recognised as one of the major threats of life and property in many countries.

The primary goal of fire protection is to preserve life safety. A second goal is to protect property and safeguard the environment.

Relatively Young discipline rapidly emerging field Broad and interdisciplinary address complex problems

Economic impact of fire in buildings has been estimated at ~1% of GDP – a vast sum now exceeding £10 billion annually

INTRODUCTION

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Buildings are at the centre of our social and economic activity. Not only do we spend most of our lives in buildings, we also spend most of our money on buildings. The built environment is not only the largest industrial sector in economic terms, it is also the largest in terms of resource flow.

INTRODUCTION

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Windsor Building Madrid, 12 February 2005

Building Fires – Compartmentation not well respected

Previous Fire Disasters

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The next day...

Insurance payout €300 millio 2 metro lines closed 30,000 people unable to get to work Olympic bid damaged

slide-8
SLIDE 8

13th, FEB, 2003

Taegu St.

Chungangro St

Arson in the train

Fire propagation over train

Chungangro St

Fire Propagation

Train approach

8

Taegu Subway Fire Disaster

slide-9
SLIDE 9

100 200 150 50

WOUNDED DEAD 9

Previous Fire Disaster

100 200 150 50

WOUNDED DEAD

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Seoul 10th February 2008, 610 year old landmark top national treasure

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Tunnel Fires - Explosive Spalling of Concrete

Channel Tunnel (UK-France, 2008)

A Warehouse without Sprinklers

Matalan, Birmingham 2 March 2006 loss in business turnover Job losses problems with clients and customer if supply cannot be fulfilled due to fire damage.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Shanghai high rise residential building, 2010 53 persons died and over 50 injured

Previous Fire Disaster

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Saif Belhasa building fire, Tecom 2012 (left) & Tamweel Tower fire 2012 (right). Shanghai Fire (left) and CCTV Tower, Beijing fire (right).

The rate of fires resulting in extensive fire spread involving combustible exterior wall systems is gradually increasing due to the of energy efficient but combustible materials and the consequences of such fires are very large especially for those smart and green high-tech buildings.

Previous Fire Disaster

slide-14
SLIDE 14

what is clear is that there is a need to better understand how façade systems behave in situ, during fires and how the combination of decoration and insulation materials,

Previous Fire of Disaster

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order

  • Responsible person
  • Fire Risk Assessment of

‘general fire precautions’

  • Competent person
  • Enforced by Fire Authority
  • Problems:
  • Qualifications?
  • Skills?
  • Competency

Evaluation?

Legal liabilities

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Research is required to improve Buildings fire safety

  • Lessons from real fires in real buildings
  • Full (or large) scale fire tests
  • Well instrumented and designed small scale fire tests
  • Validated design methods
  • Materials investigation
  • Use of smart technology
  • Robustness of building regulations
  • More robust and safer designs
  • Validate d computer software
  • Allows optimum design to be determined taking into

account life safety, financial impact and environmental issues

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Challenge Fire safety

Economic impact of fire in buildings has been estimated at ~1% of GDP – a vast sum now exceeding £10 billion annually

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Government University/ Institute Industry

  • Commerce & Marketing
  • Research Development
  • Design Rules
  • Fire Research
  • Fire testing
  • Fire Guidance and

design

  • Software development
  • Training (CPD)
  • EUROPEAN FUNDING
  • EPSRC FUNDING

Mechanism of working

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Supporting the Next Generation Leaders for Fire Safety and Clean

Regeneration Energy Application Technology

Developing Qualified Human Resources

“Developing high level research oriented universities”

Select & focus

Producing next generation scholars

Improvement and assistance

Top class experts

Specialization in Future technologies Continuous support for master course, PhD, and advanced-level researchers Improvement and assistance of education program Industry-academic collaboration and international cooperation

Role of the University of Ulster to FireSERT

slide-21
SLIDE 21

How Fire spread in Long Corridor Enclosure and Facades

50 cm 300 cm Propane burner 50 cm 155 cm Facade

  • Side view -
  • Front view -

The enclosure is made of fireboard (4 cm thickness).

4 Opening dimensions (Width× Height) : 0.10 × 0.25 m2, 0.10 × 0.25 m2, 0.10 × 0.25 m2, 0.10 × 0.25 m2

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Flame moving horizontally from the back (location of the burner) towards the opening then ejected (i.e. external burning).

Time (min) 10 20 30 40 50 HRR (kW) 10 20 30 40 Theoretical HRR Actual HRR 1500 A0 H0

1/2

Growth (Fuel-controlled) Ventilation-controlled Ejected flame Decay Steady State

HRR profile

Time (min) 10 20 30 40 Temperature (C) 250 500 750 1000 Box F Box E Box D Box C Box B Box A

Fire Growth Ventilation-controlled stage HRR = 1500 A0 H0 1/2 Flame comes out Steady-state (Maximum HRR)

Temperature profiles

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Temperature Profiles

  • EXP. DATA:

No external burning FDS 5.3.0: External burning FDS 4.0.7: External burning

slide-24
SLIDE 24

How people Behave in fire and modelling fire evacuation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

How real building failed in fires

a) Early stages, b) spreading in the northwest side, c) extended to entire floor levels

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

How to use FEM to Analyse failure mechanisms

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Actions on structures exposed to fire

EN 1991-1-2

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Structural Fire Safety Engineering

  • vs. Classification
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Actions on structures exposed to fire

EN 1991-1-2

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Natural Fire Safety Concept

1- Implemented in Eurocode 1 Fire Part 2- Some National Fire Regulations include now alternative requirements based on Natural Fire

slide-31
SLIDE 31

List of needed physical parameters

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Characteristics of the fire compartment

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Characteristic of the Fire for different buildings

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Fire load density

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Rate of Heat Release Curve Stationary State and Decay Phase

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Rate of Heat Release Curve Stationary State and Decay Phase

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Fire Engineer Code of practice

Solution

Structural Fire Specialist

Research Structural Knowledge

Experiences

Structural Engineer

Code of practice

Architects

Analysis / Calculations

How Fire Engineers interact with

  • ther members
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Simplified Fire Models

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Fully Engulfed Compartment : Parametric Fire

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Case study 1: Localised Fire in Large Compartment

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Reason for the project

41

  • 2. State-of-the-art and reason for the project

Y

Annex C of EN 1991-1-2: Flame impacting the ceiling Annex C of EN 1991-1-2: Flame not impacting the ceiling

How to calculate the temperature in a column subjected to the radiation of the fire ?

Flame axis L z D f H

Y = Height of the free zone

concrete slab

θ

g

beam

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Localised Fire: Annex C of EN 1991-1-2

slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45

DESIGN OF COLUMNS SUBJECT TO LOCALISED FIRES

It assumes that the shape of the fire on the ground is circular and is intended for localised fires that do not exceed a diameter of 10 m and a heat release rate of 50 MW. The effects of a local fire result in four distinct regions, each of which receives different levels of heat flux. These regions can be split as follows: 1- Outside the fire 2- Inside the fire 3- Inside the fire, in the smoke layer 4- Outside the fire, in the smoke layer

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Analytical method and validation

Modelling of the flame

Step 1: The surface of the fire is transformed into an equivalent discus Step 2: The evolution of Heat Release Rate is calculated according to EN 1991-1-2 Annex E (growing phase, plateau, decaying phase) Step 3: The flame length Lf is calculated by application of EN 1991-1-2 Annex C Step 4: The action of the fire is represented by a virtual solid flame, conic or cylindric, defined by Deq and Lf

HRRmax (fuel or ventilation controlled) paraboli c constant linear time Q (or HRR) Deq Deq Lf Cone model Cylinder model

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Analytical method and validation

Simplified model

Sub-division of the flame into cylinders and rings

If the flame does touch the ceiling (Lf > Hceiling)

If the flame does not touch the ceiling (Lf < Hceiling or no ceiling)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Analytical method and validation

Simplified model

Model validation based on Ulster tests (and FDS modelling)

Case 1a 1 pan D = 0.7 m Gauges at 0.5/1.8 m Case 1b 1 pan D = 0.7 m Gauges at 1.0/1.6 m

Gauge location Experime nt mean FDS Simulatio n Cylinder flame Conic flame Height Distance m m kW/m² kW/m² kW/m² kW/m²

1.0 0.5 30.6 28.5 74.0 39.0 1.0 1.0 13.8 12.9 33.2 17.9 1.0 1.6 5.9 5.5 15.5 8.5 1.0 1.8 4.2 3.8 10.8 6.0 2.0 0.5 6.2 11.2 22.0 5.9 2.0 1.0 4.5 5.9 14.1 5.5 2.0 1.6 3.0 3.7 8.8 4.1 2.0 1.8 2.3 2.6 6.7 3.3

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Water mist suppression research Improving water mist performance using chemical additives

– Various additives testing – Novel small compartment experimental set-up

Low pressure water mist systems

– Feasibility studies aimed at improving system performance

Case 2: Fire Protection

slide-50
SLIDE 50

The compartment is designed to represent a modern open plan

  • ffice15x 9 m. In this test, both the perimeter beams and the columns are

protected (including connections) with the internal beams unprotected.

Sponsor: EU £ 1.6 Million (2007- Oct 2010) Design Safe structures Avoid and eliminate catastrophic collapse.

Case study 3:

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Fire Test

slide-52
SLIDE 52

EUROCODE DESIGN

RFS-PR-06102: Fire Resistance of Long Span Cellular Beams Made of Rolled Profiles (FCEB)

Starts: 28 August 2007 Ends: 31 July 2011 Value (Euro): 1.6 Million Engineering Physical Science Research Council(EPSRC): EP/F001525/1 Performance of Cellular Composite Floor Beams under Severe 2008 – end April 2011

Fire Conditions, Value (£) £408,000 Starts: May

slide-53
SLIDE 53

New strength mode in the Design Code

0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 200 400 600 800 1 000 1 200

Reduction factors Temperature ( C)

kEa,θ kap,θ kay,θ

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 200 400 600 800 1 000 1 200

Reduction factors (x 1E-3) Temperature ( C)

kEa,θ kap,θ kay,θ

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

MACS+ Design Example

  • Gravity design case
  • MACS+ membrane design case
  • Fire load design case
slide-55
SLIDE 55

02

ASD Westok - Projects

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Past Facade Fires – Castledawson Fire Test conducted by Nadjai 2010

Low energy, lightweight building components and thermally effective facades for zero carbon buildings (ENERGY-BUILD)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Membrane Action of Composite Structures in Case of Fire

Ali Nadjai, Olivier Vassart, Bin Zhao

Design Guide

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Experimental Investigation of Localised fire on Glazing Facades systems having different orientations Prof A NADJAI

Vertical Glazed Facade Test Vertical Glazed Facade Inclined Glazed Facade Test Inclined Glazed Facade Vertical Glazed Facade Model Stresses Inclined Glazed Facade Test Inclined Glazed Facade Model Stresses

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Pre Test & Post Test Pictures

Intumescent Paint Sample Precision Weighing TGA DSC Results Graphs Post Test TGA Post Test DSC

slide-60
SLIDE 60

DSC Test Equipment TGA Resin Results Graph TGA Resin results Table DSC Resin Results Graph DSC Resin Results Table

Time Temperature Sample Mass Minutes °C % 5 80 99.3539 10 130 94.4108 15 180 89.4424 20 230 87.0037 25 280 84.8178 30 330 80.4458 35 380 55.2088 40 430 49.276 45 480 46.4895 50 530 43.0669 Time Temperature Power Minutes °C mW 5 80.1667

  • 9.43057

10 130.333

  • 8.13135

15 180.5

  • 5.35327

20 230.667

  • 4.23531

25 280.833

  • 3.50507

30 331

  • 3.16137

35 380 1.31762 40 430.167

  • 5.50744

45 480.333

  • 6.85893

50 530.5

  • 8.27674

TGA Test Equipment Resin Sample

Scientific Material Analysis

Low energy, lightweight building components and thermally effective facades for zero carbon buildings (ENERGY-BUILD)

slide-61
SLIDE 61

UNIQUE: FROM NANOSIZE TO 20 MW FIRES

NANOCOMPOSITES

INTRINSIC FLAMM. PROPERTIES (TGA, FTIR, MDSC,

  • UNIV. FLAMM.

APPARATUS)

LARGE SCALE (20MW) MATERIAL AND CFD MODELLING Major projects: FIRENET (EU) 2M FAÇADE FIRES (EPSRC, Japan) £200K

PREDFIRE NANO (EU) Eu3M Industrial R&D, Brominated Substitutes Eu4M

Solid Phase TGA, DTA, DSC, ATR

Milligram size samples thermal and toxicity analysis

slide-62
SLIDE 62

2018-07-15

F ir e Sta tion Risk L e ve l 2 Risk L e ve l 1 Risk L e ve l 3

T e c hnique of pr e dic ting F ir e and suppr e ssion r

  • ot

L ate st F ir e De te c tion te c hnique E ar ly F ir e Suppr e ssion e quipme nt 62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Thank you for your attention!!!