finding magic numbers for heavy and superheavy nuclei
play

Finding Magic Numbers for Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei By Roger A. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Finding Magic Numbers for Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei By Roger A. Rydin Associate Professor Emeritus of Nuclear Engineering Foreword I am a Nuclear Engineer, Specializing in Reactor Physics Nuclear Physics = Physics of Nucleus


  1. Finding Magic Numbers for Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei By Roger A. Rydin Associate Professor Emeritus of Nuclear Engineering

  2. Foreword � I am a Nuclear Engineer, Specializing in Reactor Physics � Nuclear Physics = Physics of Nucleus � Theory Taught by Robley Evans, Experiments by Norm Rasmussen � Fascinated by Magic Numbers, Semi- Empirical Binding Energy Formula � Disturbed by Fast Moving Nucleons in Nucleus, Coulomb Barrier Penetration

  3. Foreword � Met Dr. Charles Lucas at U. Tulsa Meeting � PhD Theoretical Physics W&M, Newport News Accelerator, Expert in Pion/Muon Physics, Now Owns Company � Models of Nucleons as Charge Carrying Ring Magnets � Nucleus Model in Fixed Static Shells Under Force Balance � Explained Magic Numbers � New Semi-Empirical BE Formula

  4. Foreword � Joint Letter to NSE, Published 2009 � Sent Copy to Professor Hans Weber � He Suggested Application to Superheavy Nuclei � Summary T/E by Dr. Mohini Gupta � Gupta Suggests Annals of Nuclear Energy Paper � Published December 2010 � Follow On Paper Published August 2011

  5. Order of Presentation 1. Robley Evan’s 1950s Nuclear Physics for Engineers 2. Magic Numbers and the Semi-Empirical Binding Energy Formula 3. Lucas’ Electromagnetic Model of the Nucleus 4. Superheavy Nuclei 5. New Magic Proton and Neutron Numbers 6. Consequences for Selected Isotopes

  6. The Atomic Nucleus - 1955 � Heavy on Experimental Data � Analysis of What the Data Implied � Theory of the Time – Not Cut in Stone � Orderly Treatment: Charge; Size; Mass; Moments; Isotopes; Nuclear Systematics; Forces; Nuclear Models

  7. Nuclear Magic Numbers 2, 8, 28, 50, 82, 126 Are Closed Shells of Some Kind -> Extra Stable Isotopes � Helium-4 (2p, 2n) = Alpha Decay � Oxygen-16 (8p, 8n) -> UO 2 , etc. � Double Hump Fission Yields Light (28, 50) +, and Heavy (50,82) + � Delayed Neutrons, Poisons, i.e. Xe-135 � Lead-208 (82, 126) Last Stable Isotope

  8. Semi-Empirical Binding, B/A 1955 Stable Isotope Data Contribution Terms

  9. Mass Parabolas Odd A Decay Even A Decay

  10. Questions � What is the Nature of the Closed Shells ? � What Produces Liquid Drop Property ? � Why Doesn’t the Semi-Empirical Binding Energy Formula Match the Low A Peaks ? � What is the Physical Decay Mechanism ?

  11. Lucas’ Electromagnetic Nucleus � Protons and Neutrons Occupy Fixed Positions in Symmetric 3D Space Under Static Force Balance � They are Distributed in 6 Double Cycles – Occupying 2, 8, 18, 18, 32 and 50 � Inner Neutron Shells Can Expand to Next Number Like Electron Shells

  12. Lucas’ Electromagnetic Nucleus Lead has Outer 50 and 32 Density Decreases in Protons = 82, and 50, Center for Big Nuclei 32, 18, 18, and 8 = 126 Neutrons

  13. Lucas’ “Rule” Assignments for Doubly Magic Isotopes AT A Z N N1 P1 N2 P2 N3 P3 N4 P4 N5 P5 N6 P6 He 4 2 2 2 2 O 16 8 8 8 8 Ca 40 20 20 6 6 14 14 Ca 48 20 28 2 8 6 18 14 Ni 48 28 20 2 6 8 14 18 Sn 100 50 50 18 18 32 32 Sn 132 50 82 6 8 18 18 18 32 32 Pb 208 82 126 8 18 18 32 32 50 50

  14. Lucas’ Electromagnetic Nucleus � Magic Numbers are Composites of 6 Shells � Proton Shells Fill from Outside � The Neutron Shell Between Outer Proton Shells Acts Like a Decoupler by Polarizing Sideways => Liquid Drop Properties � Interior Neutrons Polarize with Plus Ends Toward Center and Fill Inwards � Decay is a Vibration Process !

  15. Complicated Vibrations � Force Laws Nonlinear � Nucleons Vibrate About Positions � Internal “Bumped” Nucleon Vibrations -> Beta Decay? � Non-Spherical Rotational Vibrations � Linear Model Analog of Schrödinger Equation !

  16. Semi-Empirical Binding Energy B/A - K 1 Volume - K 2 (#Neutrons + #Protons) in outermost shell /A Surface - K 3 Z(Z-1) A -4/3 Coulomb - K 4 (#paired Neutrons - #paired Protons) 2 /A Asymmetry, Magic - K 5 (#unpaired Protons + #unpaired Neutrons) /A Pairing

  17. Lucas’ New Semi-Empirical Binding Energy for 3000 Nuclei

  18. Electromagnetic Nucleus Computational Confirmation

  19. Superheavy Nuclei � Produced by Bombarding Heavy Elements, i.e., Uranium, Plutonium, Curium, Californium, and Berkelium by Heavy Ions Like Doubly Magic Ca-48 (20, 28) � Work Done at GSI Darmstadt, JINR Dubna, ORNL, RIKEN Japan, LLNL � Longest Half Lives are 12 Minutes, and 22 Seconds

  20. Superheavy Nuclei Sea Extent

  21. Observations � Lower End of the Red Peninsula is Near Z = 90 and N = 140; Upper End of the Red Peninsula is Near Z = 100 and N = 158 � Low End of the Green Peninsula Area is Near Z = 82; Upper End Around Z = 108 � Shoal is Near Z = 108, and it Lies Between N = 158 and 164 � Island of Stability is Centered with a Red Area Near Z = 108 and N = 182; Island Lies Between Z = 102 and 118, and Between N = 172 and N= 184.

  22. Theoretical Superheavy Nuclei Magic Numbers � Spherical and Deformed Nuclei, Multiple Theories, Liquid Drop Plus Shells � Magic Z at 108, 110, 114, 120 ? � Magic N at 152, 164, 172, 184 ? � Why Not Others, Close Together ?

  23. Z Extension of Lucas’ Shells Z = 50 + 32 + 8 = 90 � Z = 50 + 32 + 8 + 2 = 92 � Z = 50 + 32 + 18 = 100 � Z = 50 + 32 + 18 + 2 = 102 � Z = 50 + 32 + 18 + 8 = 108 � Z = 50 + 32 + 18 + 8 + 2 = 110 � Z = 50 + 32 + 18 + 18 = 118 � Z = 50 + 32 + 18 + 18 + 2 = 120 �

  24. N Extension of Lucas’ Shells � N = 50 + 32 + 32 + 18 + 8 = 140 � N = 50 + 32 + 32 + 18 + 8 + 2 = 142 � N = 50 + 50 + 32 + 18 + 8 = 158 � N = 50 + 50 + 32 + 32 = 164 � N = 50 + 50 + 32 + 32 + 8 = 172 � N = 50 + 50 + 32 + 32 +18 = 182 � N = 50 + 50 + 32 + 32 +18 + 2 = 184

  25. Consequences � New N and Z Numbers Cover Other Theoretical Values � Agree with Peninsula, Shoal and Island Boundaries � Suggestion of Lower A Single and Double Magic Nuclei in Continent Yet Unexplored � Requires a Careful Look at Isotope Data In the Table of Isotopes

  26. N Extension of Lucas’ Shells ? N = 50 + 32 + 8 = 90 � N = 50 + 32 + 8 + 2 = 92 � N = 50 + 32 + 18 = 100 � N = 50 + 32 + 18 + 2 = 102 � N = 50 + 32 + 18 + 8 = 108 � N = 50 + 32 + 18 + 8 + 2 = 110 � N = 50 + 32 + 18 + 18 = 118 � N = 50 + 32 + 18 + 18 + 2 = 120 � � N = 50 + 32 + 18 + 18 + 8 + 2 = 128

  27. Further Downward Z Extension of Lucas’ Shells ? Z = 32 + 18 + 8 = 58 � i.e. Cerium, N = 58 First Suggested in 1981 by Linus Pauling Z = 32 + 18 + 18 = 68 � i.e. Erbium, Near N = 70 by Pauling Z = 32 + 18 + 18 + 8 = 76 � i.e. Osmium �

  28. Linus Pauling Data

  29. Isotopes Considered Peninsula � Thorium Z = 90 � Uranium Z = 92 � Fermium Z = 100 � Nobelium Z = 102 Continent � Cerium Z = 58 � Dysprosium Z = 66 � Osmium Z = 76 � Lead Z = 82

  30. Thorium, Z = 90 = Holy Grail ? � 19 Isotopes � Doubly Magic Th-230 (90, 140) @ 75000 y � Doubly Magic Th-232 (90, 142)@ 1.4E10 y � Th-229, One Short of Double @ 7300 y � N/Z ~ 1.54 for Most Stable � Lighter Isotopes, ns to days � Heavier Isotopes, days to minutes

  31. Uranium, Z = 92 � 20 Isotopes � Doubly Magic U- 232 (92, 140) @ 68 y � Odd U-233 @ 1.6E5 y � Doubly Magic U- 234 (92, 142) @ 2.4E5 y � U-236 @ 2.4E7 y � U-238 @ 4.5E9 y and N/Z = 1.52 � Lighter Isotopes, µs to days � Heavier Isotopes, days to minutes

  32. Neptunium and Plutonium � Long Lived U, Np and Pu Isotopes All Lie at a Ratio of N/Z Near 1.54 � Seaborg Criterion for Even A Spontaneous Fission Parameter Z 2 /A > ~ 44 � Odd-A Nuclei More Stable to Spontaneous Fission than Even-A Nuclei � Fission Preferred Mode of Decay for the Proton Rich Heavy and Superheavy Isotopes

  33. Thorium, Uranium, Neptunium and Plutonium Conclusions � N/Z ~ 1.54 Is Important � Magic and Near Magic Gives Longer Half Lives � Magic Gives More Isotopes � Worse to Have Too Many Protons vs. Too Many Neutrons

  34. Fermium, Z = 100 � 19 Isotopes � Odd Fm-257 @ 100 days Longest Lived � Doubly Magic Fm-258 (100, 158), Short Spontaneous Fission � Lighter Isotopes, ms to days � Heavier Isotopes, days to ms

  35. Nobelium, Z = 102 � 12 Isotopes � Odd No-259 @ 58 minutes Longest Lived � Doubly Magic Fm-260 (102, 158), Short Spontaneous Fission � Lighter Isotopes, ms to minutes � Heavier Isotopes, ms

  36. Fermium and Nobelium Conclusions � Magic Effects Not As Clear � Longest Lived Odd, One Short of Doubly Magic � Spontaneous Fission More Important, at Doubly Magic � Magic Gives More Isotopes � Worse to Have Too Many Protons vs. Too Many Neutrons

  37. Cerium, Z = 58 � 20 Isotopes � Ce-140, Doubly Magic at N = 82, Almost 90% of Natural Cerium � Ce148, Doubly Magic at N = 90, @ 56 seconds, and Ce-150 Doubly Magic at N = 92 @ 4 seconds Are Among Heaviest Cerium Isotopes Known

  38. Dysprosium, Z = 66 � 30 Isotopes � Dy-160 to Dy-164, Comprise Most of the Naturally Stable Isotopes � Lighter Dy-158, with a Magic N = 92, and Dy-156, with a Magic N = 90, Are Also Stable � Light Dy-148, with a Magic N = 82 @ 3.1 minutes � Heavy Dy-166, with a Magic N = 100 @ 81.6 hours, and Dy-168, with a Magic N = 102 @ 8.7 minutes

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend