finding a better way
play

Finding a Better Way: Genomic Distinctiveness Kyle B. Brothers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Finding a Better Way: Genomic Distinctiveness Kyle B. Brothers Genomics and Ethics in Research and Medical Decision-Making Cincinnati, OH March 13, 2015 Debates over genomic exceptionalism Overview Clinical analogies Genomic


  1. Finding a Better Way: Genomic Distinctiveness Kyle B. Brothers Genomics and Ethics in Research and Medical Decision-Making Cincinnati, OH March 13, 2015

  2. • Debates over genomic exceptionalism Overview • Clinical analogies • Genomic Distinctiveness

  3. Genomic Exceptionalism

  4. Definitions • -ome = noun suffix indicating “all of the specified constituents of a cell, considered collectively or in total” • -omic = adjective suffix with same meaning

  5. Genomic Exceptionalism • Large number of findings generated simultaneously • High likelihood of secondary finding

  6. Genomic Exceptionalism Results may need filtering due to: • Genomics • Overwhelming number of secondary findings • Genetics • “Right not to know” • “Right to an open future”

  7. Debate Over ACMG Recommendations

  8. ACMG Recommendations “[W]e felt that clinicians and laboratory personnel have a fiduciary duty to prevent harm by warning patients and their families about certain incidental findings and that this principle supersedes concerns about autonomy, just as it does in the reporting of incidental findings elsewhere in medical practice .”

  9. Critique of Recommendations “Rejecting the need for the patient’s informed consent to look for mutations in a predetermined list of 57 genes is a profound departure from prevailing law and norms .”

  10. Response to Critique “To date, the traditions of genetic testing and reporting have exceptionalized all genetic risk information as potentially dangerous to the well- being of patients. This tradition, in the era of genome sequencing, must be reconsidered.”

  11. Clinical Analogies

  12. Imaging

  13. Imaging Genomics • CT and MRI capture • WGS captures “whole” “whole” part of the body genome • High likelihood of incidental • High likelihood of secondary findings findings • Confirmation potentially • Confirmation potentially risky risky

  14. Imaging Genomics • Images display incidental • Secondary findings are findings by default hidden by default • Filtering requires • Filtering can be achieved by sophisticated image narrowing analysis processing • “Incidental” • “Secondary”

  15. Imaging Genomics • Incidental findings • Almost every patient has infrequent secondary findings • Narrow scope of possible • Potential for secondary findings findings related to every organ system

  16. Imaging vs. Genomics • Similar in some ways, different in others • These differences could justify differences in practice

  17. Newborn Screening

  18. NBS Genomics • New technology (tandem • New technology (WGS) mass spec) provides cheap, provides cheap, easy easy alternative to multiple alternative to multiple existing technologies existing technologies • Also generates large • Also generates large number of results that were number of results that were not previously obtained not previously obtained

  19. NBS Genomics • Many secondary findings • Many secondary findings reflect circumstances that reflect circumstances that are ambiguous – not clear- are ambiguous – not clear- cut pathology cut pathology • Confirmatory testing can • Confirmatory testing can take time, cause stress take time, cause stress

  20. NBS Genomics • Results: • Results: • Reflect current metabolic • Reflect genetic state composition • Are proximal to clinical • Are distal from clinical signs and symptoms signs and symptoms • Reflect potential current • Typically reflect disease disease state risk

  21. NBS Genomics • Typically performed: • Typically performed: • In public health setting • In research or clinical setting • On healthy patients • On patients with clinical indication • In infants • In adults or children

  22. NBS vs. Genomics • Similar in some ways, different in others • These differences could justify differences in practice

  23. Routine Laboratory Panels

  24. Typical Laboratory Panels • Complete Blood Count: • Parameters for variety of cells in the blood • Basic Metabolic Panel: • 7-8 parameters reflecting fluid and electrolyte status • Complete Metabolic Panel: • BMP + liver and nutritional parameters

  25. Routine Lab Panels Genomics • Laboratory devices generate • Secondary findings could be “package” of findings considered “part of the package” • Not practical to account for • Concerns about practicality of individual preferences in accounting for preferences components of package • Generates unexpected findings • Can generate unexpected that may need to be addressed findings that may need to be addressed

  26. Routine Lab Panels Genomics • Limitations and implications • Limitations and implications still well understood poorly understood • “Package” is routinely filtered, • Concern that failure to analyze since laboratory devices can for important incidental findings generate more parameters than would be unethical requested

  27. Imaging vs. Genomics • Similar in some ways, different in others • These differences could justify differences in practice

  28. Antibiotic Sensitivities

  29. Antibiotic Sensitivity Reports Genomics • Potential to generate large • Potential to generate large number of findings number of findings • Total number determined by • Total number determined by analytical decisions analytical decisions

  30. Antibiotic Sensitivity Reports Genomics • Filtering is common practice; • Concerns about filtering sensitivities to expensive or include: restricted antibiotics are • Liability for not reporting suppressed to influence potentially useful information provider practice • Paternalistic laboratory practices

  31. Antibiotic Sensitivities vs. Genomics • Similar in some ways, different in others • These differences could justify differences in practice

  32. Genomic Distinctiveness

  33. Dualist Perspectives Genomics is different, Genomics is the should be treated same, should be differently. treated the same.

  34. Exceptionalism in Practice • In many debates, both sides accuse the other of exceptionalism • Most deny accusations of exceptionalism • Not useful for clarifying the issues

  35. Distinctiveness • Every domains of medicine reflects distinctive traits • Each trait is shared with other domains • Unique combination of traits defines each domain

  36. Genomic Distinctiveness Claim Identify Partial Practice Analogy Should Be The Same

  37. Genomic Distinctiveness Determine Identify Relevant Decide on Implications Traits Practices of Traits

  38. • Aaron Goldenberg • Nanibaa’ Garrison Thanks! • Rich Sharp • Jen McCormick

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend