Financial Results for the Period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006 20 July - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

financial results for the period from 26 apr to 30 jun
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Financial Results for the Period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006 20 July - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Financial Results for the Period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006 20 July 2006 Content Highlights Financial Results Portfolio Performance Market Review and Outlook Going Forward 2 Highlights 1st Interim Results (26 Apr to 30


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Financial Results for the Period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006

20 July 2006

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Content

  • Highlights
  • Financial Results
  • Portfolio Performance
  • Market Review and Outlook
  • Going Forward
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Highlights

1st Interim Results (26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006)

Distributable income of $2.8m exceeded forecast by 17.5% DPU of 1.16 cts is 18% higher than forecast of 0.98 cts

* Annualised DPU of 6.42 cts is higher than forecast of 5.43 cts

Net Property Income of $4.3m outperformed forecast by 9% 5­year fixed­rate term loans of $190.1m have been secured

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Financial Results

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Actual * Forecast ^ ($'000) ($'000) Property Income 5,990 5,710 4.9 Property Expenses (1,652) (1,721) (4.0) Net Property Income 4,338 3,989 8.7 Non­Property Expenses (2,284) (2,270) 0.6 Net Profit 2,054 1,719 19.5 Distributable Income to Unitholders 2,797 2,381 17.5 % Chg

  • Distributable income exceeded forecast by 17.5%

Distributable Income

* Income is for the period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006 as acquisition of the properties was completed on 26 Apr 2006. ^ Forecast is extracted from the Introductory Document and prorated for the period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

  • DPU up 18% from forecast of 0.98 cts to 1.16 cts ^

* Annualised DPU of 6.42 cts is higher than forecast of 5.43 cts ^^

Distribution to Unitholders

Actual Forecast Chg Distribution Per Unit 1.16 cts 0.98 cts +18% Annualised Distribution Per Unit 6.42 cts 5.43 cts +18% Distribution Yield # 4.98% 4.21% +18% Ex­date for Trading Books Closure Date Payment Date 27 Jul 2006 31 Jul 2006 28 Aug 2006

^ For the period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006 ^^ Annualised DPU of 6.42 cts is based on DPU of 1.16 cents for the period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006.

Forecast DPU of 5.43 cts is for the period from 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2006 as disclosed in the Introductory Document.

# Based on unit closing price of $1.29 on 19 Jul 2006

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Net Property Income Breakdown

  • Net Property Income of $4.3m outperformed

forecast by 9% *

* 9% is the overall increase in Net Property Income from Prudential Tower Property (20%), Keppel Towers & GE Tower (9%) and Bugis Junction Towers (4%) for the period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006.

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 $'000 Prudential Tower Property Keppel Towers & GE Tower Bugis Junction Towers

Forecast Actual

20%

9%

4%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Active Capital Management

30­Jun­06 30­Sep­05 Actual Pro Forma Borrowings ($m) 190.1 190.6 Gearing (%) * 29.6 30.0 Interest Coverage Ratio (times) ** 2.5 2.3 All­in Interest Rate (%) *** 4.06% 3.96%

  • Secured 5­year fixed­rate term loans of $190.1m

at an interest rate of about 3.9% per annum

* Gearing = Borrowings / Total Assets ** Interest Coverage Ratio = Profit before Interest and Tax / Net Interest *** All­in interest rate for 5­year term loans includes the amortisation of upfront debt arrangement expenses of approximately $1.3m.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Portfolio Performance

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Positive Occupancy and Rental Trends

  • Committed occupancy rate of 98.4% at end­Jun

2006, higher than average occupancy of 92.9% for Core CBD (Source : CBRE)

  • Average rental rates on upward trend for next

renewal cycle

Source : CBRE and KLL

$3.50 $3.60 $3.70

psf/month

Jun­05 Sep­05 Dec­05 Mar­06 Jun­06

Average Rentals on Consistent Growth

K­REIT portfolio 85 % 90 % 95 % 100 % Sep­05 Dec­05 Mar­06 Jun­06

Overall Committed Occupancy on the Rise

K­REIT portfolio Core CBD Average

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Rental Renewal Cycle Benefits Lease Expiry Profile

  • Strong demand and tight supply will lead to higher

rentals across the board

As at 30 June 2006

3.5% 23.5% 13.9% 23.6% 17.0% 6.1% 10.8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2H2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2002

Expiry Leases as a Percentage of NLA

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Good Tenant Mix

As at 30 Jun 2006

Top 10 Tenants : 53% of Total NLA (73,322 sm)

2.8% 2.8% 3.0% 3.2% 3.6% 4.1% 5.9% 6.6% 10.1% 10.8% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% The McGraw ­Hill Companies, Inc. The Executive Centre InterContinental Hotels Group (Asia­Pacific) Pte Ltd Singapore Business Federation Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd J.V. Fitness Pte Ltd Sw an Trustees Ltd Keppel Land International Ltd GE Pacific Pte Ltd International Enterprise Singapore

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

High Tenant Retention

1H2006 Area Renewed (sm) 7,922 * Tenant Retention Ratio 99%

* Another 2,594 sm is available for renewal for 2H2006.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Market Review and Outlook

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Sustainable Demand Growth

  • Strong economic growth drives demand

* Average occupancy of 92.9% in CBD at 1H06 * Average rentals up to $6 psf at 1H06 * Estimated take­up of >2 mil sf for 2006

(Source : CBRE)

  • Prime office rents still attractive and

competitive in Asia

* Singapore ranked 43rd among 173 cities in CBRE’s latest Global Market Rents survey, up from 63rd position a year ago

80% 82% 84% 86% 88% 90% 92% 1Q01 3Q01 1Q02 3Q02 1Q03 3Q03 1Q04 3Q04 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 (1.0) (0.5) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Ave Occupancy Annual Demand Annual Supply Million sf 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1Q01 3Q01 1Q02 3Q02 1Q03 3Q03 1Q04 3Q04 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 $psf 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 $psf Capital Values Rentals

Source : URA and CBRE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Limited Future Supply

  • Average new office

supply of 0.7 mil sf per annum from 2006 to 2010

  • Declining existing stock

due to conversion to

  • ther use

* More than 800,000 sf of space removed from Shenton Way/CBD area

Source : CBRE and KLL Future Supply of Office Space 1.53 0.32 0.29 1.65

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

mil sf 10­15 yr average annual take­up

ORQ : Almost 100% pre­committed

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Going Forward

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Growth Strategy

  • Target AUM of about S$2 bln within next few years
  • Identify and pursue prime properties for acquisition

in Singapore and the region

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Geographical Focus

  • Grow into a pan­Asian commercial Reit focusing on

key growth cities in Asia

  • Diversify risks by cross­country exposure, riding on

cycles and market conditions

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Leveraging KLL’s Regional Network

Myanmar South Korea Vietnam

  • KLL’s representation in major Asian markets
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

  • Active leasing and asset enhancement of portfolio
  • Rentals optimization through pro­active marketing
  • Focus on increasing operational efficiency to lower

costs

  • Potential addition of net lettable area
  • Selective upgrading of assets to enhance

marketability

Active Asset Enhancement

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Thank You

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Additional Slides

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Snapshot of K­REIT

Manager

K­REIT Asia Management Limited

Portfolio

Four Quality Office Buildings

Listing and Trading Date 28 Apr 2006 on Singapore Stock Exchange Market Capitalisation

$310.3 million (as at 19 Jul 2006) *

Gearing

29.6% (as at 30 Jun 2006)

Unit Price

$1.29 per unit (closing price on 19 Jul 2006)

* Market cap based on weighted average number of units (240,508,000 units) as at 30 Jun 2006

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Property Portfolio

Prudential Tower Property * Keppel Towers GE Tower Bugis Junction Towers Total Lettable Area (sm) 10,076 22,990 Car Park Lots ­ ­ Number of Tenants 12 12 Principal Tenants ­ The McGraw­Hill Companies, Inc. ­ The Executive Centre ­ KBC Bank N.V. (Singapore Branch) ­ International Enterprise Singapore ­ J.V. Fitness Pte Ltd ­ Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd Title Leasehold estate of 99 years expiring 14 Jan 2095 Leasehold estate of 99 years expiring 9 Sep 2089 Valuation (S$mil)

^

117.7 159.5 Committed Occupancy 99.0% 98.5% ­ GE Pacific Pte Ltd ­ Singapore Business Federation ­Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd Estate in fee simple 65 40,083 288 353.5 98.2% Information as at 30 Jun 2006 * Approximately 44% of the strata area of the building

^ Average appraised value as at 24 Nov 2005

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Distributable Income

Actual * Pro Forma ^ ($'000) ($'000) Property Income 5,990 4,881 22.7 Property Expenses (1,652) (1,890) (12.6) Net Property Income 4,338 2,991 45.0 Non­Property Expenses (2,284) (2,246) 1.7 Net Profit 2,054 745 175.7 Distributable Income to Unitholders 2,797 1,470 90.3 % Chg

* Income is for the period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2006 as acquisition of the properties was completed on 26 Apr 2006. ^ Comparative numbers extracted from the pro forma financial information in the Introductory Document and prorated for the period from 26 Apr to 30 Jun 2005.

  • Distributable income almost doubled to $2.8m
slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Balance Sheet

30­Jun­06 30­Sep­05 * As at Actual ($'000) Pro Forma ($'000) Investment Properties 630,700 630,700 Cash & Cash Equivalents 9,366 4,457 Other Assets 1,348 3 Total Assets 641,414 635,160 Borrowings ^ 188,829 189,300 Other Liabilities 11,941 7,270 Total Liabilities 200,770 196,570 Unitholders' Funds 440,644 438,590

  • No. of Units in Issue ('000)

240,508 240,508 Net Asset Value Per Unit $1.83 $1.82

* Based on pro forma balance sheet as at 30 Sep 2005 in the Introductory Document.

^ Borrowings are stated net of amortised cost.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Office Rental Cycle in Asia

Source : JLL Singapore 1Q2006 report

GROWTH SLOWING DECLINE SLOWING RENTS RISING RENTS FALLING

3 years 5 years 7 years or more

Jakarta Hong Kong Shanghai Singapore Bangkok Tokyo Kuala Lumpur Delhi Chennai Seoul Mumbai Taipei Manila Beijing Bangalore

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

This release may contain statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which are based in the current views of Management

  • n future developments and events.