FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS IN FISHERIES (ESTONIA) Madis Reinup Rural - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS IN FISHERIES

(ESTONIA)

Madis Reinup

Rural Development Foundation

Member of the Board

Rural Development Fund

■ Founded by state in 1993 ■ Equity 38,8 MEUR ■ Financial services for bioeconomy and economy in rural areas: – quarantee portfolio – 73 MEUR, – loan portfolio 10,4MEUR – management of financial instruments:

■ EFF – january 2013 (6MEUR)

■ EAFRD – march 2016 (36MEUR) ■ EMFF – january 2017 (11,2MEUR)

FI ex-ante assesment for EAFRD and EMFF

■ 2014 – Ernst&Young Baltic AS ■ Web questionnaire – 663 enterprises (~15% in fisheries) ■ Detailed interviews -30 ■ 90% - microenterprises

Ex-ante assesment - results

■ No big differences in market gaps for different sectors. ■ Banks are not interested in: – New enterprises – Micro enterprises – Investment loans under 100 000 EUR ■ Long term (7 years +) loans usually not offered. ■ Different views on the value of collateral. ■ Alternative financial market (risk capital etc) missing. ■ NB! Market gap in financial market is a moving target.

• Growth loan (2MEUR)
• Investment loan for micro/small enterprises
• 10 000 - 100 000 EUR
• 7 years (incl. 2 year grace period)
• At least 50% collateral.
• Interest rates from 2-6%, depending on collateral (may include

subsidy)

• Long term-investment loan (2MEUR)
• Investment loan for micro/small/medium enterprises
• 100 000– 500 000EUR
• Co – financing with banks – banks 30%/70% FI
• 15 years (incl. 5 year grace period)
• At least 80% collateral.
• Market based interest rates - still under discussion

• Growth loan (3,2MEUR)
• Investment loan for micro/small enterprises
• 10 000 - 100 000 EUR
• 5 years (incl. 2 year grace period)
• At least 50% collateral.
• Interest rates from 2-6%, depending on collateral (may include

subsidy)

• Long term-investment loan (4 MEUR)
• Investment loan for micro/small/medium enterprises
• 100 000– 500 000EUR
• Co – financing with banks – banks 30%/70% FI
• 10 years + 5 year grace period
• At least 80% collateral.
• Market based interest rates - still under discussion

Lessons learned 1

■ Investments financed by loans are much more carefully calculated than grants – collateral! ■ In certain cases loan can lead to economically more viable (cheaper) investment decision than grant and a loan (for co-financing) combined; ■ Interest rates are important but ... ■ ... amount of collateral is the key to deal with „access to finance“ problem; ■ Grace period is attractive (for new businesses)! ■ Higher interest rates might „force“ entrepreneurs go to banks (a good thing!) ... .... and ... ■ ... lower interest rate can be tool for policy making – young fishers, investments for adding value etc.

Lessons learned 2

■ Banks may have sector based (negative) financial policy, so loan applications individually might not be even considered, especially in the time

• f declining markets;

■ Financial market cap is a moving target, because financial policy of banks might change rapidly – need for flexible FI; ■ Interaction with grants: – FI is for co-financing the grants? – FI are for the ones who will not have grants? – Certain investments (non-productive?) supported by grants and certain (productive?) investments by FI?

Thank you!