Field Indicators for TDS Prediction from Appalachian Mine Spoils - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

field indicators for tds prediction from appalachian mine
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Field Indicators for TDS Prediction from Appalachian Mine Spoils - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Field Indicators for TDS Prediction from Appalachian Mine Spoils Daniel Johnson, W. Lee Daniels & Carl Zipper Dept. of Crop & Soil Environmental Sciences Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University TDS Risk: ? ? ? ? ?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Field Indicators for TDS Prediction from Appalachian Mine Spoils

Daniel Johnson, W. Lee Daniels & Carl Zipper

  • Dept. of Crop & Soil Environmental Sciences

Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

TDS Risk:

? ? ? ? ?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Objectives:

Measure the net TDS elution potential of a range of materials originating from surface coal mines in Central Appalachia and analyze the following geochemical properties: − Saturated paste SC, pH, and ionic composition − Microwave assisted acid digestion and total sulfur (total-S) − Citrate-dithionite (CD) - extractable Al, Fe, and Mn − Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) pH and SC Investigate the nature of the boundary between weathered and unweathered strata to determine if: − An abrupt boundary exists at some confining layer, such as a shale or mudstone layer; or − The boundary is more diffuse, being more related to the distance from the earth’s surface.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Objectives:

Develop a set of simple field indicators for predicting TDS elution potential by statistically relating the geochemical properties described above to the following properties: − Munsell color, hue, value, and chroma − Rock type − Horizon Type − Degree of preweathering − Hydrochloric (HCl) acid fizz test − H2O2 reaction

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

02-b-01 02-b-03 02-b-04 02-b-05 02-b-06 02-b-07 02-b-02 02-a-01 02-a-02 02-a-03 02-a-04 02-a-05 02-a-06 02-a-07 02-c-01 02-c-02 02-c-03 02-c-04 02-c-05 02-c-06

Sampling and Replication Scheme:

02-a-08 02-c-07 02-c-08

Each distinct layer was sampled and described according to the NRCS Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils, version 3.0

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Saturated Paste Specific Conductance Across all Sites

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Saturated Paste Major Ions

n = 120 n = 52 n = 32

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Saturated Paste Minor Ions

n = 120 n = 52 n = 32

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Microwave Assisted Acid Digest Major Ions

n = 120 n = 52 n = 32

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

n = 120 n = 52 n = 32

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sandstones – Thin Section Analysis

generally quartz rich subarkoses or sublitharenites high in weatherable feldspars

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

TDS Production Risk

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

A B C Weathered R Unweathered R

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Reaction with 30% H2O2

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

 SC had a very strong direct and linear relationship with the sum of all of the ions study… ~1:1 ratio  Sulfate-S, Ca, and Mg dominated saturated paste SC for the samples studied  Many other ions present in lower concentrations did not increase from low to high TDS samples (Se DID increase from low to high TDS)significantly  Shallowest shale/mudstone layer forms boundary between weathered/unweathered spoils  Unweathered samples lower in SC, Ca, Mg, and sulfate-S  SC, sulfate-S, Ca, Mg, Se all higher in heat/violent H2O2 reaction samples Low TDS Risk High TDS Risk Yellowish-brown Soil, sandstone Cold H2O2 reaction Low Se Weathered – above SH/MS layer Dark gray, very dark gray, black Shale, mudstone, coal Heat or violent H2O2 reaction High Se Unweathered – below SH/MS layer

Summary

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Figure by Daniel K. Johnson

Recommendations

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Figure and concept by Dr. Carl Zipper

Recommendations

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Funding: Powell River Project Site Access: Teco Coal, Red River Coal Company, Apogee Coal Company, Alpha Natural Resources, and others Field and lab assistance: Staff and students of the Virginia Tech marginal soils research group Special Thanks: Dr. Lee Daniels, Dr. John Galbraith, Dr. Carl Zipper, Dr. Ken Eriksson, and Dr. Stephen Schoenholtz

Acknowledgements