chekshani cliffs water
play

Chekshani Cliffs Water Improvements Results Near Kanarraville TDS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Chekshani Cliffs Water Improvements Results Near Kanarraville TDS Results: 1604 1000 CICWCD Chekshani Well CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT TDS Results: 1604 1000 432 Holt Well (Near I-15) HOLT WELL (I- CHEKSHANI EPA MAX 15)


  1. Chekshani Cliffs Water Improvements

  2. Results Near Kanarraville

  3. TDS Results: 1604 1000 CICWCD Chekshani Well CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  4. TDS Results: 1604 1000 432 Holt Well (Near I-15) HOLT WELL (I- CHEKSHANI EPA MAX 15) CONTAMINANT

  5. TDS Results: 1604 1000 509 Holt Well (West of U.S. 91) HOLT WELL (US CHEKSHANI EPA MAX 91) CONTAMINANT

  6. TDS Results: 1604 1240 1000 Big Trees Well BIG TREES WELL CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  7. TDS Results: 1604 1080 1000 Camp Creek CAMP CREEK CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  8. TDS Results: 1604 1100 1000 Carter Well CARTER WELL CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  9. TDS Results: 1604 1000 400 Kanarraville Rest Area KANARRAVILLE CHEKSHANI EPA MAX REST AREA CONTAMINANT

  10. TDS Results: 1604 1000 750 Rock Bumpers Factory FACTORY CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  11. TDS Results

  12. TDS Results: 1604 1000 572 Lund Home (Kanarraville) LUND HOME CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  13. TDS Results: 1604 1000 550 Lamb Home (Kanarraville) LAMB HOME CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  14. TDS Results: 1604 1000 650 Kanarraville Town Well KANARRAVILLE CHEKSHANI EPA MAX TOWN CONTAMINANT

  15. TDS Results: 1604 1000 376 400 N 1200 W (Kanarraville) 400 N 1200 W CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  16. TDS Results: 1604 1000 415 Kanarraville Springs KANARRA CHEKSHANI EPA MAX SPRINGS CONTAMINANT

  17. TDS Results: 1604 1502 1000 789 S Hwy 91 789 S HWY 91 CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  18. TDS Results: 1604 1000 495 385 W Center St. (Kanarra) 385 W CENTER CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

  19. TDS Results 1604 1502 1240 1100 1080 750 650 572 550 509 495 432 415 400 376 Chekshani 789 S Hwy Big Trees Carter Well Camp Creek Rock Kanarra Lund Home Lamb Home Holt Well 385 W Holt Well Kanarra Kanarra 400 N 1200 Well 91 Well Bumper Town Well (Kanarra) (West of 91) Center (Near I-15) Springs Rest Area W (Kanarra) (Kanarra)

  20. Water Quality Analysis • 15 wells within the region were sampled to identify the best location to drill a new well. • CICWCD worked with landowners near Kanarraville (proposed #2 Larson Well) to look at the possibility of drilling a well close to Kanarra. This would provide a dual-purpose line, both from the well and an interconnection between the two communities as an emergency source. • Ultimately, based on sampling, “Proposed New Well Site 1” (near I-15) was identified as the best location to drill a new well. TDS results shown in ppm

  21. Drill a new well in a different location Three Drill a new well AND install a Proposed treatment facility Solutions Simply do nothing

  22. Water Chemistry of the current well is not satisfactory Why Drill a A redundant source is needed New Well? Age of current well Drilled 1991

  23. Current water chemistry Why Install a Treatment Facility would be able Treatment to treat multiple wells Facility? Culligan is confident that this will lower future corrosion

  24. The CICWCD Board of Directors suggests drilling a new well for the Chekshani Cliffs Subdivision.

  25. Total Project Cost Estimates New Well New Well New Well (Private) (District Drill) (Private) + Treatment $748,000 $448,000 $848,000

  26. Chekshani Contribution Cost Estimates (with 30% grant) New Well New Well New Well (Private) (District Drill) (Private) + Treatment $266,000 $161,000 $441,000

  27. Option 1: New Well (District Drill) Project Cost Chekshani Contribution District Cost New Well 525,000 262,500 262,500 Line to Chekshani 223,000 111,500 111,500 Totals: $748,000 $374,000 $374,000 Possible Grant Funding 30% 30% Cost Overhead Cost 4,200 Grand Total: $266,000 $261,800 Breakdown: Option 1 Project Cost per Lot: $3,800 Improvement Cost/Lot/Month 5% 10 yrs (if financed): $40.30 Current Average Monthly Bill: $40.86 Total Average Monthly cost/lot/month (if financed): $81.16

  28. Option 1a: New Well (Private) Project Cost Chekshani Contribution District Cost New Well 225,000 112,500 112,500 Line to Chekshani 223,000 111,500 111,500 Totals: $448,000 $224,000 $224,000 Possible Grant Funding 30% 30% Cost Overhead Cost 4,200 Grand Total: $161,000 $156,800 Breakdown: Option 1a Project Cost per Lot: $2,300 Improvement Cost/Lot/Month 5% 10 yrs: (if financed): $24.40 Current Average Monthly Bill: $40.86 Total Average Monthly cost/lot/month: (if financed): $65.26

  29. Option 2: New Well (Private) & Treatment Facility Project Cost Chekshani Contribution District Cost New Well 225,000 112,500 112,500 Line to Chekshani 223,000 111,500 111,500 Treatment Facility 400,000 400,000 Totals: $848,000 $624,000 $224,000 Possible Grant Funding 30% 30% Cost Overhead Cost 4,200 Grand Total: $441,000 $156,800 Breakdown: Option 2 Project Cost per Lot: $6,300 Improvement Cost/Lot/Month 5% 10 yrs: (if financed): $66.82 Current Average Monthly Bill: $40.86 Treatment O & M Costs (monthly): $13.69 Total Average Monthly cost/lot/month (if financed): $121.37

  30. Cost Comparison (for Chekshani Customers) 6,300 Monthly Cost per Lot Capital Cost per Lot 3,800 2,300 $121.37 $81.16 $65.26 New Well (District Drill New Well (Private) New Well (Private) & Treatment Facility

  31. Assessment Area Process: (complete) Utah Code §11-42 Preliminary Evidence of Sufficient Engineer’s Estimates Discussion Support of Possible Solutions • Improvement. • Initial indication • Request of of majority Proposal for • Area Boundary. interest. Treatment • Probable Facility. • Ballots received participants. in January 2019 • Regional water • Method of with 66% voting quality sampling Assessment. to proceed. • Cost Estimates. • Financing Term.

  32. Assessment Area Process: Utah Code §11-42 Prep & Submittal Board Meeting on Notice Period March 19 th , 2020. of Application • Signatures of • Discuss ballot • 4 weeks majority in results and the published in proposed area. probability of newspaper and moving posted to State • Signature forward. Public Notice Ballots must be Website. received by March 12 th , • Letters sent to 2020. all proposed property owners.

  33. Assessment Area Process: Utah Code §11-42 Public Hearing on Protest Period Board Meeting on April 16 th , 2020 June 18 th , 2020 • Formal • Written • Discuss Protest opportunity for protests can be Tally. comments. filed with • Determination CICWCD. • Begins 60-day on resolution protest period. • If 40% protest to establish improvements, Assessment project will not Area or go forward. abandon the proposal.

  34. Thank You!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend