Chekshani Cliffs Water Improvements Results Near Kanarraville TDS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

chekshani cliffs water
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Chekshani Cliffs Water Improvements Results Near Kanarraville TDS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Chekshani Cliffs Water Improvements Results Near Kanarraville TDS Results: 1604 1000 CICWCD Chekshani Well CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT TDS Results: 1604 1000 432 Holt Well (Near I-15) HOLT WELL (I- CHEKSHANI EPA MAX 15)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Chekshani Cliffs Water Improvements

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Results Near Kanarraville

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CICWCD Chekshani Well

TDS Results:

1604 1000 CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Holt Well (Near I-15)

TDS Results:

432 1604 1000 HOLT WELL (I- 15) CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Holt Well (West of U.S. 91)

TDS Results:

509 1604 1000 HOLT WELL (US 91) CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Big Trees Well

TDS Results:

1240 1604 1000 BIG TREES WELL CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Camp Creek

TDS Results:

1080 1604 1000 CAMP CREEK CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Carter Well

TDS Results:

1100 1604 1000 CARTER WELL CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Kanarraville Rest Area

TDS Results:

400 1604 1000 KANARRAVILLE REST AREA CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rock Bumpers Factory

TDS Results:

750 1604 1000 FACTORY CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TDS Results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Lund Home (Kanarraville)

TDS Results:

572 1604 1000 LUND HOME CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Lamb Home (Kanarraville)

TDS Results:

550 1604 1000 LAMB HOME CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Kanarraville Town Well

TDS Results:

650 1604 1000 KANARRAVILLE TOWN CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-15
SLIDE 15

400 N 1200 W (Kanarraville)

TDS Results:

376 1604 1000 400 N 1200 W CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Kanarraville Springs

TDS Results:

415 1604 1000 KANARRA SPRINGS CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-17
SLIDE 17

789 S Hwy 91

TDS Results:

1502 1604 1000 789 S HWY 91 CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-18
SLIDE 18

385 W Center St. (Kanarra)

TDS Results:

495 1604 1000 385 W CENTER CHEKSHANI EPA MAX CONTAMINANT

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1604 1502 1240 1100 1080 750 650 572 550 509 495 432 415 400 376

Chekshani Well 789 S Hwy 91 Big Trees Well Carter Well Camp Creek Rock Bumper Kanarra Town Well Lund Home (Kanarra) Lamb Home Holt Well (West of 91) 385 W Center (Kanarra) Holt Well (Near I-15) Kanarra Springs Kanarra Rest Area 400 N 1200 W (Kanarra)

TDS Results

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Water Quality Analysis

  • 15 wells within the region were

sampled to identify the best location to drill a new well.

  • CICWCD worked with landowners

near Kanarraville (proposed #2 Larson Well) to look at the possibility of drilling a well close to

  • Kanarra. This would provide a

dual-purpose line, both from the well and an interconnection between the two communities as an emergency source.

  • Ultimately, based on sampling,

“Proposed New Well Site 1” (near I-15) was identified as the best location to drill a new well. TDS results shown in ppm

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Three Proposed Solutions

Drill a new well in a different location Drill a new well AND install a treatment facility Simply do nothing

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Why Drill a New Well?

Water Chemistry of the current well is not satisfactory A redundant source is needed Age of current well

Drilled 1991

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Why Install a Treatment Facility?

Current water chemistry Treatment Facility would be able to treat multiple wells Culligan is confident that this will lower future corrosion

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The CICWCD Board of Directors suggests drilling a new well for the Chekshani Cliffs Subdivision.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

New Well (District Drill) New Well (Private) New Well (Private) + Treatment $748,000 $448,000 $848,000

Total Project Cost Estimates

slide-27
SLIDE 27

New Well (District Drill) New Well (Private) New Well (Private) + Treatment $266,000 $161,000 $441,000

Chekshani Contribution Cost Estimates (with 30% grant)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cost Breakdown: Option 1

Option 1: New Well (District Drill) Project Cost Chekshani Contribution District Cost New Well 525,000 262,500 262,500 Line to Chekshani 223,000 111,500 111,500 Totals: $748,000 $374,000 $374,000 Possible Grant Funding 30% 30% Overhead Cost 4,200 Grand Total: $266,000 $261,800 Project Cost per Lot: $3,800 Improvement Cost/Lot/Month 5% 10 yrs (if financed): $40.30 Current Average Monthly Bill: $40.86 Total Average Monthly cost/lot/month (if financed): $81.16

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Cost Breakdown: Option 1a

Option 1a: New Well (Private) Project Cost Chekshani Contribution District Cost New Well 225,000 112,500 112,500 Line to Chekshani 223,000 111,500 111,500 Totals: $448,000 $224,000 $224,000 Possible Grant Funding 30% 30% Overhead Cost 4,200 Grand Total: $161,000 $156,800 Project Cost per Lot: $2,300 Improvement Cost/Lot/Month 5% 10 yrs: (if financed): $24.40 Current Average Monthly Bill: $40.86 Total Average Monthly cost/lot/month: (if financed): $65.26

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Cost Breakdown: Option 2

Option 2: New Well (Private) & Treatment Facility Project Cost Chekshani Contribution District Cost New Well 225,000 112,500 112,500 Line to Chekshani 223,000 111,500 111,500 Treatment Facility 400,000 400,000 Totals: $848,000 $624,000 $224,000 Possible Grant Funding 30% 30% Overhead Cost 4,200 Grand Total: $441,000 $156,800 Project Cost per Lot: $6,300 Improvement Cost/Lot/Month 5% 10 yrs: (if financed): $66.82 Current Average Monthly Bill: $40.86 Treatment O & M Costs (monthly): $13.69 Total Average Monthly cost/lot/month (if financed): $121.37

slide-31
SLIDE 31

3,800 2,300 6,300

New Well (District Drill New Well (Private) New Well (Private) & Treatment Facility

Cost Comparison (for Chekshani Customers)

Monthly Cost per Lot Capital Cost per Lot

$81.16 $65.26 $121.37

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Assessment Area Process: (complete)

Utah Code §11-42

Preliminary Discussion

  • Improvement.
  • Area Boundary.
  • Probable

participants.

  • Method of

Assessment.

  • Financing Term.

Evidence of Sufficient Support

  • Initial indication
  • f majority

interest.

  • Ballots received

in January 2019 with 66% voting to proceed. Engineer’s Estimates

  • f Possible Solutions
  • Request of

Proposal for Treatment Facility.

  • Regional water

quality sampling

  • Cost Estimates.
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Assessment Area Process:

Utah Code §11-42

Prep & Submittal

  • f Application
  • Signatures of

majority in proposed area.

  • Signature

Ballots must be received by March 12th, 2020. Board Meeting on March 19th, 2020.

  • Discuss ballot

results and the probability of moving forward. Notice Period

  • 4 weeks

published in newspaper and posted to State Public Notice Website.

  • Letters sent to

all proposed property

  • wners.
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Assessment Area Process:

Utah Code §11-42

Public Hearing on April 16th, 2020

  • Formal
  • pportunity for

comments.

  • Begins 60-day

protest period. Protest Period

  • Written

protests can be filed with CICWCD.

  • If 40% protest

improvements, project will not go forward. Board Meeting on June 18th, 2020

  • Discuss Protest

Tally.

  • Determination
  • n resolution

to establish Assessment Area or abandon the proposal.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Thank You!