Fiducialization in DEAP-3600 using Machine Learning algorithms with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fiducialization in deap 3600 using machine learning
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fiducialization in DEAP-3600 using Machine Learning algorithms with - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fiducialization in DEAP-3600 using Machine Learning algorithms with robust validation Connor Stone Queens University May 30 2017 1 Big Thanks To Everyone At DEAP-3600! 2 Thats Me! 3 Introduction to DEAP-3600 and Machine Learning


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Fiducialization in DEAP-3600 using Machine Learning algorithms with robust validation

Connor Stone Queen’s University May 30 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Big Thanks To Everyone At DEAP-3600!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

That’s Me!

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Introduction to DEAP-3600 and Machine Learning Using Machine Learning to improve the Dark Matter discovery potential Validating the event classification Validating the event classification

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Argon Volume Acrylic Vessel, Light Guides Wavelength Shifter (TPB) Photo-Multiplier Tube (PMT) Fiducial Volume

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Position reconstruction can be achieved using relative PMT charges

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Position reconstruction can be achieved using relative PMT charges

More light Less light

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

The MBLikelihood algorithm does a good job of creating a fiducial volume

1 tonne fiducial volume Surface event leakage Uniform in R3

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Machine Learning is well poised to assist in creating a fiducial volume

Machine Learning

Class 2 Class 1 Measurement 1 Measurement 2 Decision Boundary Measurement 2 Measurement 1

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 Logistic Regression (LR) Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) Naive Bayes (NB)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 Support Vector Machine (SVM) Neural Network (NN)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Using Machine Learning to improve the Dark Matter discovery potential

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Training data can be taken from the real detector for Machine Learning, but not for MBLikelihood

Both agree these are surface events Both agree these are surface events

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Some Machine Learning algorithms perform well, but don’t beat MBLikelihood

MBLikelihood radius is the best

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

MBLikelihood and Machine Learning algorithms can be combined (Boosted)

Bad Bad Bad Good

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

The boosted analysis has reduced surface event leakage

Near order of magnitude improvement! LSVM+ at 2.5*10-4, MBR at 1.8*10-3

+

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Validating the event classification Validating the event classification

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

The boosted analysis behaves well

  • n real neutron data

The boosted analysis behaves well

  • n real neutron data
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

The boosted analysis has an expected energy dependence The boosted analysis has an expected energy dependence

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

The boosted analysis is robust against changes in the optical model The boosted analysis is robust against changes in the optical model

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Conclusion: The boosted analysis can increase the fiducial volume by 50%!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Extra

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Runtime is very different for each algorithm

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Preprocessing the data allows for easier surface event classification

PMT2 PMT1 PMT2 PMT1

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Machine Learning is robust against changes in the optical model

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Some optical properties don’t affect MBLikelihood or the boosted analysis

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Support Vector Machine Logistic Regression

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Neural Network Naive Bayes

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

210Po event leakage is reduced with

the boosted analysis