Fermi-LAT Upper Limits on Gamma-ray Bursts Daniel Kocevski Kavli - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fermi lat upper limits on gamma ray bursts
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fermi-LAT Upper Limits on Gamma-ray Bursts Daniel Kocevski Kavli - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fermi-LAT Upper Limits on Gamma-ray Bursts Daniel Kocevski Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology SLAC - Stanford University On behalf of the Fermi collaboration Fermi GRB Detections 291 GBM detections 10 LAT detections


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Daniel Kocevski

Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology SLAC - Stanford University On behalf of the Fermi collaboration

Fermi-LAT Upper Limits

  • n Gamma-ray Bursts
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

Fermi GRB Detections

291 GBM detections Rate ~ 0.7 events/day 10 LAT detections LAT is detecting roughly 3%

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

LAT Upper Limits on GRBs

What are the upper limits to the 0.1-300 GeV flux for GBM only bursts? Can we rule out high energy emission for these events? How do these upper limits compare to the expected flux?

Could point to interesting physics Intrinsic spectral breaks? EBL or γ-γ absorption?

LAT Count Map of hypothetical GRB Position

GBM XRT

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

LAT Field of View (FOV)

Detector Fields of View GBM: Full unocculted sky LAT: ~2.4 Sr LAT does not see all events Bursts in the LAT FOV For this analysis: < 65° from the LAT Boresight Sensitivity decreased rapidly

Expected counts vs. boresight angle

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

Burst Demographics

GBM Detections 291 events GBM Events in LAT FOV: 154 events (52%) LAT Detections 10 events was ~3.4% 10 events now ~ 6.4%

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 LAT Zenith Angle 5 10 15 20 25 Number of events

Angle of GRB to the LAT boresight at GBM trigger

What can we say about remaining 52%?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

Flux Upper Limit Calculations Method based on Helene 1983 Spatially: 10 degree ROI Temporally: T90 Also searched -200 to 200 s Spectral Slope Assumed beta = -2.2 for all events Flux limit weakly depends on beta Obtain 95% CL flux (or flux limit) and the significance of detection (TS value)

3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8

  • 2•105

4•105 6•105 8•105 1•104 Flux Limit 95% (Photons cm2 s1)

Flux Upper Limits Method

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

LAT Flux Upper Limits

5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 LAT Flux Limit (photons cm2 s1) 5 10 15 20 Number of events

GBM events in LAT FOV: 152 events (52%) Events with flux upper limits 117 events (45%) Assume beta = -2.2 Median flux limit (0.1 to 300 GeV) ~ 2.6x10-5 photons cm-2 s-1 Over T90 duration Implications for extra components?

Log

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

Extra Components

SSC & pion decay components No obvious evidence Unless significantly delayed Implications of flux limits Y < 1, εB > εe γ >> 100, EpkSSC >> 10 GeV EBL attenuation? No evidence for EBL in any LAT event

Synchrotron SSC? 10 GeV 1 K e V 100 GeV Flux (photons cm-2 s-1)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

GBM Extrapolation

Bright BGO Sample GBM events with > 70 BGO cts But no LAT detections 79 events 33 in LAT FOV Performed spec fits with rmfit 15 events in “Gold” sample Median beta ~ -2.3

GRB 090620.400

BGO1 NaI7

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

GRB 090620.400

Epk = 149.5 +/-3.69 Alpha = -0.21 +/- 0.04 Beta = -2.65 +/- 0.11 LAT Flux Limit = 3.6x10-5 Expected LAT Flux = 9.2x10-8

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

GRB 081207.680

LAT Flux Limit = 3.0x10-4 Expected LAT Flux = 1.0x10-3 Epk = 433.4 +/- 18.7 Alpha = -0.66 +/- 0.03 Beta = -2.19 +/- 0.13

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

Possible Explanations

EBL attenuation Test: Should vary with redshift γ-γ abortion due to compactness Lower end of the Γ distribution? Test: Correlate with Epk, Eiso? Finely tuned SSC peak Mimic a spectral cutoff Test: Detailed spectral fits

Synchrotron SSC? 10 GeV 1 K e V 100 GeV Flux (photons cm-2 s-1)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Daniel Kocevski - 2009 Fermi Symposium, Nov 2nd-5th 2009

Conclusions

Only ~52% of Fermi GRBs are in LAT field of view Flux limit ~ few x 10-5 photons cm-2 s-1 Bright BGO Sample ~80% of “Gold” sample do not predict LAT counts ~20% do show discrepancies that hint at spectral curvature Explanations? Extra-galactic background light attenuation gamma-gamma absorption due to compactness at the source Finely tuned SSC peak located near the break Look for a paper on this topic soon!