feature detection and matching applications
play

Feature Detection and Matching Applications Goal : Develop matching - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feature Detection and Matching Applications Goal : Develop matching procedures that can detect Feature detectors - Line detectors possibly partially-occluded objects or features specified as - + - Corner detectors patterns of


  1. Feature Detection and Matching Applications � Goal : Develop matching procedures that can detect � Feature detectors - � Line detectors possibly partially-occluded objects or features specified as - + - � Corner detectors patterns of intensity values, and are invariant to position, + � Spot detectors orientation, scale, and intensity change � Known shapes � Character fonts � Faces � Template matching � Applications � gray level correlation � Image alignment, e.g., Stereo � edge correlation � 3D scene reconstruction � Hough Transform � Motion tracking � Object recognition � Chamfer Matching � Image indexing and content-based retrieval 1 2 Example: Build a Panorama How do we build panorama? � We need to match (align) images M. Brown and D. G. Lowe. Recognising Panoramas. ICCV 2003 3 4 1

  2. Matching with Features Matching with Features • Detect feature points in both images • Detect feature points in both images • Find corresponding pairs 5 6 Matching with Features Matching with Features • Detect feature points in both images � Problem 1: • Find corresponding pairs � Detect the same point independently in both images • Use these pairs to align images no chance to match! We need a repeatable detector 7 8 2

  3. Harris Corner Detector Matching with Features � Problem 2: � For each point correctly recognize the corresponding one ? We need a reliable and distinctive descriptor 9 10 C. Harris, M. Stephens, “A Combined Corner and Edge Detector,” 1988 Harris Detector: Basic Idea The Basic Idea � We should easily recognize the point by looking through a small window � Shifting a window in any direction should give a large change in response “flat” region: “edge”: “corner”: no change in no change along significant change all directions the edge direction in all directions 11 12 3

  4. Harris Detector: Mathematics Harris Detector: Mathematics Expanding E ( u , v ) in a 2 nd order Taylor series, we have, for small Change of intensity for the shift [ u,v ]: shifts, [ u,v ], a bilinear approximation: ∑ [ ] 2 = + + − E u v ( , ) w x y ( , ) I x ( u y , v ) I x y ( , ) ⎡ ⎤ u [ ] ≅ E u v ( , ) u v , M ⎢ ⎥ x y , ⎣ ⎦ v Window Shifted Intensity function intensity where M is a 2 × 2 matrix computed from image derivatives: ⎡ ⎤ 2 I I I ∑ = x x y ⎢ ⎥ M w x y ( , ) Window function w ( x,y ) = or 2 ⎢ I I I ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ x y , x y y 1 in window, 0 outside Gaussian 16 17 Selecting Good Features Harris Detector: Mathematics Intensity change in shifting window: eigenvalue analysis ⎡ ⎤ u [ ] λ 1 , λ 2 – eigenvalues of M ≅ E u v ( , ) u v , M ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ v direction of the fastest change Ellipse E(u,v) = const direction of the slowest change ( λ max ) -1/2 ( λ min ) -1/2 λ 1 and λ 2 are large 18 19 4

  5. Selecting Good Features Selecting Good Features large λ 1 , small λ 2 small λ 1 , small λ 2 20 21 Harris Detector: Mathematics Harris Detector: Mathematics λ 2 Measure of corner response: “Edge” λ 2 >> λ 1 “Corner” ( ) 2 = − Classification of R det M k trace M λ 1 and λ 2 both large, image points using λ 1 ~ λ 2 ; eigenvalues of M : E increases in all directions = λ λ det M 1 2 = λ + λ trace M 1 2 λ 1 and λ 2 are small; “Edge” E is almost constant “Flat” λ 1 >> λ 2 in all directions region k is an empirically-determined constant; e.g., k = 0.05 λ 1 22 23 5

  6. Harris Detector: Mathematics Harris Detector λ 2 “Edge” “Corner” � The Algorithm: • R depends only on R < 0 � Find points with large corner response function R eigenvalues of M ( R > threshold) • R is large for a corner R > 0 � Take the points of local maxima of R (for localization) • R is negative with large magnitude for an edge • | R | is small for a flat region “Flat” “Edge” |R| small R < 0 λ 1 24 25 Harris Detector: Example Harris Detector: Example Compute corner response R 26 27 6

  7. Harris Detector: Example Harris Detector: Example Find points with large corner response: R > threshold Take only the points of local maxima of R 28 29 Harris Detector: Example Harris Detector: Example Interest points extracted with Harris (~ 500 points) 30 31 7

  8. Harris Detector: Summary Harris Detector: Some Properties � Rotation invariance � Average intensity change in direction [ u,v ] can be expressed as a bilinear form: ⎡ ⎤ u [ ] ≅ E u v ( , ) u v , M ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ ⎦ v � Describe a point in terms of eigenvalues of M : measure of corner response: Ellipse rotates but its shape (i.e., eigenvalues) ( ) 2 = λ λ − λ + λ R k remains the same 1 2 1 2 � A good (corner) point should have a large intensity change Corner response R is invariant to image rotation in all directions , i.e., R should be a large positive value 32 33 Harris Detector Properties: Rotation Invariance Harris Detector Properties: Rotation Invariance [Comparing and Evaluating Interest Points, Schmid, Mohr & Bauckhage, ICCV 98] 34 35 C.Schmid et.al. “Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors”. IJCV 2000 8

  9. Harris Detector Properties: Perspective Changes Harris Detector Properties: Intensity Changes � Partial invariance to affine intensity change � Only derivatives are used ⇒ invariance to intensity shift I → I + b � Intensity scale: I → a I R R threshold [Comparing and Evaluating Interest Points, Schmid, Mohr & Bauckhage, ICCV 98] x (image coordinate) x (image coordinate) 36 37 Harris Detector Properties: Scale Changes Harris Detector: Some Properties � But not invariant to image scale � Quality of Harris detector for different scale changes Repeatability rate: # correspondences # possible correspondences Fine scale: All points will Coarse scale: Corner be classified as edges 38 39 C. Schmid et al., “Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors,” IJCV 2000 9

  10. Tomasi and Kanade’s Corner Detector Corner Detection (cont.) � Diagonalize M converting it to the form ⎡ λ ⎤ � Idea: Intensity surface has 2 directions with significant 0 = 1 ⎢ ⎥ M intensity discontinuities λ ⎣ 0 ⎦ � Image gradient [ I x , I y ] T gives information about direction 2 and magnitude of one direction, but not two � Eigenvalues λ 1 and λ 2 , λ 1 ≥ λ 2 , give measure of the edge strength (i.e., magnitude) of the two strongest, perpendicular edge directions (specified � Compute 2 x 2 matrix by the eigenvectors of M ) ∑ ∑ ⎡ ⎤ 2 � If λ 1 ≈ λ 2 ≈ 0, then p ’s neighborhood is approximately constant intensity I I I x x y ⎢ ⎥ = Q Q � If λ 1 > 0 and λ 2 ≈ 0, then single step edge in neighborhood of p M ⎢ ∑ ∑ ⎥ 2 I I I � If λ 2 > threshold and no other point within p ’s neighborhood has greater ⎢ ⎥ x y y ⎣ ⎦ Q Q value of λ 2 , then mark p as a corner point where Q is a 2 n +1 x 2 n +1 neighborhood of a given point p 40 41 Tomasi and Kanade Corner Algorithm Results � Compute the image gradient over entire image � For each image point p : � form the matrix M over (2N+1) x (2N+1) neighborhood Q of p � compute the smallest eigenvalue of M � if eigenvalue is above some threshold, save the coordinates of p in a list L � Sort L in decreasing order of eigenvalues � Scanning the sorted list top to bottom: For each current point, p , delete all other points on the list that belong to the neighborhood of p 42 43 10

  11. Results Results 44 45 Moravec’s Interest Operator � Compute four directional variances in horizontal, vertical, 3 2 ∑∑ = + + − + + + 2 ( ( , ) ( 1 , )) V P x i y j P x i y j diagonal and anti-diagonal directions for each 4 x 4 h = = j 0 i 0 window 2 3 ∑∑ � If the minimum of four directional variances is a local = + + − + + + 2 V ( P ( x i , y j ) P ( x i , y j 1 )) maximum in a 12 x 12 overlapping neighborhood, then v = = 0 0 j i that window (point) is “interesting” 2 2 ∑∑ = + + − + + + + 2 ( ( , ) ( 1 , 1 )) V P x i y j P x i y j d = = j 0 i 0 2 3 ∑∑ = + + − + − + + 2 V ( P ( x i , y j ) P ( x i 1 , y j 1 )) a = = 0 1 j i 46 47 11

  12. = V ( x , y ) min( V ( x , y ), V ( x , y ), V ( x , y ), V ( x , y )) h v d a ⎧ 1 , if ( , ) is a local max V x y = ⎨ ( , ) I x y ⎩ 0 , otherwise 48 49 Models of Image Change Invariant Local Features � Goal: Detect the same interest points regardless of � Geometry image changes due to translation, rotation, scale, etc. � Rotation � Similarity (rotation + uniform scale) � Affine (scale dependent on direction) valid for: orthographic camera, locally planar object � Photometry � Affine intensity change ( I → a I + b ) 50 51 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend