FC2015 RSDYK Dyke quality assessment by remote sensing Robert Hack - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fc2015 rsdyk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FC2015 RSDYK Dyke quality assessment by remote sensing Robert Hack - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FC2015 RSDYK Dyke quality assessment by remote sensing Robert Hack Robert Hack 14-Apr-09 1 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack Pilot project: RSDYK2008 Trial to establish whether remote sensing in combination with geological knowledge can be used for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FC2015 RSDYK

Dyke quality assessment by remote sensing Robert Hack

14-Apr-09 1

FC2015-RSDYK - Hack Robert Hack

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pilot project: RSDYK2008 Trial to establish whether remote sensing in combination with geological knowledge can be used for quality assessment

  • Brief literature review
  • Remote sensing data acquisition in different seasons
  • Borehole, CPT, geophysics for ground truth
  • Brief preliminary analyses

14-Apr-09 2 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Test sites in Reeuwijk – Zuid Holland

(map: Routenet-Routeplan, http://www.routenet.nl ; 16 Feb 2009)

14-Apr-09 3 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Test sites

Area: Partially excavated for peat excavation Tempeldijk = “veenkade” Location: North – No known problems South – Seepage (“kwel”)

14-Apr-09 4 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Geology

G0: Holland peat C2: Holland peat on Callais III Deposits (tidal flat deposits) on an alternation of Holland peat and Gorkum deposits C2..: Holland peat on Callais III Deposits (tidal flat deposits) on Gorkum deposits (channel deposits) rC0: Holland peat on Gorkum deposits (channel deposits)

Geological map of the area around Reeuwijk (after Bosch and Kok, 1994)

14-Apr-09 5 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tempeldijk

Poles (20m apart) Main body

  • f the

dyke

Canal

Electrodes attached by multi cables STING R1/IP

A 2-D electrical imaging survey on the Tempeldijk-North

a b c

Visual images of Tempeldijk-South showing the difference in the apparent surface roughness in (a) August 15, 2007, (b) October 31, 2007 and (c) December 13, 2007 field campaigns.

14-Apr-09 6 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tempeldijk - temperature

c

b a c b a

Tempeldijk-South Tempeldijk-North

14-Apr-09 7 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Subsurface – Tempeldijk - South

14-Apr-09 8 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Conclusions

  • All surface and subsurface investigations the Tempeldijk-South surface and

subsurface structure are more irregular which are due to or indicate “problems’ such as “kwel” and subsidence.

  • The thermal infrared images of Tempeldijk-South showed a layered structure which is

reflecting the subsurface structure of the dyke. The layered structure was detectible likely because excess water was present in some of the layers.

  • Visual images showed differences in vegetation cover at locations where excess

water is likely present.

  • The gamma ray survey shows a pattern that is likely related to the real subsurface

structure, but further investigations are required to determine the exact nature of this relation.

  • Lidar surveys are probably accurate enough to determine surface patterns with high

detail.

  • Reflectance is highly depending on the vegetation properties such as the leaf area,

biomass, chlorophyll concentration in leaves, plant productivity, vegetation cover, accumulated rainfall etc.

  • Position of the sun angle, apparent roughness and wind direction are also some of

the external factors that affect the true reflectance.

  • the surface area and the greater the emission.

14-Apr-09 9 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RSDYK2009-2012

  • Pilot project gives enough indications for further

investigations and research

  • 2 full-time PhD students
  • Relations between subsurface and remote sensing on

dykes

  • Relations between groundwater and remote sensing
  • n dykes
  • Relations quality assessment dykes and remote

sensing

14-Apr-09 10 FC2015-RSDYK - Hack