failures latency and happy eyeballs
play

Failures, Latency and Happy Eyeballs Q/A Recommendations YouTube - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Websites Joint work with Vaibhav Bajpai TU Munich CAIDA San Diego, USA Under revision at: IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking Jrgen Schnwlder Motivation Jacobs University Bremen, Germany Steffje Jacob Eravuchira Samknows Limited,


  1. Websites Joint work with Vaibhav Bajpai TU Munich CAIDA San Diego, USA Under revision at: IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking Jürgen Schönwälder Motivation Jacobs University Bremen, Germany Steffje Jacob Eravuchira Samknows Limited, London, UK Sam Crawford Samknows Limited, London, UK August 2017 Failures, Latency and Happy Eyeballs Q/A Recommendations YouTube Contribution Complete Failures Partial Failures Latency Happy Eyeballs Q/A Motivation Methodology Success Rate IPv6 Preference TCP connect times Startup Delay Tiroughput Stall Events 1 / 33 A Longitudinal View of Dual-stacked Websites −

  2. Websites IPv6 Preference shaded region represents the duration of the longitudinal study. Motivation Motivation Q/A Recommendations Stall Events Tiroughput Startup Delay TCP connect times 2 / 33 Success Rate Complete Failures Motivation YouTube Q/A Happy Eyeballs Latency Partial Failures Methodology Contribution Google IPv6 Adoption 15% ▶ Literature focus largely on IPv6 adoption. 10% 5% ▶ Very little work on measuring IPv6 performance. 0% ▶ Tiis study closes the gap. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 NETWORK TYPE # RESIDENTIAL 78 NREN / RESEARCH 10 BUSINESS / DATACENTER 08 OPERATOR LAB 04 IXP 01 RIR # RIPE 60 ARIN 29 APNIC 10 AFRINIC 01 LACNIC 01 ∼ 100 dual-stacked SamKnows probes ( ∼ 66 difgerent origin ASes)

  3. Websites TCP connect times shifuing signifjcant traffjc overnight over IPv6. A CDN plays a leading role in technology adoption and Motivation Motivation Q/A Recommendations Stall Events Tiroughput Startup Delay 3 / 33 IPv6 Preference Latency Complete Failures Partial Failures Success Rate Contribution Happy Eyeballs Q/A YouTube Motivation Methodology Google IPv6 Adoption 3.0% ALEXA 1M with AAAA entries Native IPv6 Weekends - Weekdays 2.0% 20.0% 1.0% W6D W6LD 15.0% 0.0% 10.0% -1.0% 5.0% 0.06% Teredo/6to4 0.04% 0.0% 0.02% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 0.0% -0.02% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 top 1000K 12.1 top 100K 17.4 top 10K 20.4 ▶ Tie drifu of IPv6 penetration is increasing. top 1K 25.7 top 0.1K 40.0 Country Distribution 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Websites Canada: 3.70 % Canada: 3.70 % Botswana: 1.85 % Botswana: 1.85 % Taiwan: 1.85 % Taiwan: 1.85 % Japan: 29.63 % Japan: 29.63 % Zambia: 1.85 % Zambia: 1.85 % ▶ Cloudfmare Efgect (shaded region) Bulgaria: 1.85 % Bulgaria: 1.85 % Sri Lanka: 3.70 % Sri Lanka: 3.70 % ▶ Tie dent created by Cloudfmare > W6D (or W6LD). South Africa: 1.85 % South Africa: 1.85 % Australia: 3.70 % Australia: 3.70 % ▶ Cloudfmare added AAAA entries for all websites [1]. Kenya: 1.85 % Kenya: 1.85 % Argentina: 3.70 % Argentina: 3.70 % Pakistan: 1.85 % Pakistan: 1.85 % Brazil: 16.67 % Brazil: 16.67 % Peru: 20.37 % Peru: 20.37 % United States: 1.85 % United States: 1.85 % Malaysia: 3.70 % Malaysia: 3.70 % Highcharts.com ▶ Prefjxes blacklisted by Google over IPv6 (2017)

  4. Websites IPv6 Preference of failures and performance of dual-stacked websites. Tiis is the fjrst study to provide a longitudinal view (4 years) Research Contribution Q/A Recommendations Stall Events Motivation Startup Delay TCP connect times Tiroughput Success Rate Partial Failures Contribution Complete Failures Methodology 4 / 33 Latency Happy Eyeballs Q/A YouTube Motivation ▶ Complete Failures ▶ Partial Failures ▶ Failures silently exist; clients do not notice them due to IPv4 fallback. ▶ Can websites with partial failures be deemed IPv6-ready? ▶ Quantifjcation of failures helpful for upcoming IPv6-only networks. ▶ Latency ▶ Happy Eyeballs

  5. Websites IPv6 Preference Metrics should account for changes in IPv6-readiness. Motivation Complete Failures Q/A Recommendations Stall Events Tiroughput Startup Delay TCP connect times 5 / 33 Success Rate Complete Failures Motivation YouTube Q/A Happy Eyeballs Latency Partial Failures Contribution Methodology www.bing.com 10 3 10 2 10 1 ALEXA 1M with AAAA entries 10 0 50.0% W6D W6LD www.detik.com 40.0% HTTP Failure 10 3 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 10 2 0.0% www.engadget.com TCP Connect Times (ms) 10 3 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 10 2 10 1 10 0 ▶ Failures reduced from 40% (2009) to 3% today. www.nifty.com 10 3 10 2 Failing AAAA Websites www.qq.com 1.0 10 4 [Mar '17] 10 3 0.8 10 2 0.6 CDF 10 1 0.4 10 0 4.3K 0.2 www.sakura.ne.jp 10 3 0.0 0.1K 1K 10K 100K 1000K ALEXA Rank 10 2 Jul Jul Jul Jan Jan Jan Jan 2013 2014 2015 2016 ▶ 88% failing websites rank > 100K. IPv6 IPv4 ▶ 1% rank < 10K, six websites rank < 300.

  6. Websites IPv6 Preference Motivation Complete Failures | WL6D websites Q/A Recommendations Stall Events Tiroughput Startup Delay TCP connect times 6 / 33 Success Rate Methodology Motivation YouTube Q/A Happy Eyeballs Latency Partial Failures Complete Failures Contribution ▶ ∼ 3K websites participated on the W6LD (2012). ▶ Promise to permanently enable production-ready IPv6 on the Internet. Failing W6LD Websites W6LD websites − 1.0 0.8 ▶ 8% (259) do not have A or AAAA entries in DNS. 0.6 CDF 0.4 253 0.2 0.0 W6LD websites (with A and AAAA entries) − 1K 10K 100K 1M 10M 100M ALEXA Rank ▶ 1% (36) TCP timeout over both AF. ▶ 3% failing websites rank < 10K. ▶ 8% (253) TCP timeout over IPv6. ▶ 75% rank > 100K, 61% rank > 1M.

  7. Websites Stall Events Motivation IPv4 W6LD Success Rate (%) Webpage # tools that identify such partial failures failures can be deemed IPv6-ready overestimation of IPv6 adoption numbers Partial Failures Q/A Recommendations 7 / 33 Tiroughput Contribution YouTube Q/A Happy Eyeballs Latency Partial Failures Startup Delay Methodology Complete Failures Success Rate IPv6 Preference TCP connect times Motivation IPv6 ( ↓ ) ALEXA top 100 websites with AAAA entries. 01 www.bing.com 0 100 ✓ 02 www.detik.com 0 100 ✓ ▶ 27% show some rate of failure over IPv6. 03 www.engadget.com 0 100 ✓ 04 www.nifty.com 0 100 ▶ 9% exhibit more than 50% failures over IPv6. 05 www.qq.com 0 100 06 www.sakura.ne.jp 0 100 07 www.flipkart.com 09 99 ✓ 08 www.folha.uol.com.br 13 100 1.0 09 www.aol.com 48 100 IPv6 (100) ✓ 0.8 0.6 IPv4 (100) CDF 0.4 10 www.comcast.net 52 100 ✓ 0.2 11 www.yahoo.com 72 100 ✓ 0.0 12 www.mozilla.org 84 100 ✓ 13 www.orange.fr 86 100 ✓ 0 20 40 60 80 100 14 www.seznam.cz 89 100 ✓ Success Rate (%) 15 www.mobile.de 90 100 ✓ 16 www.wikimedia.org 90 100 ▶ Limiting to root webpage can lead to 17 www.t-online.de 93 100 ✓ 18 www.free.fr 95 100 19 www.usps.com 95 100 ▶ Unclear whether websites with partial 20 www.vk.com 95 100 ✓ 21 www.wikipedia.org 95 100 ✓ 22 www.wiktionary.org 95 100 ▶ ISOC now supporting [2] development of 23 www.elmundo.es 96 100 ✓ 24 www.uol.com.br 96 100 ✓ 25 www.marca.com 97 100 ✓ 26 www.terra.com.br 98 100 ✓ 27 www.youm7.com 99 100

  8. Websites TCP connect times error on DNS resolution Motivation Partial Failures | Root Cause Analysis Q/A Recommendations Stall Events Tiroughput Startup Delay 8 / 33 IPv6 Preference Partial Failures Methodology Motivation YouTube Q/A Happy Eyeballs Latency Contribution Complete Failures Success Rate Website failing over IPv6 Network Level Content Level Service Level www.bing.com (100%) CURLE_OK www.detik.com (100%) CURLE_COULDNT_RESOLVE_HOST www.engadget.com (100%) CURLE_COULDNT_CONNECT www.nifty.com (100%) CURLE_OPERATION_TIMEDOUT www.qq.com (100%) CURLE_GOT_NOTHING www.sakura.ne.jp (100%) CURLE_RECV_ERROR www.flipkart.com (91%) www.folha.uol.com.br (87%) ▶ Failures due to www.aol.com (52%) */css www.comcast.net (48%) */html www.yahoo.com (28%) */javascript, */json www.mozilla.org (16%) */octet-stream www.orange.fr (14%) */plain www.seznam.cz (11%) image/*, */rdf www.mobile.de (10%) */xml www.wikimedia.org (10%) */javascript, image/* www.t-online.de (7%) */json and www.free.fr (5%) www.usps.com (5%) SAME ORIGIN */css content. www.vk.com (5%) CROSS ORIGIN www.wikipedia.org (5%) www.wiktionary.org (5%) www.elmundo.es (4%) www.uol.com.br (4%) www.marca.com (3%) www.terra.com.br (2%) www.youm7.com (1%) 0 30 60 90 0 30 60 90 0 30 60 90 Contribution (%) ▶ Failures silently exist; clients do not notice them due to IPv4 fallback. ▶ Identifjcation of operational issues relevant for upcoming IPv6-only networks

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend