Extending the Service Life of Bridges in Maine Presented by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

extending the service life of bridges in maine
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Extending the Service Life of Bridges in Maine Presented by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Extending the Service Life of Bridges in Maine Presented by Robert S. Blunt, PE Matt Miltenberger, PE- VCS October 22, 2019 SHRP2 Service Life Design of Bridges (R19A) Goals of Maines R19A Participation Save $ bridges that last


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Extending the Service Life of Bridges in Maine

Presented by Robert S. Blunt, PE Matt Miltenberger, PE- VCS October 22, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SHRP2– Service Life Design of Bridges (R19A)

Goals of Maine’s R19A Participation

§ Save $ bridges that last longer and require less maintenance § Reduce user impacts § Balance the life of bridge components

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Meeting Our Goal

§ Service Life Design Guide - R19A Lead Adopter State

– A more scientific approach

§ State-of-the-art materials

– Reinforcing – Coatings – Composites

§ Learning from the past

– Bridge type selection – Better concrete – Jointless bridges – Better drains

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Extending the Service Life of Bridges in Maine

§ Jonesport-Beals Bridge

– Environmental Challenges – Detailing and Design- deemed to satisfy – SHRP2 Grant Recipient – Lead Adopter State

  • Durability Review & Consultation
  • Testing Work Plan- Study

§ Concrete Durability Study

– Objectives – Evaluate Source Materials – Existing Bridge- What can we learn – Laboratory Work

  • MaineDOT Mix properties

– Learning Outcomes

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Plan View

§ 7 Piers § 8 Spans § 1062ft

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Profile View

§ 39ft Nav. Clearance § 40ft Water Depth § Founded on Drill Shafts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Corrosion Threat Mitigation

§ Steel corrosion- failure mechanism in concrete bridges § Early design - avoid corrosion

– Avoidance Detailing Practices

  • Deck end and joint details
  • Encased beam ends
  • Increased Clear Cover

– Beams

  • Zero tension under service conditions
  • Clear protective coating
  • Targeted approach to rebar

– MaineDOT Standard Specifications

  • Low permeability concrete mixes
  • Reduction of concrete cracks
  • Addition of dci-s as applicable
  • ASR Mitigation- Risk Assesment
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Corrosion Regions & Design Options

Existing Pier Proposed Pier Materials Corrosion Threat High Medium High Medium

GFRP/SS/Epoxy dci-s Mild Steel Add cover 3” dci-s Stainless Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing Mild Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing

Deicing Splash Submerged Atmospheric Tidal Mud Zone Rock Socket

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Superstructure

Deicing Zone High GFRP/SS Epoxy Bars dci-s Tension=0 Service

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Details (Bridge Joint)

Deicing Zone

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Column & Cap

Atmospheric

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Plinth Section

Splash/Tidal Zone

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Shafts

Submerged Zone

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Shafts

Mud Zone

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Profile View

Rock Socket

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Existing Bridge Testing

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Testing Work Plan

§ Validate 100-year design life § Design Basis

– Past Performance – Engineering Judgment – Environmental characterization

§ Chloride Ingress Rate

– Collect Existing Bridge Data – Modeling for Proposed

§ Reduce Cracking

– Freeze Thaw – Shrinkage – Mass Concrete - Thermal – Alkali-Silica Reactivity

  • Test Aggregate Sources
  • Mitigate Potential
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Concrete Durability Study- Objectives

§ Learn more about Maine’s concrete and its raw material sources. § Alkali Silica Reactivity (ASR)- i.e. Bangor I-395, I-295 Concrete Pavement- closer look § Service Life Prediction Models – Calibration parameters for Maine

– fib Bulletin 34 – R19A or – ACI Life 365

§ The Study may be used to develop guidance for the design of future Forever Bridges and Inventory Bridge.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Concrete Durability – Field Work

§ Environment Characterization

– Existing pier has performed well – Cover survey – Core samples

§ Chloride profile - ASTM C1152

– Surface Chloride concentration as a function elevation. – Measure the chloride ingress depth – ASTM 1556 Diffusion Coef.

§ Petrographic Analysis - ASTM C856

– air content, asr, aggregates, etc. etc.

§ Field monitor internal and external concrete temps during curing.

Existing Pier Elevation Medium High High

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Concrete Durability – Evaluate the Past

§ Calibrate Service Life Variables

– Chloride Ingress – Cover survey – Core samples

Existing Pier Elevation Medium High High

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Corrosion Regions & Design Options

Existing Pier Proposed Pier Materials Corrosion Threat High Medium High Medium

GFRP/SS/Epoxy dci-s Mild Steel Add cover 3” dci-s Stainless Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing Mild Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing

Deicing Splash Submerged Atmospheric Tidal Mud Zone Rock Socket

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Existing Surface Chloride Concentration

Existing Pier Predicted Measured Corrosion Threat

Surface Chloride 63yr old structure Deck Columns Plinth

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Chloride Concentration at 3-inch Depth

Existing Pier Predicted Measured Corrosion Threat

Chloride concentration at depth = 3” 63yr old structure Deck Columns Plinth

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Corrosion Threat Regions at Piers

Proposed Pier Predicted Measured

Chloride concentration at depth = 3” 63yr old structure Deck Columns Plinth/ Strut Surface Chloride 63yr old structure

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Corrosion Mitigation at Piers

Existing Pier Proposed Pier Recommendation

GFRP/SS/Epoxy dci-s Mild Steel Add cover 3” dci-s Stainless Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing Mild Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing

High (deicing salts) Medium (atmospheric zone) High (tidal range) Medium (deep water) High (splash zone)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Corrosion Mitigation at Piers

Existing Pier Proposed Pier Recommendation

GFRP/SS/Epoxy dci-s Mild Steel Add cover 3” dci-s Stainless Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing Mild Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing

High (deicing salts) Medium (atmospheric zone) High (tidal range) Medium (deep water) High (splash zone)

slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Concrete Durability- Laboratory Work

§ Mass Concreting

– Concrete maturity – In-situ strength, used for thermal modeling – Splitting tensile test – Elastic modulus – Concrete shrinkage – Coefficient of thermal expansion – Semi-adiabatic temperature rise- aka “The Cube”

§ Chloride Ingress Rates (R19A)

– Bulk diffusion – NT Build – (no corrosion inhibitors)

§ Super Air Meter– air bubble sz. & volume § ASR Evaluation- ASTM C1260, ASTM C1567, and ASTM C1778

– Standard of care for design with marginal aggregate sources, and is particularly relevant given reactive aggregates present in Maine’s quarries

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Results

§ ASR Decision Matrix

– ASTM C1778 Standard Guide for Reducing the Risk of ASR – Outcome: Switched to Low Alkali Cement (McInnis) – 50% Slag Cement

§ Diffusion Coefficient Testing

– ASTM C1556 Bulk Diffusion – NT Build 492 Migration

§ Temperature monitoring of mass placements during construction

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Maturity Results

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Chloride Surface Concentration

Surface concentration is determined by taking a curve-of-best-fit to the data gathered from concrete cores, and projecting back to the surface. In the example below, Cs is given as 5000ppm.

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Chloride Content, ppm Depth, mm

Chloride Profile Fit - Elev. -4.0 MSL

Cs = 5000 ppm; Ci =1500 ppm; Da =1.12e-12 m2/sec;

Extrapolated from Chloride profile

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Chloride Surface Concentration

Surface concentrations are found for every sample:

GFRP/SS/Epoxy dci-s Mild Steel Add cover 3” dci-s Stainless Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing Mild Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing

Class A Zone Elevation Cs (ppm)* %/mass Mean Std deviation COV Deicing Deck A 3000 1.89945 2.11 0.00 0.09 Deicing Deck B 3500 2.216025 Deicing Deck C 3500 2.216025 Airborne 15.92 4000 2.5326 1.82 0.00 0.33 Airborne 17.83 3300 2.089395 Airborne 22.25 3500 2.216025 Airborne 26.33 3000 1.89945 Splash 9.5 4500 2.849175 2.43 0.00 0.20 Splash 11.5 4000 2.5326 Splash 14.42 3000 1.89945 Tidal

  • 4

5000 3.16575 3.96 0.00 0.28 Tidal

  • 2.5

7500 4.748625

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Chloride Surface Concentration

GFRP/SS/Epoxy dci-s Mild Steel Add cover 3” dci-s Stainless Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing Mild Steel Add cover 6” 1” Casing

Class A Zone Elevation Cs (ppm)* %/mass Mean Std deviation COV Deicing Deck A 3000 1.89945 2.11 0.00 0.09 Deicing Deck B 3500 2.216025 Deicing Deck C 3500 2.216025 Airborne 15.92 4000 2.5326 1.82 0.00 0.33 Airborne 17.83 3300 2.089395 Airborne 22.25 3500 2.216025 Airborne 26.33 3000 1.89945 Splash 9.5 4500 2.849175 2.43 0.00 0.20 Splash 11.5 4000 2.5326 Splash 14.42 3000 1.89945 Tidal

  • 4

5000 3.16575 3.96 0.00 0.28 Tidal

  • 2.5

7500 4.748625

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Chloride Diffusion Coefficient

§ Data from CTL Bulk Diffusion- ASTM 1556 -Class A

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Service Life Prediction- Columns

Threshold Mild Steel with 3” cover & dci-s

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Chloride Migration Coefficient

§ Data from CTL NT Build Results shows the migration coefficient

  • f the SAHK-18-2-A concrete mix.
slide-38
SLIDE 38

fib Bulletin 34 Chloride Ingress Model

In Inpu put Para rameters

ParameterDescription Units Distribution Function Mean, μStd Dev, σ Coeff of Variation, σ/μ Lower Bound, a Upper Bound, b α β in 2 /yr 0.237 0.045 0.19 mm 2 /yr 152.9 29.1 m 2 /sec 4.85E-12 9.21E-13 b e Regression variable, (limited to 3500 °K to 5500 °K) °K Normal 4800 700 °F 44.51 1.29 °C 7.0 0.72 °K 280.10 0.72 °F 67.6 °C 19.8 °K 292.9 k e Environmental transfer variable n/a n/a k t Transfer parameter n/a Constant 1.0 α Aging exponent - PCC w/ Blast Furnace Slag n/a Beta 0.45 0.2 0 1 2.33 2.85 t
  • Reference point of time (28 days = 0.0767 yrs) yrs
Constant 0.0767 A(t) Aging function n/a n/a C
  • Initial Chloride Content of Concrete
mass% of binderNormal 0.04 0.01 0.233 C s
  • r C
s,Δx Chloride Concentration at surface, or at substitute surface Δx mass% of binderLog-Normal 2.40 0.96 0.40 0.8 0.39 in 0.35 0.22 0.629 0 1.97 1.90 8.77 mm 8.90 5.60 0 50 1.90 8.77 in 3.00 0.25 0.083 mm 76.20 6.35 4.33 0.08 C crit Critical chloride content (plain reinforcing) mass% of binderBeta 0.60 0.15 0.25 0.2 1 3.06 3.06 t SL Design service life yrs n/a 100 β Target Reliability n/a n/a 1.3 Transfer function - splash/spray zone Δx Beta Concrete cover cover, a Log-Normal Standard test temperature T ref Constant Temperature (from Local Weather Data) T real Normal Beta Distr Coeffs Log-Normal Distr Coeffs Normal Distr Coefficients D RCM,0 Normal Chloride Migration Coefficient (from Nordtest NT Build 492 - results are given in m 2 /sec) lnµ−ln((σ/µ) ) +1)/2 ln((σ/µ) ) +1)

Parameter Description Units Distribution Function Mean, μ Std Dev, σ Coeff of Variation, σ/μ Lower Bound, a Upper Bound, b α β in2/yr 0.426 0.085 0.20 mm2/yr 274.8 55.0 m2/sec 8.71E-12 1.74E-12 be Regression variable, (limited to 3500 °K to 5500 °K) °K Normal 4800 700 °F 44.5 1.30 °C 6.9 0.72 °K 280.09 0.72 °F 67.6 °C 19.8 °K 292.9 ke Environmental transfer variable n/a n/a kt Transfer parameter n/a Constant 1.0 α Aging exponent - PCC w/ Blast Furnace Slag n/a Beta 0.45 0.2 1 2.33 2.85 to Reference point of time (28 days = 0.0767 yrs) yrs Constant 0.0767 A(t) Aging function n/a n/a Co Initial Chloride Content of Concrete mass% of binder Normal 0.04 0.00 0.013 Cs or Cs,Δx Chloride Concentration at surface, or at substitute surface Δx mass% of binder Log-Normal 2.40 0.96 0.40 0.8 0.39 in 0.35 0.22 0.629 1.97 1.90 8.77 mm 8.90 5.60 50 1.90 8.77 in 3.00 0.50 0.167 mm 76.20 12.70 4.32 0.17 Ccrit Critical chloride content (0.25% plain reinforcing) mass% of binder Beta 1.65 0.4125 0.25 0.75 1.9 0.25 0.07 tSL Design service life yrs n/a 100 β Target Reliability n/a n/a 1.3 Standard test temperature Tref Constant Temperature (from Local Weather Data) Treal Normal Beta Distr Coeffs Log-Normal Distr Coeffs Normal Distr Coefficients DRCM,0 Normal Chloride Migration Coefficient (from Nordtest NT Build 492 - results are given in m2/sec) Transfer function - splash/spray zone Δx Beta Concrete cover cover, a Log-Normal ln µ − ln((σ/µ)) + 1)/2 ln((σ/µ)) + 1)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

100 yr Results for Chloride Ingress Model

Mo Mont nte e Ca Carlo Trial Res esults:

Total Passing 4973 Total # of Trials 5000 Reliability 0.99 P f , Probability of failure 0.01 β, Reliability Index (calculated) 2.549Passes β, Target Reliability Index 1.3
  • ASTM C1556 Diffusion Coef. Used:
  • NT Build Migration Coef. Used:

Total Passing 4771 Total # of Trials 5000 Reliability 0.95 Pf, Probability of failure 0.05 β, Reliability Index (calculated) 1.687Passes β, Target Reliability Index 1.3 Total Passing 4981 Total # of Trials 5000 Reliability 1.00 Pf, Probability of failure 0.00 β, Reliability Index (calculated) 2.669Passes β, Target Reliability Index 1.3

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Concrete Durability Study- Outcomes

§ Environmental Characterization – Marine Exposure Zones § Detailing Practices § Alkali Silica Reactivity (ASR) ASTM C1260/C1567/C1778

– Evaluate material sources and determine project ASR risk profile

§ Freeze Thaw Durable § Mass concrete can handle 70 degree differential § Service Life Prediction Calculations – Calibration parameters for Maine Concrete

– fib Bulletin 34 – R19A – ACI Life 365- complete

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Service Life Design in Maine

§ Bridge Design Guide Revisions § Service Life Calculations? § NCHRP 12-108 – Guide Specification for Service Life Design of Highway Bridges § Expand Conc Mix Standard Specifications § Similar to other states, Maine can develop performance requirements for DB & CMGC

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Future Specifications For Maine

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Dale Peabody, PE- MaineDOT Research Joseph Stilwell, PE- MaineDOT Fabrication Mike Redmond- MaineDOT Materials Robert Blunt, PE- VHB | 207.441.6980 Matt Miltenberger- VCS | 269.251.1347