Extending Earthquakes’ Reach Through Cascading
David Marsan and Olivier Lengliné
Kawai lab M1; Lina Yamaya
1 地震発生論セミナー
Extending Earthquakes Reach Through Cascading David Marsan and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Extending Earthquakes Reach Through Cascading David Marsan and Olivier Lenglin Kawai lab M1; Lina Yamaya 1 Research question If we can separate aftershocks that were directly
Kawai lab M1; Lina Yamaya
1 地震発生論セミナー
If we can separate aftershocks that were directly triggered by the mainshock, the physical mechanism that causes direct triggering (static or dynamic stress changes, fluid flow, afterslip, etc.) can be studied.
地震発生論セミナー 2
mainshock aftershock aftershock aftershock aftershock aftershock aftershock aftershock aftershock aftershock aftershock
地震発生論セミナー 3
𝜇 𝑦, 𝑢 = 𝜇0 +
𝑢𝑗<𝑢
𝜇𝑗(𝑦, 𝑢) 𝜇 𝑦, 𝑢 : observed (dressed) seismicity rate density 𝜇0 : background seismicity rate density 𝜇𝑗 𝑦, 𝑢 : bare contribution of earthquake 𝑗 (representing the aftershocks directly caused by earthquake 𝑗) They assume only (i) The triggering process is linear. (ii) A mean-field response to the occurrence can be estimated that depends only on its magnitude.
地震発生論セミナー 4
地震発生論セミナー 5
𝑥𝑗,𝑘 = 𝛽𝑘𝜇 𝑦𝑗 − 𝑦𝑘 , 𝑢 − 𝑢𝑗, 𝑛𝑗 (𝑢𝑗 < 𝑢𝑘) (𝑓𝑚𝑡𝑓) 𝑥0,𝑘 = 𝛽𝑘𝜇0 The normalization coefficients 𝛽𝑘 such that
𝑗=1 𝑘−1
𝑥𝑗,𝑘 + 𝑥0,𝑘 = 1 𝜇 ∆𝑦 , ∆𝑢, 𝑛 =
1 𝑂𝑛×𝜀𝑢×𝑇( ∆𝑦 ,𝜀𝑠) 𝑗,𝑘∈𝐵 𝑥𝑗,𝑘
where A is the set of pairs such that 𝑦𝑗 − 𝑦𝑘 = ∆𝑦 ± 𝜀𝑠, 𝑛𝑗 = 𝑛 ± 𝜀𝑛, 𝑢𝑗 − 𝑢𝑘 = 𝑢 ± 𝜀𝑢 𝜇0 = 1 𝑈 × 𝑇
𝑘=1 𝑂
𝑥0, 𝑘
1. 2.
These two steps are iterated until convergence is reached.
i : mainshock j : any shocks 0: background 𝜇0: Background seismicity rate density 𝜇𝑗 : Bare seismic rate density
地震発生論セミナー 6
The rates decayed more slowly when considering the full cascade including indirectly triggered aftershocks.
地震発生論セミナー 7
Dressed p values were 0.2~0.4 smaller than the bare p values.
地震発生論セミナー 8
𝑏 = 0.60 ± 0.07 (bare) 𝑏 = 0.66 ± 0.04 (dressed)
地震発生論セミナー 9
The dressed kernels (continuous lines) are compared to the bare ones (color dashed lines). The densities ls have been vertically shifted for clarity.
地震発生論セミナー 10
6.6km 0.25km 𝑀~100.43𝑛 (close to the 100.5𝑛 dependence expected for the rupture length of small to intermediatesize earthquakes)
Due to the limited resolution on the relative hypocenter positions (~400m)
地震発生論セミナー 11
(i) Calculating, for all the mainshocks, the delays after which the last direct and last indirect aftershocks occurred (ii) Averaging these delays conditioned
short (on the order of 10 to 15 days for m ≥ 3 aftershocks).
process, along with the cascading effect, in controlling earthquake dynamics.
地震発生論セミナー 12
𝐼 = −0.01 ± 0.03 (bare) 𝐼 = −0.19 ± 0.04 (dressed)
𝐼 = 0.08 ± 0.02 (bare) 𝐼 = −0.21 ± 0.06 (dressed)
地震発生論セミナー 13
The dynamic rupture extent is not a priori controlled by the triggering mechanism (either previous earthquakes or aseismic processes such as tectonic loading) at work.
地震発生論セミナー 14
地震発生論セミナー 15
Latitude Latitude Latitude Latitude Background m ≥ 3 earthquakes
2000 1500 1000 500
Poisson process
clusters following large main shocks (1992 landers and 1999 Hector Mine)
地震発生論セミナー 16