exploring ways to move past implicit bias
play

Exploring Ways to Move Past Implicit Bias Erik J. Girvan, J.D., - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exploring Ways to Move Past Implicit Bias Erik J. Girvan, J.D., Ph.D. University of Oregon School of Law Nave Realism 1. I see stimuli, issues, and events as they are in objective reality. 2. Other rational social perceivers generally share


  1. Exploring Ways to Move Past Implicit Bias Erik J. Girvan, J.D., Ph.D. University of Oregon School of Law

  2. Naïve Realism 1. I see stimuli, issues, and events as they are in objective reality. 2. Other rational social perceivers generally share my judgments and reactions – provided that they have had access to the same information that I do. 3. If someone does not share my judgments and reactions: A. They have different (less) knowledge or information than me  solution = share or pool information  agreement They are biased, duplicitous, stupid, etc. B.  Solution = delegitimize and disregard

  3. Naïve Realism  Systematically discount the extent to which disagreement with others is also attributable to our own biases or lack of knowledge.

  4. Short Cuts and Heuristics

  5. Quick Exercise

  6. Quick Exercise

  7. Quick Exercise

  8. Removing (irrelevant) features can de-bias our perceptions

  9. Quick Exercise

  10. Automatic Categorization and Association

  11. Categorization effects  Over-emphasize perceived similarities within categories or groups and the differences between categories or groups

  12. Over-Emphasize Within-Group Similarities & Between-Group Differences Winner of Random Pairings: • Men = 65% • Women = 35%

  13. Availability Heuristic

  14. Gun Deaths (fivethirtyeight.com)

  15. Terrorism, mass shootings, police

  16. Suicides

  17. 2016 Election Air Force Times SFGate

  18. 2016 Election (NY Times, 2016) (1,000,000 = 1 square)  324 million people  1 million = 1 square

  19. 2016 Election (1,000,000 = 1 square) (NY Times, 2016)  Primaries:  4% Trump  5% Clinton

  20. 2016 Election  General Election:  63 million Trump  65 million Clinton

  21. Political Parties (Pew, 2018)

  22. Negotiate with North Korea? Agree Approve Negotiation: 63% Agree Disapprove Negotiation: 15% 78% Agreement

  23. US Foreign Involvement? 21% Type equation here. 22% 21%+ 64% Agreement

  24. Is Russia Hostile? 25% 39% 17%+ 81% Agreement

  25. Opinions of Fed. Agencies 55% 22%+ 77% Agreement

  26. 94% 76% 80% 71% 74% 93% 78% 81%

  27. 100% 90% 98% 74% 71% 70%

  28. Science

  29. Impacts?

  30. Inequity in Job Applications (Pager et al., 2009)

  31. Oregon Criminal Justice Commission  In 2015, controlling for estimates of rates of drug use, Black Oregonians were more than 3.5 times more likely than White Oregonians to be convicted of felony drug use.

  32. Gender disparities (NY Times, 2018)

  33. Police/Community Relations

  34. Solutions? Daryl Davis

  35. Thank you! Erik J. Girvan University of Oregon School of Law 1221 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1221 (541) 346-8934 ~ girvan@uoregon.edu

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend