Experimental motivations for studying few-hadron systems on the lattice
Alessandro Pilloni
Scattering Amplitudes and Resonances properties from Latticd QCD MITP, Mainz, August 27th, 2018
Experimental motivations for studying few-hadron systems on the - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Experimental motivations for studying few-hadron systems on the lattice Alessandro Pilloni Scattering Amplitudes and Resonances properties from Latticd QCD MITP, Mainz, August 27 th , 2018 Outline Introduction The light sector: the
Scattering Amplitudes and Resonances properties from Latticd QCD MITP, Mainz, August 27th, 2018
2
3
Molecule Tetraquark Hybrids
π²/π π π π
Hadroquarkonium Glueball Meson Baryon
Data Amplitude analysis Properties, Model building
Interpretations on the spectrum leads to understanding fundamental laws of nature
Experiment Lattice QCD
4
Experiment Lattice QCD
decay channels available οΌ
production mechanisms ο»
physical point only ο»
production; unaccessible channels οΌ
(quark masses, ππ and ππ) and study the effect on amplitudes οΌ
5
Experiment Lattice QCD
Intermediate step through a 2-body isobar (partial wave truncation) π π π π π π π π π1(1260) π π π π π π1(1260) π
6
Experiment Lattice QCD
Intermediate step through a 2-body isobar (partial wave truncation) π π π π π π π π π1(1260) π π π π1(1260) π IP π π π
7
HadSpec PRD88, 094505 π1(1260) π1(1600) π1 1420 ? The higher the mass, the more channels open
8
Unitarity constraints on the Isobar-Spectator amplitude
AP, A. Szczepaniak EPJA53, 9, 177
β See Michaelβs talk on Friday
9
Despite it has been known since forever, the resonance parameters of the π1 1260 are poorly determined The production (and model) dependence is affecting their extraction
10
The extraction of the resonance in the π decay should be the cleanest, but the determination of the pole is still unstable
(Lattice simulations with stable π, Lang, Leskovec, Mohler, Prelovsek, JHEP 1404, 162)
11
We can use these models to fit πβ β 2πβπ+ π and describe the π1(1260) The dispersed improved model describes better the data at threshold
12
COMPASS, PRD95, 032004 (2017) Slide by B. Ketzer
13
πππ
IP
This production mechanism allows for a nonresonant contribution (Deck effect) Because of the light mass of the pion, the singularity is close to the physical region and generates a peaking background
14
The strength of the Deck effect depends on the momentum transferred π’, but the precise estimates rely on the model for the Deck amplitude
(Deck) (Deck)
15
A strong signal is also observed in π(β²)π, consistent with the naive expectation for a hybrid meson Having the 3π β 3π scattering data from Lattice will allow for a coupled channel analysis unaffected by the Deck effect
PLB740, 303-311
16
π2(1320) π2
β² (1700)
π1 1400 ? π1 1600 ?
17
Production amplitude Scattering amplitude πΈ(π‘) πΈ(π‘) π(π‘) π(π‘)
π’(π‘) = π π‘ πΈ(π‘)
The πΈ(π‘) has only right hand cuts; it contains all the Final State Interactions constrained by unitarity β universal
18
Production amplitude Scattering amplitude πΈ(π‘) πΈ(π‘) π(π‘) π(π‘)
π’(π‘) = π π‘ πΈ(π‘)
The π π‘ , π(π‘) have left hand cuts only, process-dependent, smooth Having access to scattering directly can help reducing systematics
19
0 980 π β πππ
COMPASS claimed the observation of another π1 at a slightly higher mass
0 980 π
20
0 980 π β πππ
Mikhasenko, Ketzer, Sarantsev, PRD91, 094015 If that is the case, the strength
depend on the mass of the exchanges: studying the amplitude at different pion/kaon masses will confirm whether this is true It has been proposed that the peak is due to a triangle singularity i.e. a dynamical enhancement generated by rescattering Triangle Breit-Wigner
21
A host of unexpected resonances have appeared decaying mostly into charmonium + light Hardly reconciled with usual charmonium interpretation
Esposito, AP, Polosa, Phys.Rept. 668
πΆ β πΏ π β πΏ πΎ/π ππ
treshold charmonium
Ξ πβπΎ/π π Ξ πβπΎ/π π ~0.8 Β± 0.3
compatible with ππ1(2π)
π = 3871.68 Β± 0.17 MeV ππ β ππΈπΈβ = β3 Β± 192 keV Ξ < 1.2 MeV @90% 22
23
Large prompt production at hadron colliders ππΆ/ππππ = 26.3 Β± 2.3 Β± 1.6 % πππ Γ πΆ(π β πΎ/πππ) = 1.06 Β± 0.11 Β± 0.15 nb CMS, JHEP 1304, 154
24
πΈπ may play a role. Playing with lighter charm mass?
Prelovsek, Leskovec, PRL111, 192001
Lots of unexpected πΎππ· = 1ββ states found in ISR/direct production (and nowhere else!) Seen in few final states, mostly πΎ/π ππ and π 2π ππ Not seen decaying into open charm pairs Large HQSS violation
25
Belle J/πππ BES βπππ
26
BESIII, PRL118, 092001 (2017) π+πβ β πΎ/π ππ π+πβ β βπ ππ BESIII, PRL118, 092002 (2017) New BESIII data show a peculiar lineshape for the π(4260), and suggest a state narrower and lighter than in the past The state is mature for a coupled channel analysis (on the lattice?) π+πβ β π+πΈ0πΈββ BESIII, arXiv:1808.02847
π+πβ β ππ 3900 +πβ β πΎ/π π+πβ and β πΈπΈβ +πβ π = 3888.7 Β± 3.4 MeV, Ξ = 35 Β± 7 MeV π+πβ β ππ
β² 4020 +πβ β βπ π+πβ and β
πΈβ0πΈβ+πβ π = 4023.9 Β± 2.4 MeV, Ξ = 10 Β± 6 MeV
27
β²(4020)
In the Dalitz plot projections, two states appear slightly above πΈ(β)πΈβ thresholds
28
β² (10650)
Ξ₯ 5π β ππ 10610 +πβ β Ξ₯ ππ π+πβ, βπ ππ π+πβ and β πΆπΆβ +πβ π = 10607.2 Β± 2.0 MeV, Ξ = 18.4 Β± 2.4 MeV Ξ₯ 5π β ππ
β² 10650 +πβ β Ξ₯ ππ π+πβ, βπ ππ π+πβ
and β πΆβ0πΆβ+πβ π = 10652.2 Β± 1.5 MeV, Ξ = 11.5 Β± 2.2 MeV Anomalous dipion width in Ξ₯ 5π , 2 orders of magnitude larger than Ξ₯ ππ Moreover, observed Ξ₯ 5π β βπ ππ ππ which violates HQSS
2 twin peaks
29
No calculations have found evidence for a resonance Prelovsek, Leskovec, PLB727, 172-176 HALQCD, PRL117, 242001 HadSpec, JHEP 1711, 033
30
One can test different parametrizations of the amplitude, which correspond to different singularities β different natures
Szczepaniak, PLB747, 410 π πΈ1 π πΈβ π πΎ/π πΈ
Triangle rescattering, logarithmic branching point (anti)bound state, II/IV sheet pole (Β«moleculeΒ») Resonance, III sheet pole (Β«compact stateΒ»)
Tornqvist, Z.Phys. C61, 525 Swanson, Phys.Rept. 429 Hanhart et al. PRL111, 132003 Maiani et al., PRD71, 014028 Faccini et al., PRD87, 111102 Esposito et al., Phys.Rept. 668
AP et al. (JPAC), PLB772, 200
ππ 3900 ? πΈ1(2420) π£: πΈ0(2400) π£: ππ 3900 ? "π, π
0(980)"
31
ππ 3900 ? πΈ1(2420) π£: πΈ0(2400) π£: ππ 3900 ? "π, π
0(980)"
Khuri-Treiman
32
33
34
35
36
III+tr. IV+tr. III tr. Data can hardly distinguish these scenarios. Lattice QCD can actually provide the scattering matrix as an input to this analysis
37
In the reaction π+πβ β πβ²π+πβ, the situation looks even more obscure Data refused to be fitted with any simple model BESIII, PRD96, 032004
38
Very complicated Dalitz plots They can all benefit of the knowledge of the underlying 2 β 2 scattering amplitude LHCb, πΆ β πΏ πΎ/π π LHCb, πΆ β πΏ πβ² π LHCb, Ξπ β πΏ πΎ/π π Belle, πΆ β πΏ ππ1π
39
Lattice can disentangle the scattering from the production mechanism Three body dynamics AND coupled channels Lattice can provide the 2 β 2 scattering amplitude that can be used as input in the phenomenological models
41
III+tr. IV+tr. III Not conclusive at this stage
42
LHCb, PRL 115, 072001 LHCb, PRL 117, 082003 Quantum numbers πΎπ = 3 2
β
, 5 2
+
2
+
, 5 2
β
2
+
, 3 2
β
Opposite parities needed for the interference to correctly describe angular distributions, low mass region contaminated by Ξβ (model dependence?) No obvious threshold nearby Two states seen in Ξπ β πΎ/π π πΏβ, evidence in Ξπ β πΎ/π π πβ π1 = 4380 Β± 8 Β± 29 MeV Ξ
1 = 205 Β± 18 Β± 86 MeV
π2 = 4449.8 Β± 1.7 Β± 2.5 MeV Ξ2 = 39 Β± 5 Β± 19 MeV
43
LHCb, PRL 115, 072001 LHCb, PRL 117, 082003 Quantum numbers πΎπ = 3 2
β
, 5 2
+
2
+
, 5 2
β
2
+
, 3 2
β
Opposite parities needed for the interference to correctly describe angular distributions, low mass region contaminated by Ξβ (model dependence?) No obvious threshold nearby Two states seen in Ξπ β πΎ/π π πΏβ, evidence in Ξπ β πΎ/π π πβ π1 = 4380 Β± 8 Β± 29 MeV Ξ
1 = 205 Β± 18 Β± 86 MeV
π2 = 4449.8 Β± 1.7 Β± 2.5 MeV Ξ2 = 39 Β± 5 Β± 19 MeV
MC simul.
44
Much narrower than LHCb! Look for prompt! Maiani, Polosa and Riquer, PRD 94, 054026
Good description of the spectrum but
for the π 4274 to be incorrect (two unresolved states with 0++ and 2++)
45
π(3915), seen in πΆ β π πΏ β πΎ/π π and πΏπΏ β π β πΎ/π π πΎππ· = 0++, candidate for ππ0(2π) But π 3915 β πΈ πΈ as expected, and the hyperfine splitting M 2++ β M 0++ too small One/two peaks seen in πΆ β ππΏ β πΎ/π π πΏ, close to threshold
46
To exclude any rescattering mechanism, we propose to search the π
π(4450) state
in photoproduction. Hiller Blin, AP et al. (JPAC), PRD94, 034002
π photoproduction
Vector meson dominance relates the radiative width to the hadronic width Hadronic vertex EM vertex Hadronic part
β approx. equal, πππ,ππβ² βΌ π
branching ratio
47
π π
π = orbital angular momentum π = spin π + π πΎ = total angular momentum = exp. measured spin π½ = isospin = 0 for quarkonia π β π β€ πΎ β€ π + π π = β1 π+1, π· = β1 π+π π» = β1 π+π+π½
48
π 4430 + β π(2π) π+ π½π»πΎππ· = 1+1+β π = 4475 Β± 7β25
+15 MeV
Ξ = 172 Β± 13β34
+37MeV
Far from open charm thresholds If the amplitude is a free complex number, in each bin of ππβ²πβ
2
, the resonant behaviour appears as well
49
50
BESIII, 1611.01317 BESIII, 1611.07044 π+πβ β πΎ/π ππ π+πβ β βπ ππ
51
0 π invariant
mass by D0 (both πΆπ‘
0 β πΎ/π π
and β πΈπ‘ππ),
distributions) Controversy to be solved
52
Molecule Tetraquark Hybrids
π²/π π π π
Hadroquarkonium Glueball Meson Baryon
Data Amplitude analysis Properties, Model building
Interpretations on the spectrum leads to understanding fundamental laws of nature
Experiment Lattice QCD
53
These are constraints the amplitudes have to satisfy, but do not fix the dynamics Resonances (QCD states) are poles in the unphysical Riemann sheets
54
I sheet II sheet
Bound states on the real axis 1st sheet Not-so-bound (virtual) states on the real axis 2nd sheet
55
More complicated structure when more thresholds arise: two sheets for each new threshold
III sheet: usual resonances IV sheet: cusps (virtual states) I sheet II sheet Bound state Virtual state Resonance
π+πβ β ππ 3900 +πβ β πΎ/π π+πβ and β πΈπΈβ +πβ π = 3888.7 Β± 3.4 MeV, Ξ = 35 Β± 7 MeV
56
A charged charmonium-like resonance has been claimed by BESIII in 2013.
Such a state would require a minimal 4q content and would be manifestly exotic
57
ππ 3900 ? πΈ1(2420) π£: πΈ0(2400) π£: ππ 3900 ? "π, π
0(980)"
Khuri-Treiman
58
Szczepaniak, PLB747, 410-416 Szczepaniak, PLB757, 61-64 Guo, Meissner, Wang, Yang PRD92, 071502 Logarithmic branch points due to exchanges in the cross channels can simulate a resonant behavior, only in very special kinematical conditions (Coleman and Norton, Nuovo Cim. 38, 438), However, this effects cancels in Dalitz projections, no peaks (Schmid, Phys.Rev. 154, 1363) ...but the cancellation can be spread in different channels, you might still see peaks in
π(4260) πΈ1 π πΈβ π πΎ/π πΈ
59
The scattering matrix is parametrized as π’β1 ππ = πΏππ β π ππ πππ Four different scenarios considered:
ππ ππ π2βπ‘, this generates a pole in the closest unphysical sheet
the rescattering integral is set to zero
are not normalized anyway β but not the position of singularities. This also limits the number of free parameters
60
Triangle IV sheet pole Triangle III sheet pole Triangle no pole Different lineshapes according to different singularities III+tr. IV+tr. tr.
61
Guerrieri, AP, Piccinini, Polosa, IJMPA 30, 1530002