Experience of fish mortalities caused by epidemic clonal strains of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

experience of fish mortalities caused by epidemic clonal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Experience of fish mortalities caused by epidemic clonal strains of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Experience of fish mortalities caused by epidemic clonal strains of Aeromonas hydrophila carrying a lysogenic bacteriophage Wes Baumgartner*, Mark Liles, Mark L. Lawrence* *Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine Motile


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Experience of fish mortalities caused by epidemic clonal strains of Aeromonas hydrophila carrying a lysogenic bacteriophage

Wes Baumgartner*, Mark Liles, Mark

  • L. Lawrence*

*Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motile aeromonads

  • A group of loosely associated Aeromonas

species with similar biochemistry, genetics, and serology.

  • Optimal growth temperature of 35o C to 37o C.
  • Commonly associated with disease in

warmwater fish.

  • A. hydrophila was the first motile aeromonad

species named.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aeromonas hydrophila

  • A. hydrophila is found in almost all freshwater

environments; sediment, domestic tap water, sewage, and as normal flora on the skin and intestines of fish.

  • Therefore, the presence of A. hydrophila by itself is not

indicative of disease in fish.

  • Diseases attributable to A. hydrophila have been

reported in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), minnows and baitfish, carp (Cyprinus carpio), gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum), striped bass (Morone saxatilis), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), and tilapia.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motile aeromonad septicemia

  • Disease caused by A. hydrophila and other motile

aeromonads -Motile Aeromonad Septicemia (MAS)- characterized by a widespread systemic infection.

  • Fish typically exhibit epidermal hemorrhage, ulceration,

and soft tissue necrosis, severe periophthalmic cellulitis with exophthalmia, iridial hemorrhages, and swollen abdomens.

  • Skin lesions start as irregularly-shaped depigmented areas

that eventually ulceate, exposing muscle and bone.

  • Internal signs include generalized hyperemia and

petechiation, renomegaly, splenomegaly, mottled livers, cloudy and bloody ascites, and flaccid intestines with intramural hemorrhage

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • A. hydrophila is an opportunistic

pathogen

  • Disease potential is based on complex interactions

between multiple biotic (host and bacterium) and abiotic (climate, water chemistry, etc.) factors.

  • The strains of A. hydrophila commonly found on the

skin and intestines of healthy fish are considered

  • pportunistic.
  • Disease occurs secondarily to preexisting diseases,

weakened immune systems, injury, or following periods of low oxygen, high ammonia, extreme temperatures, or other forms of stress (crowding).

  • Diseased fish are often infected with other bacteria

such as Flavobacterium columnare and Edwardsiella ictaluri.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Epidemic A. hydrophila (EAh)

  • Outbreaks of EAh started in West Alabama in April

2009, and they continued through September.

  • Disease was characterized by acute onset of anorexia

followed by high mortality rates.

  • Affected fish had clinical signs typical of a systemic

bacterial infection, but distinct from E. ictaluri infection.

  • Pure isolates of A. hydrophila were grown-BBL crystal

and API testing found differences from typical A. hydrophila

  • Mortality in ponds ranged up to 50-60%, and

predominantly marketable size fish were affected.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Epidemic A. hydrophila (EAh)

  • Histopathology- consistent lesions in clinically

diseased fish were limited to the gastrointestinal tract

– The entire length affected, varying severity – Acute epithelial necrosis with mucosal sloughing – Small numbers of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria – Sub-epithelial, large macrophages with abundant proteinaceous and karyorhectic ingested material – Few bacteria seen-morphology consistent with A.hydrophila – Suspect bacterial enterotoxin

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Impact on catfish aquaculture

  • In 2009, EAh was documented on at least 48 farms

with an estimated loss of 3,184,000 lbs. of catfish.

  • In spring and summer of 2010, the disease reemerged

and spread to at least 60 farms (including the 48 affected in 2009) with an estimated loss of 2,400,000

  • lbs. of catfish.
  • Relative to 2009, there was a 25% increase in the

number of infected farms in 2010 over 2009, but 20%

  • f the farms infected in 2009 did not have a

reoccurrence in 2010.

  • Data from 2011 and 2012 are also similar to 2010, with

a loss of over 2 million lbs. of catfish per year

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Importance of biosecurity

  • Cases of EAh have occurred in east Mississippi, but the

disease is currently not active in the delta of Mississippi and Arkansas.

  • Contaminated fish, water, seining and hauling

equipment are good sources for spreading this disease.

  • Implementation of biosecurity measures to stop the

spread of EAh, which requires a reliable detection method, is critical to prevent further spread of the disease in the west Alabama/east Mississippi region and keep it from entering the Mississippi delta and Arkansas

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Formation of a multistate research group

  • Due to the severity of outbreaks in 2009, fish

health diagnosticians and researchers began communicating and sharing information on the disease in summer 2009.

  • Participants in the Aeromonas working group

were located at Auburn University, Mississippi State University (College of Veterinary Medicine in east Mississippi and Thad Cochran National Warmwater Aquaculture Center in the Mississippi delta), University of Arkansas-Pine Bluff, Louisiana State University, and the USDA ARS.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Primary or secondary pathogen?

  • Because A. hydrophila is considered a secondary

pathogen, initial efforts focused on identification

  • f an underlying primary pathogen.
  • Through cooperative efforts, the group ruled out

underlying primary bacterial disease agents (including known pathogens such as E. ictaluri and unknown anaerobes or obligate intracellular bacteria), viruses, and parasites.

  • Visceral toxicosis (caused by Clostridium

botulinum toxin) was ruled out.

  • Host genetic factors were ruled out.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Primary or secondary pathogen?

  • Preliminary studies using culture supernatant

were unsuccessful in reproducing the disease.

  • Immersion and bacterial laced feed also

unable to cause disease.

  • Intraperitoneal injections can reproduce

disease-unsatisfactory method.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

EAh is a clonal group

  • An emerging primary pathogen of catfish?
  • EAh strains from channel catfish had been previously

typed as A. hydrophila based on biochemistry (e.g., API 20E assay) and by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (100% identity to known A. hydrophila strains).

  • Using phylogenetic analysis based on the DNA gyrase

B-subunit gene (gyrB), all of the recent epidemic strains of A. hydrophila were grouped together as a single clade that could be distinguished from all other

  • A. hydrophila.
  • Phenotypic characterizations by API 20E assay also

indicated that the epidemic A. hydrophila had a unique biochemical profile (EAh isolates ferment inositol).

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Concatenated

phylogeny based on seven evolutionarily conserved gene sequences also demonstrated the highly clonal nature of these recently emerged epidemic A. hydrophila isolates.

Concatenated phylogeny of A. hydrophila based

  • n seven gene sequences (atpD, dnaJ, dnaX,

gyrA, gyrB, recA, and rpoD) from representative strains, based on a Maximum Parsimony analysis with 1000 iterations for bootstrap support (indicated at each node).

slide-23
SLIDE 23

EAh is more virulent in channel catfish

Percent survival of channel catfish or grass carp after intraperitoneal injection

  • f 1x105 CFU of the EAh strain ML09-119 or RAh strain AL06-06 (n=5 tanks

containing 20 fish per treatment group).

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Comparative genomics

  • A. hydrophila isolates (n=7 epidemic A. hydrophila

(EAh); n=5 historical "reference" A. hydrophila strains (RAh)) were selected for bar-coded sequencing using an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx next-generation sequencer (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA).

  • Genome sequences from EAh strain ML09-119 were

assembled against the only fully sequenced A. hydrophila genome in GenBank (ATCC 7966T).

  • All sequences that did not assemble against this

reference genome were then de novo assembled to identify contiguous regions (contigs) of the ML09-119 genome that were not in common with the ATCC 7966T strain genome.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Comparative genomics

  • The set of contigs that were unique to strain ML09-119

were used as the reference genome for assembly of each of the other 11 sequenced A. hydrophila genomes.

  • This assembly revealed that all of the other six EAh

strains shared this genomic region(s) in common with ML09-119, whereas the reference A. hydrophila genomes were highly variable and lacked many of the gene sequences present in the EAh strain.

  • 54 ML09-119-unique contigs were found that had

>99% identity among all seven EAh strains.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Comparative genomic analysis of a contig from EAh strain ML09-119 against EAh strain AL09-79 (outer ring) and two RAh strains (inner rings) along with %GC content. Graph represents BLASTn comparison using CGView (Grant & Stothard, 2008).

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • ORF analysis of the 54 epidemic-associated

unique genetic regions revealed 307 predicted genes that are present in EAh isolates but absent from RAh isolates.

  • 35% of the unique genes are located within

predicted genomic islands, suggesting their acquisition through lateral gene transfer.

  • BLAST analysis of EAh-associated ORFs:

– Numerous predicted genes involved in inositol metabolism (responsible for unique biochemical profile) – Prophage structure and regulation – Transposases – Other genes with low percent similarity to known A. hydrophila gene sequences.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Phenotypic differentiation of EAh

  • EAh isolates were capable of good growth in a M9

minimal medium containing only inositol as a sole carbon source.

  • The differential growth of EAh and RAh strains on a M9

minimal medium with inositol was consistently

  • bserved for all sequenced A. hydrophila strains, as

well as for A. hydrophila strains isolated from diseased fish in ponds experiencing a MAS epidemic (n=129).

  • The West Alabama Fish Farming Center (W. Hemstreet,

director) has used this low-cost assay since the summer of 2012 for diagnostic differentiation of EAh versus environmental A. hydrophila isolates.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Unique O antigen

  • A. hydrophila ML09-119 along with all other sequenced

EAh strains contain a unique 33 kb O-antigen biosynthesis gene cluster.

  • There are 29 total predicted genes within this cluster,

all organized in the same transcriptional orientation, suggesting that this is an O-antigen biosynthesis

  • peron.
  • Genes required for biosynthesis of the building blocks
  • f surface polysaccharides are often found clustered in

bacteria.

  • 24 of the 29 genes do not have any similarity to known
  • A. hydrophila genes.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Unique lysogenic prophage

  • More than 20 prophage-linked open reading frames

(ORFs) were identified.

  • Only three of these ORFs had any known affiliation

with any previously described Aeromonas phage, suggesting that this prophage may be a novel Aeromonas phage.

  • Twenty-eight of the genes encoded in these regions

were similar to known virulence factors in other species, and several putative virulence loci (including the myo-inositol utilization pathway) appear to be linked to prophage elements within the EAh genome.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Genetic differentiation of EAh

  • The set of consensus sequences present in all of the

sequenced EAh strains was used to develop primer sets that were specific to these strains and that would be useful for diagnostic and epidemiological studies.

  • Eah-specific sequences met the following criteria:

– 1) present in each sequenced EAh strain – 2) did not have significant homology to known genes in GenBank – 3) did not have an overly high or low %G+C content – 4) were sufficiently long enough (>500 bp) for development of primer sets.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Diagnostic PCR for EAh

  • Selected primer sets had an approximate Tm of 60oC

and an expected PCR product length of 300 bp.

  • The primer sequences were evaluated by diagnostic

laboratories in MS, AL, and AR.

  • Three primer sets were selected as providing the best

specificity and robust PCR for known EAh strains and not giving any significant amplification for environmental or reference strains.

  • The most promising primers have been refined to

provide even better results in real-time PCR assays

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Summary

  • 1) a unique prophage is ubiquitous among EAh

strains

  • 2) this prophage is not present within reference
  • A. hydrophila strains
  • 3) there is physical linkage between virulence

associated-ORFs and this prophage region.

  • In conclusion, lateral gene transfer has

contributed to the pathogenicity of epidemic A. hydrophila strains, mediated by lysogenic conversion by a temperate phage.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Summary

  • In addition to prophage, EAh has unique O

antigen biosynthetic genes.

  • EAh has unique inositol metabolism genes and

can be phenotypicallly differentiated based on inositol utilization.

  • Using comparative genomics, a diagnostic PCR

assay was developed to differentiate EAh from environmental or reference A. hydrophila.