SLIDE 1 Example of Applying Hydric Soil Technical Standard (HSTS)
This lecture reinforces the
concepts explained in the previous lecture.
SLIDE 2 Introduction
This lecture provides an example of the application of the Hydric Soil Technical Standard (HSTS) used to make hydric soil determinations based on Data. Two types of data are analyzed for Anaerobic Conditions and if one of these two data set pass the HSTS, the soil is considered to have been proven to meet the Anaerobic Conditions part of the HSTS. One type of data is analyzed for Saturated Conditions and if it passes the HSTS, the soil is considered to have been proven to meet the Saturated Conditions part of HSTS. Both the Anaerobic Conditions part of the HSTS and the Saturated Conditions part of HSTS must be met for the soil to be considered hydric. In situ pH and precipitation data are also needed to apply the HSTS. “Normal” precipitation is explained again.
SLIDE 3 Proposal to NTCHS
An individual has requested that the NTCHS revise Indicator S6, Stripped Matrix, (Hurt, et
- al. 2002) from “A layer starting within 15 cm
…” to “A layer starting within 20 cm …” The rest of the indicator requirements remain the same. Data were collected to determine validity of proposed revision.
SLIDE 4
0-5 cm 60% 10YR 5/2 and 40% 10YR 2/1 sand 5-12 cm 75% 10YR 2/1 and 25% 10YR 5/2 sand 12-17 cm 60% 10YR 5/2 and 40% 10YR 2/1 sand 17-35 cm 60% 10YR 5/2, 20% 10YR 7/1, and 20% 10YR 6/2 sand (Indicator S6, Stripped Matrix)
Soil Profile Description
SLIDE 5
Site that was instrumented.
SLIDE 6
Precipitation data were collected Dry-wet-dry cycle for this area is June through September
On-site Features
SLIDE 7
“Normal” Precipitation
For the purposes of applying the HSTS the definition of “Normal” precipitation is the average monthly precipitation (50%) + 20%. This would be the 30-70% probability of occurrence. Another way to express this range is that during any given 10 years of precipitation data collection on the average for any given month 4 of 10 years would have precipitation within this range for that month; 3 would have lower and 3 would have higher precipitation for that or any month.
SLIDE 8
“Normal” Precipitation
In order to be able to apply data collected (Eh, dye, and saturation data) to the HSTS on-site precipitation have to fall within the 30-70% range during the dry-wet-dry cycle for the area. Therefore for this site data would be collected for the months of June through September and if the precipitation falls within the 30-70% range, then the other data can be used to see if the HSTS is met. In the following slide data collected at this site are presented for the June through September period and plotted along with the 30 and 70% probability (NRCS, National Water and Climate Center).
SLIDE 9
Precipitation during the month of September was between 16 and 84% of Normal
SLIDE 10 Checking Normal Precipitation
From the data shown on the previous slide we see that precipitation data collected for the period of June through September fall between the 30 and 70 % probability of
On-site precipitation data is compared with the data from the nearest weather station. These data (30-70%) are available at http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/water/wetlands.html for thousands of weather stations nationwide.
SLIDE 11 Dry-Wet-Dry Cycles
Dry-wet-dry cycles are not only a function of precipitation but also a function of evapotraspiration and snow melt. Evapotraspiration is a function of the types and amounts of plants present, wind velocity, air temperature, and amount of water in the
- soil. Local soil/wetland scientists should be
consulted if necessary.
SLIDE 12 Anaerobic Conditions and Saturated Conditions Data
Anaerobic Conditions are verified by Platinum Electrode Data or Alpha-Alpha-Dipyridyl Data. Saturated Conditions are verified by Piezometer Data. Data presented represent the most reduced and saturated
- periods. Data presented are for September 1, 8 and 15.
Three consecutive weekly reading is the minimum requirement; two is not enough. If only two consecutive weekly reading are reported the NTCHS could interpret the data as representing 8 days (September 1 -September 8) and the HSTS requires 14 days of data for comparison.
SLIDE 13
5 Platinum electrodes were installed at 12.5 cm as measured from the mineral soil surface (because soils are sandy and no muck was present). For most loamy or clayey soils the depth would have been 25 cm.
SLIDE 14
Platinum Electrode Data
Dates: Sept 1 Sept 8 Sept 15 Electrode #1 = 201 mv 189 mv 201 mv Electrode #2 = 233 mv 177 mv 167 mv Electrode #3 = 103 mv 100 mv 113 mv Electrode #4 = 252 mv 252 mv 252 mv Electrode #5 = 189 mv 160 mv 180 mv Soil pH was 6.6 on all dates
SLIDE 15 100 200 300 400
pH 4 pH 5 pH 6 pH 7 pH 8 Eh
Aerobic Conditions Exist Anaerobic Conditions Exist
Eh/pH Line (-60) for Determining Aerobic and Anaerobic Conditions with data points for September 1 are indicated by the arrows
SLIDE 16 100 200 300 400
pH 4 pH 5 pH 6 pH 7 pH 8 Eh
100 200 300 400
Eh
Data points for September 8 and September 15 indicated by
SLIDE 17
Interpretation of Eh/pH Data
Based on the Eh/pH line of 175 mv for pH 7 adjusted for pH with a slope of negative 60 the critical Eh for pH 6.6 would be 199 mv. Thus Anaerobic Conditions = Eh of < 199 and Aerobic Conditions = Eh of > 199. Sept 1: 2 of 5 were Anaerobic Sept 8: 4 of 5 were Anaerobic Sept 15: 3 of 5 were Anaerobic
SLIDE 18
Electrode Data Analysis
Data are not summarized. Data from each electrode are presented separately. Data summarization would have been: Sept 1 196 mv (Anaerobic) Sept 8 176 mv (Anaerobic) Sept 15 183 mv (Anaerobic) Compare the results of summarization Vs. reporting data from all electrodes. Platinum electrodes often fail; note that one electrode recorded a value of near 100 (Electrode 3) for each of the three weekly readings (the electrode may be faulty). By analyzing all data, suspect data can better be analyzed.
SLIDE 19
Alpha-Alpha-Dipyridyl Data and Data Analysis
Dates Sept 1 Sept 8 Sept 15 Sample #1 Yes No Yes Sample #2 Yes Yes Yes Sample #3 No Yes No Yes = positive reaction in at least 1/2 of the upper 12.5 cm. No = no positive reaction in at least 1/2 of the upper 12.5 cm.
SLIDE 20
2 piezometers were installed at 25 cm. 2 piezometers were installed at 100 cm. An open well to a depth of 2 m was also installed.
SLIDE 21 Saturation Data and Data Analysis
- f the two 25 cm Piezometers
Dates: Sept 1 Sept 8 Sept 15 Piezometer 1 Yes Yes Yes Piezometer 2 No Yes Yes
Yes = Water in piezometer No = No water in piezometer
Summary No* Yes Yes *Water has to be in both piezometers.
SLIDE 22
HSTS Data Analysis
Dates: Sept 1 Sept 8 Sept 15 Anaerobic (Eh) No Yes Yes Anaerobic (dye) Yes Yes Yes Saturated No Yes Yes Has the soil been proven to be hydric? Is the proposed revision valid? Does the NTCHS accept the proposed change to Indicator S6 (Stripped Matrix)?
SLIDE 23 HSTS Data Analysis
Has this soil been proven to be hydric? This is a 2 part test. Has the Anaerobic Conditions part of the HSTS been met? Remember the Eh and dye data are analyzed for Anaerobic Conditions and if one of these two types of data collected pass the HSTS, the soil is considered to have been proven to meet the HSTS. This soil meets Anaerobic Conditions for at least 14 consecutive days based on the dye data. This soil does not meet anaerobic conditions for at least 14 consecutive days based on the Eh data. The soil meets the anaerobic conditions part of the HSTS Has the Saturated Conditions part of the HSTS been met? The soil is not known to be saturated for at least 14 consecutive days based on the piezometer data; only 8 days. This soil fails the Saturated Conditions part of the HSTS. This soil has not been proven to be hydric. Is the proposed revision valid? NO Does the NTCHS accept the proposed change to Indicator S6 (Stripped Matrix)? NO
SLIDE 24 Analyze the data on the previous slide based on the following September precipitation scenarios:
- 1. The month had precipitation of less than 16% of
normal
- 2. The month had precipitation of between 16% to
84% of normal
- 3. The month had precipitation of more than 84% of
normal
SLIDE 25 Literature Cited
Vasilas, Hurt, and Noble ( Eds.). 2010. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States (Version 7.0), USDA, NRCS, Fort Worth, TX. http://soils.usda.gov/soil_use/hydric/field_ind.pdf National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 2001. Hydric Soil Technical Standard (Technical Note 11). http://soils.usda.gov/soil_use/hydric/hstn.htm 30-70 percentile probability data are available from the WETS web site at http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov//efotg_locator.aspx Select a state Select a county Select Section II from the drop down menu Open the climate tab Select AgCIS Select WETS Select a weather station
