Ex Extreme and and Persis istent In Ineq equality ty: : Ne - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ex extreme and and persis istent in ineq equality ty ne
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ex Extreme and and Persis istent In Ineq equality ty: : Ne - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ex Extreme and and Persis istent In Ineq equality ty: : Ne New Evidence for Br Brazil Co Combining National Acc Na Accounts, , Sur Survey eys and and Fis iscal al Data, a, 2001-2015 2015 Marc Morgan Paris School of Economics


slide-1
SLIDE 1

First WID.world Conference Paris School of Economics | 14-15 December, 2017

Ex Extreme and and Persis istent In Ineq equality ty: : Ne New Evidence for Br Brazil Co Combining Na National Acc Accounts, , Sur Survey eys and and Fis iscal al Data, a, 2001-2015 2015

Marc Morgan

Paris School of Economics & EHESS World Inequality Lab & WID.world Fellow

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Why Brazil?

  • A large developing country with a long and dramatic inequality history
  • High market income inequality (Gini = 0.50-0.60)
  • Improved data quality and access in recent years

The 2000s

  • Return of growth (18% per adult) amid crises
  • First “PT” government since early 1960s
  • Strong decline in income inequality during 2000s according to surveys

(‘success story’) : fall in Gini by 7-10 pp

Barros et al. (2010) in López-Calva and Lustig (Eds.) Declining inequality in Latin America: A Decade of Progress?

Mo Moti tivati tion

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Notes: The figure shows the evolution of national income per adult (aged 20+). IBGE and WID.world.

R$ 24,000 R$ 26,000 R$ 28,000 R$ 30,000 R$ 32,000 R$ 34,000 R$ 36,000 R$ 38,000 R$ 40,000 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Constant (2015) Reais

Evolution of per adult national income in Brazil: 1985-2015

  • 0.3%

+ 18.2%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Di Distributional Na National Accounts (DI (DINA NA)

= Adding inequality to SNA (using surveys and fiscal data) Applied to Brazil to offer a new analysis of inequality:

  • How unequal is Brazil?
  • How has inequality evolved over this new period of growth and government?
  • Is there evidence of a decline? Sources?
  • How was growth distributed?

First attempt at combining three sources of data for Brazil

Mo Motivation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Da Data sour urces, Conc ncepts ts and nd Metho thod

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

§ Sur Survey eys: PNAD (IBGE) E)

  • Micro-files: 2001-2015
  • Complemented with POF 2009 survey

§ Pe Pers rsonal income tax declara rations (DIRPF) )

  • Tabulations of total gross income (taxable, withheld & exempt) before social contrib.
  • Coverage: 25-28 million declarations (20% of adult population)
  • Tax unit = individuals or couple

§ Na National accounts (I (IBG BGE)

  • Flow of funds (2001-2015) = SNA (2008)
  • Financial balance sheets (2010-2014)

Da Data Sources

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Unit of observation: Eq Equal-sp split a t adults ts

  • Aged 20+, income of married couples is equally divided

Income concept: Pr Pre-ta tax post-re replaceme ment t nat national nal i inc ncome me ( (DIN INA)

  • National income attributed to households
  • Including pensions + unemployment insurance & deducting social contributions
  • vs fiscal income = income assessed by tax administration
  • vs survey income = income appearing in surveys

Co Concepts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Me Method: building fr from th the e bo bottom up up Na National income Personal income Fiscal income Survey income

+ government income (SNA)

+ Net government capital income + net production taxes

+ non-fiscal income (SNA & surveys) + top incomes (tax data)

+ Imputed rent (7%) – social contributions (14%) + insurance/pension fund income (1%) + household undistributed profits (6%) = Gross wages + pensions + self-employed income + capital income ≈ 71% of NI Correct survey incomes by ratio yfiscal / ysurvey by percentile where it is > 1 Assume a correlation structure between fiscal and missing income (Gumbel Copula) Normalize distribution by national income

slide-9
SLIDE 9

R$ 0 R$ 1,000,000 R$ 2,000,000 R$ 3,000,000 R$ 4,000,000 R$ 5,000,000 R$ 6,000,000 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Million (2015) Reais

Notes: The figure shows the evolution of total real income in billions of Reals across datasets and income concepts. The Survey + Tax data series uses survey incomes up to the percentile where average percentile income in the surveys is less than or equal

Figure 1. Evolution of total real income in Brazil: 2001-2015

National Accounts (national income) National Accounts (fiscal income) Survey + Tax data (fiscal income) Survey data Tax data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Combine surveys + tax data as above but for labour earnings Note: Labour income is not purely observable in tax returns Estimation: § Ta Taxable income (wages, self-employed labour income, rent) § Distribution of taxable income – property rent (= 2% of fiscal taxable income in national accounts) § Assumptions:

  • 20% of rental income à Middle 40% taxable income share
  • 80% of rental income à Top 10% (incl. 40% à Top 1%) share

Me Method: est stimating th the l e labou

  • ur ea

earnings d s distr tributi tion

  • n
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Extreme and consolidated concentration at the top vs compression in bottom 90% Surveys seem to massively underestimate levels and overestimate decline Overall the distribution narrowed over the period Labour incomes seem to do most of the work .

Re Results: : inc income ine inequality quality in in Br Brazil 2001 2001-2015 2015

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Notes: Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining survey, fiscal and national accounts data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 2. Income inequality in Brazil: DINA estimates

Top 10% Middle 40% Bottom 50%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Notes: Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining survey, fiscal and national accounts data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 2. Income inequality in Brazil: DINA estimates

Top 10% Middle 40% Bottom 50%

+2.0%

  • 7.6%

+11.2%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Notes: Distribution of income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment. insurance) among adults in

  • ur three series, raw estimates from surveys, a fiscal income series (combining surveys and fiscal data) and a national

income series (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 8. Top 1% in Brazil: survey vs fiscal vs DINA series

National income series Fiscal income series Survey income series

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Notes: Distribution of pretax taxable labour income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining survey, fiscal and national accounts data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 9. Labour income shares in Brazil: corrected estimates

Top 10% Middle 40% Bottom 50%

  • 7.0%

+2.2% +19.5%

Inequality of labour income more clearly falls

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Notes: Distribution of pre-tax income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults compared to a fiscal total income series (combining surveys and fiscal data) and a national income series (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 10. Top 1% in Brazil: labour income vs total income

Top 1% (national income) Top 1% (fiscal income) Top 1% (labour income)

Capital income makes up the difference

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Notes: Distribution of income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults. Raw estimates from surveys and a national income series (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split- adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

Role of labour income inequality for Gini

0.500 0.520 0.540 0.560 0.580 0.600 0.620 0.640 0.660 0.680 0.700 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure A.4. Gini coefficients in Brazil: 2001-2015

Gini (national income) Gini (survey income)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Most of the action from the labour income side Mi Minimum wage (+ 64% real growth since 2000)

  • Incidence: Ferreira et al. (2017); Brito et al. (2016)

Fa Fall in education premium

  • Higher wage growth of lower skilled labour
  • Exceptional educational expansion, 1990-2010 (Barro and Lee, 2013)

“H “Horizontal wage inequalities” ” (Ferreira et al. 2017)

  • Men vs women; blacks vs whites; rural vs urban; formal vs informal sectors

Ex Explaining plaining Recent Trends nds in in Braz azilian ilian ine inequalit quality

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Growth was far from being equally distributed

Full population 18.2% 100% 18.2% 100% Bottom 50% 31.4% 21.8% 72.1% 50% Middle 40% 9.3% 16.9% 21.9% 40% Top 10% 20.6% 61.3% 3.4% 10%

  • incl. Top 1%

25.9% 36.5% 0.7% 1%

  • incl. Top 0.1%

21.3% 14.7% 0.1% 0.1%

  • incl. Top 0.01%

84.8% 22.3% 0.04% 0.01%

  • incl. Top 0.001%

121.5% 13.8% 0.01% 0.001%

Income growth under actual sharing and equal sharing in Brazil

Notes: Distribution of pre-tax national income among equal-split adults. The unit is the adult individual (20-year-old and over; income of married couples is split into two). Fractiles are defined relative to the total number of adult individuals in the population. Corrected estimates (combining survey, fiscal and national accounts data).

Income groups

(distribution of per adult pre-tax national income)

Actual cumulated growth

(2001-2015)

Counterfactual growth rates

(2001-2015)

Actual fraction of total growth captured Fraction of total growth captured

(equal sharing)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

In Inter erna nati tiona nal c compa pariso sons ns

Structure of inequality in Brazil: developed country elite vs developing country poor Brazil: at the world inequality frontier?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The structure of inequality in Brazil: a country of two societies

Full Population €15,178 €32,688 €49,509 Bottom 50% €4,337 €14,692 €12,422 Middle 40% €11,830 €36,691 €50,054 Top 10% €82,772 €106,660 €232,767

  • incl. Top 1%

€405,698 €352,921 €1,000,041

  • incl. Top 0.1%

€1,857,471 €1,208,114 €4,614,051

  • incl. Top 0.01%

€8,520,530 €4,226,609 €21,550,391

  • incl. Top 0.001%

€40,147,935 €12,894,262 €94,063,272

Notes: The unit is the adult individual (20-year-old and over; income of married couples is split into two). In 2014, 1 Euro = 2.32 reals (purchasing power parity). Income corresponds to pre-tax national income. Fractiles are defined relative to the total number of adult individuals in the population. Corrected estimates combine national accounts, surveys and fiscal data.

Income groups

(distribution of per adult pre-tax income)

Brazil

(2014 Euros PPP)

France

(2014 Euros PPP)

USA

(2014 Euros PPP)

Table 2.1 Average incomes in Brazil, France and USA: 2014

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Notes: Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment. insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income

  • f married couples divided by two). Estimates for USA, France and China, India and Russia are from http://wid.world/.

20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 42% 44% 46% 48% 50% 52% 54% 56% 58% 60% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 11. Top 10% income share: Brazil vs other countries

Brazil USA China France India Russia

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Notes: Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment. insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income

  • f married couples divided by two). Estimates for USA, France and China, India and Russia are from http://wid.world/.

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 14. Top 1% income share: Brazil vs other countries

Brazil USA China France India Russia

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Notes: Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment. insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income

  • f married couples divided by two). Estimates for USA, France and China, India and Russia are from http://wid.world/.

5% 7% 9% 11% 13% 15% 17% 19% 21% 23% 25% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 13. Bottom 50% income share: Brazil vs other countries

Brazil China USA France India Russia

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

§ The findings confirm Brazil’s status as one of the world’s most unequal countries using DINA framework § Extreme and persistent concentration at the top: rich country elite, poor country non-elite. Cash poor bottom (but growing) and a “squeezed middle” § Income inequality among Bottom 90% decreased with poverty reduction

  • Compression of labour incomes (min. wage, fall in education premium)
  • Lack of capital resources

N. N.B. Importance of capital income to explain resilience of top shares & inequality

Co Conclusions

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Re Re-ex examine wage inequality § Exploit tabulations of social contributions (1995-2015) § Combine with PNAD survey contributors In Ineq equality ality over er th the e lo long-ru run of

  • f B

Brazilian h histor

  • ry

§ 1926-1988 income tax tabulations (IBGE) & scattered publications for late-1990s à long run fiscal income series (Morgan and Souza, forthcoming). § Exploit 1976-1999 survey micro-data and samples of census data (1960, 1970, 1980, 1991, 2000, 2010) à DINA

Fu Further Research

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Notes: Morgan and Souza (forthcoming), using income tax tabulations and SNA.

Historical persistence...? (Morgan & Souza, forthcoming)

0% 4% 8% 12% 16% 20% 24% 28% 32% 36% 40% 1926 1932 1938 1944 1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 2010

Top 1% share of fiscal income in Brazil: 1926-2015 (preliminary series)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Notes: Morgan and Souza (forthcoming), using income tax tabulations and SNA.

0% 4% 8% 12% 16% 20% 24% 28% 32% 36% 40% 1926 1932 1938 1944 1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 2010

Top 1% share of fiscal income in Brazil: missed 20th century leveling?

Brazil Argentina India South Africa

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Ap Appendix ix

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Notes: Morgan and Souza (forthcoming), using income tax tabulations and SNA.

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 1926 1932 1938 1944 1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 2010

Top 1% share of fiscal income in Brazil: 1926-2015 (preliminary series)

Vargas & Estado Novo dictatorship Military dictatorship "Social democractic / Labour" turn "New Republic"

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Notes: Morgan and Souza (forthcoming), using income tax tabulations and SNA.

10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 1926 1932 1938 1944 1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 2010

Top shares of fiscal income in Brazil: 1926-2015 (preliminary series)

Top 10% Top 1%

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Notes: Morgan and Souza (forthcoming), using income tax tabulations and SNA.

10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 1926 1932 1938 1944 1950 1956 1962 1968 1974 1980 1986 1992 1998 2004 2010

Top shares of fiscal income in Brazil vs DINA shares

Top 10% Top 10% (DINA) Top 1% Top 1% (DINA)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Notes: Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining survey, fiscal and national accounts data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two). The annual share of social assistance transfers in national income is added to the share of the Bottom 50% and taken away from the share of the Top 10% to illustrate the maximum inequality reduction that can be achieved with these benefits at their current levels.

Limits of cash transfers

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure A.5 Income inequality in Brazil: DINA estimates (incl. cash transfers)

Top 10% Top 10% (incl. welfare cash transfer payments) Middle 40% Bottom 50% Bottom 50% (incl. welfare cash transfers received)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

2001 100% 78% 63% 71% 60% 50% 29% 17% 12% 2002 100% 77% 62% 71% 61% 49% 29% 16% 12% 2003 100% 74% 60% 70% 60% 48% 30% 14% 12% 2004 100% 71% 58% 68% 58% 46% 32% 14% 11% 2005 100% 72% 59% 69% 59% 48% 31% 13% 11% 2006 100% 72% 60% 69% 60% 48% 31% 12% 12% 2007 100% 71% 58% 42% 69% 59% 48% 33% 31% 12% 10% 9% 2008 100% 71% 58% 46% 69% 59% 48% 35% 31% 12% 10% 11% 2009 100% 73% 59% 46% 73% 61% 49% 35% 27% 12% 10% 11% 2010 100% 71% 56% 45% 70% 59% 47% 34% 30% 12% 9% 11% 2011 100% 71% 54% 46% 70% 59% 46% 34% 30% 12% 8% 12% 2012 100% 71% 56% 46% 70% 60% 47% 34% 30% 11% 9% 12% 2013 100% 71% 55% 45% 71% 60% 46% 33% 29% 11% 8% 12% 2014 100% 73% 57% 47% 73% 62% 48% 35% 27% 11% 9% 12% 2015 100% 75% 58% 49% 75% 64% 49% 36% 25% 12% 8% 13% DIRPF Labour Income PNAD Labour Income SNA Fiscal Labour Income SNA National Labour Income Year

Notes: The table shows the ratio of the income of each dataset to the total net national income of the economy. For instance in 2015, the total income we measure in the tax data accounts for 49% of national income, while the equivalent income conept from the survey is 58%. The equivalent income concept estimated from national accounts is 75% of national income. While 75% of total national income is labour income, 64% is labour income defined for fiscal purposes, 49% is labour income in the survey and 36% is labour income in the tax data. The PNAD incomes are from the microfiles provided by the IBGE, while incomes from the DIRPF are from detailed tabulations provided by the Secretaria da Receita Federal do Brasil. SNA data is from IBGE. Percentages may not add up due to rounding. Mixed income is divided up between labour and capital income in proportion to the division

  • f income between employee remuneration and net operating surplus in the corporate sector. On average the split is 61%-39% between labour and capital.

Table 1. Comparison of incomes in the System of National Accounts (SNA), Household Surveys (PNAD) and Income Tax Declarations (DIRPF)

Total income (% national income)

  • Incl. labour income (% national income)
  • Incl. capital income (% national income)

DIRPF PNAD SNA Fiscal Income SNA National Income DIRPF Capital Income PNAD Capital Income SNA Fiscal Capital Income SNA National Capital Income

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Notes: the figure shows ratios between average incomes in the tax data and average incomes in surveys for each percentile

  • f the two respective distributions. Tax data start at around P80 for all years.

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 P80 P81 P82 P83 P84 P85 P86 P87 P88 P89 P90 P91 P92 P93 P94 P95 P96 P97 P98 P99 Tax average income / survey average income at percentile p

Figure A.1. Ratios between tax and survey average incomes in Brazil: 2007-2015

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

slide-36
SLIDE 36

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 P99.0 P99.1 P99.2 P99.3 P99.4 P99.5 P99.6 P99.7 P99.8 P99.90 P99.91 P99.92 P99.93 P99.94 P99.95 P99.96 P99.97 P99.98 P99.990 P99.991 P99.992 P99.993 P99.994 P99.995 P99.996 P99.997 P99.998 P99.999 Tax average income / survey average income at percentile p

Figure A.2. Ratios between tax and survey average incomes in Brazil above P99: 2007-2015

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Notes: the figure shows ratios between average incomes in the tax data and average incomes in surveys for each percentile

  • f the two respective distributions. Tax data start at around P80 for all years.
slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

St Step 3: How is imputed income distributed? Im Imputed ed ren ent à distribution from POF (29.6% to Top 10% incl. 7.5% to Top 1%, 44.3% to Middle 40%, and 26.1% to Bottom 50%) So Soci cial contributionsà distribution from POF (49.4% to Top 10% incl. 13.1% to Top 1%, 44.2% to Middle 40%, and 6.4% to Bottom 50%) Un Undistributed p profits à distribution of financial incomes & employer capital income (PNAD) In Insurance/p ce/pen ension fund income e à distribution of primary job of those who contribute to public or private pension fund (PNAD) è 90.5% to Top 10% (incl. 53.7% to Top 1%) 9.2% to Middle 40%, and 0.3% to Bottom 50% on average Go Government income à distribution neutral

Me Methods | Re Reconciling wi with n national i income

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Notes: The figure shows the evolution of total real labour income in millions of Reals across datasets and income concepts. The Survey + Tax data series combines taxable labour income assessed for tax purposes in the two datasets. Taxable labour income includes wages, pensions and self-employment pro-labore income on which the income tax applies. The difference with SNA fiscal labour income is that it excludes annual bonuses, the exempt portions of pensions and agricultural income, indemnity income for the termination of a contract and unemployment insurance. The difference with national labour income is that it excludes employer fringe benefits and payroll taxes and any potential tax evasion.

R$ 0 R$ 500,000 R$ 1,000,000 R$ 1,500,000 R$ 2,000,000 R$ 2,500,000 R$ 3,000,000 R$ 3,500,000 R$ 4,000,000 R$ 4,500,000 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Million (2015) Reais

Figure A.3. Evolution of labour income in Brazil: 2001-2015

SNA National Labour Income SNA Fiscal Labour Income Survey + Tax Data (Taxable Labour Income)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Full population 18.2% 100.0% 100.0% 10.4% 7.1%

  • 5.5%

Bottom 50% 31.4% 21.8% 13.3% 15.2% 14.1%

  • 7.1%

Middle 40% 9.3% 16.9% 31.5% 6.5% 2.6%

  • 7.0%

Top 10% 20.6% 61.3% 55.2% 11.6% 8.0%

  • 4.2%
  • incl. Top 1%

25.9% 36.5% 26.9% 15.5% 9.0%

  • 3.3%
  • incl. Top 0.1%

21.3% 14.7% 12.6% 13.1% 7.2%

  • 0.7%
  • incl. Top 0.01%

84.8% 22.3% 7.2% 119.9%

  • 16.0%
  • 2.2%
  • incl. Top 0.001%

121.5% 13.8% 3.7% 196.8%

  • 25.4%
  • 0.8%

Notes: Distribution of pre-tax national income among equal-split adults. The unit is the adult individual (20-year-old and over; income of married couples is split into two). Fractiles are defined relative to the total number of adult individuals in the population. Corrected estimates (combining survey, fiscal and national accounts data).

Table 4. Income growth, recession and inequality in Brazil: 2001-2015

Income groups

(distribution of per adult pre-tax national income)

Average income share (2001-2015) Total cumulated growth (2001-2015) Fraction of total growth captured (2001-2015) Total cumulated growth (2001-2007) Total cumulated growth (2007-2015) Total growth (2014-2015)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Notes: Distribution of income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults in our three series, raw estimates from surveys, a fiscal income series (combining surveys and fiscal data) and a national income series (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 42% 44% 46% 48% 50% 52% 54% 56% 58% 60% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 5. Top 10% in Brazil: survey vs fiscal vs DINA series

National income series Fiscal income series Survey income series

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Notes: Distribution of income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults in our three series, raw estimates from surveys, a fiscal income series (combining surveys and fiscal data) and a national income series (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

16% 18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 42% 44% 46% 48% 50% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 6. Middle 40% in Brazil: survey vs fiscal vs DINA series

Survey income series Fiscal income series National income series

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Notes: Distribution of income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment insurance) among adults in our three series, raw estimates from surveys, a fiscal income series (combining surveys and fiscal data) and a national income series (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income of married couples divided by two).

4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 7. Bottom 50% in Brazil: survey vs fiscal vs DINA series

Survey income series Fiscal income series National income series

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Notes: Distribution of pretax national income (before taxes and transfers, except pensions and unemployment. insurance) among adults. Corrected estimates (combining national accounts, surveys and fiscal data). Equal-split-adults series (income

  • f married couples divided by two). Estimates for USA, France and China, India and Russia are from http://wid.world/.

20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40% 42% 44% 46% 48% 50% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 12. Middle 40% income share: Brazil vs other countries

Brazil China USA France India Russia

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Two final points to note: § Fall in wage inequality à ch change in remu muneration forms rms ?

  • Self-employed, business owners/executives (tax incentives)

§ Ro Role of undistributed profits (6% of national income)

  • Growth (273%) vs employee compensation (75%) & dividends (35%)
  • Concentration in Top 1%
  • Why the accumulation: uncertain economic and political landscape…limits to

external finance?

Ex Explaining plaining Recent Trends nds in in Braz azilian ilian ine inequalit quality