Evaluation of a Display for Airborne Separation in Safety-critical Situations
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Marcus ARENIUS Human and Organisational Engineering & Systemic Design Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, D-34132 University of Kassel
Evaluation of a Display for Airborne Separation in Safety-critical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Evaluation of a Display for Airborne Separation in Safety-critical Situations Marcus ARENIUS Human and Organisational Engineering & Systemic Design Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, D-34132 University of Kassel Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Marcus ARENIUS Human and Organisational Engineering & Systemic Design Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, D-34132 University of Kassel
Pilots conduct separation (without ATC assistance) Find optimale flight route
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014 (Schneider, 2014) (Schneider, 2014)
„fly the aircraft first“ (CRM-Training)
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Prepare pilots for new demands in task coordination (Training Curriculum) Maintaining adequate Situation Awareness in challenging situations?
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Discern effect of the ATC-display on Situational Awareness in Safety-critical situations
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
in Safety-critical situations Simulator study with ATC-Display Using Measurements of visual attention; Expert ratings (and others)
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
„the perception of the elements in the environment within a volume of time and space, the comprehension of their meaning and the projection of their status in the near future.
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
(Endsley & Garland, 2001, p. 5)
(Wickens, 2002)
Rollers / Rolling Pitch Steering
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Yawing Flight level Lateral deviations from flight route Position on flight route Positioning in time & space
Mainly monitoring Awareness of System
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
System paramenters Routine Unexpected situations Risk: Loss of Control
Priority
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Flexibility
Assessment System Decisions Performance Interface Process Indices Direct Indices Behaviour and Performance Indices
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Processes Awareness Decisions Performance System Eye-Tracking Evasion option Ratings
(ad. fr. Endsley & Garland, 2001, p. xi)
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014 (Schneider, 2014) (Schneider, 2014)
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
(Schneider, 2014)
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014 (Schneider, 2014)
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Traffic Warning Single Engine Failure
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
AirCrt137 HDG 130° FL360 Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.201419
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
P8 P9 P10 P11 ipant
Delay in noticing the Engine Failure
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
5 10 15 P1 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 Delay in [sec] Particip
Variable A Variable B Correlation coeff. Fixation Duration ATC-Display Performance Rating
Noticing Engine Failure Performance Rating
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Variable A Variable B Correlation coeff. ET strategy Performance rating
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
− High delays in noticing EF associated with decreases in performance ranking (Systems Awareness) − High fixation times on ATC-display associated with decreases in
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
performance ranking (Systems Awareness) − „Bank Angle“-Warnings (>30°; „out-of-the-loop“)
− Vicinity of PFD,E/WD und NAV − Issue: Blending/Overlapping of tasks
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Different strategies
Psychological coping mechanisms (Sträter, 2005)
Correlations of AoI
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Disregards dynamics of behavior!
F1/S1 F2/S2 F3/S3
Functions & coping strategies:
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014 Indentified functions & coping strategies
strategies:
Aggregated evaluation Fit Strat. <-> Techn. HMI-Function allocation
Performance Shaping Factor Quantity Distraction 45 Irregularities 44 Work experience on job 22 Cooperation 9
Task
Adaptive Cognitive System
Action Task
Technic
Outcome
Feedback techn. system Feedback on activity level
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Cooperation 9 Stress 7 Time-pressure 5 Authority 5
Cognitive Couplings Cognitive Processing Loop Task type and demand Experience-driven, iterative determination of goals and actions
Resilience
nical system
Outcome
Contextual Conditions (Psf-> mod. HEP)
− Database (~500 events, ~100 aviation)
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Database (~500 events, ~100 aviation) − Coping strategies − Demands, Coping Strategies & Psf − Design of (complex) HF studies
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Contact information Marcus Arenius arenius@ifa.uni-kassel.de
Analysis and Measurement. Atlanta, GA: CRC Press.
Piloten und dessen Untersuchung hinsichtlich Auswirkungen auf das Verhalten von Piloten in kritischen Flugsituationen [Development and Evaluation of a Display for Airborne Separation] (Master Thesis).
Arenius et al, ICRAT 2014, 28.05.2014
Evaluation of a Display for Airborne Separation] (Master Thesis). University of Kassel, Department of Human and Organisational Engineering & Systemic Design, Kassel.
design and assessment. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 128–133.