evaluating widening
play

Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFEs reports to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFEs reports to HEFCE 2 nd September 2015 About CFE Research An independent not- for-profit company specialising in providing research and evaluation services in the fields of education,


  1. Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFE’s reports to HEFCE 2 nd September 2015

  2. About CFE Research An independent not- for-profit company specialising in providing research and evaluation services in the fields of education, the economy and wellbeing.

  3. Working in partnership with... • Professor Liz Thomas • Economists from: • University of Sheffield • University of Sussex • University of Birmingham • London School of Economics

  4. Two reports for HEFCE Report on the piloting of a more detailed data return

  5. Two reports for HEFCE Report on the piloting of a more detailed data return In-depth study with case studies

  6. What we did

  7. Reviewed evidence

  8. Review of evidence Drafted frameworks

  9. Consulted with HE providers • Visits to 25 institutions • Interviews with key staff • 15 institutions also piloted the data return • Six case studies

  10. Designed & piloted a more detailed data return

  11. Key messages

  12. The purpose of an evaluation framework • Accountability • Benchmarking What works • • Impact assessment Return on investment •

  13. Different purposes require different approaches

  14. Accountability • Data return most appropriate for this purpose • Any new data or changes need to be requested in advance of reporting periods... • ...with plenty of time to put in place data collection

  15. Benchmarking UK Performance • Indicators meet this need • Measures should link back to the issue funding/activity is seeking to address • The role of measuring ‘distance travelled’

  16. What works and impact • Need to improve attribution • Stronger evaluation methods with good comparison groups including RCTs • More appropriate for new or innovative approaches • Longitudinal tracking of students • Better use of secondary data • Supported by qualitative research

  17. More evaluations with good comparison groups

  18. More longitudinal tracking

  19. Making better use of existing data For example, • National Pupil Database , HM Revenue & Customs Data Labs • • Small Business, Enterprise & Employment Act 2015

  20. A role for qualitative research How does it work? • • Does it matter? • Is this intervention right for this group of people? Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung CC BY-SA 2.0

  21. Return on investment Econometric analysis • of secondary data • Not all benefits of WP can or should be measured in financial terms Mattia Landoni CC BY-SA 2.0

  22. Make findings accessible

  23. Thank you Rachel Moreton rachel.moreton@cfe.org.uk 0116 229 3300 www.cfe.org.uk

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend