Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFEs reports to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evaluating widening
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFEs reports to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluating widening participation Key findings from CFEs reports to HEFCE 2 nd September 2015 About CFE Research An independent not- for-profit company specialising in providing research and evaluation services in the fields of education,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Evaluating widening participation

Key findings from CFE’s reports to HEFCE 2nd September 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

About CFE Research

An independent not- for-profit company specialising in providing research and evaluation services in the fields of education, the economy and wellbeing.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Working in partnership with...

  • Professor Liz Thomas
  • Economists from:
  • University of Sheffield
  • University of Sussex
  • University of Birmingham
  • London School of Economics
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Two reports for HEFCE

Report on the piloting of a more detailed data return

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Two reports for HEFCE

Report on the piloting of a more detailed data return In-depth study with case studies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What we did

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Reviewed evidence

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Review of evidence

Drafted frameworks

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Consulted with HE providers

  • Visits to 25 institutions
  • Interviews with key staff
  • 15 institutions also piloted the data return
  • Six case studies
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Designed & piloted a more detailed data return

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Key messages

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The purpose of an evaluation framework

  • Accountability
  • Benchmarking
  • What works
  • Impact assessment
  • Return on investment
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Different purposes require different approaches

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Accountability

  • Data return most

appropriate for this purpose

  • Any new data or

changes need to be requested in advance

  • f reporting periods...
  • ...with plenty of time

to put in place data collection

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Benchmarking

  • UK Performance

Indicators meet this need

  • Measures should link

back to the issue funding/activity is seeking to address

  • The role of measuring

‘distance travelled’

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What works and impact

  • Need to improve attribution
  • Stronger evaluation methods with good

comparison groups including RCTs

  • More appropriate for new or innovative

approaches

  • Longitudinal tracking of students
  • Better use of secondary data
  • Supported by qualitative research
slide-17
SLIDE 17

More evaluations with good comparison groups

slide-18
SLIDE 18

More longitudinal tracking

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Making better use of existing data

  • For example,

National Pupil Database , HM Revenue & Customs

  • Data Labs
  • Small Business,

Enterprise & Employment Act 2015

slide-20
SLIDE 20

A role for qualitative research

  • How does it work?
  • Does it matter?
  • Is this intervention

right for this group

  • f people?

Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung CC BY-SA 2.0

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Return on investment

  • Econometric analysis
  • f secondary data
  • Not all benefits of WP

can or should be measured in financial terms

Mattia Landoni CC BY-SA 2.0

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Make findings accessible

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Thank you

Rachel Moreton rachel.moreton@cfe.org.uk 0116 229 3300 www.cfe.org.uk