Eulerian Partial Duals of Plane Graphs Xianan Jin School of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

eulerian partial duals of plane graphs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Eulerian Partial Duals of Plane Graphs Xianan Jin School of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Eulerian Partial Duals of Plane Graphs Xianan Jin School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, P. R. China Shanghai Jiao Tong University December 7, 2015 Contents I. A little background (history) II. Basic definitions: Ribbon


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Eulerian Partial Duals of Plane Graphs

Xian’an Jin School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University,

  • P. R. China

Shanghai Jiao Tong University December 7, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

  • I. A little background (history)
  • II. Basic definitions:

Ribbon graphs, partial duals and medial graphs

  • III. Result:

Characterization of Eulerian partial duals of plane graphs

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Part I. A little background

A little background as far as I know. There is a classical one-to one correspondence between link di- agrams, a representation of links in 3-dimensional Euclidean space and edge-signed (checkerboard) plane graphs. This correspondence was discovered more than one hundred years ago as a method of knot tabulation. This may be ear- liest application of graphs to knots and links.

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Example. A signed plane graph (black) and its corresponding link diagram with two components (red and blue).

3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

In mathematics, traditionally, knot theory is a subject of topol-

  • gy.

Motivated by the discovery of the Jones polynomial [V.

  • F. R. Jones, A polynomial invariant for knots via Von Neumann

algebras, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 12 (1985) 103-111.] in 1984 (Fields medal in 1990), the state model of Jones polynomial [L. H. Kauffman, State models and the Jones polynomial, Topol-

  • gy 26 (1987) 395-407.], the combinatorial knot theory was
  • developed. Now knots also appear in some textbooks on graph

theory and combinatorics. I give several examples.

4

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • B. Bollob´

as, Modern graph theory, GTM 184, Springer-Verlag, 1998, Chapter 10.

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • C. Godsil, G. Royle, Algebraic graph theory, GTM 207, Springer,

2001, Chapters 15-17.

6

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • M. Aigner, A course in enumeration, GTM 238, Springer, 2007,

Chapter 9.

7

slide-9
SLIDE 9

In the late 1980s, connections between the Jones polynomial in knot theory and the Tutte polynomial [W. T. Tutte, A contri- bution to the theory of chromatic polynomials, Canad. J. Math. 6 (1954) 80-91.] in graph theory were discovered by Thistleth- waite [M. B. Thistlethwaite, A spanning tree expansion of the Jones polynomial, Topology 26 (1987) 297-309.] and were then generalized by Kauffman [L. H. Kauffman, A Tutte polynomial for signed graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 25 (1989) 105-127.].

8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

To be precise, Thistlethwaite established a relation between the Kauffman bracket polynomial of alternating link diagrams and a special evaluation of the Tutte polynomial of unsigned checker- board graphs. Then, Kauffman generalized Thistlethwaite’s re- sult to arbitrary link diagrams using signed checkerboard graphs by extending the Tutte polynomial to edge-signed graphs.

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

In the late 1990s, the theory of virtual links was discovered by Kauffman [L. H. Kauffman, Virtual knot theory, European J. Combin. 20 (1999) 663-990] and Goussarov, Polyak and Viro [M. Goussarov, M. Polyak and O. Viro, Finite type invariants of classical and viertual knots, Topology 39 (2000) 1045-1068.], independently, motivated by non-planar Gauss codes and links in the 3-manifold–the product of a surface and the real line.

10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

In [B. Bollob´ as, O. Riordan, A polynomial of graphs on orentable sufraces, Proc. London Math. Soc. 83 (2001) 513-531.], a three-variable Bollob´ as-Riordan polynomial was introduced for cyclic graphs (i.e.

  • rientable ribbon graphs) and was then ex-

tended to a four-variable polynomial of arbitrary ribbon graphs in [B. Bollob´ as, O. Riordan, A polynomial of graphs on surfaces,

  • Math. Ann. 323(1) (2002) 81-96.].

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13

In recent years, connections between the Jones polynomial and the (signed) Bollob´ as-Riordan polynomial of ribbon graphs have been studied.

  • 1. In [O. Dasbach, D. Futer, E. Kalfagianni, X.-S. Lin and N. S-

toltzfus, The Jones polynomial and graphs on surfaces, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 98(2) (2008) 384-399.], Dasbach et al built a relation between the Kauffman bracket polynomial of an arbi- trary classical link diagram and the Bollob´ as-Riordan polynomial

  • f the ribbon graph constructed based on the all A-splittings of

the diagram.

12

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 2. In [S. Chmutov, I. Pak, The Kauffman bracket of virtual links

and the Bollob´ as-Riordan polynomial, Moscow Math.

  • J. 7(3)

(2007) 409-418.], Chmutov and Pak built a relation between the Kauffman bracket polynomial of an alternating virtual link diagram and a special evaluation of the Bollob´ as-Riordan polyno- mial (3 variables) of the ribbon graph constructed based on the all B-splittings of the diagram. They then introduced a three- variable signed Bollob´ as-Riordan polynomial for signed ribbon graphs and extended the result to checkerboard colorable vir- tual link diagrams.

13

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 3. In [S. Chmutov, J. Voltz, Thistlethwaite’s theorem for virtual

links, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 17(10) (2008) 1189-1198.], Chmutov and Voltz succeeded in establishing a similar relation between the Kauffman bracket polynomial for arbitrary virtual link diagram and a special evaluation of the signed Bollob´ as- Riordan polynomial (3 variables) of the signed ribbon graph con- structed based on Seifert splittings (some are A and the other are B-splittings). They used different constructions of a ribbon graph from a vir- tual link diagram. To unify them, the notion of partial dual is introduced.

14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Part II. Basic definitions: ribbon graphs, partial duals, and medial graphs

Ribbon graphs arise naturally as neighborhoods of graphs em- bedded into surfaces. Embedded graphs will be called core graphs of corresponding ribbon graphs. Ribbon graphs as neighborhoods of cellularly embedded graphs.

15

slide-17
SLIDE 17

One can think of a ribbon graph as consisting of disks (vertices) attached to each other by thin strips or bands (edges) glued to their boundaries. An example of ribbon graphs.

16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A ribbon graph G = (V (G), E(G)) is a surface with boundary represented as the union of two sets of discs, a set V (G) of vertices, and a set E(G) of edges such that

  • 1. The vertices and edges intersect in disjoint line segments.
  • 2. Each such line segment lies on the boundary of precisely one

vertex and precisely on edge.

  • 3. Every edge contains exactly two such line segments.

17

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Besides graph theoretic properties, a ribbon graph as a surface with boundary also has topological properties. Two ribbon graphs are equivalent if there is a homeomorphism from one to the other mapping vertices to vertices and edges to edges. We point out that ribbon graphs, cellularly embedded graphs, ram graphs, arrow presentations, signed rotation systems (com- binatorial) are all equivalent notions.

18

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Partial dual

  • 1. Dual of a plane graph.

The red graph is the dual graph of the blue graph.

  • 2. Generalization: the dual of a cellularly embedded graph.

19

slide-21
SLIDE 21

3. Chmutov [S. Chmutov, Generalized duality for graphs on surfaces and the signed Bollob´ as-Riordan polynomial, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 99 (2009) 617-638.] introduced the concept of the partial duality to generalize the fundamental concept of the dual of an cellularly embedded graph. 4. Partial duality was further generalized to twisted duality by Ellis-Monaghan and Moffatt in [J. A. Ellis-Monaghan and I. Moffatt: Twisted duality for embedded graphs, Trans. Amer.

  • Math. Soc. 364 (2012) 1529-1569.].

20

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Informally the partial dual GA of a cellularly embedded graph G is obtained by forming the geometric dual with respect to only a subset A of edges of the graph. To be precise, let G be a ribbon graph and A ⊂ E(G).

  • 1. Arbitrarily orient and label each of the edges of G.
  • 2. The boundary components of (V (G), A) meets the edges of G

in disjoint arcs, on each of these arcs, place an arrow (labelled) according to orientations of edges.

  • 3. Add edges.

21

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The partial dual of K4 with A = {1, 2, 3}.

22

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Geometric definition. Let G be a ribbon graph. Let A ⊂ E(G). The partial dual GA can be obtained from G by adding discs to G along each boundary component of (V (G), A) and removing the interior of al vertices

  • f G.
  • Proposition. 1. G∅ = G.
  • 2. GE(G) = G∗, the geometric dual of G.
  • 3. (GA)B = GA△B.
  • 4. G is orientable iff GA is orientable.

23

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The medial graph Gm of a cellularly embedded graph G is the 4-regular cellularly embedded graph obtained from G by placing a vertex on each edge of G, and joining two such vertices by an edge embedded in a face whenever the two edges are adjacent and lie in the boundary of the face. We denote by ve the vertex

  • f Gm lying on the edge e.

The medial graph of a plane graph.

24

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • J. A. Ellis-Monaghan, I. Moffatt, Graphs on Surfaces: Dualities,

Polynomials, and Knots, Springer, 2010.

25

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Part III Result: characterization

  • f Eulerian partial duals of plane

graphs

In the paper [Bipartite partial duals and circuits in medial graph- s, Combinatorica 33(2) (2013) 231-252] Huggett and Moffatt characterized all bipartite partial duals of a plane graph in terms

  • f oriented circuits in its medial graph. An open problem intro-

duced in their paper is the characterisation of Eulerian partial duals of a plane graph. We solve this problem by considering half-edge orientations of medial graphs.

26

slide-28
SLIDE 28

By a half-edge orientation of a graph we mean an assignment

  • f an orientation for each half-edge of the graph.

An edge of a graph with a half-edge orientation is said to be consistent (resp. inconsistent) if orientations of two half-edges of the edge is conherent (resp. incoherent). An edge orientation of a graph can be considered as a half-edge

  • rientation of the graph with only consistent edges.

Let G be a cellularly embedded graph. Let Gm be the medial graph of G. Given a a fixed half-edge orientation of Gm, a vertex

  • f Gm under this fixed half-edge orientation is called a crossing

if orientations of the four half-edges incident to this vertex are along the cyclic order (incoming, incoming, outgoing, outgoing) with respect to the vertex.

27

slide-29
SLIDE 29

There are two types of crossing vertices of Gm, relative to edges

  • f G or the canonical checkerboard colouring of Gm.

One is called c- vertices, the other is called d-vertices. An edge e of G is said to be a c-edge (resp. d-edge) if ve in Gm is a c-vertex (resp. d-vertex).

28

slide-30
SLIDE 30

We shall call a half-edge orientation of Gm satisfying the follow- ing three conditions a semi-crossing orientation of Gm

  • 1. each vertex of Gm is a crossing;
  • 2. loops of G are all c-edges and bridges of G are all d-edges;

3.

  • rientations of half edges of d-vertices surrounding a same

vertex and of c-vertices surrounding a same face must occur as shown in the following figure or its opposite.

29

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Remark It deserves noting that the three conditions are self-dual, since Gm = (G∗)m and furthermore a c-edge of G correspond to a d- edge of G∗ in the natural bijection. In addition, an all-crossing direction of Gm defined in [Bipartite partial duals and circuits in medial graphs, Combinatorica 33(2) (2013) 231-252] is a half-edge orientation of Gm such that it contains only crossing vertices and consistent edges. Theorem (Metsidik & Jin, 2015) Let G be a plane graph and A ⊆ E(G). Then the partial dual GA is Eulerian if and only if A is the set of d-edges arising from a semi-crossing orientation of Gm.

30

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Example.

c c c d d d c c c c d d c c c d d d c c d d d d

31

slide-33
SLIDE 33

1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6

32

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Thanks!

33