estimating baryonic properties of galaxies from their
play

Estimating Baryonic Properties of Galaxies from Their Dark Matter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Machine Learning in Astrophysics & Cosmology Estimating Baryonic Properties of Galaxies from Their Dark Matter universetoday.com MPA/Springel M51/HST Ji-hoon Kim (Department of Physics & Astronomy, SNU) Special thanks to: Yongseok Jo


  1. Machine Learning in Astrophysics & Cosmology Estimating Baryonic Properties of Galaxies from Their Dark Matter universetoday.com MPA/Springel M51/HST Ji-hoon Kim (Department of Physics & Astronomy, SNU) Special thanks to: Yongseok Jo (SNU), Juhan Kim (KIAS), et al.

  2. Evolution of Our Universe ● Based on the mankind’s best guess for our Universe, standard Big Bang LCDM cosmology.

  3. Numerical Cosmology: Structure Formation Evolution for the past ~13.6 billion years Dark matter - interacts only by 150 million gravitational force light-years - dominates structural evolution Kravtsov et al. www.jihoonkim.org

  4. Kim et al. NASA/GSFC Governato et al. Governato et al.

  5. Large-Scale Structure (LSS) of Universe Dark matter web (Abel et al.) Lemson et al. ~2 billion “Galaxies” light-years

  6. Numerical Experiment in Cosmology ● Numerical experiment essential due to galaxy’s nonlinear nature → often the only tool to test a theory on Universe’s evolution Jonsson/GADGET-2 Teyssier/RAMSES Moody/ART-I Teyssier/RAMSES Kim/ENZO Wadsley/GASOLINE Guedes/GASOLINE Guedes/GASOLINE Agertz/RAMSES Kim/GIZMO Pontzen/CHANGA Keller/GASOLINE Renaud/RAMSES Guedes/GASOLINE Agertz/RAMSES Hopkins/GIZMO Vogelsberger/AREPO Fujimoto/ENZO Gallery of galaxy-scale cosmological simulations www.jihoonkim.org

  7. Numerical Galaxy Formation: Upcoming Era Mass resolution in stellar disk (M ⊙ ) 10 9 10 7 Hopkins+ 2015 Barnes 1988 Springel+ 2005 10 5 10 3 Holmberg 1941 Toomre 1978 Next 10 1 Decade 2010 1940 1980 1990 2000 2020 2030 Year 2019 www.jihoonkim.org

  8. Galaxies: Building Blocks of Universe ● Galaxies sit right in the middle of cosmological distance scale. → Universe’s building blocks + give contexts for star formation ~10 9 pc ~10 6 pc ~10 4 pc ~10 1 pc ~10 0 pc ~10 -4 pc Planets Stars Star Clusters Galaxies Galaxy Large-scale Clusters Structures * 1 parsec (pc) = 3.26 light-year www.jihoonkim.org

  9. Multi-scale, Nonlinear Interactions R halo Gas Gas Star MBH Stars or Molecular Clouds Massive Black Hole (MBH) (Inter-)Galactic Formation & Feedback Accretion & Feedback Dynamics & Interaction R Bondi ~ pc R GMC ~ 10 pc R halo ~ 100 kpc R Schw. ~ 10 -5 pc SFR in M33 M87/VLA Radio M51/HST www.jihoonkim.org

  10. Self-consistent Simulation Framework ● Self-consistent galaxy-SMBH co-evolution from first principles - computing techniques like adaptive refinement help include more physics Massive Black Hole Star-forming Clumps Multi-scale Hydrodynamics Accretion & Feedback Formation & Feedback Simulation Code —— Adaptive Mesh Refinement Artificially boosted Insert a star simply by Enzo (Bryan et al. 2014) Schmidt law ( ρ SFR ~ ρ gas1.5 ) Bondi accretion Previous Work Thermal Turn off gas cooling or energy thermal energy Bondi accretion Insert a star when a cell of without any boost factor ~10 3 M ⊙ turns Jeans unstable Adaptive mesh New UV/X-ray photons + Winds Approach UV photons radiative transfer (photoheating & ionization) + Supernova thermal energy www.jihoonkim.org

  11. Adaptive Mesh Refinement Cosmology ● Adaptively focus on regions of high interests - refines cells if found interesting; e.g., dense, collapsing, unstable, shocked ● More easily include relevant physics for galaxy-SMBH evolution - e.g., gravity, hydrodynamics, radiation, cooling, chemistry, stellar physics Enzo AMR level=0 level=1 level=2 Abel et al. (2002) www.jihoonkim.org

  12. Numerical Galaxy Formation: Upcoming Era Mass resolution in stellar disk (M ⊙ ) 10 9 10 7 Hopkins+ 2015 Barnes 1988 Springel+ 2005 10 5 10 3 Holmberg 1941 Toomre 1978 Next 10 1 Decade 2010 1940 1980 1990 2000 2020 2030 Year 2019 www.jihoonkim.org

  13. Gravity and Hydrodynamics ● Gravity (dominated by dark matter) drives Universe’s evolution. ● Hydrodynamics and others small-scale physics (dominated by baryon or ordinary matter) affect detailed properties of galaxies. MPA/Springel ESA/Planck (2013) www.jihoonkim.org

  14. Gravity and Hydrodynamics ● There is a hint that we may reliably correlate baryonic (normal matter) properties of a galaxy only with dark matter properties. Large-scale structure sculpted by dark matter Galaxies Baryonic interactions inside a galaxy www.jihoonkim.org

  15. Machine-assisted Semi-Simulation Model (MSSM) www.jihoonkim.org

  16. Machine-assisted (Semi-)Simulation ● Predict ordinary matter from dark matter using ERT TRAINING DARK MACHINE Yongseok Jo, MATTER Hydrodynamic kerex@snu.ac.kr LEARNING DATA arXiv:1908.09844 Simulation MODEL (MNRAS, 2019) Halo Catalog BARYON DATA APPLICATION MACHINE Dark Matter Only DARK LEARNING BARYON Simulation MATTER MODEL DATA Halo Catalog DATA

  17. Machine-assisted (Semi-)Simulation ● Done in negligible time (~hours) compared to full-scale hydrodynamic simulation (~months). ● Can “paint” a large DM-only simulation with the result from a smaller, high-resolution simulation. Yongseok Jo, kerex@snu.ac.kr arXiv:1908.09844 (MNRAS, 2019) Dark matter of IllustrisTNG colored This work IllustrisTNG with baryons Left: DM density of IllutrisTNG with circles representing virial radii. Middle/right: circles representing stellar masses colored by baryon fraction

  18. ̂ Improvements In Machine Design Previous work This work Considers 3 input properties of Considers 11 inputs including the halo’s only the target halo itself growth history and its local environment By building a two-stage tree, model grows Model grows exponentially linearly, resulting in smaller but deeper ERT n N Error = 1 Error = 1 ∑ ∑ (log y i log y i hydro ) 2 (y i y i hydro ) 2 pred − pred − ̂ n N i i Default error function in ERT Refined error function

  19. Improved Machine Performance ● More accurate prediction compared to previous attempts. MSE: ~0.02 MSE: ~0.0002 based only on dark matter Predicted stellar mass Stellar mass in each galaxy from a full simulation www.jihoonkim.org

  20. Machine Better Than Human Parametrization ● Machine (red line) predicts galaxy’s baryonic properties better than a human-devised parametrization model (blue line) does. Galactic stellar mass distribution Massive black hole distribution in the Universe in the Universe www.jihoonkim.org

  21. Machine-assisted (Semi-)Simulation ● Viable to generate a large, yet detailed mock Universe with ML. - a large volume to enclose variations at a “cosmological” scale - and yet a detailed physics and structures at a very small scale NASA illustris-project.org sdss.kias.re.kr/astro/Horizon-Runs/ www.jihoonkim.org

  22. Machine Learning in Astrophysics & Cosmology Estimating Baryonic Properties of Galaxies from Their Dark Matter 1. New Opportunity: ● Ever-increasing Importance of Numerical Cosmology ● Advances in Machine Learning arXiv:1908.09844 II. Newly Possible Research: (MNRAS, 2019) ● Possibility of “Machine-assisted” (Semi-)Simulation www.jihoonkim.org

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend