Establishing Realistic Investment Earnings Benchmarks What is a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

establishing realistic investment earnings benchmarks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Establishing Realistic Investment Earnings Benchmarks What is a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Establishing Realistic Investment Earnings Benchmarks What is a Benchmark? A benchmark is a standard reference point that is used to compare the results of similar investments over time. Institutional investors use benchmarks to analyze


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Establishing Realistic Investment Earnings Benchmarks

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • A benchmark is a standard reference point that is used to compare the

results of similar investments over time.

– Institutional investors use benchmarks to analyze the earnings of individual investment managers/strategies, as well as the Total Portfolio. – Benchmark may be a well specified index such as the S&P 500; or a hybrid or combined benchmark such as 60% S&P 500 / 40% Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. – Key Question - Has the manager/strategy/total portfolio added value?

  • Benchmarking the Total Portfolio

– Measures the value add relative to the policy index (commonly a hybrid index), or long term strategic asset allocation. – Peer group analysis against “comparable” portfolios.

  • Benchmarking Individual Managers/Strategies

– Individual managers have different objectives than the Total Portfolio, and therefore require different benchmarks. – Benchmarks that best reflect the manager’s sector and/or style are used to measure performance, and should be chosen in advance. – Peer group analysis against “comparable” managers/strategies.

  • It is important to note that while we think investment earnings

benchmarking is important, we believe risk-adjusted measures of performance are more important when evaluating performance at both the Total Portfolio and individual manager/strategy level.

What is a Benchmark?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Investable and Liquid - investors should be able to replicate the

benchmark on their own and it should be reasonably liquid.

– This can be difficult within the alternative asset classes such as private equity, private real estate and real assets.

  • Measurable – performance should be readily available and

calculable.

– The identities and weights of securities or factor exposures should be clearly defined.

  • Appropriate – benchmark should reflect the investment’s style
  • r expertise.

– The manager must be willing to accept responsibility for performance relative to the benchmark, and the benchmark should be established in advance.

  • The benchmark must be a fair and passive representation of the

market it is designed to measure.

– Over the past several years, markets have become increasingly segmented resulting in increased focus on choosing appropriate measures.

What Makes a Good Benchmark?

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Establishing an Asset Allocation for the Total Portfolio is the

first step in establishing realistic investment earnings benchmarks for both the Total Portfolio and individual managers/strategies.

– Investment earnings benchmarks are dependent on the markets in which the Total Portfolio invests. – Modern Portfolio Theory and Mean Variance Optimization result in a diversified asset allocation with broad exposure to the global markets.

  • Each asset class represents an investable market and/or

specific idea within the portfolio.

– The Total Portfolio is measured against the policy index, which is calculated by multiplying the target asset class weights times the return of the respective passive benchmark (re-balanced monthly). – Individual managers and strategies used to implement the asset allocation are measured against specific or hybrid indexes that best reflect the manager’s sector and/or style.

  • Indexes used to measure individual manager performance may be different from

those used to calculate the policy index. For example, a portfolio may have an allocation to small cap equities which is benchmarked to the Russell 2000 Index at the Total Portfolio Level, but implemented using managers who are benchmarked to the Russell 2000 Growth and Russell 2000 Value Index.

Establishing Realistic Investment Earnings Benchmarks

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Asset Class Target Weight Range Benchmark PUBLIC MARKETS EQUITIES Domestic Equities: 25% 15-30% Large Cap 23% 18-28% S&P 500 Small/mid Cap 2% 0-5% Russell 2000 International Equities: 15% 0-30% Developed 5% 0-10% MSCI EAFE Emerging Markets 10% 5-15% MSCI Emerging Markets Total Equities 40% 25-55% FIXED INCOME Opportunistic Credit 20% 0-30% Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield BB-B (2% constrained) Core Bonds 5% 0-15% Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index Emerging Market Debt 2% 0-8% JP Morgan GBI-EM Global Diversified (Unhedged) Total Fixed Income 27% 10-35% ALTERNATIVES Real Estate/REITS 5% 0-10% NCREIF Property Index/ Wilshire REIT Index Real Assets 7% 0-10% CPI + 5% Private Equity 7% 0-20% Cambridge PE Index Absolute Return 8% 0-10% 90 day t-bills + 2%/HFRI Fund

  • f Funds: Conservative

Global Tactical Asset Allocation 5% 0-10% 60% MSCI World/40% Citigroup World Government Bond Index (WGBI) Total Alternatives 32% 10- 40% Cash 1% 0% - 10% 90 day t-bills

5

Current Asset Class Weights and Indexes used to Calculate the Current NMERB Policy Index

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Relies on a combination of historical data and forward-looking analysis

– Expected returns based mostly on forward-looking current market pricing – Volatility based on history, with some recognition of recent increase – Correlations based on a mix of history and current trend

  • Historical data is used to frame current market environment as well as to

compare to similar historical periods

– Historical index returns, volatility, and correlations – Average historical valuation and yield metrics

  • Forward-looking analysis is based on current market pricing and a building

blocks approach

– Return equals yield + changes in price (valuation, defaults, etc.) – Use of key economic observations (inflation, real growth, dividends, etc.) – Structural themes (supply and demand imbalances, capital flows, etc.)

  • Assumptions prepared by Asset Allocation Committee

– Specialists from public markets, hedge funds and private markets provide insight on market themes

  • Assumptions and actions reviewed and approved by Partner’s Research

Committee

Development of Asset Class Assumptions

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Inflation is an important component of our asset allocation

assumptions

– An essential building block for projecting returns in stocks, bonds, and commodities

  • There are several measures of inflation used to inform our view

(all of which have issues)

– Consumer Price Index – Producer Price Index – TIPS break-even inflation

  • For asset class assumptions, we use a broader but less

measurable concept of inflation

– Thought of as the inflation that flows through to ending corporate earnings for equities, required market yields on fixed income, or spot price returns on commodities

  • We are projecting 3% inflation over the next 5-7 years

– This assumption represents the geometric mean of a time series – Inflation could take several different paths over 5-7 years to arrive at a 3% mean – Given the binary nature of potential inflation paths (US 1970s or Japan 1990s), we continue to use an elevated estimate of inflation volatility

Inflation

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Starting yield is the key building block for future performance

– Correlation to forward return of 0.88

  • Yields have had a 30 year secular decline

– This has been a tailwind to performance

  • Low current yields will challenge forward looking returns

– 10 year Treasury Yield as of November 30, 2010 is 2.8%

Starting Yields Signal Bond Returns

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 6 year Forward Return Beginning 10 year Treasury Yield Source: St. Louis Fed, Ibbotson, Research Affiliates

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Earnings & current dividends are key fundamental building

blocks of equity returns

– Correlation to forward return of 0.51 – Current measure equals 6.5%

  • Valuation expansion can be a tailwind to performancee

– We do not believe that valuation expansion will be a key return driver as corporate profitability (at all-time highs) mean reverts

Starting Earnings + Dividends Signal Stock Returns

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

1926 1931 1936 1941 1946 1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 10y Avg Earnings + Dividend Yield S&P 500 6 year Forward Total Return

Source: Robert Shiller, Ibbotson, Research Affiliates

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2011 5-to-7 Year Return Forecasts

10 Geometric Expected Return

Asset Class 2010 2011 2011- 2010

Cash 2.00% 2.00% 0.00% Treasuries 2.75% 2.00%

  • 0.75%

Credit 5.50% 4.00%

  • 1.50%

MBS 4.00% 3.50%

  • 0.50%

TIPS 3.50% 2.25%

  • 1.25%

High-Yield Bonds 8.00% 6.25%

  • 1.75%

Global Bonds (Unhedged) 3.25% 1.75%

  • 1.50%

Global Bonds (Hedged) 1.92% EMD External 6.50% 5.25%

  • 1.25%

EMD Local Currency 6.25% Large Cap Equities 7.75% 7.00%

  • 0.75%

Small/Mid Cap Equities 8.00% 7.00%

  • 1.00%

Int'l Equities (Unhedged) 8.00% 7.00%

  • 1.00%

Int'l Equities (Hedged) 7.25% Emerging Int'l Equities 9.50% 9.00%

  • 0.50%

Private Equity 10.00% 9.50%

  • 0.50%

Private Debt 10.00% 9.25%

  • 0.75%

Real Estate 7.00% 6.00%

  • 1.00%

Commodities 4.75% 4.50%

  • 0.25%

Hedge Funds Low Vol 6.25% 5.75%

  • 0.50%

Hedge Funds Mod Vol 7.50% 7.00%

  • 0.50%

Volatility

Asset Class 2010 2011 2011- 2010

Cash 1.50% 1.50% 0.00% Treasuries 5.50% 6.00% 0.50% Credit 7.00% 7.00% 0.00% MBS 9.00% 10.00% 1.00% TIPS 7.00% 7.50% 0.50% High-Yield Bonds 12.00% 12.00% 0.00% Global Bonds (Unhedged) 10.00% 9.00%

  • 1.00%

Global Bonds (Hedged) 5.00% EMD External 15.00% 12.00%

  • 3.00%

EMD Local Currency 15.00% Large Cap Equities 18.00% 18.00% 0.00% Small/Mid Cap Equities 23.00% 22.00%

  • 1.00%

Int'l Equities (Unhedged) 21.00% 21.00% 0.00% Int'l Equities (Hedged) 19.00% Emerging Int'l Equities 29.00% 28.00%

  • 1.00%

Private Equity 30.00% 28.00%

  • 2.00%

Private Debt 19.00% 19.00% 0.00% Real Estate 15.00% 15.00% 0.00% Commodities 22.00% 20.00%

  • 2.00%

Hedge Funds Low Vol 7.00% 7.00% 0.00% Hedge Funds Mod Vol 12.00% 12.00% 0.00%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2011 30-Year Return Forecasts

11 Geometric Expected Return

Asset Class 2010 2011 2011- 2010

Cash 4.50% 4.50% 0.00% Treasuries 4.75% 4.75% 0.00% Credit 6.25% 6.00%

  • 0.25%

MBS 5.50% 5.50% 0.00% TIPS 5.25% 5.00%

  • 0.25%

High-Yield Bonds 8.00% 7.50%

  • 0.50%

Global Bonds (Unhedged) 5.25% 4.75%

  • 0.50%

Global Bonds (Hedged) 4.75% EMD External 8.25% 6.75%

  • 1.50%

EMD Local Currency 8.00% Large Cap Equities 8.75% 8.50%

  • 0.25%

Small/Mid Cap Equities 9.50% 9.00%

  • 0.50%

Int'l Equities (Unhedged) 9.75% 9.00%

  • 0.75%

Int'l Equities (Hedged) 9.00% Emerging Int'l Equities 10.25% 10.00%

  • 0.25%

Private Equity 10.50% 10.50% 0.00% Private Debt 9.00% 9.00% 0.00% Real Estate 7.00% 7.00% 0.00% Commodities 5.00% 5.50% 0.50% Hedge Funds Low Vol 6.50% 6.50% 0.00% Hedge Funds Mod Vol 8.00% 8.00% 0.00%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Comparison of Assumptions

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2011 5-7 Year Correlations

13 Asset Class Cash Treas Credit MBS High Yield EMD Lcl Lg Cap Eq Sm/Mid Cap Eq Int'l Eq (U) Emerg Eq Private Eq Real Estate Comm Cash 1.00 0.20 0.15 0.25

  • 0.05

0.10 0.05

  • 0.05
  • 0.10 -0.10
  • 0.10

0.40 0.10 Treas 0.20 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.35 0.15 0.20 0.10 0.15 0.00 0.05

  • 0.05
  • 0.05

Credit 0.15 0.95 1.00 0.90 0.50 0.55 0.50 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.25

  • 0.05
  • 0.05

MBS 0.25 0.90 0.90 1.00 0.45 0.25 0.35 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.15 0.00

  • 0.05

High Yield

  • 0.05 0.35

0.50 0.45 1.00 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.45 0.60

  • 0.10

0.00 EMD Lcl 0.10 0.15 0.55 0.25 0.70 1.00 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.80 0.25

  • 0.10

0.10 Lg Cap Eq 0.05 0.20 0.50 0.35 0.60 0.60 1.00 0.90 0.70 0.55 0.75 0.15 0.00 Sm/Mid Cap Eq

  • 0.05 0.10

0.30 0.20 0.60 0.55 0.90 1.00 0.55 0.60 0.85 0.05

  • 0.05

Int'l Eq (U)

  • 0.10 0.15

0.25 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.70 0.55 1.00 0.60 0.50 0.10 0.00 Emerg Eq

  • 0.10 0.00

0.20 0.05 0.45 0.80 0.55 0.60 0.60 1.00 0.25

  • 0.10

0.10 Private Eq

  • 0.10 0.05

0.25 0.15 0.60 0.25 0.75 0.85 0.50 0.25 1.00 0.00 0.00 Real Estate 0.40 -0.05 -0.05 0.00

  • 0.10 -0.10

0.15 0.05 0.10

  • 0.10

0.00 1.00 0.00 Comm 0.10 -0.05 -0.05

  • 0.05

0.00 0.10 0.00

  • 0.05

0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Diversified Portfolio Return/Risk Comparison

Diversified Portfolio

Cash 0% Large Cap Equities 35% Small/Mid Cap Equities 15% Int'l Equities (Unhedged) 12% Emerging Int'l Equities 3% Total Equity 65% Treasuries 10% Credit 6% High-Yield Bonds 5% MBS 9% Global Bonds (Unhedged) 5% Total Fixed Income 35% 2009 5-7 Year Return 9.0% 2009 Standard Deviation 14.2% 2010 5-7 Year Return 7.2% 2010 30 Year Return 8.6% 2010 Standard Deviation 12.8% 2011 5-7 Year Return 6.3% 2011 30 Year Return 8.2% 2011 Standard Deviation 12.9%

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Efficient Frontier Comparison

Red = 2011 Black = 2010

S ta n d a r d D e v ia tio n ( R is k ) E x p e c te d R e tu r n 0 .0 3 0 .0 2 .0 4 .0 6 .0 8 .0 1 0 .0 1 2 .0 1 4 .0 1 6 .0 1 8 .0 2 0 .0 2 2 .0 2 4 .0 2 6 .0 2 8 .0 0 .0 1 4 .0 1 .0 2 .0 3 .0 4 .0 5 .0 6 .0 7 .0 8 .0 9 .0 1 0 .0 1 1 .0 1 2 .0 1 3 .0 C a s h L IB O R T r e a s u r ie s C r e d it M B S T IP S H ig h - Y ie ld B o n d s G lo b a l B o n d s G lo b a l B o n d s - H e d g e d E M D - E x te r n a l E M D - L o c a l L a r g e C a p E q u itie s S m a ll/M id C a p E q u itie s In t'l E q u itie s In t'l E q u itie s - H e d g e d E m e r g in g In t'l E q u itie s P r iv a te E q u ity P r iv a te D e b t R e a l E s ta te C o m m o d itie s H e d g e F u n d s L o w v o l H e d g e F u n d s M o d v o l

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Recommended Asset Mix (Board Approved October 2010)

Current Target Allocation Recommended Target Allocation Range Cash 0% 1% 0-5% Large Cap Equities 23% 23% 15-30% Small/Mid Cap Equities 2% 2% 0-10% Int'l Equities 10% 5% 0-15% Emerging Int'l Equities 10% 10% 0-15% Total Equity 45% 40% 25-55% Core Bonds 15% 5% 0-15% Emerging Market Debt 0% 2% 0-8% Opportunistic Credit 5% 20% 0-30% Total Fixed Income 20% 27% 15-40% Private Equity 10% 7% 0-10% Real Estate 5% 5% 0-10% Absolute Return 10% 8% 0-10% Inflation-Linked Assets 5% 7% 0-10% Global Asset Allocation 5% 5% 0-10% Total Alternatives 35% 32% 10-40% Expected Return (compound) 8.1% 8.9% Expected Risk (volatility) 11.4% 11.5% Sharpe Ratio 0.53 0.60 Sortino Ratio (0% Minimum Acceptable Return) 0.93 1.04 Probability of < 0% over 1 year 22.7% 20.7% Probability of < 0% over 5 Years 4.7% 3.4% Probability of < 8% over 5 years 49.0% 42.7% Probability of < 8% over 10 Years 48.6% 39.8% Similar Risk, Higher Return

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Updated Expected Return w/ 2011 Capital Market Assumptions

Long Term Policy Target Long Term Policy Target w/2010 Capital Market Assumptions Range w/2011 Capital Market Assumptions Range Cash 1% 0-5% 1% 0-5% Large Cap Equities 23% 15-30% 23% 15-30% Small/Mid Cap Equities 2% 0-10% 2% 0-10% Int'l Equities 5% 0-15% 5% 0-15% Emerging Int'l Equities 10% 0-15% 10% 0-15% Total Equity 40% 25-55% 40% 25-55% Core Bonds 5% 0-15% 5% 0-15% Emerging Market Debt 2% 0-8% 2% 0-8% Opportunistic Credit 20% 0-30% 20% 0-30% Total Fixed Income 27% 15-40% 27% 15-40% Private Equity 7% 0-10% 7% 0-10% Real Estate 5% 0-10% 5% 0-10% Absolute Return 8% 0-10% 8% 0-10% Inflation-Linked Assets 7% 0-10% 7% 0-10% Global Asset Allocation 5% 0-10% 5% 0-10% Total Alternatives 32% 10-40% 32% 10-40% Expected Return (compound) 8.9% 8.1% Expected Risk (volatility) 11.5% 11.9% Sharpe Ratio 0.60 0.47 Sortino Ratio (0% Minimum Acceptable Return) 1.04 0.89 Probability of < 0% over 1 year 20.7% 24.7% Probability of < 0% over 5 Years 3.4% 6.3% Probability of < 8% over 5 years 42.7% 50.9% Probability of < 8% over 10 Years 39.8% 48.7% 30 Year Expected Return (compound) 9.4% 9.2%

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Appendix: Assumption Development

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Sources of Return

– Valuation – Real earnings growth – Dividend yield – Inflation

Assumption Development - Large Cap Equity

  • Volatility

– Historical annualized volatility = 15% – Trailing 12 month volatility (Dec 2010) = 18% – Current VIX Pricing ~ 18 – Volatility is conditional – spikes in volatility tend to result in extend periods of increased volatility – Annual volatility expected to normalize over 5-7 years but this likely leads to 5-7 year volatility above historical average – 2011 5-7 year Volatility assumption = 18%

Return Source Current Values Expected Forecast Values Return Contribution Valuation 14.3 (forward earnings) 15 0.00% Real Growth* 2.5% 2.0% 2.0% Dividend Yield** 1.9% 2.0% 2.0% Inflation 1.2% 3.0% 3.0% Total Expected Return 7.0%

* Real GDP growth used as proxy for real earnings per share growth

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

1951 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006

Annualized Daily Vol Date

Trailing Volatility - S&P 500

1 yr Vol 5 yr Vol

19

Source: Bloomberg, NEPC

slide-20
SLIDE 20

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006

S&P 500 Dividend Yield

Average S&P 500 Dividend Yield

US Equity Building Blocks

  • 10%
  • 8%
  • 6%
  • 4%
  • 2%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

Real Gross Domestic Product Growth

2.5%

  • 4%
  • 2%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 12-Mo CPI Rolling 12 Month CPI

1.2% 1.9%

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

US Equity P/E Ratio (5 Year Normalized)

P/E Ratio Expectation

15.2

20

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg, NEPC

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Valuation Factors Are Offsetting

  • Analysis of Price-to-Earnings multiples suggest a case for small

valuation expansion

– Could argue for higher multiple given low cash rates – Suggests modest upward pressure on equity prices

  • However, corporate profits are approaching all-time highs

– Corporate profits have historically exhibited mean-reversion characteristics – Declining profitability over 5-7 year horizon suggests downward pressure on equity prices

  • Offsetting factors lead to no assumed valuation adjustment in

2011 US Large Cap Equity assumption

6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 13%

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Corporate Profits as % of GDP

Profits/GDP Average

21

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

US Equity P/E Ratio (5 Year Normalized)

P/E Ratio Expectation Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg, NEPC

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Small Cap Equity

  • Small/mid cap equity has outperformed large cap consistently
  • ver the last decade

– Significant outperformance in 2010 (more than 10% above S&P 500) – Premium for smaller capitalization is expected to persist over the long-term but exhibits mean-reversion characteristics over medium-term

  • Valuations appear above long-term expectations
  • Small cap companies expected to be more challenged in muted

growth environment

  • We are not projecting a small/mid cap premium over the next

5-7 years

22

  • 15%
  • 10%
  • 5%

0% 5% 10% 15% 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008

5 Year SMID premium over Large

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

Russell 2500 5 year Normalized P/E

Russell 2500 P/E Long Term Expectation

Source: Ibbotson Source: Bloomberg, NEPC

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Sources of Return

– Valuation – Real earnings growth – Dividend yield – Inflation

Assumption Development – International Developed Equity

  • Volatility

– Historical annualized volatility = 17% – Trailing 12 month volatility (Dec 2011) = 22% – Volatility of international equity markets and currencies expected to remain high – 2011 5-7 year Volatility assumption = 21%

Return Source Current Values Expected Forecast Values Return Contribution Valuation 12.6 (forward earnings) 16 0.0% Real Growth* 2.5% 1.5% 1.5% Dividend Yield** 3.1% 2.5% 2.5% Inflation 1.3% 3.0% 3.0% Total Expected Return 7.0%

* Real GDP growth used as proxy for real earnings per share growth

23

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Annualized Daily Vol Date

Trailing Volatility - MSCI EAFE

1 yr Vol 5 yr Vol

Source: Bloomberg, NEPC

slide-24
SLIDE 24

International Equity Building Blocks

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

MSCI EAFE Dividend Yield

EAFE Dividend LT Average

24

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 MSCI EAFE Equity 5 year Normalized P/E Ratio

EAFE Expectation

12.6

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

MSCI EAFE Profit Margin

Profit Margin Average

0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% US GDP G7 ex-US GDP US Inflation G7 ex-US Infl

IMF 2011-2015 Forecasts

Source: IMF Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Emerging Markets Equity

  • Historical valuation discount for emerging markets has

dissipated in recent years

– Further fundamental multiple expansion limited

  • High economic growth prospects (especially relative to

developed countries) expected to drive higher returns

– 4% higher growth forecast than developed world – We assume a 2% return premium to developed markets

  • With higher volatility

25

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% World GDP G7 GDP Emerging GDP

IMF 2011-2015 Forecasts

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

EAFE vs. EM 5 year Normalized P/E Ratio

EAFE EM Source: IMF Source: Bloomberg, NEPC

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Currency Hedged Asset Class Assumptions

  • Adding currency hedged developed equity and global bonds

– Facilitates analysis of currency risk in portfolio independent of asset class risk

  • Currency risk is additive to non-dollar asset classes
  • We use similar arithmetic returns (net of hedging costs) and

lower expected volatility based on relative contribution to risk from currency

– Developed equities volatility reduced from 21% to 19% – Global bonds reduced from 9% to 5%

26

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009

Rolling 10 year EAFE Volatility - Hedged vs. Unhedged

Hedged Vol Currency Vol Total Vol

0% 3% 6% 9%

1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 Rolling 10 year WGBI Volatility - Hedged vs. Unhedged

Hedged Vol Currency Vol Total Vol

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Commodities

  • We use the Goldman Sachs

Commodity Index to set assumptions for broad exposure to commodities

  • We expect the following over the

next 5-7 years

– Much lower collateral returns due to low cash yields in line with 2011 cash assumption of 2% – Similar or even higher than historical spot return due to emerging market demand and supply constraints – Higher than historical negative roll yield as many markets remain in contango

27

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Rolling 5 year Components of GSCI Returns

Roll Return Spot Return Collateral Return Total Return 5.6% 2.00% 4.4% 4.50%

  • 0.2%
  • 1.75%

9.8% 4.75%

  • 2%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% Historical (1970) Forecasted

Building Blocks Forecast

Roll Return Spot Return Collateral Return Total Return

  • 4%
  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 1%

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% Wheat (CBT) Corn (CBT) Cocoa (NYB) Cotton, No. 2 (NYB) Crude Oil, Brent (ICE) Crude Oil, WTI (NYM) Gasoil (ICE) Gasoline, RBOB (NYM) Average Copper (LME) Soybean (CBT) Coffee, 'C' (NYB) Sugar, #11 World (NYB) Nickel (LME) Zinc (LME) Lead (LME) Gold, 100 oz (CMX) Silver (CMX) Natural Gas (NYM)

Relative Commodity One Month Roll

Backwardation

Contango

Source: Ibbotson Source: Ibbotson Source: Bloomberg

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Return/volatility/correlation assumptions for fixed income

sectors

– Discreet returns for subsectors creates opportunity to build customized allocations across fixed income markets and maturities

  • Assumptions built for:

– US Treasury

  • 1-3 year; Intermediate; Long

– US Investment Grade Credit

  • 1-3 year; Intermediate; Long

– US MBS – US TIPS – US High Yield Credit

  • 1-3 year; Intermediate; Long

– Global Bonds (Sovereign)

  • Hedged and Unhedged

– Emerging Market Debt (Sovereign)

  • Local and External (USD Denominated)

Fixed Income Factor Model

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Market based inputs

– 7 years of forward US, UK, Europe and Japanese sovereign yield curve assumptions from Bloomberg

  • Both Nominal and Real for US only

– Current Spreads for IG, MBS, HY & EMD Credit – Historical correlation matrix (approx 30 years of monthly data)

  • Rounded up to reflect expectations of rising correlations

– Current duration inputs for 1 year through 10 year, 20 year and 30 year Treasury

  • Adjusted market based inputs

– Horizon end point for IG, MBS, HY & EMD Credit spreads

  • Straight line compression from current levels to target spreads

– Volatility figures adjusted up from historical medians

  • Lower than current in many cases
  • Adjusted by review of periods of rising yields (mid-70s to early-80s)

– Modified durations calculated based on current and projected yields

Fixed Income Factor Model Inputs

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Each subsector return calculated:

– Annual Return = Price x (Yield + Yield differential x Duration) – Computed for 7 years and annualized to geometric return figure – Returns then adjusted for expectations

  • Most are very close to calculation

– Defaults incorporated for High Yield

  • Mortgages and EMD Local are more complex to model

– Return calculated using calculated spreads to current US Treasury market – MBS prepayment optionality reflected in elevated volatility relative to historical realized levels – EMD Local assumes greater spread compression to capture assumed higher local market short rates vs. US Treasuries

Fixed Income Factor Model Methodology

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Roll-down methodology

– Price change calculation modified to better capture yield curve steepness – Investors targeting relatively constant maturity benefit by rolling down curve and repurchasing longer maturity at higher yield

  • Maturity segments expanded for benchmarks and spreads

– Return expectations reflect each index composition – Improved specificity in spreads recognizes credit spread differentials across various maturity segments

  • Dynamic duration adjustment

– Expectations of rising rates will lower durations, lower duration will reduce year over year price impacts

  • Forward yield curve analysis of developed international

markets

– Separate international bond assumptions

  • Similar bolt-together approach as core bonds for creating global bonds assumption

Fixed Income Factor Model – 2011 Enhancements

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Forward yield curves show increasing yield expectations in

US Treasury market over the assumption period

  • Yield changes are more prominent at the short end of the

curve

– Market expectations show a flattening of the curve over the next 7 years

Current US Yields and Forward Yields

1 2 3 4 5 6

US

1m 1y 3y 5y 7y

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Global Developed Yield Curves

  • Across major global

developed bond markets a similar story emerges

– Rising Rates – Flatter curve

  • However, market

expectations of Japan’s curve still exhibit steepness in forward years

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5

Eurozone

1m 1y 3y 5y 7y 1 1 2 2 3 3

Japan

1m 1y 3y 5y 7y 1 2 3 4 5 6

UK

1m 1y 3y 5y 7y

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Investment Grade Credit Spreads

  • Current IG spreads are still elevated relative to history

– Chart on left examines spread history of BarCap Credit index – Overlays historical percentiles to get a sense of current relative attractiveness

  • Investment Grade credit curve is steep out to 7 years

– Chart on right shows current spreads based on maturity segments (Blue) – Assumption of spreads reverting towards median

  • Green line represents our target spread for year 7 of our analysis

– Red line is historic median spreads

  • Spreads expected to be slightly elevated at the end of our horizon

50 100 150 200 250 Spread (bps)

US Investment Grade Spreads

Start Target

  • Adj. Median

100 200 300 400 500 600 Spread (bps)

Option Adjusted Spread

5% 25% 50% 75% 95% OAS

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

High Yield Credit Spreads

  • Current high yield spreads remain elevated relative to history

based on BarCap US Corporate High Yield Index

  • High Yield credit curve reflects inversion after 5 years

– Quality of various segments

  • Lower rated companies more likely to issue short term debt

– Technical issues

  • 2009-2010 saw increased issuance, often for refinancing, in the 5-10 year area
  • This was met with strong investor demand, thereby compressing spread

– Consistent with investment grade, spread compression included in analysis

  • However, target is not as close to long term median as in IG

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000 Spread (bps)

Option Adjusted Spread

5% 25% 50% 75% 95% OAS 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Spread (bps)

US High Yield Spreads

Start Target

  • Adj. Median

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • In years past, NEPC has published a single Emerging Market Debt

assumption

– This blended figure encompassed both the external, or USD denominated, debt and local currency debt issued by emerging sovereign nations

  • Local Currency EMD created as a distinct asset class given growing

size and unique characteristics

– Local EMD has shorter duration, higher yield and different issuer mix – Investable local EMD issuance now totals $600 billion as compared to the $400 billion in USD denominated debt – We expect issuance to shift from external to local currency debt for many large nations

  • BarCap notes that Russia and Mexico are unlikely to issue in USD or EUR in 2011 – the two

make up about 30% of the current external debt market

  • Based on improving fundamentals we believe volatility is likely to

decline slightly in EMD on a blended basis to approximately 14%

– This view is executed through a reduction in volatility for External USD denominated debt to 12% – Maintaining prior EMD volatility assumption of 15% for EMD Local to account for additive currency volatility

Emerging Market Debt

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

TIPS

  • TIPS returns are comprised of a fixed coupon (real yield) and

realized inflation (CPI)

– If the market correctly predicts inflation, then TIPS and Treasuries will have the same return – We believe the current market implied breakeven rate is low and apply an adjustment to this to reflect our 3% inflation expectation

  • Current real yields are quite low relative to history

– In late 2010, some shorter maturities offered negative real yields – Our TIPS assumption reflects a real yield adjustment closer to long-term averages and forward curve expectations of 2%

  • A headwind to TIPS performance
  • 2.00
  • 1.00

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 1953 1958 1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008

Historical Real Yields

Implied Real Actual Real Average = 2.5

(1) (1) 1 1 2 2 3

US Real Yields - Forward Curves

1m 1y 3y 5y 7y

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Mean/variance framework can be used to show diversification

benefits of alternatives, but is limited in ability to:

– Size alternatives relative to traditional investments – Address distinctions of sub-categories or current manager strategies in the market – Actual implementations should use Research teams to adjust to specific strategies

  • Real Estate

– Mix of fixed income, equity, and real asset components – 6.5% return with 15% volatility

  • Hedge Funds – Low Volatility

– Cash + 3.75% (includes imbedded .20 beta to equity) – 5.75% return with 7% volatility

  • Hedge Funds – Moderate Volatility

– Cash + 5% (includes imbedded .50 beta to equity) – 7% return with 12% volatility

  • Private Equity

– Extension of public equity market – 9.5% return with 28% volatility

  • Private Debt

– Extension of public high yield market – 9.25% return with 19% volatility

Alternative Assumptions

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

2011 Efficient Portfolios: 10% Standard Deviation

Constrained Frontier Unconstrained Frontier Int'l Equities (Hedged)

10% 0%

Emerging Int'l Equities

10% 5%

Total Equity

20% 5%

Credit

5% 0%

High-Yield Bonds

10% 0%

EMD (Local Currency)

5% 0%

Total Fixed Income

20% 0%

Real Estate

10% 35%

Private Equity

10% 19%

Private Debt

10% 34%

Hedge Funds Low Vol

10% 2%

Hedge Funds Mod Vol

10% 0%

Total Alternatives

50% 90%

Commodities

10% 5%

Total Other

10% 5%

2011 5-7 Year Return

8.1% 9.4%

2011 30 Year Return

9.1% 9.8%

2011 Standard Deviation

10.0% 10.0%

39

L:\Administrative\Company Meetings\2011 Company Offsites\1 - January\Presentations