Corporate Presentation December 2019 Cautionary Statements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Corporate Presentation December 2019 Cautionary Statements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Corporate Presentation December 2019 Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements : The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E
N Y S E : D N R 2
Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and their volatility, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels or extend debt maturities, together with assumptions based on current and projected production levels, oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows or the impact of changes in commodity prices on cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, price and availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, the nature of any future asset purchases or sales
- r the timing or proceeds thereof, estimated timing of commencement of CO2 flooding of particular fields or areas, including Cedar Creek Anticline (“CCA”), or the availability of capital for CCA pipeline construction, or its ultimate
cost or date of completion, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, development activities, finding costs, anticipated future cost savings, capital budgets, interpretation or prediction of formation details, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves and supply and their availability, potential reserves, barrels or percentages of recoverable original oil in place, levels of tariffs or other trade restrictions, the likelihood, timing and impact of increased interest rates, the impact of regulatory rulings or changes, anticipated outcomes of pending litigation, prospective legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, environmental regulations, mark-to-market values, competition, rates of return, estimated costs, changes in costs, future capital expenditures and overall economics, worldwide economic conditions, the likelihood and extent of an economic slowdown, and
- ther variables surrounding operations and future plans. Such forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “predict,” “forecast,” “to our knowledge,” “anticipate,”
“projected,” “preliminary,” “should,” “assume,” “believe,” “may” or other words that convey, or are intended to convey, the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such forward-looking information is based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly and adversely affect current, anticipated actions, the timing of such actions and our financial condition and results of operations. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are fluctuations in worldwide oil prices or in U.S. oil prices and consequently in the prices received or demand for our oil and natural gas; evolving political and military tensions in the Middle East; decisions as to production levels and/or pricing by OPEC or production levels by U.S. shale producers in future periods; levels of future capital expenditures; trade disputes and resulting tariffs or international economic sanctions; effects of our indebtedness; success of our risk management techniques; accuracy of our cost estimates; availability or terms of credit in the commercial banking or other debt markets; fluctuations in the prices of goods and services; the uncertainty of drilling results and reserve estimates; operating hazards and remediation costs; disruption of operations and damages from well incidents, hurricanes, tropical storms, forest fires,
- r other natural occurrences; acquisition risks; requirements for capital or its availability; conditions in the worldwide financial, trade and credit markets; general economic conditions; competition; government regulations, including
changes in tax or environmental laws or regulations; and unexpected delays, as well as the risks and uncertainties inherent in oil and gas drilling and production activities or that are otherwise discussed in this presentation, including, without limitation, the portions referenced above, and the uncertainties set forth from time to time in our other public reports, filings and public statements. Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures: This presentation also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures including free cash flows, adjusted cash flows from operations and adjusted EBITDAX. Any non-GAAP measure included herein is accompanied by a reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure along with a statement on why the Company believes the measure is beneficial to investors, which statements are included at the end of this presentation. Note to U.S. Investors: Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserves information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we may make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which have been estimated by our independent engineers and some of which have been estimated by Denbury’s internal staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also may refer to one or more of estimates of original oil in place, resource or reserves “potential,” barrels recoverable, “risked” and “unrisked” resource potential, estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) or other descriptions of volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible (2P and 3P reserves), include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk.
Cautionary Statements
N Y S E : D N R 3
Uncommon Company, Extraordinary Potential
- Favorable crude quality & premium pricing
- Industry leading oil weighting
- Top quartile operating margins
Extreme Oil Gearing CO2 EOR: A Sustainable Business Model
- Vertically integrated EOR infrastructure
- Cost structure independent from industry
- Operating in unconstrained basins
Strategically Advantaged Operations
- >400 MMBbl EOR potential at CCA
- Inventory of EOR development opportunities
- Short-cycle exploitation opportunities
Significant Organic Growth Potential Financial Discipline
- Generating significant free cash flow
- Strong liquidity and improving leverage profile
- Quality asset base provides capital flexibility
- We achieve net negative carbon
emissions through associated storage
- f industrial-sourced CO2
- Aligned with international CO2
emission reduction efforts
- Assets and expertise well-suited for
future carbon capture
N Y S E : D N R 4 Plano H
- HQ
CO2 Sources Denbury Owned Fields Planned Pipelines Current Pipelines
Unique Energy Business
- ~60% of production via CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
- Vertically integrated CO2 supply and distribution
- Cost structure largely independent from industry
Fundamentally Geared to Crude Oil
- 97% oil, high exposure to Gulf Coast premium pricing
- Superior crude quality (Mid-30’s API gravity, low sulfur)
Value Sustaining with Organic Growth Upside
- Over 1 billion BOE proved + EOR and exploitation potential
Relentless Focus on Execution and Results
- Highly economic project portfolio at $50 oil
- Significant debt reduction and cost structure improvements
since 2014
- Track record of spending within cash flow
Carbon Conscious Producer
- Annually injecting >3 million tons of industrial-sourced CO2
into our reservoirs
Denbury – What We Are
Gulf Coast Region Rocky Mountain Region
3Q19 Production
56,441 BOE/d
YE18 Proved O&G Reserves
262 MMBOE $4.0B PV-10 Value
YE18 Proved CO2 Reserves
6.1 Tcf
N Y S E : D N R 5
ESG – Capturing CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery
~30% of our CO2
is in
indus ustri trial al sourced
We are a different kind of oil company – Denbury is the only U.S. public company of scale where injecting CO2 into the ground to produce oil is our primary business
Environment
N Y S E : D N R 6
ESG – Sustainably Leveraging the Denbury Difference
We maintain a long-standing commitment to the highest standards for the safety and development of our employees, contractors and local communities
- Achieved our best Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) in 2018; on track for new
record in 2019
- Safety targets explicitly tied to executive compensation
- Comprehensive training and development program including safety, leadership, and
diversity training
- Matched >$250,000 employee charitable donations over last 5 years
- Chaired 2019 Dallas Heart Walk for the American Heart Association
Social
Strong corporate governance is essential to fulfilling our obligations to our stakeholders and to operating as a responsible corporate citizen
- 7 out of 8 directors are independent, including independent Chairman of the Board
- Female board representation
- ISS Governance Rating of “1” (Best Possible)
- Code of Conduct and Ethics Rated “A” by NYSE Governance Services (Top 1%)
Governance
0.5 1 1.5 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Total al R Recordab able I e Incident R Rate ( e (TRIR)
Consistent sustainability reporting (2014-2018) in accordance with GRI Standards
Our most recent Corporate Responsibility Report can be accessed on our website at: csr.denbury.com
GOVERNANCE
ISS
RATING “1”
N Y S E : D N R 7
Differentiated Oil Quality & Market Access
Mid-30’s API Gravity Low Sulfur Content (< 0.5%) Ideal for U.S. Refineries Highly Sought After for Blending with Ultra Light Crude Outside Constrained Basins ~60% of Production Receives Gulf Coast Premium Pricing Established Pipeline Takeaway Infrastructure Access to Diverse Markets
Premium Quality Geographically Advantaged
N Y S E : D N R 8
On Track to Accomplish all Key 2019 Goals
Operational Financial
Progress CCA EOR Development
- Procure CO2 pipeline pipe in 2019
- Position for CO2 pipeline installation in 2020,
first CCA CO2 injection in early 2021
Drive Organic EOR Growth
- Bell Creek Phases 5 & 6
- Heidelberg Christmas
Operate Safely and Responsibly
- Improve on record-levels of health, safety
and environmental performance
Expand Exploitation Opportunity Set
- CCA Mission Canyon
- CCA Charles B
- Gulf Coast Unswept Low-Perm
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Strengthen Balance Sheet
$
- Continue to prioritize debt reduction
- Focus on extending near-term maturities
Generate Significant Free Cash Flow
- Free cash estimate of $140-$150 million for
FY19 assuming $55 oil for 4Q19
- Above market hedge book provides upside
exposure while protecting downside
$
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
N Y S E : D N R 9 76% 61% 65% 65% 63% 57% 62% 71% 51% 59% 34% 62% 38% 35% 44% 60% 37%
DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M Peer N Peer O Peer P Peer Q
Peer Average
Industry-Leading Oil Weighting
Source: Company filings for the third quarter ended 9/30/2019. Peers include CLR, CPG, CRC, CRZO, CXO, DVN, LPI, MRO, MUR, NBL, OAS, OXY, PDCE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX. 1) NGL production is not reported separately for this entity.
NGL Production Oil Production
(1) (1) (1)
55% Oil 70% Liquids
(1)
98% Oil
Peer Average
3Q19 % Liquids Production
N Y S E : D N R 10
Source: Company filings for the third quarter ended 9/30/2019. 1) Operating margin calculated as revenues less lifting costs. Lifting costs calculated as lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses and production and ad valorem taxes. 2) Revenues exclude gain/loss on derivative settlements.
Leading Revenue and Operating Margin per BOE
$5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 3Q19 Operating Margin per BOE(1) 3Q19 Revenue per BOE(2)
DNR
Higher Revenue per BOE Higher Operating Margin per BOE
Peers include CLR, CRC, CRZO, CXO, DVN, LPI, MRO, MUR, NBL, OAS, OXY, PDCE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX.
Denbury’s EOR-focused
- perations generate the
highest revenue per BOE among peers, driving a best- in-class operating margin
N Y S E : D N R 11
63% 21% 17% 39% 9% 6%
11% 11% Capex LOE G&A
- Prod. Taxes & Transp.
Average of Peers(1)
YTD19 Operating & Capital Spend as % of Oil & Gas Revenue
Lowest Spend Among Peers as a Percent of Revenue
77% 100%
Spend as % of Revenue
1) Source: results from Company filings for the nine months ended 9/30/2019. Peers include CLR, CRC, CRZO, CXO, LPI, MUR, MTDR, OAS, PDCE, PE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX. See Appendix slide 35 for a detailed list of peers and selected operating and capital costs as a percentage of revenue.
Denbury’s differentiated, EOR-driven model drives the lowest spend as % of revenue across peers Denbury’s high oil weighting & premium pricing exposure deliver highest revenue per BOE among peers
- Spend versus revenue is more effective metric than per-BOE
comparisons given low natural gas and NGL pricing environment
- Metric directly drives free cash flow
Combined LOE & Capex lowest among peers
- EOR business model results in higher LOE but allows for superior
flexibility in capital spend
- Combination of LOE and Capex ~25% lower than peer average
G&A spend ~33% below peer average
- Sustained focus on efficiencies and cost reductions
N Y S E : D N R 12
FY19 Production On Track to Midpoint of Guidance
2019E Development Capital Budget (1)
1) Amounts presented exclude $30 - $40 million of capitalized interest. 2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs.
In millions
2019E $240 - $260 Million
2019E Production Guidance (BOE/d) $30 $100 $70 $50
CO Pipeline & Other Tertiary Non-Tertiary Other Capitalized Items
2
(2)
Tertiary Timing Bell Creek Field Phase 6 Development 1Q-3Q Heidelberg Field Christmas Development 1Q-3Q Non-Tertiary Cedar Creek Anticline Mission Canyon/ Charles B Exploitation 3Q-4Q Conroe Field 2A Sand Exploitation 1Q-2Q Tinsley Field Cotton Valley Exploitation 1Q-2Q CO2 Pipeline & Other Cedar Creek Anticline EOR Pipeline Construction 1Q-4Q Significant 2019 Capital Projects
FY 2019E
57,000 000 – 59,500 500 59,218 218 59,719 719 56,441 441
1Q19 2Q19 3Q19
3Q19 below 2Q19 primarily due to CO2 supplier maintenance, Tropical Storm Imelda and other seasonal effects
N Y S E : D N R 13
$2,852 $826 $358 $246 $246 $246 $1,521 $1,623 $1,623 $324 $185 $174 $171 $395 $80 $50 12/ 2/31/ 1/14 14 12/ 2/31/ 1/18 18 6/ 6/30/ 0/19 19 Pro ro F Form rma 9/ 9/30 30/201 2019
Continuing to Improve Debt Profile
(In millions)
$553 $246 $51 $615 $50 $58 $456 $136 20 2019 19 20 2020 20 20 2021 21 20 2022 22 20 2023 23 20 2024 24
- Sr. Subordinated Notes
- Sr. Secured 2nd Lien Notes
Convertible Sr. Notes
$716 $799 $136 $514
- Sr. Secured Credit Facility
$3,571
Pipeline / Capital Lease Debt
$2,532
$1.2B debt reduction since 2014
Pro Forma(1) $2,336
Debt Principal - Pro Forma(1) 9/30/19 Maturity Window - Pro Forma(1) 9/30/19
(In millions)
$510 million of Bank Line Availability at 9/30/19 after $55 million of LCs
$2,481
1) 9/30/19 debt principal balances pro forma for the impact of the repurchases and debt exchanges of $101 million of 5½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2022 and 4⅝% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2023 in October and November 2019.
(1)
N Y S E : D N R 14
9/30/19 L Lever erage R e Ratio io ( (incl.
- l. h
hedg edges es) Trailin iling 1 12 months Trailing 1 12 months P Pro F Forma(2) Adjusted EBITDAX(1) (millions) $593 $593 Net Debt Principal (millions) 2,436 2,336 Net D Debt/Adjusted ed E EBITDAX(1)
1)
4. 4.1x 1x 3. 3.9x 9x Average Realized Oil Price ($/Bbl) $58.73 $58.73
Debt Metrics
1) A non-GAAP measure. See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed November 7, 2019 for additional information, as well as slide 41 indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful for investors. 2) 9/30/19 net debt principal balance pro forma for the impact of the repurchases and debt exchanges of $101 million of 5½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2022 and 4⅝% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2023 in October and November 2019 and is net of cash & cash equivalents and debt issuance costs, and excludes future interest payable and unamortized debt discounts. 3) A non-GAAP measure. PV-10 Value is an estimated discounted net present value of Denbury’s proved reserves at December 31, 2018, before projected income taxes, using a 10% per annum discount rate. PV-10 Valueas of December 31, 2018 was computed using 12-month average prices of $65.56 per Bbl for oil (based on NYMEX prices) and $3.10 per million British thermal unit (“MMBtu”) for natural gas (based on Henry Hub cash prices), adjusted for prices received at the field. See the Form 8-K filed November 7, 2019 for additional information, as well as slide 42, indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful to investors. 4) SEC PV-10 (12/31/18) / Net Debt Principal Pro Forma (9/30/19). 5) Includes the outstanding borrowings under the bank credit facility and senior secured second lien notes, debt issuance costs and net of cash & cash equivalents, but excludes pipeline financing.
Tot
- tal De
Debt Secured ed D Debt(5
(5)
SEC PV-10 (12/31/18)(3) (millions) $4,025 $4,025 Net Debt Principal Pro Forma (9/30/19)(2) (millions) 2,336 1,670 Asset C Cover erage R e Ratio io(4)
4)
1. 1.7x 7x 2. 2.4x 4x
Improving Leverage Substantial Asset Coverage
N Y S E : D N R 15
Hedge Positions – as of December 6, 2019
2019 2019 2020 2020
4Q 1H 2H FY Fixed xed P Price Swa waps WTI N NYMEX Volume mes H Hedged ( (Bbls/d) 2,000 000 2,000 000 2,000 000 2,000 000 Swap Price(1) $60.60 $60.59 $60.59 $60.59 Argus LLS LLS Volume mes H Hedged ( (Bbls/d) 13,000 000 4,500 500 4,500 500 4,500 500 Swap Price(1) $64.69 $62.29 $62.29 $62.29 3-Way C Collars WTI N NYMEX Volume mes H Hedged ( (Bbls/d) 23,000 000 23,000 000 21,000 000 21,995 995 Sold Put Price(1)(2) $48.57 $48.25 $48.26 $48.25 Floor Price(1) $56.61 $56.95 $56.85 $56.90 Ceiling Price(1) $69.04 $62.83 $62.68 $62.76 Argus LLS LLS Volume mes H Hedged ( (Bbls/d) 5,500 500 9,000 000 7,000 000 7,995 995 Sold Put Price(1)(2) $54.73 $52.83 $52.71 $52.78 Floor Price(1) $63.09 $61.68 $61.24 $61.49 Ceiling Price(1) $79.93 $68.53 $68.83 $68.66 Total Vo Volumes He Hedged 43,500 500 38,500 500 34,500 500 36,490 490 % of FY19E P Produ duction M n Midpo dpoint nt ( (BOE/d) d) 75% 75% 66% 66% 59% 59% 63% 63% Weighted ed A Aver erage F e Floor P Prices es WTI N NYMEX $56. 6.93 93 $57. 7.24 24 $57. 7.17 17 $57. 7.21 21 Argus LLS LLS $64. 4.22 22 $61. 1.88 88 $61. 1.65 65 $61. 1.77 77
1) Averages are volume weighted. 2) If oil prices were to average less than the sold put price, receipts on settlement would be limited to the difference between the floor price and sold put price.
Downside Protection with Significant Upside Potential
N Y S E : D N R 16
Excluding hedges, each $5 change in oil price impacts annual cash flow by ~$100 million
Generating Significant Free Cash Flow in 2019
1) Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that represents adjusted cash flows from operations less interest treated as debt reduction, development capital expenditures and capitalized interest but before acquisitions. See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed November 7, 2019 for additional information. 2) Currently expected range as of October 30, 2019 based on actuals January 1, 2019 – September 30, 2019 and 4Q 2019 forecast assuming $55 oil price. 3) Estimated ranges as of August 5, 2019, based upon actuals January 1, 2019 – June 30, 2019 and forecast July 1, 2019 – December 31, 2019 at referenced prices where applicable. 4) Cash flow from operations before working capital changes (a non-GAAP measure). See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed November 7, 2019 for additional information indicating why the Company believes this non-GAAP measure is useful for investors.
In millions
2019E Adjusted cash flow from operations(4) $490 – $520 Interest payments treated as debt reduction (85) Adjusted total, net $405 – $435 Development capital 240 – 260 Capitalized interest 30 – 40 Total capital costs $270 – $300 Free cash flow(1) $120 – $150
2019E Sources & Uses @ $55 oil(3)
In millions, unless otherwise noted
2019E Free Cash Flow Range, Including Hedges(1)
$90 $100 $110 $120 $130 $140 $150 $160 $170 $180 $190
$50 oil $55 oil $60 oil
1H19 actuals; 2H19 forecast(3) at stated NYMEX per-Bbl pricing
Current Expected Range(2) FY 2019E $140 – $150
N Y S E : D N R 17
Gulf Coast Region
Reserves Summary(1) (MMBOE)
Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia iary P y Pot
- tential
Tert rtiary ry R Reserv rves Proved 127 Potential 276 No Non-Ter ertiary R Reser erves es Proved 22 Total M al MMBOE(2)
(2)
425 425 Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia iary P y Pot
- tential b
l by F Field ld(3)
3)
Mature Area 25 Conroe 130 Delhi 25 Hastings 30 – 65 Heidelberg 25 Manvel 10 Oyster Bayou 20 Tinsley 25 Thompson 20 – 40 Webster 40 – 75
- W. Yellow Creek
5 – 10
Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Planned Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Potential CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Industrial CO2 Sources Naturally-Occurring CO2 Source
Note: See “Slide Notes” on slide 27 in the appendix to this presentation for footnote explanations.
N Y S E : D N R 18
Rocky Mountain Region
Reserves Summary(1) (MMBOE)
Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia iary P y Pot
- tential
Tert rtiary ry R Reserv rves Proved 24 Potential 536 No Non-Ter ertiary R Reser erves es Proved 88 Total M al MMBOE(2)
(2)
648 648 Prov
- ved +
+ Tertia iary P y Pot
- tential b
l by F Field ld(3)
3)
Bell Creek 20 – 40 Cedar Creek Anticline Area 400 – 500 Gas Draw 10 Grieve 5 Hartzog Draw 30 – 40 Salt Creek 25 – 35
Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Planned Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Potential CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates CO2 Resources Owned or Contracted Pipelines Owned by Others
Note: See “Slide Notes” on slide 27 in the appendix to this presentation for footnote explanations.
N Y S E : D N R 19
EOR Potential >400 MMBbl at Cedar Creek Anticline
Development Summary
- Phase
se 1 1 – Red River f formation d development a at East L Lookout Bu Butte a and Ce Cedar H Hills s South – Targeting 30 MMBbls of recoverable oil; expected online 2H’22/1Q’23, with peak production 2024-25 – $150 MM development capital (excl. CO2 pipeline) to initial tertiary production; $400 MM total capital over 15-years – Requires $150 MM CO2 pipeline to service entire CCA EOR development; represents <$0.50/Bbl across total project – Will evaluate external capital sources for pipeline
- Phase
se 2 2 - Ca Cabin Cr Creek d development i in Interlake, S Stony M Mountain a and Red R River f formations – Targets 100 MMBbls of recoverable oil, est. development start 2024 –
- Est. total capex of $500 – $600 MM over multiple decades; fully funded from
Phase 1 cash flow
- Futur
ure P Phases – Remainder o
- f CCA
CCA – >300 MMBbl EOR potential in multiple formations
~105 m 105 mi. C CO2 Pipelin peline from B Bell C ell Cree eek Phase 2 2 EOR Target
~100 MMBbls oil
Phase 1 1 EOR Target
~30 MMBbls oil
~175, 175,00 000 n net a acres
- Est. 5
5 Billio llion B n Bbls ls O OOIP
N Y S E : D N R 20
(500)
- 500
1,000 1,500 2,000
2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 2042
CCA – Decades of Sustainable Production and Free Cash Flow
CCA Project Highlights
- Phase 1 and 2 estimated incremental tertiary production
- f 7,500 – 12,500 Bbls/d
– Potential to significantly increase production over time subject to CO2 availability and other factors
- Phase 1 investment, including full CO2 pipeline, attractive
at $50 oil – Initial pipeline investment benefits all incremental development
- Phase 1 payout expected within 2 years after first
production at $60 oil; future phases funded from project cash flow
- Potential to generate ~$3 billion of cumulative free cash
flow from Phases 1 and 2 at $60 oil
- Expect tertiary LOE to average $10-$15/Bbl
~7,500 - 12,500 net Bbls/d for Phase 1
- Est. Incremental EOR Production
$ in millions
~$3 billion ~$3 billion @ $60, ~$4 billion @ $70
- Est. Cumulative Net Cash Flow @ $60 oil
Future EOR Potential Planned Phase 2 Phase 1
N Y S E : D N R 21
Bell Creek Update
Phase 5
- Initial phase response in 2018
- Capital spend $28 million with 2019 average
production of ~2,100 net Bbl/d
Phase 6
- Commenced CO2 injection in April 2019
- Expect results similar to Phase 5
- Production response anticipated in 1Q20
Phases 1-4 Ongoing Exploitation
- High resolution seismic imaging identified multiple
stranded areas of unswept oil – Successful first test in 1Q19; IP >500 Bbl/d – Additional wells planned for 4Q19 – 2020
Continuing Field Development Best rock quality in Phases 5 and 6 leads to greater production response
Phase 5 Phase 4 Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 1
Total Bell Creek Production
(Net Bbl/d)
Re Recent produc duction n level p l pos
- st
3Q19 p planne nned d mainten enance e at CO CO2 sourc rce
N Y S E : D N R 22
Continued Mission Canyon & Charles B Success
Mission Canyon
- Drilled 12 wells to date with total program economics >90% ROR
– 7 successful wells drilled 2017-2018, average IP30 ~800 Bbl/d – 2 successful wells recently drilled and completed with combined projected IP30 of ~1,000 Bbl/d
- Up to 12 remaining well locations after 2019 program
Charles B
- First well online early 1Q19; IP30 >200 BOPD; Sustained high oil
cut (~80%)
- Strong potential for waterflood & EOR
- Multiple productive Charles B benches identified
– 3Q19 successful delineation of upper and lower Charles B benches – ~4.5 MMBOE waterflood recoverable resource potential – ~12 MMBOE CO2 EOR recoverable resource potential
CCA Exploitation Program
Cedar ar C Creek A eek Anticline
IP30: 842 BOPD IP30: 206 BOPD IP30: 330 BOPD IP30: 1,001 BOPD IP30: 1,234 BOPD IP30: 761 BOPD IP30: 527 BOPD IP30: 726 BOPD
Mission Canyon Horizontal 2019 Mission Canyon Horizontal Charles B Horizontal Future Charles B Horizontal
CCA Formations
N Y S E : D N R 23
Heidelberg Christmas Horizon Redevelopment
Targets Yellow and Brown Christmas sands
- Dedicated injector-producer patterns
- Repeating proven Heidelberg down-dip
injection/up-dip production configuration
- ~3 MMBbl recoverable resource potential
- Capital spend $28 million ($24 million in 2019)
Project milestones
- Commenced CO2 injection in December 2018
- First production April 2019
- All wells online at the end of 2Q19
- Production response in line with forecast; current
performance ~800 net Bbl/d
Redevelopment Overview
10 New Drill Wells 12 Workovers 7 Existing Wells
Heidelberg Formations
40’ 40’ 50’ 60’
Existing Development Existing Development Future Development
N Y S E : D N R 24
Exploitation – Gulf Coast Unswept Low-Perm Oil Potential
Opportunity
- Targeting horizontal well opportunities
– Low perm portions of reservoir with low aquifer sweep – High remaining oil saturation
- Proven concept in Gulf Coast reservoirs
- Candidate sands identified in multiple Denbury Fields
– Conroe – Webster – Thompson
Path Forward
- Complete initial review of all fields in 2019 & plan
additional drilling as early as 2020
– Manvel – Hastings – Oyster Bayou
Gulf Coast Exploitation
N Y S E : D N R 25
- $52 million closed or under contract as of October 2019
– $6 million closed in 2018 – $14 million closed to date in 2019 – $32 million under contract that provides for proceeds to be received in mid-2021 and mid-2022, subject to certain conditions
- Significant estimated value in remaining acreage
Meaningful Progress on Houston Surface Acreage Land Sales
Highlights ~800 surface acres consisting of 11 commercial parcels Multiple parcels along I-45 frontage road ~3,400 surface acres consisting of 7 parcels for commercial and residential development Webster Conroe
26
N Y S E : D N R 26
Appendix
N Y S E : D N R 27
Slide Notes
Slide 1 ide 17 – Gulf lf C Coast R Regio ion
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/18 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/18, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2, “Cautionary Statements” for additional information. 2) Total reserves in the table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
Slide ide 18 18 – Rocky M Mount untain R in Regio ion
1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/18 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/18, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. See slide 2, “Cautionary Statements” for additional information. 2) Total reserves in the table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves.
N Y S E : D N R 28
CO CO2 EOR c can p produc duce a about ut a as much o h oil a as pri rimary ry o
- r s
secondary ry reco covery ry(1
(1)
CO2 EOR Process
17% 18% 20%
Recovery of Original Oil in Place (“OOIP”)
CO2 EOR
(Tertiary)
Secondary
(Waterfloods)
Primary
1) Based on OOIP at Denbury’s Little Creek Field
~ ~ ~
CO2 moves through formation mixing with oil, expanding and moving it toward producing wells CO2 Pipeline CO2 Injection Well Production Well
Oil Oil F For
- rmation
N Y S E : D N R 29
CO2 EOR is a Proven Process
Jackson Dome Bravo Dome LaBarge Lost Cabin DGC McElmo Dome Naturally Occurring CO2 Source Industrial-Sourced CO2 Air Products Nutrien Sheep Mountain
1) Source: Advanced Resources International for data through 2014; state EOR data 2015-2018.
Significant C CO2 Supply b by R Region Gulf C Coast R Region » Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources) » Air Products (Denbury Resources) » Nutrien (Denbury Resources) » Petra Nova (Hilcorp) Permian B Basin R Region » Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental) » McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan) » Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental) Roc
- cky M
Mou
- untain R
Region » LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources) » Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips) Canada » Dakota Gasification (Whitecap, Apache) Significant C CO2 EOR O Operato tors b by Re Region Gulf Coast Re Region » Denbury Resources » Hilcorp Permian B Basin R Region » Occidental » Kinder Morgan Roc
- cky M
Mou
- untain R
Region » Denbury Resources » Devon » FDL » Chevron Canada » Whitecap » Apache
Petra Nova
50 100 150 200 250 300
1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
MBbls/d Gulf Coast/Other Mid-Continent Rocky Mountains Permian Basin
CO CO2 EOR O Oil P Production b by Region(1
(1)
N Y S E : D N R 30
Significant Running Room with CO2 EOR
1) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR. 2) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR. 3) Using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors.
33 33-83 B Billio llion o
- f T
Technic icall lly y Recov
- verab
able O Oil(1,
1,2)
(am amounts i in billio llions o
- f b
bar arrels ls) Permi mian 9-21 21 Ea East & Central al T Texas as 6-15 15 Mi Mid-Continent 6-13 13 Calif ifor
- rnia
ia 3-7 South th E East G t Gulf Coast st 3-7 Roc
- ckie
ies 2-6 Other 0-5 Michiga gan/Illin llinois 2-4 Wi Willis lliston 1-3 Appal alac achia 1-2
Up to 83 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil – U.S Lower 48(1)(2)
Den enbury’s f fiel elds rep epresent ~10% of t total p potential(3)
LA
3. 3.7 7 to 9. 9.1
Billion B Barrel els
Gulf lf C Coa
- ast Regio
ion(2)
2)
2. 2.8 8 to 6. 6.6 6
Billion B Barrel els
Rocky M Mounta tain R Regi gion(2)
2)
MT ND WY TX MS
CO2 Source Owned or Contracted Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines Planned Denbury CO2 Pipeline Denbury owned oil fields CO2 Pipeline owned by Others
N Y S E : D N R 31
Jackson Dome
– Proved CO2 reserves as of 12/31/18: ~5.0 Tcf(1) – Additional probable CO2 reserves as of 12/31/18: ~0.9 Tcf
Industrial-Sourced CO2
Current Sources – Air Products (hydrogen plant): ~45 MMcf/d – Nutrien (ammonia products): ~20 MMcf/d Future Potential Sources – Lake Charles Methanol (methanol plant)(2)
Abundant CO2 Supply & No Significant Capital Required for Several Years
LaBarge Area
– Estimated field size: 750 square miles – Estimated recoverable CO2: 100 Tcf Shute Creek – ExxonMobil Operated
- Proved reserves as of 12/31/18: ~1.2 Tcf
- Denbury has a 1/3 overriding royalty interest and
could receive up to ~115 MMcf/d of CO2 by 2021 at current plant capacity
Lost Cabin – ConocoPhillips Operated
– Denbury estimated to receive 35-40 MMcf/d of CO2
Gulf Coast CO2 Supply Rocky Mountain CO2 Supply
1) Reported on a gross (8/8th’s) basis. 2) Planned but not currently under construction. Estimated CO2 capture date could be as early as 2023, with estimated potential CO2 volumes >200 MMcf/d.
N Y S E : D N R 32
CO2 EOR Development at CCA
EOR F Formatio ion Details ils
Initial Formations Targeted Red River Interlake Stony Mountain Field Discovery Timeframe (Oil) 1930’s (Discovery) 1950’s (Development) Formation Type Carbonate Depth 7,000 – 9,000 ft Original Reservoir Pressure 3,600 – 4,140 psi CO2 Flood Type Miscible API Gravity 29-38 Average Perm 5 md Average Porosity 11.4% OOIP ~5 Billion Barrels Oil Recovered to Date ~700 Million Barrels
- Est. Tertiary Recovery Factor
8 – 15%
Cedar Creek Anticline Overview
CCA Formations
N Y S E : D N R 33
- Target i
is 2A Sand i in n Co Conr nroe Fi Field
– 3-5 MMBOE resource potential – 20-60% oil cuts in current vertical producers – Lower quality reservoir not effectively swept by past development
- Simple
le, low c cost h horizo izontal l well d ll develo lopment
– Estimated drilling and completion cost ~$3MM – No fracture stimulation required – Will utilize existing production infrastructure
- First w
well d l drille lled a and comple leted i in early ly 2Q 2Q19 19
– Peak production rate ~220 BOE/d – Achieved top end of targeted oil cut range at ~50%
- Evalu
luatin ing potentia ial t l to drill ill s second well i ll in adjacent f fault lt b block using le learnings f from f fir irst well ll
- Potentia
ial f l for >20 20 drill llin ing l g locatio ions i in 2A 2A Sand
- Addit
itio ional p l potentia ial in c comparable le Conroe s sands
Unlocking Additional Potential at Conroe
Promising Initial Well Results
Conroe Field TARG RGET Lower P r Perm rm High Remaining Oil Cuts Limited Aquifer Sweep Historical D Devel velopmen ent Higher Pe r Perm Low Remaining Oil Cuts
Low-Per erm S Sand nd Horiz izontal W l Well C ll Conc ncept Test well #1 location Planned test well #2 fault block
N Y S E : D N R 34
Tinsley Cotton Valley Exploitation
- First test well reached target depth in 1Q19
– Gas condensate discovery in Cotton Valley
- Peak test rate 2.5 Mmcf/d, 100 Bbl/d oil
- High quality gas composition, no
contaminants
- Planning tests on identified uphole pay intervals
– Additional oil potential with associated gas
- >100’ net pay above Cotton Valley interval
- Strong offset oil production in
Mooringsport through Hosston formations
- Test results will determine development plan
Tinsley Field eld
Positive Initial Well Results
Test well location Cot
- tton V
Vall alley y Prospec ective A e Area ea
N Y S E : D N R 35
Lowest Spend Among Peers as a Percent of Revenue
21% 27% 64% 51% 49% 55% 64% 66% 65% 57% 63% 77% 71% 75% 83% 76%
39% 40% 10% 17% 15% 21% 17% 13% 19% 22% 17% 9% 16% 11% 14% 15% 6% 13% 4% 9% 11% 9% 7% 8% 7% 8% 9% 8% 8% 13% 9% 8%
11% 7% 13% 16% 17% 8% 6% 9% 6% 11% 11% 9% 10% 10% 10% 18%
77% 87% 91% 93% 92% 93% 94% 96% 97% 98% 100% 103% 105% 109% 116% 117% DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer Avg Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M Peer N
YTD19 Operating & Capital Spend as % of Oil & Gas Revenue Spend as % of Revenue
Source: Company filings for the year to date third quarter ended 9/30/2019. Peers include CLR, CRC, CRZO, CXO, LPI, MUR, MTDR, OAS, PDCE, PE, PXD, SM, WLL, and WPX. *Amounts may not foot due to rounding.
Capex LOE G&A
- Prod. Taxes & Transp.
N Y S E : D N R 36
Commitments & borrowing base
- Borrowing Base / Commitment level: $615 million
- Lender group comprised of 14 banks with largest individual commitment representing
~11% of the total Scheduled redeterminations
- Semiannually – May 1st and November 1st
Maturity date
- December 9, 2021, subject to springing maturities beginning in February 2021
Permitted subordinated debt repurchases
- Up to $89 million of subordinated debt repurchases
–
~$12 million of repurchases permitted as of 12/6/19
–
Additional ~$77 million of repurchases permitted when deleveraging or when total leverage ratio is below 4x after giving effect to such repurchases Junior lien debt
- Up to $1.65 billion of junior lien debt (subject to customary requirements) (~$27 million
remaining as of 12/6/19) Anti-hoarding provisions
- If > $250 million borrowed, unrestricted cash held in accounts is limited to $225 million
Pricing grid
Covenants
- Total Debt / EBITDAX: < 5.25x with step down to < 4.5x at 3/31/2021
- Senior Secured Debt(1) / EBITDAX: < 2.50x
- Interest Coverage Ratio: > 1.25x
- Current Ratio: > 1.00x
1) Based solely on bank debt.
Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Info
Level Borrowing Base Utilization Libor margin (bps) ABR margin (bps) Undrawn pricing (bps) V > 90.0% 375.0 275.0 50.0 IV < 90.0% 350.0 250.0 50.0 III < 75.0% 325.0 225.0 50.0 II < 50.0% 300.0 200.0 50.0 I < 25.0% 275.0 175.0 50.0
N Y S E : D N R 37
Production by Area
Field 2017 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 2018 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 Delhi 4,869 4,169 4,391 4,383 4,526 4,368 4,474 4,486 4,256 Hastings 4,830 5,704 5,716 5,486 5,480 5,596 5,539 5,466 5,513 Heidelberg 4,851 4,445 4,330 4,376 4,269 4,355 3,987 4,082 4,297 Oyster Bayou 5,007 5,056 4,961 4,578 4,785 4,843 4,740 4,394 3,995 Tinsley 6,430 6,053 5,755 5,294 5,033 5,530 4,659 4,891 4,541 Bell Creek 3,313 4,050 4,010 3,970 4,421 4,113 4,650 5,951 4,686 Salt Creek 1,115 2,002 2,049 2,274 2,107 2,109 2,057 2,078 2,213 West Yellow Creek 2 57 142 240 375 205 436 586 728 Mature area(1) and other 7,089 6,726 6,725 6,618 6,768 6,709 6,531 6,489 6,473 Total tertiary production 37,506 38,262 38,079 37,219 37,764 37,828 37,073 38,423 36,702 Gulf Coast non-tertiary 5,555 5,305 5,848 5,576 5,348 5,519 5,389 5,274 5,147 Cedar Creek Anticline 14,754 14,437 15,742 14,208 14,961 14,837 14,987 14,311 13,354 Other Rockies non-tertiary 1,537 1,485 1,490 1,409 1,343 1,431 1,313 1,305 1,238 Total non-tertiary production 21,846 21,227 23,080 21,193 21,652 21,787 21,689 20,890 19,739 Total continuing production 59,352 59,489 61,159 58,412 59,416 59,615 58,762 59,313 56,441 Property divestitures(2) 946 849 835 769 451 726 456 406 — Total production 60,298 60,338 61,994 59,181 59,867 60,341 59,218 59,719 56,441
1) Mature area includes Brookhaven, Cranfield, Eucutta, Little Creek, Mallalieu, Martinville, McComb, and Soso fields. 2) Includes production from Citronelle Field sold in July 2019, Lockhart Crossing Field sold in the third quarter of 2018.
Average Daily Production (BOE/d)
N Y S E : D N R 38
NYMEX Oil Differential Summary
Crude Oil Differentials
$ per barrel 2017 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 2018 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 Tertiary Oil Fields Gulf Coast Region $0.06 $1.87 $0.85 $3.01 $5.20 $2.73 $4.07 $4.66 $2.88 Rocky Mountain Region (0.96) 0.22 (1.10) (0.86) (4.88) (1.81) (2.01) (1.36) (2.78) Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary 1.26 3.26 2.73 4.42 6.24 4.28 5.45 6.06 4.69 Cedar Creek Anticline (1.43) (0.11) (0.67) (0.31) (3.93) (1.30) (2.69) (1.43) (0.91) Other Rockies Non-Tertiary (2.72) (1.30) (1.96) (1.92) (6.58) (2.87) (4.80) (3.48) (3.92) Denbury t totals $( $(0. 0.32) 32) $1. $1.29 29 $0. $0.39 39 $1. $1.84 84 $1. $1.69 69 $1. $1.30 30 $1. $1.63 63 $2. $2.35 35 $1. $1.30 30 Positive oil differential for eight consecutive quarters
During 3Q19, ~60% of our crude oil was exposed to Gulf Coast premium pricing
N Y S E : D N R 39
Analysis of Total Operating Costs
$ per BOE 2017 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 2018 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 CO2 Costs $2.86 $3.09 $2.92 $2.63 $3.62 $3.07 $3.90 $2.81 $2.51 Power & Fuel 5.97 6.68 6.19 6.31 6.08 6.32 6.70 6.11 6.25 Labor & Overhead 6.32 6.38 6.47 6.99 6.60 6.61 6.71 6.95 7.57 Repairs & Maintenance 0.84 0.80 0.91 1.09 0.85 0.91 1.00 1.06 1.04 Chemicals 1.04 1.00 1.05 1.17 1.03 1.06 1.08 1.04 1.12 Workovers 2.44 2.84 2.21 3.20 3.60 2.96 2.94 2.43 2.71 Other 1.06 1.01 1.59 1.11 1.54 1.31 1.20 1.30 1.50 Total Normalized LOE(1) $20.53 $21.80 $21.34 $22.50 $23.32 $22.24 $23.53 $21.70 $22.70 Special or Unusual Items(2) (0.18) — — — — — — — — Total LOE $20.35 $21.80 $21.34 $22.50 $23.32 $22.24 $23.53 $21.70 $22.70 Oil Pricing NYMEX Oil Price $50.96 $62.96 $67.85 $69.60 $58.81 $64.81 $54.87 $59.87 $56.34 Realized Oil Price(3) $50.64 $64.25 $68.24 $71.44 $60.50 $66.11 $56.50 $62.22 $57.64
1) Normalized LOE excludes special
- r unusual items and Thompson
Field repair costs (see footnote 2 below). 2) Special or unusual items consist
- f cleanup and repair costs
associated with Hurricane Harvey ($3MM) offset by an adjustment for pricing related to
- ne of our industrial CO2 sources
($7MM) in 2017. 3) Excludes derivative settlements.
Total Operating Costs
N Y S E : D N R 40
CO2 Cost & NYMEX Oil Price
1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 Industrial-Sourced CO2 % 16% 16% 15% 15% 18% 22% 22% 23% 23% 25% 22% 22% 26% 24% 25% 28% 29% 34% 29% 28% 26% 25% 23% Tax 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.045 0.05 Purchases 0.24 0.30 0.28 0.20 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.07 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.153 0.19 OPEX 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.18 0.12 0.14 0.13 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.21 0.17 0.132 0.12 NYMEX Crude Oil 98.6 103. 97.3 73.0 48.8 57.9 46.7 42.1 33.7 45.5 45.0 49.2 51.9 48.3 48.1 55.4 62.9 67.8 69.6 58.8 54.8 59.8 56.3
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $0.00 $0.05 $0.10 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $0.30 $0.35 $0.40 $0.45 $0.50 NY NYMEX Crude O Oil P Price ce / / Bbl CO CO2 Costs / / Mc Mcf (1)
1)
1) Excludes DD&A on CO2 wells and facilities; includes Gulf Coast & Rocky Mountain industrial-source CO2 costs. 2) CO2 costs include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome in 3Q17 and 4Q15 of $3 million ($0.08 per Mcf) and $3 million ($0.05 per Mcf), respectively, and a downward adjustment in 4Q17 for pricing related to one of our industrial CO2 sources of $7 million ($0.12 per Mcf)
OPEX Purchases Tax NYMEX Crude Oil Price Industrial-Sourced CO2 %
(2) (2) (2)
N Y S E : D N R 41
Reconcilia iliatio ion o
- f net
et income ( (loss) ( (GAAP AP measur ure) t to a adjus usted E d EBITDAX AX ( (non-GAA AAP m mea easur ure)
1) Excludes pro forma adjustments related to qualified acquisitions or dispositions under the Company’s senior secured bank credit facility. Adjusted EBITDAX is a non-GAAP financial measure which management uses and is calculated based upon (but not identical to) a financial covenant related to “Consolidated EBITDAX” in the Company’s senior secured bank credit facility, which excludes certain items that are included in net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial
- measure. Items excluded include interest, income taxes, depletion, depreciation, and amortization, and items that the Company believes affect the comparability of operating
results such as items whose timing and/or amount cannot be reasonably estimated or are non-recurring. Management believes Adjusted EBITDAX may be helpful to investors in
- rder to assess the Company’s operating performance as compared to that of other companies in its industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical
costs basis. It is also commonly used by third parties to assess leverage and the Company’s ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDAX should not be considered in isolation, as a substitute for, or more meaningful than, net income, cash flow from operations, or any other measure reported in accordance with
- GAAP. Adjusted EBITDAX may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of another company because all companies may not calculate Adjusted EBITDAX, EBITDAX or EBITDA
in the same manner. 2018 2018 2019 2019 In millions Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 FY FY Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q3 TTM TM Net et income ( e (loss) (GAAP m mea easure) e) $40 $40 $30 $30 $78 $78 $174 $174 $323 $323 $(26) 26) $147 $147 $73 $73 $368 $368 Adjustments to reconcile to Adjusted EBITDAX Interest expense 17 16 19 18 70 17 20 23 78 Income tax expense (benefit) 14 9 16 48 87 (11) 65 37 139 Depletion, depreciation, and amortization 52 53 51 60 216 57 58 55 230 Noncash fair value losses (gains) on commodity derivatives 15 41 (17) (236) (196) 92 (26) (35) (205) Stock-based compensation 3 3 4 3 12 3 4 3 13 Litigation accrual and loan receivable impairment — — — 67 67 67 Gain on debt extinguishment — — — — — — (100) (6) (106) Noncash, non-recurring and other(1) 1 1 (3) 7 5 6 1 (5) 9 Adjuste ted E EBITDAX ( (non-GAAP AAP m measure) $142 $142 $153 $153 $148 $148 $141 $141 $584 $584 $138 $138 $169 $169 $145 $145 $593 $593
Non-GAAP Measures
N Y S E : D N R 42
Non-GAAP Measures (Cont.)
Reconcilia iliatio ion o
- f the
he stand ndardiz dized m measur ure o e of discounted d estim imated f futur ure n net et c cash f h flows a after er i income t taxes es (GAAP AP m measur ure) e) t to PV PV-10 Va Value (non-GA GAAP P measure)
PV-10 Value is a non-GAAP measure and is different from the Standardized Measure in that PV-10 Value is a pre-tax number and the Standardized Measure is an after-tax number. Denbury’s 2018 and 2017 year-end estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves and proved CO2 reserves quantities were prepared by the independent reservoir engineering firm of DeGolyer and MacNaughton. The information used to calculate PV-10 Value is derived directly from data determined in accordance with FASC Topic 932. Management believes PV-10 Value is a useful supplemental disclosure to the Standardized Measure because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a company’s unique tax situation, and it is not practical to calculate the Standardized Measure on a property-by-property
- basis. Because of this, PV-10 Value is a widely used measure within the industry and is commonly used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to
evaluate the estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific properties. PV-10 Value is commonly used by management and others in the industry to evaluate properties that are bought and sold, to assess the potential return on investment in the Company’s oil and natural gas properties, and to perform impairment testing of oil and natural gas properties. PV-10 Value is not a measure of financial or operating performance under GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Standardized Measure. PV-10 Value and the preliminary Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the fair value of the Company’s oil and natural gas reserves. De December 31, 31, In millions 2017 2017 2018 2018 Sta tandardized Measure ( (GAAP M Measure) $2,232 232 $3,351 351 Discounted estimated future income tax 302 674 PV PV-10 V Valu alue ( (Non
- n-GA
GAAP M Measu sure) $2,534 534 $4,025 025