SLIDE 1
1
2
- 1. ENERGY GOVERNANCE
ESEIA CONFERENCE 2016 Governance of Heat Grids. Towards a Governance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ESEIA CONFERENCE 2016 Governance of Heat Grids. Towards a Governance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ESEIA CONFERENCE 2016 Governance of Heat Grids. Towards a Governance Typology for Smart Heat Infrastructures Sanders, Heldeweg & Brunnekreef WORK IN PROGRESS! 1 1. ENERGY GOVERNANCE Towards a Competitive Low-Carbon European Economy in
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
3
- 2. HEAT ENERGY MARKET
Local or Regional Grids or Infrastructures as Markets New Technologies Input è Throughput è Output Supplier(s?) è Grid Manager(s?) è User(s?) Markets!
SLIDE 4
4
- 3. ENERGY (MARKETS) GOVERNANCE
New Technology in Renewable Energy Calls for fitting Governance
(Sanders & Hoppe, 2015; Lodge & Wegrich, 2014)
‘Call’ also applicable to Development of Heat Grids / Infrastructures
SLIDE 5
5
- 3. ENERGY (MARKETS) GOVERNANCE
A Well-Considered Governance Approach is needed to Prevent / Remedy Barriers that may lead to Decision Deadlocks & Non-realisation of Heat Grids. What Governance of Decision-making fosters (proper Orchestration for) Establishing Heat Grids / Infrastructures?
SLIDE 6
6
- 3. ENERGY (MARKETS) GOVERNANCE
A Well-Considered Governance Approach is needed Versus Decision Deadlocks & Non-realisation of Grids. Regional projects in the Netherlands Grids & Connecting Grids (Infrastructures) Arnhem-Nijmegen – open (growth) model Provincial ambition: in 2030 pipeline for 90,000 user connections Hengelo-Enschede – open (growth) model Provincial ambition: 17,500 homes & 800 businesses … and more Amsterdam/Metropolitan ….. The Hague Region
SLIDE 7
7
- 4. TOWARDS A GOVERNANCE
TYPOLOGY FOR HEAT GRIDS
Assumption: Heat Market is largely unregulated – no Ex Ante Structured Relation between relevant Stakeholders
- Est. Grid as Collective Action: (Non-Hierarchic) Orchestration
Bottom-Up Governance Typology (& Orchestration of Collective Action) following 2 Characteristics of Grids / Infrastructures:
- Regulatory nature of the grid regime
- esp. public ó private interest-driven
- Technical complexity of grid functionality
- esp. low/closed ó high/open
SLIDE 8
8
- 4. TOWARDS A GOVERNANCE
TYPOLOGY FOR HEAT GRIDS
Bottom-up Governance Typology following 2 Characteristics of Grids / Infrastructures
SLIDE 9
9
- 4. TOWARDS A GOVERNANCE
TYPOLOGY FOR HEAT GRIDS
Reasoning from Operational Ambition to Collective Choice Governance: Consider Levels of Analysis & Design
SLIDE 10
10
- 5. OPERATIONAL LEVEL
PROJECTED GRID TYPE
‘Bottom-Up’ Orchestration Optimality: Reason from Ideal Type Picture of Operational Grid Ambition Acknowledge hybridity…... Reason from 4 Types of Orchestration
SLIDE 11
11
- 5. COLLECTIVE CHOICE LEVEL
DECISION MAKING
Following an Operational Level Ideal Type Grid
SLIDE 12
12
- 5. COLLECTIVE CHOICE LEVEL
DECISION MAKING
As before slide; including Hybrid Governance Space
SLIDE 13
13
- 6. CONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTS
Considering ‘Top-Down’ Prescriptive Influences: Institutional Environments as Legal Institutions Descriptive and Prescriptive Pattern of Behavior Institutional Environments Ph - Public Hierarchy ê
- H1. Regulated Market
é Cm - Competitive market
SLIDE 14
14
- 6. CONSTITUTIONAL LEVEL
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTS
- 1. Dutch Heat Act projects a Regulated Heat Market
Contracting constraints (tariffs, shuttng-off, complaints) Permits for larger grids/infrastructures (≥10 u. & ≥10K GJ/an)
- 2. Dutch Heat Vision (è Δ Heat Act; Δ Orchestration Reg.Market)
Emancipate Heat Market ó Gas (& Electricity)
- terminate legally obligatory gas connection
- favor open/complex over closed/simple grids
user choice between heat suppliers
- favor public ‘over’ private lead
local heat planning + oblig. heat connection; national subsidies.. Possibly private obligation to allow 3rd party suppliers access)
SLIDE 15
15
- 8. CONCLUSION
‘Bottom-Up’ (Operational è Coll. Choice) > from ‘desired ideal type grid’ < ‘Top-Down’ (Constitutional è Coll. Choice) > from ‘prescribed Inst. Environment’ <
SLIDE 16
16