equilibria for collisions kernels appearing in weak
play

Equilibria for collisions kernels appearing in weak turbulence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Equilibria for collisions kernels appearing in weak turbulence Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique, October 22, 2019 Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG,


  1. Equilibria for collisions kernels appearing in weak turbulence Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique, October 22, 2019 Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  2. Boltzmann operator of rarefied gases � � � Q ( f )( v ) = f ( v + σ · ( v ∗ − v ) σ ) f ( v ∗ − σ · ( v ∗ − v ) σ ) R 3 S 2 � − f ( v ) f ( v ∗ ) B d σ dv ∗ Abstract formulation: � � � � f ( v ′ ) f ( v ′ Q ( f )( v ) = ∗ ) R 3 R 3 R 3 � − f ( v ) f ( v ∗ ) B ∗ | 2 } dv ∗ dv ′ ∗ dv ′ . × δ { v + v ∗ = v ′ + v ′ ∗ } δ {| v | 2 + | v ∗ | 2 = | v ′ | 2 + | v ′ Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  3. First part of the H-theorem of Boltzmann Entropy : � H ( f ) := ( − ) R 3 f ( v ) ln f ( v ) dv ; Entropy production : R 3 Q ( f )( v ) ln f ( v ) dv = 1 � 4 � � � � � � ln f ( v ) + ln f ( v ∗ ) − ln f ( v ′ ) − ln f ( v ′ ∗ ) R 3 R 3 R 3 R 3 × [ f ( v ) f ( v ∗ ) − f ( v ′ ) f ( v ′ ∗ | 2 } dvdv ∗ dv ′ ∗ dv ′ . ∗ )] δ { v + v ∗ = v ′ + v ′ ∗ } δ {| v | 2 + | v ∗ | 2 = | v ′ | 2 + | v ′ Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  4. Definition of equilibria Definition: the equilibria of the Boltzmann equation are the functions f > 0 such that when v + v ∗ = v ′ + v ′ ∗ and | v | 2 + | v ∗ | 2 = | v ′ | 2 + | v ′ ∗ | 2 , one has f ( v ) f ( v ∗ ) − f ( v ′ ) f ( v ′ ∗ ) , or equivalently, for g = ln f , g ( v ′ ) + g ( v ′ ∗ ) = g ( v ) + g ( v ∗ ) . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  5. Second part of H-theorem: explicit form of equilibria It is clear that for all a , c ∈ R , b ∈ R 3 , the function g ( v ) := a + b · v + c | v | 2 is an equilibrium. Second part of H-theorem of Boltzmann : All equilibria (in a suitable functional space) have this form. Natural functional space for g : weighted L 2 . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  6. Second part of H-theorem: traditional proof (i) For an equilibrium g , g ( v + σ · ( v ∗ − v ) σ ) + g ( v ∗ − σ · ( v ∗ − v ) σ ) = g ( v ) + g ( v ∗ ) , which, selecting σ · ( v ∗ − v ) ∼ 0, leads to ( ∇ g ( v ) − ∇ g ( v ∗ )) × ( v − v ∗ ) = 0 , or in coordinates (for i � = j ) ( ∂ j g ( v ) − ∂ j g ( v ∗ )) ( v i − v i ∗ ) = ( ∂ i g ( v ) − ∂ i g ( v ∗ )) ( v j − v j ∗ ) . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  7. Second part of H-theorem: traditional proof (ii) The formula ( ∇ g ( v ) − ∇ g ( v ∗ )) × ( v − v ∗ ) = 0 corresponds to equilibria of the Landau equation for collisions in ionized plasmas (Coulomb interaction) � � Id − v − v ∗ | v − v ∗ | ⊗ v − v ∗ �� � Q L ( f )( v ) = ∇ · ∇ ln f ( v ) − ∇ ln f ( v ∗ ) | v − v ∗ | R 3 f ( v ) f ( v ∗ ) | v − v ∗ | − 1 dvdv ∗ . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  8. Second part of H-theorem: traditional proof (iii) New starting point (for i � = j ) ( ∂ j g ( v ) − ∂ j g ( v ∗ )) ( v i − v i ∗ ) = ( ∂ i g ( v ) − ∂ i g ( v ∗ )) ( v j − v j ∗ ) . After applying ∂ v i ∗ , − ∂ ij g ( v ∗ ) ( v i − v i ∗ ) − ( ∂ j g ( v ) − ∂ j g ( v ∗ )) = − ∂ ii g ( v ∗ ) ( v j − v j ∗ ) . After applying ∂ v i on one hand, and ∂ v j on the other hand, − ∂ ij g ( v ∗ ) − ∂ ij g ( v ) = 0 , − ∂ jj g ( v ) = − ∂ ii g ( v ∗ ) . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  9. Second part of H-theorem: traditional proof (iv) New starting point (for i � = j ) − ∂ ij g ( v ∗ ) − ∂ ij g ( v ) = 0 , − ∂ jj g ( v ) = − ∂ ii g ( v ∗ ) . So Hess ( g ) = 2 c Id , and g ( v ) := a + b · v + c | v | 2 . Can be applied in the classical sense if g is of class C 2 , and in the sense of distributions if g lies in L 1 loc (that is, using integrations in v , v ∗ ). Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  10. Boltzmann operator for the four waves equation of weak turbulence theory (Zakharov) � � � � R d W ( v , v ∗ , v ′ , v ′ f ( v ′ ) f ( v ′ Q W ( f )( v ) = ∗ ) ∗ ) ( f ( v ) + f ( v ∗ )) R d R d � − f ( v ) f ( v ∗ ) ( f ( v ′ ) + f ( v ′ ∗ )) ∗ ) } dv ∗ dv ′ ∗ dv ′ . × δ { v + v ∗ = v ′ + v ′ ∗ } δ { ω ( v )+ ω ( v ∗ )= ω ( v ′ )+ ω ( v ′ Typical ω : ω ( v ) = C | v | α , for 0 < α < 1 and C > 0. � In particular, in the two-dimensional case, ω ( v ) = C | v | is used to describe gravitational waves on a fluid surface Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  11. First part of the H-theorem for the 4-waves operator Entropy : � H ( f ) := R d ln f ( v ) dv ; Entropy production : � R d Q W ( f )( v ) f − 1 ( v ) dv = 1 � W ( v , v ∗ , v ′ , v ′ ∗ ) 4 � 2 � f − 1 ( v ) + f − 1 ( v ∗ ) − f − 1 ( v ′ ) − f − 1 ( v ′ × ∗ ) × f ( v ) f ( v ∗ ) f ( v ′ ) f ( v ′ ∗ ) } dvdv ∗ dv ′ ∗ dv ′ . ∗ ) δ { v + v ∗ = v ′ + v ′ ∗ } δ { ω ( v )+ ω ( v ∗ )= ω ( v ′ )+ ω ( v ′ Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  12. Definition of equilibria Definition: the equilibria of the 4-waves equation are the functions f > 0 such that when v + v ∗ = v ′ + v ′ ∗ and ω ( v ) + ω ( v ∗ ) = ω ( v ′ ) + ω ( v ′ ∗ ) , one has f − 1 ( v ′ ) + f − 1 ( v ′ ∗ ) = f − 1 ( v ) + f − 1 ( v ∗ ) , or equivalently, for g = f − 1 , g ( v ′ ) + g ( v ′ ∗ ) = g ( v ) + g ( v ∗ ) . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  13. Second part of H-theorem: explicit form of equilibria It is clear that for all a , c ∈ R , b ∈ R d , the function g ( v ) := a + b · v + c ω ( v ) is an equilibrium. Expected result (Second part of H-theorem): All equilibria (in a suitable functional space) have this form [except maybe for a small class of functions ω ]. Natural functional space for g : weighted L 2 . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  14. Existing results Case ω ( v ) = | v | 2 (Boltzmann equation for monoatomic gases) : Proof when g is C 2 (Boltzmann); Proof when g is measurable, or a distribution (Truesdell-Muncaster; Wennberg) 1 + | v | 2 (Boltzmann equation for relativistic monoatomic � Case ω ( v ) = gases) : Proof when g is C 2 (Cercignani, Kremer); Proof when g is a distribution (suggested in Cercignani, Kremer) Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  15. Result in the general case Theorem (Breden, LD): Let d ∈ { 2 , 3 } and ω ∈ C 2 ( R d − { 0 } ). Assume that there exist i , j ∈ { 1 , . . . , d } , i � = j , such that { 1 , ∂ i ω, ∂ j ω } are linearly independant in C 1 ( R d − { 0 } ) . Assume also that the boundary ∂ A of R d � 2 , ∇ ω ( v ) � = ∇ ω ( v ∗ ) � � � A := ( v , v ∗ ) ∈ . R d � 2 . � is of measure 0 in Let g ∈ L 1 loc ( R d ) be an equilibrium. Then, there exist a , c ∈ R and b ∈ R d such that, for a.e. v in R d , g ( v ) = a + b · v + c ω ( v ) . Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

  16. Method of proof: first step As in the proof in the Boltzmann case, we consider only grazing collisions, that is, collisions for which v ′ ∼ v , v ′ ∗ ∼ v ∗ . Then, the equilibria satisfy the following property (for a.e. v , v ∗ ∈ R d ): ( ∇ g ( v ) − ∇ g ( v ∗ )) × ( ∇ ω ( v ) − ∇ ω ( v ∗ )) = 0 , or in coordinates (for i � = j ) ( ∂ j g ( v ) − ∂ j g ( v ∗ )) ( ∂ i ω ( v ) − ∂ i ω ( v ∗ )) = ( ∂ i g ( v ) − ∂ i g ( v ∗ )) ( ∂ j ω ( v ) − ∂ j ω ( v ∗ )) . This amounts to say that the entropy dissipation of the grazing collision approximation (Landau-type operator) of Q W is zero. Laurent Desvillettes, Univ. Paris Diderot, IMJ-PRG, in collaboration with Maxime Breden, Ecole Polytechnique,

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend