epsu
play

EPSU 14 March 2016 Belgium: Asylum and Migration Belgium = federal - PDF document

15/03/2016 EPSU 14 March 2016 Belgium: Asylum and Migration Belgium = federal state Federal competences include: Asylum procedure Reception of asylum seekers Voluntary and forced return Regional competences include:


  1. 15/03/2016 EPSU 14 March 2016 Belgium: Asylum and Migration Belgium = federal state  Federal competences include:  Asylum procedure  Reception of asylum seekers  Voluntary and forced return  Regional competences include:  Integration  Education  Housing  Employment  Reception of specific target groups (psychological, medical, minors) 1

  2. 15/03/2016 Belgium: Asylum and Migration  4 Administrations  Immigration Office  Visas / access to the territory  Registration asylum procedure / Dublin  Detention / Forced removals  Commissioner General for Refugees + Stateless Persons  Aliens Litigation Council  Asylum and subsidiary protection (grant / appeal)  Fedasil  Reception of asylum seekers  Voluntary return / refugees resettlement  1 political authority: State Secretary for Asylum and Migration  Access to territory, asylum, reception, forced/voluntary return, etc. www.cgrs.be 2

  3. 15/03/2016 Fedasil Federal Agency for the reception of asylum seekers Fact & figures  Agency created in 2001 (operational 2002)  Number of coworkers: 1533 persons  Expenditure in 2015 : 300 Mi €  Reception facility capacity: 16.269 beds (June 2015) -> 35.295 beds (March 2016)  Buffer capacity included: 2.150  Occupancy rate: 90,22% Fedasil Our mission  Organisation of reception (material aid) for asylum seekers  Coordination of all reception operators  Coordination of voluntary return and resettlement programmes  Observation and referral of UAM  Preparation, implementation and evaluation of reception policy 3

  4. 15/03/2016 Reception and asylum crisis 2009-2012 Reception and asylum crisis 2008-2012 Causes  Increased number of asylum applicants (mostly West Balkan)  Increased number of applications for reception  Increased number of pending cases  Longer duration of asylum procedure 4

  5. 15/03/2016 Reception and asylum crisis Evolution de l'occupation du réseau d'accueil depuis début 2005 26.000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2009 2012 2013 MAX. 23.507 24.000 25/05/2012 23.145 21.382 22.000 20.824 20.000 18.164 18.000 16.281 16.000 14.963 14.963 15.936 25/09/2013 14.000 12.900 Occupation totale (y compris accueil d'urgence) 12.000 Occupation capacité structurelle MIN. 11.545 Seuil de saturation 16/07/2007 10.000 3/01/2005 3/04/2005 3/07/2005 3/10/2005 3/01/2006 3/04/2006 3/07/2006 3/10/2006 3/01/2007 3/04/2007 3/07/2007 3/10/2007 3/01/2008 3/04/2008 3/07/2008 3/10/2008 3/01/2009 3/04/2009 3/07/2009 3/10/2009 3/01/2010 3/04/2010 3/07/2010 3/10/2010 3/01/2011 3/04/2011 3/07/2011 3/10/2011 3/01/2012 3/04/2012 3/07/2012 3/10/2012 3/01/2013 3/04/2013 3/07/2013 Reception and asylum crisis Measures  Expanded reception network (creation of new reception centres, of emergency reception facilities): up to 25.000 beds  Increased number of protection officers (CGRS)  Limitation of right to reception (multiple asylum application)  Return path (voluntary return)  List of « safe countries » 5

  6. 15/03/2016 Reception and asylum crisis 2015- … Reception and asylum crisis 2015 Causes  Increased number of asylum applicants (Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan)  Increased need for reception and decreased reception places after last reception crisis (from 24.000 to 16.000 beds) 6

  7. 15/03/2016 Reception and asylum crisis Measures  Expanded reception network (buffer capacity, new reception facilities, emergency and temporary reception facilities)  Increased number of employees and protection officers  Influx management – ‘ pre-reception ’ Dispersal plan Implementing a geographical dispersal plan of reception facilities for municipalities  goal: a balanced distribution of applicants for international protection within the national territory  reception places to be created via dispersal plan: initially 5000 places  dispersal according to following parameters : - number of inhabitants of the municipality (35%) - total of net taxable income (20%) - number of existing reception places in the municipality (30%) - number of beneficiaries of social welfare benefits (15%) 7

  8. 15/03/2016 Key figures Reception network  Sever eral al oper erat ators s – coor ordin dinat ated ed by by Feda dasi sil  27 27 rece ceptio tion cente ters s of Fedasil sil  Receptio tion operato tors s (communal and individual reception):  27 centers Croix-Rouge Communauté francophone (Red Cross)  23 centers Rode Kruis (Red Cross)  4 Socialistische Mutualiteiten, SOI Gent, Samu social (2),  2 Caritas International Belgium  11 facilities managed by 4 private operators  Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen  Ciré  Local reception initiatives – PCSW (municipalities) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Pre-rece ceptio tion by by Red Cross ss : 1000 place ces 8

  9. 15/03/2016 Reception network Reception capacity 9

  10. 15/03/2016 Capacities by operator Reception network : occupancy rate On 4.3.2016: 35.295 places and occupancy rate of 90,22% 10

  11. 15/03/2016 In & Out 2014-2016 Countries of origin Jan 2016 Dec 2015 Nov 2015 655 886 669 128 11% 17% 128 25% 2% 117 2% 2% 1082 165 2387 3% 40% 742 42% 13% 51% 2620 10% 505 75 3% 4% 103 [WAARD E] 29% 12% 879 1665 324 17% 470 Afghanistan Afghanistan Syrië Syrië Irak Afghanistan Irak Iran Onbepaald/Indéterminé Syrië Somalië Somalië Autre Irak Autre Iran Onbepaald/Indéterminé Autre 11

  12. 15/03/2016 In: family composition Jan 2016 123 4.5% 533 Alleenstaande man/Homme isolé 19.6% 1053 38.7% Familie/Famille NBMV/MENA 37.2% Alleenstaande vrouw/Femme isolée 1014 Inflow UAM 12

  13. 15/03/2016 Capacity UAM Operational capacity: 2.284 places Inflow UAM by nationality 13

  14. 15/03/2016 Protection rate Recognised Subsidiary Recognition Refugee protection rate 2012 15,4% 7,0% 22,4% 2013 16,4% 10,7% 27,1% 2014 36,6% 10,2% 46,8% 2015 50,6% 10,2% 60,8% jan/16 51,0% 13,9% 64,9% Legal basis 14

  15. 15/03/2016 Legal basis: Reception Act 2007  Accommodation, meals, clothing & sanitary products  Information  Evaluation of needs  Medical and psychological care  Social and legal support  Access to interpretation services  Pocket money, daily allowance & communal services  Education and activities  Reception in phases  Right to work (after 4 months)  Internal rules and sanctions  Complaints procedure and appeals  Code of deontology Legal basis Who?  Asylum seekers  UAM  Some groups during their illegal stay 15

  16. 15/03/2016 New reception model Principles Flexibility of reception network  More reception facilities adapted to special  needs New reception model Objectives  Less transfers between reception facilities  Better and faster integration for person granted asylum  More reception facilities adapted to special needs 16

  17. 15/03/2016 New reception model Reception model (end 2015) Obtaining status, transition and integration in Belgium PRE- reception Collective reception Dispatching Emergency shelter Return places « No show » Individual reception Return and re-integration in country of origin New reception model on hold • No transfers, except for urgent medical disciplinary transfers • Priority to high recognition rate or extented stay for assignment to local • 34 reception initiative 17

  18. 15/03/2016 Outflow Transition for persons with protection status Protection rate + 60%  Transition period of 2 months  Delay of departure possible  Conditions for delay: - Large families with minors - Medical cases - Pregnancy or birth - Other vulnerability (f.ex. lack of aan autonomy) - End of school year - Signed rental agreement  Measure: aid for departure “ meal vouchers” 18

  19. 15/03/2016 Rejected applicants  General principle : promote voluntary return as a durable solution and as alternative to forced return and illegal stay  Legal framework (art.6/1 reception act) : the « return path » since January 2012  Implementation since July 2012: Return path in several steps Future challenges  Transposition of reception directive (recast)  Stabilise reception network  Quality standards for all reception facilities - audits  New reception model  More reception facilities and adapted reception for persons with special needs (medical care, mental disorders, victims of torture…) 19

  20. 15/03/2016 Thank you for your attention Questions? 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend