EPSU 14 March 2016 Belgium: Asylum and Migration Belgium = federal - - PDF document

epsu
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EPSU 14 March 2016 Belgium: Asylum and Migration Belgium = federal - - PDF document

15/03/2016 EPSU 14 March 2016 Belgium: Asylum and Migration Belgium = federal state Federal competences include: Asylum procedure Reception of asylum seekers Voluntary and forced return Regional competences include:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

15/03/2016 1

EPSU

14 March 2016

Belgium: Asylum and Migration Belgium = federal state

  • Federal competences include:
  • Asylum procedure
  • Reception of asylum seekers
  • Voluntary and forced return
  • Regional competences include:
  • Integration
  • Education
  • Housing
  • Employment
  • Reception of specific target groups

(psychological, medical, minors)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

15/03/2016 2

Belgium: Asylum and Migration

  • 4 Administrations
  • Immigration Office
  • Visas / access to the territory
  • Registration asylum procedure / Dublin
  • Detention / Forced removals
  • Commissioner General for Refugees + Stateless Persons
  • Aliens Litigation Council
  • Asylum and subsidiary protection (grant / appeal)
  • Fedasil
  • Reception of asylum seekers
  • Voluntary return / refugees resettlement
  • 1 political authority: State Secretary for

Asylum and Migration

  • Access to territory, asylum, reception,

forced/voluntary return, etc.

www.cgrs.be

slide-3
SLIDE 3

15/03/2016 3

Fedasil

Federal Agency for the reception of asylum seekers

Fact & figures

  • Agency created in 2001 (operational 2002)
  • Number of coworkers: 1533 persons
  • Expenditure in 2015 : 300 Mi €
  • Reception facility capacity:

16.269 beds (June 2015) -> 35.295 beds (March 2016)

  • Buffer capacity included: 2.150
  • Occupancy rate: 90,22%

Fedasil

Our mission

  • Organisation of reception (material aid) for

asylum seekers

  • Coordination of all reception operators
  • Coordination of voluntary return and

resettlement programmes

  • Observation and referral of UAM
  • Preparation, implementation and evaluation of

reception policy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

15/03/2016 4

Reception and asylum crisis 2009-2012

Reception and asylum crisis 2008-2012

Causes

  • Increased number of asylum applicants (mostly

West Balkan)

  • Increased number of applications for reception
  • Increased number of pending cases
  • Longer duration of asylum procedure
slide-5
SLIDE 5

15/03/2016 5

Reception and asylum crisis

10.000 12.000 14.000 16.000 18.000 20.000 22.000 24.000 26.000 3/01/2005 3/04/2005 3/07/2005 3/10/2005 3/01/2006 3/04/2006 3/07/2006 3/10/2006 3/01/2007 3/04/2007 3/07/2007 3/10/2007 3/01/2008 3/04/2008 3/07/2008 3/10/2008 3/01/2009 3/04/2009 3/07/2009 3/10/2009 3/01/2010 3/04/2010 3/07/2010 3/10/2010 3/01/2011 3/04/2011 3/07/2011 3/10/2011 3/01/2012 3/04/2012 3/07/2012 3/10/2012 3/01/2013 3/04/2013 3/07/2013

Evolution de l'occupation du réseau d'accueil depuis début 2005

Occupation totale (y compris accueil d'urgence) Occupation capacité structurelle Seuil de saturation 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 15.936

25/09/2013

2013 2012 2011 14.963 14.963 12.900

  • MIN. 11.545
16/07/2007

16.281 18.164 20.824 23.145 21.382

  • MAX. 23.507
25/05/2012

Reception and asylum crisis

Measures

  • Expanded reception network (creation of new reception

centres, of emergency reception facilities): up to 25.000 beds

  • Increased number of protection officers (CGRS)
  • Limitation of right to reception (multiple asylum application)
  • Return path (voluntary return)
  • List of « safe countries »
slide-6
SLIDE 6

15/03/2016 6

Reception and asylum crisis 2015- … Reception and asylum crisis 2015

Causes

  • Increased number of asylum applicants (Syria,

Iraq, Afghanistan)

  • Increased need for reception and decreased

reception places after last reception crisis (from 24.000 to 16.000 beds)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

15/03/2016 7

Reception and asylum crisis

Measures

  • Expanded reception network (buffer capacity, new reception

facilities, emergency and temporary reception facilities)

  • Increased number of employees and protection officers
  • Influx management – ‘pre-reception’

Dispersal plan

Implementing a geographical dispersal plan of reception facilities for municipalities

  • goal: a balanced distribution of applicants for international protection

within the national territory

  • reception places to be created via dispersal plan: initially 5000 places
  • dispersal according to following parameters :
  • number of inhabitants of the municipality (35%)
  • total of net taxable income (20%)
  • number of existing reception places in the municipality (30%)
  • number of beneficiaries of social welfare benefits (15%)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

15/03/2016 8

Key figures

Reception network

  • Sever

eral al oper erat ators s – coor

  • rdin

dinat ated ed by by Feda dasi sil

  • 27

27 rece ceptio tion cente ters s of Fedasil sil

  • Receptio

tion operato tors s (communal and individual reception):

 27 centers Croix-Rouge Communauté francophone (Red Cross)  23 centers Rode Kruis (Red Cross)  4 Socialistische Mutualiteiten, SOI Gent, Samu social (2),  2 Caritas International Belgium  11 facilities managed by 4 private operators  Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen  Ciré  Local reception initiatives – PCSW (municipalities)

  • Pre-rece

ceptio tion by by Red Cross ss : 1000 place ces

slide-9
SLIDE 9

15/03/2016 9

Reception network Reception capacity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

15/03/2016 10

Capacities by operator Reception network : occupancy rate

On 4.3.2016: 35.295 places and occupancy rate of 90,22%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

15/03/2016 11

In & Out 2014-2016 Countries of origin

40% 17% 12% 4% 3% 25% 1082 470 324 103 75 669

Jan 2016

Afghanistan Syrië Irak Iran Onbepaald/Indéterminé Autre

51% [WAARD E] 10% 3% 2% 17% 2620 879 505 165 117 886

Dec 2015

Afghanistan Syrië Irak Iran Somalië Autre

42% 29% 13% 2% 2% 11% 2387 1665 742 128 128 655

Nov 2015

Afghanistan Syrië Irak Onbepaald/Indéterminé Somalië Autre

slide-12
SLIDE 12

15/03/2016 12

In: family composition

38.7% 37.2% 19.6% 4.5% 1053 1014 533 123

Jan 2016

Alleenstaande man/Homme isolé Familie/Famille NBMV/MENA Alleenstaande vrouw/Femme isolée

Inflow UAM

slide-13
SLIDE 13

15/03/2016 13

Capacity UAM

Operational capacity: 2.284 places

Inflow UAM by nationality

slide-14
SLIDE 14

15/03/2016 14

Protection rate

Recognised Refugee Subsidiary protection Recognition rate 2012 15,4% 7,0% 22,4% 2013 16,4% 10,7% 27,1% 2014 36,6% 10,2% 46,8% 2015 50,6% 10,2% 60,8% jan/16 51,0% 13,9% 64,9%

Legal basis

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15/03/2016 15

Legal basis: Reception Act 2007

 Accommodation, meals, clothing & sanitary products  Information  Evaluation of needs  Medical and psychological care  Social and legal support  Access to interpretation services  Pocket money, daily allowance & communal services  Education and activities  Reception in phases  Right to work (after 4 months)  Internal rules and sanctions  Complaints procedure and appeals  Code of deontology

Legal basis

Who?

  • Asylum seekers
  • UAM
  • Some groups during their illegal stay
slide-16
SLIDE 16

15/03/2016 16

New reception model

Principles

  • Flexibility of reception network
  • More reception facilities adapted to special

needs

New reception model

Objectives

  • Less transfers between reception facilities
  • Better and faster integration for person granted

asylum

  • More reception facilities adapted to special

needs

slide-17
SLIDE 17

15/03/2016 17

New reception model

34

Collective reception Individual reception

Return places

Dispatching Obtaining status, transition and integration in Belgium Return and re-integration in country of origin

Reception model (end 2015)

« No show »

Emergency shelter PRE- reception

  • New reception model on hold
  • No transfers, except for urgent medical disciplinary transfers
  • Priority to high recognition rate or extented stay for assignment to local

reception initiative

slide-18
SLIDE 18

15/03/2016 18

Outflow

Transition for persons with protection status

Protection rate + 60%

  • Transition period of 2 months
  • Delay of departure possible
  • Conditions for delay:
  • Large families with minors
  • Medical cases
  • Pregnancy or birth
  • Other vulnerability (f.ex. lack of aan autonomy)
  • End of school year
  • Signed rental agreement
  • Measure: aid for departure “meal vouchers”
slide-19
SLIDE 19

15/03/2016 19

Rejected applicants

 General principle : promote voluntary return as a durable

solution and as alternative to forced return and illegal stay  Legal framework (art.6/1 reception act) : the « return path » since January 2012  Implementation since July 2012: Return path in several steps

Future challenges

  • Transposition of reception directive (recast)
  • Stabilise reception network
  • Quality standards for all reception facilities - audits
  • New reception model
  • More reception facilities and adapted reception for

persons with special needs (medical care, mental disorders, victims of torture…)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

15/03/2016 20

Thank you for your attention

Questions?