Opening seminar of the CEMR- EPSU joint project "Lo Localising - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Opening seminar of the CEMR- EPSU joint project "Lo Localising th the European Se Semester" Namur, 22-23 March 2018

Functioning of the Semester and analysis of Country Specific Recommendations’ 2017-2018 Presentation by Inga Pavlovaite and Tina Weber (project’s experts)

What is the European Semester?

• Introduced in 2010 (crisis context)
• Annual cycle of complex policy interactions, involving the European

institutions, national governments, social partners and other stakeholders at the EU and national levels

• National economic, financial, employment and social policies and

reforms are coordinated in an efficient and systematic manner

• Member States should align their budgetary, economic, social and

employment policies with the objectives and rules agreed at EU level

• Separate procedure for Member States under MIB

Opportunities for national social partners to participate in the ES Source: Eurofound (2016)

Role of the local / regional authorities in the European Semester

• Provide active inputs into the

government’s development of the national reform programmes / national stability and convergence programmes

• Reviewing and critically

appraising the central government’s proposed national reform programmes

• Contributing to the

implementation of the national reform programmes / national stability and convergence programmes

Annual Growth Survey and Joint Employment Report

• Prepared by the European Commission and released in November,

adopted by the Council

• Sets out the broad EU economic priorities for the year to come and

invites Member States to take these into account

• The latest AGS in 2018 included the following thematic priorities:
• Boosting investment to support recovery and increase the long-term growth
• Structural reforms for inclusive growth, upward convergence and

competitiveness;

• Responsible fiscal policies to support the sustainability and convergence.
• Joint Employment Report: attached to the AGS, assesses the social

and employment situation in the EU

National Reform Programmes

• Prepared by the national

governments – in consultation with relevant partners!

• Detail how the targets of the EU

2020 Strategy are being reached, which national policies will be implemented and how EU guidance has been taken into account, also according to previous CSRs

• The Member States present

their National Reform Programme to the Commission

Country specific recommendations

• Set of actions for each Member State to take, according to its economic and social

performance during the previous year and to the delivery of priorities set out in the AGS

• Proposed by the Commission based on an assessment of the challenges, risks and

policy gaps in the country concerned and are aimed to support the achievement

• f Europe 2020, Stability and Growth Pact and other strategic goals in the

country.

• Focus on the structural reforms which can realistically be achieved by the

Member States over the next 12-18 months.

• The recommendations proposed by the Commission are discussed among

national governments in the Council, endorsed by EU leaders at a summit in June and formally adopted by the national finance ministers in July.

• Time for national governments to incorporate the recommendations into their

reform plans and national budgets for the following year.

Country reports

• Prepared by the European Commission in the

following year

• Assess how well the CSRs have been implemented
• What remaining / new reform priorities are

emerging for each Member State

Changes in 2015

• Streamlining’ the process (e.g. fewer core CSRs)
• Increasing its political ownership and improving the involvement of social

partners:

• an invitation to Member States to ‘refocus’ their NRPs and to specifically involve

national Parliaments and social partners in the elaboration of the NRPs, also allowing more time for this

• Extending the timeline from six to 12 months to allow the organisation of bilateral

meetings with Member States and ‘fact-finding missions’ on the ground for the Commission as well as allowing more time for involvement of national parliaments and social partners at the national level

• The early presentation of the Country Reports, so as to allow more time for

examining and discussing the EU level recommendations at the national level

• Function of the European Semester officers in the Member States

Practical examples of CSRs relevant to LRG -1

• COR assessment: 76% CSRs territory related
• 2017-18: CSRs addressing LRG directly (in

terms of public administration reforms):

• Eight out of 28 Member States
• A range of reforms - to improve the

spending, the coordination and efficiency across government across various government levels

• Similarly, CSRs relevant to LRG in the last

three annual cycles

Practical examples of CSRs relevant to LRG - 2

• 2017-18 CSRs focussed on policies at the heart of LRG responsibilities

in many Member States

• Improvements to the management of the public finances are called for in 15

Member States

• Improvements in employment and education policy were noted in 23

Member States

• Improvements in healthcare area in 10 Member States
• Infrastructure / housing in five Member States

Latest Winter Package

• Released on 7 March 2018
• Commission’s annual analysis of the

economic and social situation in the Member States, including progress in implementing country-specific recommendations and an assessment of possible imbalances

• 27 Country reports
• Emphasis on skills challenges + social

safety nets

• Includes reporting on the European Pillar
• f Social Rights

Questions to the participants

• Are you involved in your government’s development of the national reform

programmes?

• Do you actively contribute to the implementation of the national reform

programmes / country specific recommendations?

• What mechanisms and factors support or hinder your participation in the

European Semester process in your country?

• For trade union participants: how does the interaction with your

confederal trade union support / hinder your participation in the ES process?

• What are the most relevant policy areas/national reform

programmes/country specific recommendations to LRGs in your Member State?