Ensemble Asteroseimology of 16,000 Kepler red giants Jie Yu 1,2 , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ensemble asteroseimology of 16 000 kepler red giants
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ensemble Asteroseimology of 16,000 Kepler red giants Jie Yu 1,2 , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ensemble Asteroseimology of 16,000 Kepler red giants Jie Yu 1,2 , Tim Bedding 1,2 , Daniel Huber 1,2,3 , Dennis Stello 1,2,4 , and Marc Hon 4 1 . University of Sydney. 2. Aarhus University. 3. University of Hawaii, 4. University of New


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ensemble Asteroseimology of 16,000 Kepler red giants

Jie Yu1,2, Tim Bedding1,2, Daniel Huber1,2,3, Dennis Stello1,2,4, and Marc Hon4

  • 1. University of Sydney. 2. Aarhus University.
  • 3. University of Hawaii, 4. University of New South Wales.
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation

  • 1. Homogeneity: Largest sample
  • 2. Precision: Full-length Kepler light curves
  • 3. Measurements: , ,Amp, Width, Granulation
  • 4. Output: Catalog of M, R, log g

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

“SYD Pipeline”: Observables

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sample selection

4

misclassified as MS

unclassified in KIC

misclassified

as Subgiants

majority

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Long-cadence datasets

16,136 oscillators

𝜉max cutoff: >5 𝛎Hz

“SYD”pipeline + visual inspection!!

0 5 10. 15

Quarters

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Seismic parameter comparison with literature

Comparison

6

Hekker et al. 2011

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Seismic parameter comparison

Comparison

7

Hekker et al. 2011

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Seismic parameter comparison

Comparison

Peaking bagging: Davies et al. in prep.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

“Nike Diagram”

Red Clump Secondary Clump RGB

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Huber et al. (2011). The correction factor f is determined using the method from Sharma et al. (2016)

Masses and radii determination

Where

Masses and radii are inferred with the scaling relations:

Teff, [Fe/H]: KIC, LAMOST, APOGEE, CFOP…

Mathur et al. (2017)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Evolutionary Phase Classification from literature

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Seismically-inferred M, R, and log g

mass loss ? uncertain scaling relations ?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Massive oscillator

HeB

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Massive oscillator

[37.13, 40.77] [3.10, 3.60]

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Characterisation of power excess: Amp, Width, Granulation

Evolution

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Characterisation of power excess: Amp, Width, Granulation

  • scillation amplitude
  • scillation amplitude

power excess width

granulation amplitude

slide-17
SLIDE 17

[Fe/H] influence on Amplitude

[Fe/H]: Photometry + Spectroscopy

from Mathur et al. (2017)

RGB only

Kjeldsen & Bedding (2008)

Stello el al. (2011)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

[Fe/H] influence on Amplitude

Mathur et al. (2017)

[Fe/H]: photometry+spectroscopy

Median Standard Deviation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pinsonneault et al. (2014)

How accurate are KIC [Fe/H] values ?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Uncertainties

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 1. We provided a catalog of seismic masses, radii

and logg for ~16,000 oscillating red giants.

  • 2. Oscillation and granulation amplitudes have

dependencies on mass and Metallicity.

  • 3. Power-excess width is an increasing function of

mass.

Summary

Yu et al in prep.