ENR Upgrades Steve Woodard, Ph.D., P.E. Outline Intro to CWT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ENR Upgrades Steve Woodard, Ph.D., P.E. Outline Intro to CWT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
BioMag: New Technology for Cost Effective ENR Upgrades Steve Woodard, Ph.D., P.E. Outline Intro to CWT Secondary clarification: the weak link BioMag: ballasted biological treatment How does it work? Applications ENR
Outline
- Intro to CWT
- Secondary clarification: the weak link
- BioMag: ballasted biological treatment
- How does it work?
- Applications
- ENR Technology
- Winebrenner BioMag trial in Cascade, MD
- ENR without the denit filters
- Significant potential cost savings in Maryland
The Challenges of Biological Treatment
- Secondary clarification is the bottleneck of
activated sludge treatment
- Filamentous bulking
- Storm flow issues (I&I)
- Pin floc
- Limits MLSS concentration
- Limits nutrient removal
capacity
- Compromises effluent quality
- Requires expensive
solutions to correct
Magnetite: the Enabler
- Magnetite is Fe3O4,
- Doesn’t rust or degrade
- Completely inert
- Two critical properties:
- It’s dense;
specific gravity: 5.2
- Magnetically controllable
The Benefits of Ballasted Biological Floc
- Ballasted floc ensures
rapid, reliable settling
- Facilitates increased MLSS
concentrations
- Maintains control over
sludge blankets (I&I)
- Frees up tankage for
nutrient removal (e.g. anoxic zones)
- Provides clean effluent –
low TSS
- Facilitates low effluent TN!
BioMag: Enhanced Biological Treatment
4-Stage Bardenpho Process Flow
BioMag Pilot Trailer
Magnetite Feeder
Shear Mill
Recovery Drum
Rapid Clarification Increases Capacity
Magnets Are Used to Recover Magnetite
- Video clip
Winebrenner Plant Layout
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 1/22/2010 2/11/2010 3/3/2010 3/23/2010 4/12/2010 5/2/2010 5/22/2010 6/11/2010
Nitrogen, mg/l Date
BioMag Influent and Effluent Nitrogen
Influent TKN
Effluent NH4 + NO2 + NO3
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 1/22/2010 2/11/2010 3/3/2010 3/23/2010 4/12/2010 5/2/2010 5/22/2010 6/11/2010
Nitrogen, lbs/day Date
BioMag Influent and Effluent N, lbs/day
Influent TKN
Effluent NH4 + NO2 + NO3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2/21/2010 3/3/2010 3/13/2010 3/23/2010 4/2/2010 4/12/2010 4/22/2010 5/2/2010 5/12/2010 5/22/2010 6/1/2010
Effluent N, mg/l Date
BioMag Effluent TN and NH4 + NO2 + NO3
Total Nitrogen NH4 + NO2 + NO3
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 2/1/2010 2/21/2010 3/13/2010 4/2/2010 4/22/2010 5/12/2010 6/1/2010
MLSS, mg/l Date
BioMag MLSS (not including magnetite)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 2/1/2010 2/21/2010 3/13/2010 4/2/2010 4/22/2010 5/12/2010 6/1/2010
Effluent TSS, mg/l Date
BioMag Effluent TSS
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 2/14/2010 2/24/2010 3/6/2010 3/16/2010 3/26/2010 4/5/2010 4/15/2010 4/25/2010 5/5/2010 5/15/2010 5/25/2010
Effluent TP, mg/l Date
BioMag Effluent Total P
BioMag Wet Weather Flow Performance
ENR Without the Filters
- Excellent, reliable TN removal
- Same for TP
- Low effluent TSS (< 5 mg/l)
- High MLSS and low, stable sludge blanket
- Frees up tankage for anoxic zones
- Often eliminates need for new process tankage and/or IFAS
- Also eliminates need for filters
- Mitigates impacts of I&I
- Scales up very well