Enhancing Country Ownership
Mel Phadtare Senior consultant
GCF insight #12
Based on our 12th GCF Insight. The study was conducted solely by E Co. and is independent of the GCF.
Enhancing Country Ownership Based on our 12 th GCF Insight. The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
GCF insight #12 Enhancing Country Ownership Based on our 12 th GCF Insight. The study was conducted solely by E Co. and is independent of the GCF. Mel Phadtare Senior consultant Why Country Ownership? P2 The GCF through its Governing
Mel Phadtare Senior consultant
Based on our 12th GCF Insight. The study was conducted solely by E Co. and is independent of the GCF.
P2
The GCF through its Governing Instrument provides that:
“The Fund will pursue a country-driven approach and promote and strengthen engagement at the country level through effective involvement of relevant institutions and stakeholders”
Board meeting engagement: 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 17, 21
Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU) assessing progress to date
Direct Access Entities increasing from 42% to 55%
Readiness Programme (266 approved) and Project Preparation Facility
Required from project concept note to final M&E and beyond
P3
Four key results: ▪ Alignment with national priorities - 59%
▫
Autonomy/sovereignty in setting regulations supported by climate finance (14%) ▪ Local stakeholder engagement - 21% ▪ NDAs taking ownership – 15% ▪ Knowledge sharing – 5% Other responses:
Unnecessary bureaucracy
Great principle, hard to implement
Increased national capacity
Alignment with SDGs
Locally owned businesses
Better coordination of development activities
Limited input from external entities
Supply of a no objection letter
Success and sustainability
P4
Aim: to explore the experiences, perspectives, challenges and recommendations from stakeholders
Methodology:
Online survey: 83 respondents - conducted in June 2019
2 x Interviews:
GCF Secretariat – Mr. Eduardo Freitas, Country Relations Manager ▫ CSO Representative – Mr. Tunga Bhadra Rai from the Climate Change Partnership Program, Nepal
P5
70% have experience with GCF projects, 30% with significant experience
83 respondents:
National Designated Authorities (NDAs) – 27%
Consulting firms and individuals – 24%
Accredited Entities (excluding IAEs) – 20%
Entities wishing to be accredited - 8%
International Accredited Entities (IAEs) - 8%
NGOs and public agencies – 13%
P6
▪ 44% of respondents say the GCF is doing reasonably well but with some shortcomings ▪ 20% said the GCF efforts to address issues
▪ 16% said there were major shortcomings
▫ We have no breakdown on the shortcomings
P7
47% follow best practice
30% proactively inform
23% fail to build in beneficiary engagement for Country Ownership from the outset
NDAs ranked higher towards following best practice, while consultants ranked lower, with accredited entities in between
P8
64% respondents say low institutional capacity is the greatest barrier
15% believe requirements of the GCF exclude national stakeholders
8% cite a low project ambition
P9
Time mobilisation
Assumptions based on what Country Ownership can actually deliver on short notice
Not a shared purpose with donors
Corruption and mismanagement
Engage as early as possible to optimise and enable a project preparation phase like the GEF
P10
Respondents signalled post-project approval requires more support
Similarly, preliminary work of the GCF’s IEU, reveals a lack of reporting / consulting during the implementation stage
Suggestions for how to overcome accountability issues or follow-through e.g. country ownership activities report, or rejection of proposals without an effective NDA structure
P11
P12
GCF has demonstrated support and wants to see enhanced Country Ownership aligned with ambition and paradigm shift
Gaps exist in low institutional capacity, project ambition, and stakeholder engagement across the project cycle
A lack of coordination and collaboration between roles of NDAs/FPs, Accredited Entities and the Secretariat hinders country ownership
P13
GCF support for donor/investor alignment with enhanced Country Ownership
GCF better understanding of Country Ownership shortfalls: provision of tools and mechanisms for post-project approval Country Ownership
The IEU will be presenting their findings to the Board at B.24 in November 2019, actionable change may be clarified