Enhancing Country Ownership Based on our 12 th GCF Insight. The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

enhancing country ownership
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Enhancing Country Ownership Based on our 12 th GCF Insight. The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GCF insight #12 Enhancing Country Ownership Based on our 12 th GCF Insight. The study was conducted solely by E Co. and is independent of the GCF. Mel Phadtare Senior consultant Why Country Ownership? P2 The GCF through its Governing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Enhancing Country Ownership

Mel Phadtare Senior consultant

GCF insight #12

Based on our 12th GCF Insight. The study was conducted solely by E Co. and is independent of the GCF.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

P2

Why Country Ownership?

The GCF through its Governing Instrument provides that:

“The Fund will pursue a country-driven approach and promote and strengthen engagement at the country level through effective involvement of relevant institutions and stakeholders”

Board meeting engagement: 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 17, 21

Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU) assessing progress to date

Direct Access Entities increasing from 42% to 55%

Readiness Programme (266 approved) and Project Preparation Facility

Required from project concept note to final M&E and beyond

slide-3
SLIDE 3

P3

What is Country Ownership?

Four key results: ▪ Alignment with national priorities - 59%

Autonomy/sovereignty in setting regulations supported by climate finance (14%) ▪ Local stakeholder engagement - 21% ▪ NDAs taking ownership – 15% ▪ Knowledge sharing – 5% Other responses:

Unnecessary bureaucracy

Great principle, hard to implement

Increased national capacity

Alignment with SDGs

Locally owned businesses

Better coordination of development activities

Limited input from external entities

Supply of a no objection letter

Success and sustainability

slide-4
SLIDE 4

P4

E Co. study: Enhancing Country Ownership

Aim: to explore the experiences, perspectives, challenges and recommendations from stakeholders

Methodology:

Online survey: 83 respondents - conducted in June 2019

2 x Interviews:

GCF Secretariat – Mr. Eduardo Freitas, Country Relations Manager ▫ CSO Representative – Mr. Tunga Bhadra Rai from the Climate Change Partnership Program, Nepal

slide-5
SLIDE 5

P5

Survey overview

70% have experience with GCF projects, 30% with significant experience

83 respondents:

National Designated Authorities (NDAs) – 27%

Consulting firms and individuals – 24%

Accredited Entities (excluding IAEs) – 20%

Entities wishing to be accredited - 8%

International Accredited Entities (IAEs) - 8%

NGOs and public agencies – 13%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

P6

GCF’s extent of addressing Country Ownership

▪ 44% of respondents say the GCF is doing reasonably well but with some shortcomings ▪ 20% said the GCF efforts to address issues

  • f Country Ownership were comprehensive

▪ 16% said there were major shortcomings

▫ We have no breakdown on the shortcomings

slide-7
SLIDE 7

P7

Stakeholder engagement

47% follow best practice

30% proactively inform

23% fail to build in beneficiary engagement for Country Ownership from the outset

NDAs ranked higher towards following best practice, while consultants ranked lower, with accredited entities in between

slide-8
SLIDE 8

P8

Barriers and challenges

64% respondents say low institutional capacity is the greatest barrier

15% believe requirements of the GCF exclude national stakeholders

8% cite a low project ambition

slide-9
SLIDE 9

P9

Other barriers

Time mobilisation

Assumptions based on what Country Ownership can actually deliver on short notice

Not a shared purpose with donors

Corruption and mismanagement

Engage as early as possible to optimise and enable a project preparation phase like the GEF

slide-10
SLIDE 10

P10

Accountability – other findings

Respondents signalled post-project approval requires more support

Similarly, preliminary work of the GCF’s IEU, reveals a lack of reporting / consulting during the implementation stage

Suggestions for how to overcome accountability issues or follow-through e.g. country ownership activities report, or rejection of proposals without an effective NDA structure

slide-11
SLIDE 11

P11

Accountability

slide-12
SLIDE 12

P12

Conclusions

1.

GCF has demonstrated support and wants to see enhanced Country Ownership aligned with ambition and paradigm shift

2.

Gaps exist in low institutional capacity, project ambition, and stakeholder engagement across the project cycle

3.

A lack of coordination and collaboration between roles of NDAs/FPs, Accredited Entities and the Secretariat hinders country ownership

  • pportunities
slide-13
SLIDE 13

P13

Recommendations

1.

GCF support for donor/investor alignment with enhanced Country Ownership

2.

GCF better understanding of Country Ownership shortfalls: provision of tools and mechanisms for post-project approval Country Ownership

3.

The IEU will be presenting their findings to the Board at B.24 in November 2019, actionable change may be clarified