Grammatical collocations in English essays written by Czech secondary school students
Věra Sládková Masaryk University, Brno Czech Republic Corpus Approaches to Lexicogrammar 22nd June 2019
English essays written by Czech secondary school students Vra - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Grammatical collocations in English essays written by Czech secondary school students Vra Sldkov Masaryk University, Brno Czech Republic Corpus Approaches to Lexicogrammar 22nd June 2019 Content : 1. Specification of collocations 2.
Věra Sládková Masaryk University, Brno Czech Republic Corpus Approaches to Lexicogrammar 22nd June 2019
1. Previous research: gerund vs infinitive distinction
Frequency
Accuracy
Comparison
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
V to-inf V to-inf V -ing V -ing V inf V n to-inf V n inf
Total Correct patterns Errors
I would like to borrow (n=20) *want go (n=8) I would like to ask (n=19) *Need borrow (n=7) want to ask (n=18) *I need lend (n=6) want to go (n=13) *I want lend (n=5) I need to borrow (n=8) *I want ask if (n=3)
Verb
V to-inf V inf V past V n V prep V clause V
WANT 3,813.6 2,043 771.8 68.1 408.6 227
BF/ČNK
62.5% 57.5% WOULD LIKE 1,793.3 1,452.8 158.9 45.4 22.7
BF/ČNK
72.5% 55% NEED 4,494.6 408.6 340.5 45.4 3,541.2
BF/ČNK
35% 20% 72.5% FORGET 340.5 132.6 22.7 113.5 68.1
BF/ČNK
5% 17.5% 57.5% DECIDE 749.1 612.9 22.7 22.7 68.1
BF/ČNK
17.5% 30% HOPE 635.6 136.2 499.4
BF/ČNK
47.5% 0% 82.5% SEEM 22.7 22.7
BF/ČNK
57.5% 5% (be) 57.5% LEARN 90.8 68.1 22.7
BF/ČNK
15% 20% 25% OFFER 181.6 181.6
BF/ČNK
7.5% 0% 45% PLAN 136.2 136.2
BF/ČNK
12.5% 20% 57.5% TRY 499.4 317.8 22.7 113.5 22.7
BF/ČNK
50% 72.5% AFFORD 22.7 22.7
BF/ČNK
50% 35% AGREE 658.3 113.5 544.8
BF/ČNK
17.5% 0% 47.5% 40% EXPECT 612.9 567.5
BF/ČNK
40% 0% 60% MANAGE 90.8 68.1 22.7
BF/ČNK
12.5% 87.5%
Verb Rel. Freq. V to-inf V inf V past V 3rd person V-ing V to-ing V n V clause V V adv V prep
LIKE
635.3 22.7 22.7 45.4 22.7 499.4
BF/ČNK
26% ? 5% ?
BOTHER
90.8 90.8
BF/ČNK
30% 15% 7.5% 62.5%
BEGIN
68.1 45.4 22.7
BF/ČNK
22.5% 72.5% 7.5%
START
1,770.6 454 272.4 45.4 22.7 635.6 68.1 68.1 22.7 22.7 113.5
BF/ČNK
5% 72.5% 15%
CONTINUE
22.7 22.7
BF/ČNK
50% 0% 1% 25%
STOP
385.9 68.1 22.7 68.1 45.4
BF/ČNK
2.5% 85% 2.5%
REMEMBER
295.1 113.5 45.4 90.8 45.4
BF/ČNK
5% 0% 10% 62.5%
Verb
V -ing V inf V n V prep V V clause HATE 68.1 68.1
BF/ČNK
2.5% 2.5% 90% 2.5% LOVE 885.3 45.4 839.9
BF/ČNK
1% 75% 5% ENJOY 385.9 363.2
BF/ČNK
2.5% 60% MISS 204.3 22.7 136.2
BF/ČNK
1% 95% MIND 295.1 68.1 227
BF/ČNK
35% 7.5% 20% RISK 22.7 22.7
BF/ČNK
27% 32.5% 25% FINISH 136.2 90.8 45.4
BF/ČNK
10% 5% 85% KEEP 136.2 22.7 68.1
BF
2.5% ? SUGGEST 90.8 22.7 22.7 45.4
BF/ČNK
2.5% 52.5% 25% PRACTISE 22.1 22.7
BF/ČNK
16% 5% 80% LOOK FORWARD TO 340.5 136.2 68.1 136.2
BF/ČNK
32.5% 78% 21%
Verb
V inf V to-inf V past V -ing V WILL
6,083.6 5,289.1 45.4 158.9 181.6 363.2
WOULD
1,679.8 1,589
CAN
5,992.8 5,448 227 22.7 22.7
COULD
3,427.7 3,268.8 45.4 22.7
MAY
90.8 90.8
MIGHT SHALL SHOULD
385.9 317.8 22.7 22.7
MUST
499.4 385.9 22.7 68.1 22.7
*My old friend Marek told me that he must came because I’m his
Verb
V n to-inf V n inf V n clause V n WANT 3,813.6 158.9 22.7 408.6
BF/ČNK
5% 12.5% 10% WOULD LIKE 1,793.3 45.4
BF/ČNK
5% 25% 1% EXPECT 612.9 22.7 22.7 567.5
BF/ČNK
25% 0% 35% 60% PERSUADE 22.7 22.7
BF/ČNK
62.5% 0% 55% TEACH 22.7 22.7
BF/ČNK
10% 7.5% 1% MOTIVATE 45.4 45.4
BF/ČNK
37.5% 0% 1% 25% RECOMMEND 22.7 22.7
BF/ČNK
0% 2.5% 15% 37.5%
Verb Rel. Freq. V n inf V n to inf V n V n n V n adj V adj V n -ing V clause V prep
LET
635.6 590.2 45.4
BF/ČNK
77.5% 65%
MAKE
590.2 22.7 22.7 227 90.8 227 22.7
BF/ČNK
5% 30% 15%
HELP
385.9 22.7 317.8 22.7
BF/ČNK
10% 5% 60%
HEAR
1,362 68.1 (113.5) 839.9 113.5 45.4 227
BF/ČNK
2.5% 2.5% 55% 20%
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
let make help hear
CNC Brown Family CZEMATELC
References: Advanced Learner’s dictionary. (2008). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc. Tokio: Waseda University. Retrieved from: www.laurenceanthony.net/software/anconc/ Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R. (1986). The BBI Dictionary of English Word Combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G. (2002). Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson. Cambridge University Press. (2015). English Grammar Profile. Retrieved from http://englishprofile.org/english-grammar-profile/egp-online Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Feeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Florence: Heinle & Heinle. CQPweb v3.2.29. (2008–2016). Brown Family (C8 tags). Retrieved from https://cqpweb.lancs.ac.uk/. Deshors, S. C., & Gries, S. T. (2016). Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(2), 192–218. Dušková, L. et al. (1988). Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha. Academia. English Profile. (2012). English Vocabulary Profile. Retrieved from http://vocabulary.englishprofile.org/staticfiles/about.html Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern Grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Kim, J. E.,& Yo, I. W. (2015). A Corpus-based study of to-infinitive errors in Korean college freshmen’s writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 12(4), 37–60. Křen, M., Cvrček, V., Čapka, T., Čermáková, A., Hnátková, M., Chlumská, L., Jelínek, T., Kováříková, D., Petkevič, V., Procházka, P., Skoumalová, H., Škrabal, M., Truneček, P., Vondřička, P., & Zasina, A. (2015). SYN2015: reprezentativní korpus psané češtiny. Praha: Ústav Českého národního korpusu.
Parrott, M. (2010). Grammar for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schwartz, M., & Causarano, P. L. (2007). The role in frequency in SLA: An analysis of gerunds and infinitives in ESL written discourse. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 14, 43–57. Shirahata, T. (1991). The acquisition of English infinitive and gerund complements by Japanese EFL learners. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 2, 41–50.