Energy Efficiency Measuring for Success: Coordination, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

energy efficiency measuring for success coordination
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Energy Efficiency Measuring for Success: Coordination, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Energy Efficiency Measuring for Success: Coordination, Collaboration, and Transparency Comments by Lucas Davis Associate Professor UC Berkeley Haas School of Business ldavis@haas.berkeley.edu March 6, 2013 Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring


slide-1
SLIDE 1

– Energy Efficiency Measuring for Success: Coordination, Collaboration, and Transparency

Comments by Lucas Davis

Associate Professor UC Berkeley Haas School of Business ldavis@haas.berkeley.edu

March 6, 2013

g r b g

  • Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley)

Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 1 / 8

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SPONSORED BY

Alameda Municipal Power California Energy Commission California Independent System Operator California Public Utilities Commission Calpine Corporation Chevron Corporation City of Palo Alto Utilities Consulate General of Canada Pacifi c Gas & Electric Sacramento Municipal Utilities District San Diego Gas & Electric Southern California Edison

ANNUAL

POWER CONFERENCE

ON ENERGY RESEARCH AND POLICY

MARCH 22, 2013

Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 2 / 8

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Limited Evidence

jpg

California has spent $15 billion on energy-efficiency over the last 30 years. Yet we know very little about what works and doesn’t work.

Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 3 / 8

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Engineering Analyses

Most of what we know comes from engineering analyses.

j g

Source: McKinsey and Company, “Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy”. Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 4 / 8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Actual Savings May Be Smaller than Engineering Estimates

Electricity Consumption

−15 −10 −5 5 Kilowatt Hours Per Month −12 −10 −8 −6 −4 −2 2 4 6 8 10 12 Months Before and After Replacement

Source: Davis, Fuchs, and Gertler, “Cash for Coolers”, 2012. Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 5 / 8

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Many Participants Are Free Riders

Program Participation

Minimum to participate Subsidy falls from $170 to $110 Subsidy falls from $110 to $30 Subsidy falls from $30 to $0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Percentage of Households Participating 50 100 150 200 250 300 Average Historical Electricity Consumption (kWh)

Source: Boomhower and Davis, “Free Riders”, 2013. Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 6 / 8

slide-7
SLIDE 7

How to Ensure that Programs Reduce Energy Use?

Three Easy Steps

Collect data Make these data publicly available Design programs to facilitate evaluation

/ / 3 p jpg

Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 7 / 8

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Learn from Google

/ /

Evidence-Based Decision Making

Google doesn’t do anything without rigorous evaluation. When spending taxpayer dollars we should have the same approach.

Lucas Davis (UC Berkeley) Measuring for Success March 6, 2013 8 / 8